Advice for blog writers
I am finding out that the big difference between magazine writing and blogging is the instant feedback. One could go for weeks, in the old days, before the message you floated in a bottle came back to you with curses or blessings — and by that time “the bitterness of death is past,” as Agag put it in 1 Samuel 15:32. That’s if you even thought to check the mailbag at all.
I was about to read the Bible first thing in the morning, as is my custom, taking with wooden literalness the command to “seek first the kingdom.” But sitting at the computer desk I was tempted to just peek at the blog comments first, which was easier somehow than rummaging for a Scripture passage.
After I had read thirteen of them, my heart smote me, like David’s did after ordering the census (2 Samuel 24:10). As far as I can discern, the king’s motive was to reassure himself about the strength of men behind him. In any case, he was punished.
Seek God only. Some things are better not known. Advice for blog writers: “Do not take to heart all the things that people say, lest you hear your servant cursing you. Your heart knows that many times you have yourself cursed others” (Ecclesiastes 7:21).
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
back to top58 Comments to “Advice for blog writers”
Seek God only?
And avoid any criticisms of your work?
Sorry, Andree, if some of us have trouble getting our heads around the idea that your son totaling the family car is “an answer to prayer.” And my apologies for having trouble with your idea that the only reason he and his friends weren’t killed is because you prayed, the logical corollary of which is that God is such a petty, capricious, sadistic monster that he would’ve let your son and friends be killed because you forgot to pray.
Report comment to moderator
“I know what I believe, don’t confuse me with logic.”
At least Andree admits it.
Report comment to moderator
Wow. 1&2 are the coldest things I think I’ve read in a long time.
Andree’s pearls are truly cast before swine.
Report comment to moderator
Andree,
The key is to not give in to temptation and substitute your first morning reading of scripture with reading blogs. With that as a foundation you’ll be much more ready to face infinitely less enlightened blogs. That being said there is a place for your considerable talent in thinking and communicating. You’ll learn to separate the wheat from the chaff; there is wheat although one has to search a long time sometimes.
The part I don’t like is that in this “marketplace” of ideas so many people are afraid to take responsibility for their words (something taken very seriously in God’s Word) – hiding behind pseudonyms, acting as though there is another place in the world where they do not have to be accountable, etc. This does not encourage politeness so be prepared for some verbal bullying.
Report comment to moderator
Andree Seu
Just this morning, I too made a few phone calls, etc., and then realized that I had not read from His Word, as I normally do. Thank you for this reminder of things which are FIRST.
God Bless you
12 For the eyes of the Lord are over the righteous, and his ears are open unto their prayers: but the face of the Lord is against them that do evil.
13 And who is he that will harm you, if ye be followers of that which is good?
14 But and if ye suffer for righteousness’ sake, happy are ye: and be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled;
15 But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:
16 Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed that falsely accuse your good conversation in Christ.
conversation
17 For it is better, if the will of God be so, that ye suffer for well doing, than for evil doing. 1 Peter 3
Report comment to moderator
Andree does indeed cast mostly pearls. She is about as honest a writer that I know. She has a way of living out and articulating her Christian faith that is inspiring.
Being, also, an exquisitely sensitive person, Andree acknowledged that her heart smote her after reading the comments. Fortunately, she is, also, strong and wise enough to understand that blogging is an inherently rough game and that in seeking God only we ordinary mortals can suffer the slings and arrows of life including those of such secular crusaders as Night Train and Steve G.
Report comment to moderator
StuBob:
Cold? Andreee wrote about her belief that it was only her prayers that kept God from allowing her son to die in a wreck.
Several of us took issue with that because, as Night Train said, it suggests that God wouldn’t have been stirred to take any action were it not for prayer.
Now Andree, apparently stunned that that entry bothered a lot of the people who commented, is saying that it’s better to not hear what other people are saying than risk hearing criticisms.
So I’m cold for calling that what it is?
