Making the case for organ sales
Dr. Arthur Matas is on a mission: He’s trying to make the case for organ sales. While he admits the idea takes a little getting used to, he says it shouldn’t be written off as taboo.
“There’s one clear argument for sales,” Dr. Matas told a gathering of surgeons earlier this year. The practice, currently illegal in the U.S., “would increase the supply of kidneys, save lives and improve the quality of life for those with end-stage renal disease.”
But not everyone agrees.
Among his opponents on the issue is a friend and colleague, Francis Delmonico. A Harvard University professor who has played a central role in shaping national transplant policy, the 62-year-old physician has several objections to organ sales. He fears such a system would attract the poor, vulnerable and unhealthy, and that altruistic donations might wither away.
“Payments eventually result in the exploitation of the individual,” says Dr. Delmonico, who also worries about encouraging black-market sales both here and in developing countries. “It’s the poor person who sells.”
Where do you stand on this controversial issue–and would you ever consider selling an organ for profit?




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Special Student Discount for WORLD!








Click to Print
Include Comments










back to top16 Comments to “Making the case for organ sales”
No way! Delmonico is right.
Report comment to moderator
Absolutely not! There is already a blackmarket for organs in third world countries.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t know what I think about it, though I lean toward being opposed to it. But then I think of how we pay people for things like blood, plasma, sperm, and eggs.
I have a brother who is the recipient of a pancreas and kidney transplant. He was very, very sick and was within a few months of dying. They finally found a match for him after several tries. He was one of the lucky ones. Many people die while waiting for a transplant.
I suppose with strict ethical guidelines, I could see us giving financial renumeration to someone who donates an organ. But I would maintain a strict separation between the purchase of organs and who gets them.
For example, certain transplant centers in the US would pay for donated kidneys, like we do with plasma and other things. However the kidneys would be doled out based strictly on the current system, where those in the greatest need get the transplant. In other words, there would be a high wall between the purchase of the organs and the transplanting of them.
That way a person couldn’t pay someone to sell them their body parts.
By strict ethical guidelines, I mean no purchases from prisoners, the mentally handicapped, physically handicapped, under age 18, etc. Also, the approval of unbiased 3rd parties such as a physician and psychologist would be necessary. In short, you couldn’t walk in off the street and sell you kidney. You’d have to go through a screening process. Obviously, anonymous purchases and sales would be forbidden.
Report comment to moderator
Delmonico is half correct. Black markets are the product of shortage. Shortage, not payment, leads to the exploitation of the individual. This is economics 101 (so. drug trafficking, prohibition, natural disaster). The black market attracts the poor as supplier and caters to the rich as buyer.
Free market forces have historically been the best way to supply needs. Even though they are flawed (sometimes seriously), time and time again, open market trading allows the individual to participate. The ability to sell organs will attract more people to this life saving process.
I do not participate in the system because it is currently an oppressive operation: centrally controlled, inefficient and deadly. I will not support such systems. The political canard of ‘profits’ is costing the lives of many people each year.
Report comment to moderator
The whole thing gives me the creeps – especially when we consider the depravity of man. :O
Report comment to moderator
Anlir, I think you need to re-up to dosage of Marx.
Anyone want to guess what I think of Matas’ idea?
Report comment to moderator
Anlir, walls are made to be torn down. I wouldn’t trust any laws or regulations to prevent exploitation.
I assume that the expenses of organ donation are paid by the recipient. That seems like fair ocmpensation for a voluntary contribution. What we need is to persuade more people to be donors.
Report comment to moderator
Mac, how do shortages lead to exploitation?
Report comment to moderator
Kyle,
Absolutely, we need to encourage people to be donors.
I’m not saying I’m all in favor of paying people. But if we do, there should be strict guidelines.
There are strict guidelines around paying people for sperm and eggs, for example.
There is a “slippery slope” on this matter. But we have all kinds of “slippery slopes” in life. In a free society, you learn to deal with those issues. You involve all of the stakeholders – the donors, the recipients, the physicians, the legal community, and the ethicists.
I know this much – if you’re a parent and you’re watching your child die for lack of a transplant, you might be more open to the idea of organ purchase, if it can be done legally and ethically.
