Leaving Green Acres
In this week’s WORLD, Marvin Olasky writes on Christians’ abandonment of urban America:
Urban Christians like [Jerry] McAuley throughout the 19th century dominated poverty fighting, and their teaching spread around the country. In the 20th century, though, evangelicals lost influence as they abandoned the cities. Some came to have a distorted sense of sin and how to fight it. They started to think that the countryside was purer than the city. They thought that folks who went to the city were likely to be corrupted by their surroundings.
Their fears had a basis in fact: Urban anonymity allowed newcomers freedom they did not have within small town social strictures. But they were wrong to associate rural life with purity, since the Bible teaches that sin comes from within. David in Psalm 51 and Paul in chapter 7 of Romans write of indwelling sin…
Early Christians followed Jeremiah and became blessings to their Babylons. The apostle Paul began his major ministry activities in Antioch, then the third-largest city in the Roman Empire. Paul sent his epistles to residents of the largest cities of the Roman Empire: He wrote to the Romans, the Corinthians, the Ephesians. The church grew fast in urban areas, while rural areas were filled with pagans: The word itself comes from the Latin paganus, meaning an old country dweller, one who lives in the countryside, a hick.
Today, sadly, the pattern is reversed: Christians are mostly in the countryside, and city-dwelling pagani dominate journalism, education, the arts, and so on. Today, we need Christians who will follow Jeremiah 29 in being good neighbors to the Babylonians around us. We need Christians who appreciate and learn from urban diversity, seeing people as people, good and bad, but all needing Christ.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top32 Comments to “Leaving Green Acres”
This country bumpkin says, “Thanks for the challenge!”
I don’t want to hide my light under a country basket.
Report comment to moderator
I grew up in the small-town west, and lived several different places before settling in the big city, all before becoming a Christian about thirty years ago. It’s true that urban living has some stresses that are absent in less populous areas, but it also has some great advantages–diversity, lots of art of all kinds, lots of great churches to visit and choose from.
As I think about it, I think living in the city has actually been a large factor in faith formation for me. It’s not that there would be no opportunities for ministry in a small town, but in the big city a huge variety of them are “in your face” day in and day out. Periodically, my husband and I entertain the idea of “retiring” to small-town America. My bet is that the Lord will keep us so involved and busy in the city that we won’t ever get around to it.
Report comment to moderator
I think there’s room for Christians everywhere–wasn’t that the point of destroying the tower of Babel, so people wouldn’t remain concentrated in one spot after God told them to go out and fill the whole earth?
That being said, you can reach a lot more people in an urban setting–if that is where God has called you to live. I’ve been in both and seen progress in both, as well as disasters in country and city. God gives different gifts to different people to use in different settings. The best place to be is in the center of God’s will for your life–wherever that means you have to live.
This seems to suggest people flee to the countryside out of fear of what the urban setting requires. Given the pathologies of some cities, I can understand that reasoning. Which is why it requires grace directed from God for such dwellers to be “successful” in God’s work.
I sure wish we had the preview comments still, and I’d love spell check . . .
Report comment to moderator
“but all needing Christ.”
Huh? That’s like saying all people need to be mentally ill.
Report comment to moderator
PDFTT
Report comment to moderator
The sad fact of the matter is that Christians today are more interested in associating with good values than ministering to bad.
Report comment to moderator
Michelle, Firefox has a spellcheck built right in to the browser…
Report comment to moderator
I moved into the city in the mid 80s for these very reasons. Crime forced us out.
Christians left the cities along with many others in the 50s due to unrestrained crime (urban riots destroyed many downtowns then) and abysmal schools. Urban government was not able to deal with these issues. Many people fled. The appeal of the peaceful grassy suburbs was irresistible.
It is not easy to raise a family in the inner city. It is a lot easier to tell others to do it. We did not want to leave our pretty row house in a neighborhood most of our Christian friends were too afraid to venture into. Schools could be replaced at home, but the threats and gunfire eventually were too much. Crime was completely unrestrained.
I miss that diverse environment, seriously. The good libraries, the universities, the museums, the public spaces, the tolerance of differences. I am a suburban refugee.
Report comment to moderator
Oh how well I know this. I moved back to the smaller town where most of my family and ex-husband’s family live so that my ex-mil can help me more with Chloe. My banker (and one of George’s friends for life) lives across the street. No spend the night company if I was so inclined. (humor here). My ex-sil drives down my road to get to her shop. If my truck is there people stop. I laugh and say I can’t scratch my hiny without someone knowing and reporting back. Plus the old farmer who lives behind my cranks his tractor up almost every morning at 6:30. No need for an alarm clock! I could walk through the back field and be in my ex mil’s back yard (haven’t let Chloe in on that secret yet!) Oh small town life if just dandy!!!!
Report comment to moderator
If you had an adult child who had not yet accepted Christ where would you rather they live? I would be quite afraid of sending an ungrounded child to the city. I’m not a big fan of cites.
BTW I have always lived in the suburbs.
Report comment to moderator
Smaller town live is more conductive to and supportive of faith. But we shouldn’t be writting off the cities.