No.
Report comment to moderator
Yes, Andree–if you are going to blog, you have to be very thick-skinned. People who don’t agree with you and can remain somewhat anonymous to you will say hateful things. Do put God’s word first, but also know that many of us love your writing and are fed by it each day. What you have above is an example of how much some unbelievers hate God and do not know the least thing about Him. Sad.
Report comment to moderator
Andree,
Janie is right.
There is something about bulletin boards/blogging that is like road rage. We say harsh things that we would never say to a stranger we are sharing a plane ride with.
By the way, I read the opening paragraph of “The quiet hijacking” in devotions recently and your piece “A Long, Slow Fast” as an example of concrete vs. abstract for a group of writers.
Hope that’s OK.
-Dave
Report comment to moderator
“My heart smote me”? Are we still in the eighteenth century or something?
Report comment to moderator
Cold?
Hateful?
A lot of people on here really need to get a grip.
Report comment to moderator
Also, just about every regular on WoW “hides behind a pseudonym” such as Solon, llama, stubob, etc. Hardly anyone uses his or her real, full name. But for some reason, it’s only when you disagree with a WoW writer that you’re accused of cowardice for this practice.
And, I must say, the idea that God would’ve let 4 young adults be killed in a grisly car wreck if Andree hadn’t prayed is probably the coldest thing I’ve read on here or anywhere for quite some time.
Report comment to moderator
I know what Adree is saying. While I don’t do devotionals (not a Christian), I do have a problem with reading the comments before I’ve carefully read the story and the link.
What I strive to do is read the story and the link, and think about and formulate my response, without reading any of the comments. That way I’m more likely to address the issue at hand instead of responding to people’s perceptions and comments. Once I’ve made my post, then I go back and read what other people have written. That’s the plan anyway – I don’t always follow it.
It is very hard to be a thoughtful blogger when so much of the blogosphere is filled with people’s anger and revenge. If all one does is look at and respond to blogs, one is not getting an accurate picture. I try to divide my time between reading, including books, magazines, and newspapers, watching things like The Charlie Rose Show, and blogging.
I know it is tough for a writer of a blog to do well. There are people just waiting to pounce on a misspelled word or a tiny fact that might be incorrect, or have a personal animosity toward you.
What I do like is writers who speak from their heart, like Andree. I don’t agree with her on many things at all, but I do appreciate people who speak from their heart instead of just spouting platitudes or the latest talking points.
What I don’t like is people who mock and ridicule a writer. I want people to address the issue a writer raises. It’s helpful to remember that none of us are consistent in what we say, do, and believe. We all have our blind spots and our weaknesses in life.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t agree with mocking and ridiculing writers, either. (Although I sometimes mock/ridicule particularly rude posters who’ve mocked/ridiculed/namecalled me.) That’s not the case here. Pointing out the logical implications of Andree’s beliefs about prayer is not mocking and ridiculing her.
Report comment to moderator
- 14 –
Andree’s Topic is not about the ‘car accident’- You used another ‘Topic’ which she wrote last week, to continue your diatribe against prayer, which we as Born Again Believers believe STRONGLY. You know this, yet you continue to keep this up.
From post 1
From post – 14 –
And you don’t believe you are mocking?
Report comment to moderator
MOCK
Definition:
transitive and intransitive verb treat somebody or something with scorn: to treat somebody or something with scorn or contempt
Report comment to moderator
RIDICULE
transitive verb
Definition:
mock: to reduce or dismiss the importance or quality of somebody or something in a contemptuous way
Report comment to moderator
Andree’s Topic is not about the ‘car accident’
Who said it was? I didn’t. Her topic is the responses to her post about the car accident, and how unhappy she is that people criticized her for her views about prayer. That’s the topic I’m discussing here. And, just as on the original post, I’ve done it without treating her with either scorn or contempt.
