Political fasting?
The National Council of Churches and mainline Protestant leaders are joining U.S. Muslims in a fast aimed at ending the war in Iraq. The fast will take place during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, specifically on America’s Columbus Day, an observance the fasting groups refer to as a “day of conquest” that needs to be reimagined as a day of peace. The Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD) reports:
“We call on all Americans to join in fasting from dawn to dusk on Monday, October 8, to call for an end to the Iraq War,” read the interfaith statement. “On this day, people of faith in local communities across our nation will act as catalysts to transform the meaning of the day from one of conquest to community and from violence to reverence.” The religious officials explained that they chose this date because, “This fall, in an unusual convergence, many of our faith traditions share a season of sacred self-assessment and self-transformation.”
Dr. Sayyid Sayeed of the Islamic Society of North America said that that the Koran not only calls Muslims to fast during Ramadan but commands: “Thou shalt fast in solidarity with other faiths and generations who have fasted.” He announced that mosques would open their doors on October 8th so that “people of other faiths will come in and break fast with their Muslim neighbors.”
Mark Tooley, director of UMAction, a United Methodist group, said the Christian groups involved are incorrectly basing their call to fast on a passage in the book of Isaiah: “Organizers cite the biblical prophet Isaiah as a model for fasting, but Isaiah called upon the people of Israel to fast as an appeal to God’s mercy, not to make a political statement. This protest fast is not about spiritual transformation but about exploiting an ancient religious practice for a political purpose…In their announcement, the Religious Left fasters note that their fast coincides with Columbus Day, a day that is ‘overlaid with a history of violence and conquest.’ For the Religious Left, America is the world’s exclusive purveyor of violence and oppression, and the Iraq War is simply the latest example of America’s perfidy.”
A more authentic fast, Tooley said, would appeal to God’s mercy for peace and security for Iraq and the United States.
What’s your take?




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top15 Comments to “Political fasting?”
My take?
Straight out of Isa 58.6-8:
Is not this the sort of fast that please me
– it is the Lord [God] who speaks –
to break unjust fetters
and undo the thongs of the yoke,
to let the oppressed go free and break every yoke,
to share your bread with the hungry
and shelter with the homeless poor,
to clothe the man you see to be naked
and not turn from your own kin
-Jerusalem Bible
Those are rough words for all who care about society, and they’re words that are easy to read (or dismiss) as political. But I don’t see how you escape them.
Report comment to moderator
Mark Tooley’s got it right. Fasting involves prayerful communion with (and appeal to) God. The wording of the “call” to fast really sounds like “let’s get together and posture religiously as a message to the political decision-makers”. The “call,” in other words is horizontal in nature (men to men), not vertical (men to God). And even if we were to grant that this call for a fast was a genuine attempt at a vertical appeal to God, the mixing of religions turns that exercise into an abstraction. Which God? You pick. Whatever.
Report comment to moderator
The “Religious Left”? What an awful phrase, he could have at least used the “Christian left”, though even then it would be horribly misapplied in this case. And if he can demonstrate the soundness of his virulent claim that they believe America to be the world’s “exclusive purveyor of violence and oppression” then I shall eat my shorts. The man does not inspire my confidence in the least.
Report comment to moderator
I would join this fast if it was a call to confess sin–personal and corporate–and beseech God for wisdom. And I could really get behind it if these religious leaders started with the American sin of condoning abortion. That kills more people each year than die in Iraq.
I like the idea of a political fast–I’d be happy to not have politics in my life for a day.
Report comment to moderator
Tooley is demonstrating that he is a Republican first and a pastor second.
Report comment to moderator
Awesome! My Fast Weekend ‘08 is really shaping up now!