Report comment to moderator
One of the best ways to ensure that cities will be godless is for God’s people to abandon them. Much like schools in that way.
For some people — artists, writers, musicians, business leaders, officers of the government, etc — cities are where their community lies. It would only seem sensible that a Christian painter, for instance, should live in the city. That’s where he or she is most likely to be a blessing to his or her community.
Report comment to moderator
I’ve lived in big cities and rural/ag environments. Suburbs too, although I find them mostly too anonymous and homogeneous to have a unique sense of place. It could be anywhere. I wonder if there are more religious people in rural areas because of the isolation. It’s easy to feel “small” out there, and this may lead people to feel there “must be something” else in charge? Personally, I love to feel small. I love standing alone on a mountain, or walking through miles of forest with no one else around. My wife and I talk about moving out of the city some day. Not because we dislike it. We love it. But, we love big landscapes and open spaces too. We’ll probably compromise and build a place on acreage and keep our city house. It’s on the to-do list. First, I have to go change the laundry.
Report comment to moderator
The American Dream has gaping holes not likely to be fixed in the x-urbs. The greatest danger our kids face is boredom, not cultural corruption. Parents everywhere are angry when their kids don’t come home on time. Parents in America, peculiarly, are angry and scared, a predicament that probably serves a lot of them right. It’s partly the fault of bad & lopsided values, but mostly a problem of priorities, materials, and organization and community.
Report comment to moderator
the white flight led to suburban angst by their offspring which in reality isn’t much different than rural kids drinking and driving in their pickups while smashing mailboxes with their baseballs.
perhaps urban cities are not conducive to old stale religons. In the roman era this was the old gods, fertility cults, etc now its Christianity. Cities now and then featured competition between different gods and cults whereas the rural areas have often featured a conservative streak with traditional and cultural dominant gods.
Report comment to moderator
From my own experiences I believe that there are many Christians in both the cities and the rural settings. Having worked the last ten years as a union electrician. It has been my misfortune (and yet a blessing in disguise) to travel to many parts of our great nation to find work. We now attend a fifty member rural church. But while working in Las Vegas for six months I attended a church which at that time had around seven thousand members. There has been wonderful believing Christians in both of the extremes and in between.
Report comment to moderator
Well, let’s turn over this rock and see what thistheme of “Christians in the country” might hide (even as I’m listening to Lyle — that’s irony for you)
Hidden in the flight to the country is a notion that’s more Romantic than biblical, that being closer to Nature is somehow closer to God.
There is also another piece of Romanticism hiding in it in the illusion that in the country we can better control our destiny. (This is populism that has been processed by the flight to the country of the 60s). On this latter, we can see it in the emphasis on things like Rod Dreher’s Crunch Con, and generally in the move to home schooling — indeed with the latter, it is the lower cost of the country that allows for greater options when it comes to education.
We need to handle this Romanticism gingerly, for it frequently carries the seed of self-regard: we can subtly pride ourselves on the move. A biblical alternative is to remember don’t need to go to some special place to meet God, but to lift up our eyes where we are now.
Report comment to moderator
Re #9 and #10.
I think rural or suburban living can be a more protective and sheltering cocoon for a young baby Christian. But kids who are saved and ready to defend and contend should be cautiously deployed into cities. I say cautious because if they arent rooted in and plugged into a fellowship where they can spiritually be equipped and have their batteries recharged, the big city can secularize them with all the opps for compromise it offers.
Report comment to moderator
I deliberately moved into the inner city with my family. We lived there ten years, we loved the diversity and culture. We bought a house, we set down roots. We worked hard to improve our neighborhood. I have no regrets. I miss the public spaces, the attitude of people open to new ideas and willing to accept us for what we were.
But Marvin avoids the real issues driving productive (having an income) young families out. Education and crime. To recommend modern urban living without mentioning these issues is like recommending the army to a young man without informing him that he may have to endure combat. Most people who I heard advocating that Christians should return to urban life were able to afford sheltered urban communities and private school. They were insulated from the real world.
Education can be addressed via homeschooling. Don’t go on about changing the schools from within – they are not schools, not there, not at all. They are prisons for children nobody cares about. A place they can be that is not on the streets, a place that therefore becomes worse than the streets. It is truly a different world.
Crime is the primary issue. Out of control crime with zero expectation of punishment. Everyone in the inner city is a victim. People leave because they want to live in a place where law and order are respected, because their families are at significant risk if they don’t.
We finally had to leave our cute row house at significant loss because of the constant threats and gunfire. We were calling 911 every other day. Most friends were too afraid to even visit us, even our urban friends. It was not America; it was like living somewhere occupied by a foreign army.
It is good to call Christians to return to the cities. It is not so good to paint an unrealistic and rosy picture. There are real tangible issues that keep people out. These must be realistically faced before a return is contemplated, and those that return need significant support.
Report comment to moderator
Suburban relatives used to ask us if our homeschooled children were sheltered. We would laugh and tell them that they are the sheltered ones, not our children.
It took months for my daughter’s nightmeres to stop – nightmeres of fire brought on by that burning car at the end of our block.