Victoria, I don’t know what you for a living, but if you ever need work, I’d think, based on your creative use of both bold type and ALL CAPS, you could make a good living writing pamphlets for the John Birch Society.
Report comment to moderator
victoria post 17,
now if I understand Lynn correctly the intent would seem to be:
1) we should not make personal comments about the poster
2) it is anticiapted that there will be heavy blocking and tackling regarding the ideas a person posts: dcebating ideas is a contact sport
Last I checked praying was a concept and idea, not about Andree Seu persoanally.
Report comment to moderator
Dick Friedrich,
Your point that a serious Christian ought not hide behind a name and ought to be careful that the thoughts one utters be acceptable in His sight is compelling.
My name is Peter Leavitt; I have emailed Lynn to find out how to get it changed on this blog.
Frankly, I had some business reasons to be careful about disclosing my name but am willing to take the risk that might come with disclosing it.
Report comment to moderator
I remain, as always, Night Train.
Report comment to moderator
Peter #20
I am humbled by your honesty and transparency. I wish I could live up to it consistently. I’m cognizent (on Veteran’s day) that we live in a free and open society that many around the world don’t have. I believe that means that we are obligated to share our ideas (even disagreements) responsibly even with new technologies. Using words responsibly honors those who have sacrificed their lives for us to exercise our freedom no matter how much we disagee in principle. It also might help us get to something that is true, beautiful, noble, or wise along the way.
Report comment to moderator
Well, since almost no one at all has even touched the issue on Andree’s original post here, not that she’ll likely read these comments anyway
, I guess I will comment.
To #1:
I don’t believe that Andree is trying to avoid *all* criticism of her work. She’s just pointing out that ultimately, like any Christian, she answers first to God and not to man.
She also hinted at (though didn’t fully spell out) the reason for looking at the comments in the first place. She said it was the same as the reason for David’s census. From that, I gather is was largely pride. She was probably hoping in her fallen humanness to see glowing comments that would affirm her as a brilliant writer and a person. And what’s so uncommon with that? We all have that sense of pride and wanting to be admired. However, as Christians that should not rule our hearts and emotions, or else we are our own self-centered god. Christians know that our ultimate source of identity, purpose, love, and affirmation is God. Again, he is the first and main person to whom we should look.
Of course there’s also purely secular reasons for not reading your own press. I’ve heard of many musicians that don’t read reviews of their works, knowing (usually from experience) it would cripple any confidence they have and their future works if they did. Creative people tend to have large yet quite fragile egos, and one word of criticism to them can usually cancel out ten words of praise. I speak from experience.
But the Bible also gives warning to putting too much stock in your own press, which Andree just pointed out. Now, instead of putting down her faith and the way she shares her life’s journey with us, can we discuss the topic at hand? Andree knows Who she answers to, but if Andree did actually happen read this very thread’s comments, who could blame her if she felt that she was throwing her vulnerable pearls of hard-lived truth to swine?
Report comment to moderator
I generally try to respond to people in the same tone and discourse they address me.
I generally to not try to “pretty up” disagreements though just for the sake of making a false accord.
Christians are the majority here. To my imperfect ear, many of them tend to expect a lot of admiration and approval and sympathy from others, while being a bit loath to grant it to others.
I use a random pseudonym for public use on the blog. I have revealed my “real” name in email correspondence with various people who seem reasonably cordial and respectful in their communications to me. I doubt this is a perfect mix of security and transparency, but it’s worked out so far OK. (Please don’t the preceding sentence as a dare.)
I would advise people whose feelings are sensitive or whose self confidence is shaky, not to engage in public communication on the Internet. Not that there is anything wrong with the traits I mention. It’s just having good sense about one’s weaknesses and vulnerabilities.
I am allergic to halibut. It makes me throw up. I don’t eat halibut.
I am a mechanical idiot. When my car needs repair, I pay someone who is not a mechanical idiot to fix it.
I can make idiotic posts on a blog without any help.