Report comment to moderator
I used to be hugely supportinve of organ donation, but my wife, who is a nurse, has turned me away from it somewhat. I was no aware that viable organs can only be harvested from someone who has clinically died within the previous few minutes. Since organ teams are nowhere near that fast, they primarily get organs from patients who have a heartbeat and other autonomous life-support functions intact, but are “brain dead”. Which is a loaded term as we know. i.e., they have to physically stop the heart and respiration and then immediately harvest the organs. That’s a little too dicey for me to agree with.
Report comment to moderator
A lot of study has shown that “selling blood” is not the best way to provide for a reliable supply of blood for medical needs in our society.
I suspect that we will find the same about organs.
Report comment to moderator
Random,
Indeed. But there was a case where not all of the stakeholders were involved in the decision to buy blood, resulting in some bad things. So the practice was stopped.
Presently, in a way, you can purchase your own blood for surgery. Many hospitals allow you to “bank” blood in exchange for a reduction in your bill. It can come from you, family members, or even members of your church.
Report comment to moderator
Wow – the title of this thread really threw me off; I was expecting a discussion of Mueller vs Ott.
Report comment to moderator
Desperate times cause people to make desperate decisions.
I commented a few days ago about a specific situation I find myself in. In short, my wife has suffered from excruciating pain from a fall she took down a flight of stairs 19 years ago. The condition has worsened. Even after numerous surgical procedures.
A new doctor has found a combination of drugs that seem to be working in providing her with a measure of relief that is allowing her to once again experience a level of quality of life that we had almost given up on.
Our insurance company has refused to cover these drugs because they have not been approved for pain relief even though they work. The cost is prohibitive (about $900 per month). In about 6 months or so we will have gone through what is left of the equity we had in our house which was sold to pay for medical bills.
If I could sell a kidney and it would give me the resources to provide for my wife’s treatment I’d do it in a heartbeat.
Altruistically I’d like to belive that “greater love has no man than this . . .” But in this case it would be prompted more by desperation than anything else.
It’s easy to talk about hypothetical situations until faced with reality. I can live without a kidney, or one eye etc. But I wouldn’t want to withhold treatment for a loved one just because my value is measured in dollars.
Report comment to moderator
Metanoia,
I can’t tell you how much it tears at me to hear stories like yours! I know of so many people who are in desperate situations like yours, because I work in the employee benefits field, particularly medical insurance.
In my own family, my brother’s health care bills are over $1 million now. He is bankrupt and is on Medicaid. He’s uninsurable at any price. He has lost his home and has basically nothing because the government will not let you have any assets and be on Medicaid. His transplant rejection drugs are $6,000 per month.
I hope you will not give up fighting the insurance company. Tell them you want to appeal it, and go as far as you can up the ladder. Contact the Insurance Commissioner of your state. Contact your state representative and congressperson. Write a letter to your local paper. Call your local TV station and offer your story. When the chips are down, you do what you’ve got to do. Finally, ask the doctor if the pharmaceutical company has a plan to cover medicine for people in your situation. Don’t give up yet!
Report comment to moderator
Organ sales represents a huge growth market for China. Moral qualms should not present a barrier to the free market economy. Quite clearly there is a market and there are sellers, gov’t regulation only leads to a distortion in the market which will result in either over supply or unsatisfied demand. Once freedom has taken root, we can look at other ruthless oppression of the medical markets. At the present time, blood and plasma is barred from the international marketplace, again an instance where weak-minded liberals have imposed a barrier based on supposed moral interests. Once the international market is established, free trade will allow for specialization, efficiencies and economies of scale. Certain nations can take an unused resource and create wealth. Right now, the Congo is in the middle of what has been called the African World War; blood is being spilled yet noone is collecting and selling due to moral computations – what a waste. The blood and plasma industry can even be green — many Congolese can sell several times without side effects — blood is a renewable resource.
Capitalism is a wonderful system which allows all resources including our flesh and blood to part of the global economy. The simple fears of weak-kneed liberals should not stop the advancement of freedom.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!