Friday – E-mail Fast
Saturday – Fastpitch Softball (2 games)
Sunday – Second Breakfast
Monday – Columbus Day Fast
- Cranking the Eagles “Life in the Fast Lane”
Report comment to moderator
DC Lawyer, I saw your comment and realized I had glossed over the political commentary by Tooley. In that, he is falling into the common stereotype that assumes any opposition to the Iraq comes from the “left,” or in this case, since we’re talking about a religious display, the “Religious Left”. His initial statement about the nature of fasting was good. His knee-jerk politicizing wasn’t. It is possible to oppose this war as a conservative. I do.
Report comment to moderator
DC Lawyer, I saw your comment [5] and realized I had glossed over the political commentary by Tooley. In that, he is falling into the common stereotype that assumes any opposition to the Iraq comes from the “left,” or in this case, since we’re talking about a religious display, the “Religious Left”. His initial statement about the nature of fasting was good. His knee-jerk politicizing wasn’t. It is possible to oppose this war as a conservative. I do.
Report comment to moderator
DC Lawyer, I saw your comment and realized I had glossed over the political commentary by Tooley. In that, he is falling into the common stereotype that assumes any opposition to the Iraq comes from the “left,” or in this case, since we’re talking about a religious display, the “Religious Left”. His initial statement about the nature of fasting was good. His knee-jerk politicizing wasn’t. It is possible to oppose this war as a conservative. I do.
Note: This is a third attempt at posting this comment. Tried logging out and back in.
Report comment to moderator
DC Lawyer, I saw your comment and realized I had glossed over the political commentary by Tooley. In that, he is falling into the common stereotype that assumes any opposition to the Iraq comes from the “left,” or in this case, since we’re talking about a religious display, the “Religious Left”. His initial statement about the nature of fasting was good. His knee-jerk politicizing wasn’t. It is possible to oppose this war as a conservative. I do.
Note: This is a fourth attempt at posting this comment. Tried logging out, closing Firefox browser, opening browser, and logging back in.
Report comment to moderator
Travis – Cute!
BTW, is your gravatar a pic from North By Northwest, & if so, what is the significance?
Report comment to moderator
Hi Karen O,
Yes, my gravatar depicts Roger Thornhill (Cary Grant) being chased by a plane through the cornfield in one of Hitchcock’s signature scenes.
Significance? It was the smallest jpg file on my computer when I was testing the gravatar thingy.
And, I’m a fierce Hitchcock fan.
While this is one of the more memorable scenes in cinema history, the overlooked reality is that it is a pretty dumb way to try kill someone!
Report comment to moderator
Fasts are a wonderful, God-given tool for crying out to God regarding issues we care about. And desiring God to stop a war is a good and loving thing.
That said, I don’t hear a legitimate cause in the article. I don’t hear anything about spiritual freedom and genuine transformation, merely the same old garbage about violence and nonviolence, et al. This is about scoring points, not about redemption and a future for folks in the Middle East caught between terrorists and the military.
I wonder, do the folks behind this really comprehend God changing people’s heart, or simply political rhetoric?
Report comment to moderator
#13 “do the folks behind this really comprehend God changing people’s heart, or simply political rhetoric?”
Kennethos,
I don’t know the people behind this, but I grew up in a church that probably would support this, so I will speculate based on that background.
People in such churches vary widely, but my overall impression is that they tend to think of God as working primarily through other people’s words and actions. They view prayer as something that changes the person who prays, rather than expecting God to work in some miraculous way in response to prayer. I do not remember anyone ever talking about fasting, but I would guess that they would see its purpose as being a combination of reinforcing their commitment to what they believe God wants them to do – to work for peace, and a statement to other people of their commitment to bringing about peace.
So to answer your question, I would guess that they do not understand God changing people’s hearts the same way that evangelical Christians generally do, but that to reduce this to “simply political rhetoric” implies that they are insincere. No doubt some are insincere, just as there are insincere people among conservative churches, but doing something to make a statement does not necessarily mean one is insincere. They have a very different view of how God works in the world than evangelical Christians do, and they expect God to work through this.
Report comment to moderator
I am on a political fast. I am avoiding all politics until 40 days and 40 nights before an election.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!