Also – there are a lot of Christians in the city. They are just not white suburban Christians.
Report comment to moderator
Today, sadly, the pattern is reversed: Christians are mostly in the countryside, and city-dwelling pagani dominate journalism, education, the arts, and so on.
Many of the pagani also live in the suburbs and commute. Those who don’t live in sheltered urban enclaves. Hollywood is far from Harlem.
Christians were forced out of all of these institutions not by proximity, but by ideology. Many centers of education (such as the land-grant universities) are far from urban areas.
Living in the city does not make one relevant. Being relevant makes one relevant.
Don’t move to the city to change the world, move to the city to serve suffering people.
Report comment to moderator
Race riots, housing projects, welfare, degeneration of once great urban schools (it happened in one generation), crime left unpunished, cheap drugs, public corruption – these are what drove people to the green pastures of the suburbs. And many (most?) suburbs are as pagan as the inner city.
The more I contemplate Olasky’s article, the more I question his analysis. The ideas never quite get connected to the conclusions, or to the real world. Comparing Rome to modern America is a stretch – was there a significant rural/suburban population in ancient Rome? Was Paul going to the cities, or to where the people were?
I agree with the sentiment, just not the rationale or the guilt trip put on Suburban Christians. I’ve lived out these ideas. The elite urban attitudes were once mine. Maybe I became a bit disillusioned.
Report comment to moderator
Well said, Ampipholis. You most certainly should question Marvin’s analysis, because there wasn’t any. It was just another guilt trip to lay on Christians. Instead of focusing on the people who are destroying our cities and making people flee them through their brutality, larceny, and violence, it’s a lot easier to just hit Christians over the head and blame them. It’s also, while blaming the people who’ve made our cities so dangerous isn’t. Writing this article didn’t require much thought at all, let alone analysis.
Talking about moving to big cities, or discussing why people leave them, without even mentioning crime is extremely irresponsible, and the (what can only be) deliberate refusal to even mention violence and crime as reasons for people avoiding living in cities in this article is inexcusable.
Report comment to moderator
4th sentence should read:
It’s also ver PC, while blaming the people who’ve made our cities so dangerous isn’t.
Report comment to moderator
Make that “very PC”.
Preview window please!
Report comment to moderator
I wouldn’t go that far. Olasky’s Tragedy of American Compassion is on my shelf. He is not being PC. I just wish that a more comprehensive analysis was applied here. I’m being a little harsh on a story that was probably not meant to be comprehensive, but hey – you hit a nerve. People respond to this kind of hype. I think the issues, once brought up, deserve a lot more thought.
I specifically take issue with the link between the decline of Christian cultural influence and the exodus from urban areas, the exaggerated importance of urban over country/suburban residency, the implied obligation of Christians to move to the cities, and the lack of consideration to the real life issues that would hold people back.
These are serious issues that warrant serious discussion. I mostly agree with the trajectory of the discussion, I just question the exaggeration and the rationale. It’s OK to present something as a good idea or a wise suggestion. Let’s not warp it with flimsy reasoning into a false moral imperative. Caveats may not make exciting reading, but they do make a more thoughtful article which is what I expect here.
Report comment to moderator
The Biblical arguments for urban life seem cherry picked and misapplied. I could present lots of arguments for Christians to go out to all the world, how God on occasion deliberately scattered them from the city. The emphasis on cities needs to be shown to be theological, and not just because that was where the people were.
Once again, shallow reasoning. I heard it for years before I saw the holes. I would have no problem with it if it stays away from the realm of moral imperative, and concentrates on the idea of calling – specific people called to reach specific people. Not elite Christians living in condos.
I know of a church that was very proud that it did not leave the city like lesser churches did. But 80% of its members commuted from the suburbs and had little consideration for real (as opposed to theoretical) urban issues. Those who actually lived in “the neighborhoods” (as opposed to the wealthy downtown) were on their own. Thankfully, this has largely changed.
Report comment to moderator
By the way – I just noticed my post 8, I thought it didn’t go through. Sorry about the redundancy.
Report comment to moderator
Actually, the whole premise of the article is wrong. America, just like the rest of the world, becomes more urban and less rural every day. Most people in America live in cities, and that includes Christians. The trend of moving from rural to urban has been going on for well over a century, and shows no sign of reversing. I have no idea where Olasky got the idea that Christians have abandoned the cities for rural areas. They might prefer suburbs to the inner city, but that’s not what he’s saying. And that’s largely due to crime.
Report comment to moderator
My favorite apologetic for the city is simply that the Bible starts in a garden and ends in a city.
I’m a city dweller and have been most of my life. With the exception of a 4 year stint in the Air Force, two years in a small college town, and 6 years in the suburbs of a large city, I have always returned back to the city.
There are a lot of myths about city life vs. country living. May claim that cities are unfriendly, dangerous, immoral etc. Only lazy students of sociology hold those views. A more in-depth study reveals that for the most part, cities are wonderful places to live and raise families.
I wouldn’t trade city living for anything.
Report comment to moderator
Jack…
cheap televisions…
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!