Report comment to moderator
Random Name,
Before you leave for your sabbatical, are you going to enlighten us on the meaning of your avatar? It reminds me of Small, one of Rabbit’s friends-and-relations in A.A. Milne’s The House at Pooh Corner, but I checked the picture and Small’s legs are longer. (Not that I really thought that’s what it was, but it does look like something small crawling up something.)
Report comment to moderator
#25
Chas about has it. When I ava-tarred, I messed up the size.
My favorite painting is Hieronymous Bosch’s Garden of Earthly Delights. In our otherwise impeccably decorated house, tastefully decorated by my wife, she allows me to have a large reproduction of his painting on the wall in my nefarious corner of the upstairs.
My avatar is a demonic creature from the Hell portion of Bosch’s triptych.
Perhaps in such a holy web site as this, the forces of Good shrunk my evil avatar to microbe size.
http://www.talariaenterprises.com/product_lists/parastone/bosch-garden-earthly-deli.html
Report comment to moderator
Andree knows Who she answers to, but if Andree did actually happen read this very thread’s comments, who could blame her if she felt that she was throwing her vulnerable pearls of hard-lived truth to swine?
Any rational person not given to hysterics.
Report comment to moderator
Now, instead of putting down her faith and the way she shares her life’s journey with us, can we discuss the topic at hand?
That’s what we’ve been doing. The topic at hand is the reactions to her previous post on this blog. She brought it up herself, please note.
Report comment to moderator
Prayer to the living God bothers many people who find no peace within their souls.
People become hysterical when faced with ‘prayer’ when they themselves are without, lost without Christ?
Report comment to moderator
I don’t know the folks who have no peace in their souls. And prayer doesn’t bother me a bit. But it does bother me when I see somebody say that God might well have allowed the gruesome deaths of four young adults simply because they didn’t pray. Which is exactly what Andree said. It betrays an incredibly cold and impious view of “God”, as well an incredibly self centered view of the universe.
Report comment to moderator
God has never taken a poll to find out who is happy about his law and who isn’t.
Anyone who finds fault with God, or His purpose has made their own bed, their path is very wide, they have no one to blame but themselves when they come to the end which is ………..
Report comment to moderator
Alright, that does it, Victoria!
You are not allowed to mix more than two metaphors, tops!
Report comment to moderator
#26
Random Name,
I have always liked Hieronymous Bosch, as his painting seems much more interesting that the more realistic painters. (My other favorites are El Greco and Dali.)
I can’t make out the image on talaria’s site well enough to identify where you got your avatar from, though. I thought the Blue Flutist would be a nice decoration to have if I had $42 and no better place to spend it, but that’s not likely to ever happen.
I see I am way off topic here. But that’s another way blogs are very different from magazines – the comment threads can take on a life of their own.
Report comment to moderator
SteveG and Night Train,
Sounds like you guys are experts on the subject prayer and I’d really like to know what your sources are. Can you please explain to us what the invisible God is up to and how prayer works exactly?
As for me, prayer is one of the most difficult aspects of faith to understand, yet one of the most natural to do. I’ve studied and taught the Bible for over 30 years and I still don’t know how prayer works or what God does when I pray. He is invisible after all.
The Bible says God knows everything we need before we ask, yet he says to pray anyway. He cares for every sparrow and hair of our head that falls to the ground. So while I don’t understand the logic of prayer, my soul desires to communicate with this wonderful, loving and terrifyingly powerful God all the more.
I pray because he asks me to and because my spirit desires to. I don’t presume that the universe changes course as a result. On the other hand, the Bible documents God “changing his mind” at least from our perspective. The effective fervent prayer of the righteous avails much. Did Andree’s prayer avert disaster? Who knows the thoughts of an infinite mind? Oh, right. Somehow, the people who believe the least claim to know the most.
Report comment to moderator
Prayer is a direct way to our Father’s ears, through Jesus Christ His Son. The Holy Spirit knows what we should pray, “the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.”
24 For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?
25 But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it.
26 Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.
27 And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God Romans 8
Report comment to moderator
Well Xion, it’s a pretty simple thing. Andree believes that God might well have killed her son had she not prayed.
This is the kind of God you believe in: One who would take the lives of children and throw families into a lifetime of grief because they didn’t pray for the right thing at the right time.
Is such a being worthy of your worship? Because it sounds more like a protection racket. “Good son you got there … be a shame if anything happened to him.” If you are praying out of fear of what God might do to you if you don’t, that’s not a belief system I want any part of.
Report comment to moderator
#36 SteveG, you presume to tell us the kind of God we believe in and then have a barrel of laughs knocking over your own straw man. God has done far more shocking things than this. We may as well consider some examples documented by God himself.
God told Abraham to offer his son as a sacrifice on Mt. Moriah. What kind of gruesome, cruel God is this who not only asks such things of a father, but writes them down for all the world to mock. Rabbis argued and puzzled about this for centuries. Some thought of God as capricious, testing people when he felt the need. Other saw a lesson of offering our kids to the Lord. None of these answers are satisfactory.
God allowed this puzzle to stand for 2000 years before it was made clear. God asked his people to do all sorts of bizarre things like circumcision, substitutionary sacrifice, blood on the doorposts, unleavened bread, strange land redemption laws, leading them through the wilderness, crossing the Jordan, anointing with oil, etc.
Mockers have loads of fun with all of these outrageous rituals, the most bizarre being Abraham’s attempted murder of his own son. What kind of God rewards attempted murder?
The answer is that all of these bizarre rituals are illustrations that are fulfilled in one man, the Messiah (Gal 3:24). Jesus Christ was sacrificed on this very same Mt. Moriah 2000 years after the illustration with Isaac. There is nothing more gut wrenching and painful than the loss of a child. What greater price in the universe could anyone pay than to offer one’s only child in the place of sinners.
God took thousands of years to lay out an illustration of his love for you, planned from the beginning of time. Love means sacrifice and God took it to the maximum with the greatest story ever told.
Just as God spared Isaac, who knows why God spared Andree’s son now? Since our lives are short and we will all die soon anyway, what are a few years more in the light of eternity? We believe God has a purpose and plan. Prayer somehow works into this, but good luck explaining it.
RC Sproul calls this “confluence”, the merging together of two streams: the sovereignty of God and the will of man. Who knows the response of the invisible hand of God to the feeble prayer of a child? We are all headed for the grave very soon, but the pains of this life will be a forgotten pinprick in the unlimited expanse of time.
And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose…Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword? Rom 8:28,35
Report comment to moderator
Paragraph 2 should say, “Others saw a lesson of offering our kids to the Lord” -> “in the service of others”.
Report comment to moderator
There are only a few times in my life that an answer to prayer seemed almost miraculous. As with Andree’s son, it was when death was imminent.
When I was about 19 I was hitchhiking through Texas on Christmas eve trying to get home. There was a severe ice storm and there was no traffic on the road. I was alone wandering along a deserted road drenched to the bone and covered with ice. I thought I was a goner. I prayed that God would help me (as I’m sure everyone does when faced with death).
I continued to walk a little and noticed a burned out barn. It was the only shelter for miles. I looked inside and there was a small room that survived the fire. And for some reason there was fresh hay on the floor. I lay down and covered myself with a blanket I had in my knapsack. Lying there I thought. Wow, not only does God let me live, but he provides a manger on Christmas Eve.
Now, did my prayer cause a burned out barn to appear? No. I can’t think of anything that my prayer changed. It would have had to have changed the course of things back in time. I don’t understand any of that. All I know is I prayed and God provided. Someone who’s all powerful has the capacity to figure that stuff out. For me, I simply get to live a few more years.
Report comment to moderator
“lest you hear your servant cursing you”
What?! Since when are we your servants?
In any case, you should always consider the source. If you can’t figure that out, Andree, then perhaps you shouldn’t blog. A significant part of blogging is starting and participating in dialogue with others. Comments are an integral part of blogging. Perhaps looking at blogging in this light will help:
“As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another.” – Provebs 27:17
Report comment to moderator
I agree with everything Xion said and totally believe about prayer exactly as he describes. However, I, too find Andree’s blogs offensive (as I find most of her stuff offensive). I can’t exactly explain it – it just always rubs me the wrong way (only one metaphor per blog entry)
Report comment to moderator
Busted. I am so guilty of checking my computer first thing each morning. Thanks for the reminder to put God before Mac.
Report comment to moderator
Mommy – 41
How can you claim you find Andree’s blogs offensive and yet you don’t know why?
Report comment to moderator
Solon #20-
You’ll have to use more of your last name than the initial for obvious reasons. The first few times I posted I used only the first name. Then someone else started posting as Peter, so I added the initial. Last year there were five Peters on here. It seems the others have gone away.
Report comment to moderator
Xion: Well said at 37. God can defend himself.
Mommy: Is it possible that Andree’s transparency cuts too deep for you?
Personally, when I read something of Andree’s and disagree, I assume I’m wrong and she’s right.
Report comment to moderator
Mommy: Is it possible that Andree’s transparency cuts too deep for you?
Oh, brother.
Could it possibly be, Stubob, that the thing that rubs her the wrong way but she can’t put her finger on is that every column, which is ostensibly about “the Lord”, is actually about Andree and her feelings?
Report comment to moderator
I’m surprised Night Train can handle the estrogen overload here!
Report comment to moderator
- 46 -
Why would it bother you if Andree writes about what the LORD has done in her life? Of course she writes about her ‘feelings’ so does everyone on this blog.
You write about your feelings and beliefs ALL the time – LOL, I wonder why?
Report comment to moderator
Hi Andree:
Foolishly, I haven’t actually read your column on prayer, your son’s car accident, etc. Since I’m not planning on addressing that, I feel a bit less hypocritical.
That said, I know a bit about having to be thick-skinned in regard to negative responses. For the last couple of years, I’ve written religious/political essays published in a local university political magazine, here in the midwest.
Sometimes I get polite appreciate feedback. More often, I don’t. But, I feel spiritual freedom to write about what needs to be said, with less care and apprehension for myself. What I’ve written is a smidgen of what you’ve written for WORLD. You understand, I think, that part of you is always on display, for untold numbers of people you’ll likely never meet. And yet, you continue to do this, for a variety of reasons…spiritual gifts, encouragement, etc. Part and parcel with this is a senstitivity to how your readers will take this. Most, like myself, are appreciative, and glad for the words and thoughts. Others, however, may be possessed of various insanities that do not lend themselves to polite discussions. Such folks may need to be ignored, and prayed for, instead of allowing them to get under your skin.
Report comment to moderator
Various insanities? What does Pat Robertson have to do with this?
And then you go on, after calling people you disagree with insane, to decry the lack of “polite discussion”. What a hypocrite.
And what part of the discussion has been impolite? Please point it out.
Report comment to moderator
Report comment to moderator
And you can’t see it?
Report comment to moderator
No. Certainly I’ve written nothing impolite in this thread. I assumed that I was the one being referred to, but could be wrong. The rudest person on here is the one decrying impolite people, and referring to their “insanities”. While there are people on this thread who strongly disagree with each other, they’re all quite rational, and there’s no one who remotely appears to be insane. And, until Kennethos came along, we were all being quite civil to each other.
Report comment to moderator
Interesting …………..
Report comment to moderator
It is very odd………..
Report comment to moderator
The concept of impolite is arguably very imprecise with a wide variety of meanings.
It can, for example, mean making comments about another’s beliefs.
It can, for example, mean making comments about another’s politics.
It can, for example, mean making comments about another’s looks or origin.
I do believe that Lynn has been very clear on the following point:
1) it is open season on ideas, so long as the comments are fact based and use reasonable standards of language
2) the individuals themselves are off limits
So calling a poster insane is probably inappropriate.
Saying that a posted idea is insane because [fill in with supported reason] is perhaps appropriate.
And politeness, I suggest, is always within the context of the situation.
Report comment to moderator
re: 39. XION, who said “All I know is I prayed and God provided.” Praise the Lord! I believe our God blessed your obedience to pray; it was not so much WHAT you prayed, but WHETHER you prayed.
Your comment reminds me of the blessing received by the blind man who told his interrogators he did not know how Jesus had healed him, but “One thing I know: that though I was blind, now I see.” (John 9:1)
Just a little encouragement: to know how or why is not as important as it is to “know,” or believe, and trust. Do we know how or why the laws of physics, science or nature work? Even though we do not know or understand the reasons for their working, we can and do and must trust/beleive that they will work. Our is not to know but to trust and obey. I am happy you see (and correctly credit) God’s provision for you.
Report comment to moderator
You may call me insane if you wish.
A SHROPSHIRE LAD: LXII
Terence, this is stupid stuff…
“Terence, this is stupid stuff:
You eat your victuals fast enough;
There can’t be much amiss, ’tis clear,
To see the rate you drink your beer.
But oh, good Lord, the verse you make,
It gives a chap the belly-ache.
The cow, the old cow, she is dead;
It sleeps well, the horned head:
We poor lads, ’tis our turn now
To hear such tunes as killed the cow.
Pretty friendship ’tis to rhyme
Your friends to death before their time
Moping melancholy mad:
Come, pipe a tune to dance to, lad.”
Why, if ’tis dancing you would be,
There’s brisker pipes than poetry.
Say, for what were hop-yards meant,
Or why was Burton built on Trent?
Oh many a peer of England brews
Livelier liquor than the Muse,
And malt does more than Milton can
To justify God’s ways to man.
Ale, man, ale’s the stuff to drink
For fellows whom it hurts to think:
Look into the pewter pot
To see the world as the world’s not.
And faith, ’tis pleasant till ’tis past:
The mischief is that ’twill not last.
Oh I have been to Ludlow fair
And left my necktie God knows where,
And carried half way home, or near,
Pints and quarts of Ludlow beer:
Then the world seemed none so bad,
And I myself a sterling lad;
And down in lovely muck I’ve lain,
Happy till I woke again.
Then I saw the morning sky:
Heigho, the tale was all a lie;
The world, it was the old world yet,
I was I, my things were wet,
And nothing now remained to do
But begin the game anew.
Therefore, since the world has still
Much good, but much less good than ill,
And while the sun and moon endure
Luck’s a chance, but trouble’s sure,
I’d face it as a wise man would,
And train for ill and not for good.
‘Tis true, the stuff I bring for sale
Is not so brisk a brew as ale:
Out of a stem that scored the hand
I wrung it in a weary land.
But take it: if the smack is sour
The better for the embittered hour;
It will do good to heart and head
When your soul is in my soul’s stead;
And I will friend you, if I may,
In the dark and cloudy day.
There was a king reigned in the East:
There, when kings will sit to feast,
They get their fill before they think
With poisoned meat and poisoned drink.
He gathered all that sprang to birth
From the many-venomed earth;
First a little, thence to more,
He sampled all her killing store;
And easy, smiling, seasoned sound,
Sate the king when healths went round.
They put arsenic in his meat
And stared aghast to watch him eat;
They poured strychnine in his cup
And shook to see him drink it up:
They shook, they stared as white’s their shirt:
Them it was their poison hurt.
–I tell the tale that I heard told.
Mithridates, he died old.
Report comment to moderator