Regard their suffering
I’ve been reading Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s prison letters. It is striking, how he integrated a painful realism regarding the depravity of mankind, and in particular the Nazi regime that eventually murdered him, with an optimism that God’s providence, writ in miracles as well as nature, would overcome such evils. “I believe,” he wryly wrote, “that even our mistakes and shortcomings are turned to good account, and that it is no harder for God to deal with them than with our supposedly good deeds.”
Here was a man who was safely abroad, but chose to return to Germany under the conviction that pastors who did not endure with their people would be in no position to lead a restoration once Nazism was defeated. A Christian and therefore peaceful, he nonetheless conspired to kill Hitler. He wrestled with the responsibilities of a Christian man in the face of evil. As I consider my responses — and more grievously, my non-responses — to our present day’s evils, I find Bonhoeffer’s worldview illuminating:
“The ultimate question for a responsible man to ask is not how he is to extricate himself heroically from the affair, but how the coming generation is to live. It is only from this question, with its responsibility towards history, that fruitful solutions can come, even if for the time being they are very humiliating.”
In the end he came to know greater humiliation; on a drizzly day weeks before the war’s end, he was led from his cell, ordered to strip naked, and shot. It is edifying, therefore, to see how Bonhoeffer regarded his persecutors. In his letter titled “After Ten Years,” he wrote something that has convicted me, and subsequently grieved me as I think about how I and many of us in the church sometimes regard sinners:
“We must learn to regard people less in the light of what they do or omit to do, and more in the light of what they suffer. The only profitable relationship to others — and especially to our weaker brethren — is one of love, and that means the will to hold fellowship with them. God himself did not despise humanity, but became man for men’s sake”
I thought of this recently as I saw a car with a window sticker that read: NOTHING FAILS LIKE PRAYER
My instinct was to despise the car’s owner, but I thought about what Bonhoeffer wrote from his prison cell. It occurred to me, then, that perhaps the car’s owner is right. When your worldly options are exhausted, so that you cry to God for release from suffering, or for someone you love to be spared, and this pleading is met with apparent silence, maybe there is no greater sense of abandonment. Maybe there is nothing like a prayer that seems to have failed.
The car’s owner probably didn’t intend for it to be read that way. I pondered what suffering must lead a rational adult to spend time fastening six-inch high letters to his window that shout to God: You weren’t there for me. I considered the pain of suffering strangers and aliens, those who are stricken by the world, yet do not know God. Of course they would slap offensive slogans on their cars and bodies, and spit at the image of Christ, and busy themselves with distraction and self-destruction. Wouldn’t you or I, absent that still, small voice?
So instead of hating the car’s owner, I tried to regard him, as Bonhoeffer urged, in the light of his suffering. And then I prayed for him. Then I prayed thanks to God, for the pleadings answered and the pleadings denied, because in my striving with him he has been there. Even when I thought him absent, he was there. This, more than any immediate answer to my wants, is the blessing to which I cling.














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top17 Comments to “Regard their suffering”
Lots of conviction and food for thought here. Thank you, Tony. Thank you, Lord.
Report comment to moderator
Everyone applauds Bonhoeffer for plotting to kill Hitler, because of Hitler killing millions of Jews. But would they applaud someone who tried to assassinate George Bush for killing tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, innocent Iraqis?
Why is Hitler regarded as evil?
Because he was an imperialist who invaded several countries? No.
Because he killed six million Jews? No.
Hitler is regarded as evil because he lost the war. Had he won, we’d all be singing his praises on here every day, and comparing someone to Roosevelt would be the ultimate insult.
Nothing fails like prayer? That’s pretty much true. Of course, every day on WoW we read about answers to prayer for a cold to go away, or a sister in law to get a job, or for a boss to stop being so demanding, etc. We’re also told that our kid totaling the family car is “an answer to prayer”, by Andree. But if prayer really worked, then why is abortion still legal? Tens of millions of Christians have been praying for an end to abortion for decades now. Can anyone think of any other thing or issue that has more man hours of prayer devoted to is since 1980 or so? And yet abortion continues unabated, even though we’re told that God hates abortion, and that he delights in answering the prayers of his people.
Maybe the guy with the bumper sticker was a pro-lifer.
Report comment to moderator
Sir, All I can say is wow. Life is busy, kids are full of energy and I seem to be drained of it. My life requirements seem so demanding that I actually felt sorry for myself, that is until I read your thoughts on a true Saint.
Night Train, I have added you to my prayer list.
Happy Thanksgiving weekend to all!
Report comment to moderator
“Hitler is regarded as evil because he lost the war. Had he won, we’d all be singing his praises on here every day, and comparing someone to Roosevelt would be the ultimate insult.”
I marvel at how easy it is for you to say this… But it’s much harder to prove.
Report comment to moderator
Train,
I suspect you are right about the beatifying effects of power, although there are probably examples in history of victors who were later judged to be evil. There’s an interesting (to me) novel by Thomas Harris, titled Fatherland, set in a post-war Germany which has been victorious. Have you read it?
Regarding prayer, you’re touching on something that I have wrestled with since becoming a Christian. The Bible enjoins us to pray, and says that the prayers of a righteous man accomplish much, but it also describes a God who doesn’t need man’s counsel or assistance to move in the world.
But, you rightly note, it doesn’t seem logical to credit prayer with a cured cold, when millions of prayers have yet to lift the scourge of abortion. It would seem, in light of that reality, that we shouldn’t assign efficacy to our prayers. At the same time, Christ said that all things we pray for in faith will be granted. Some theologians thread the needle by arguing that it’s only the prayers that fit into God’s great design that will be granted, but that seems little different than saying that prayers aren’t answered, that we either pray for what God was going to do anyway (Look! An answered prayer!), or pray for something that is outside his will (an unanswered prayer, against which we bring out Romans 8:28 (”all things work together for good…”) to transform it into an answered prayer, of sorts).
It’s one of those mysteries which is especially challenging for those of us in the Reformed tradition, geeked up as we are about predestination.
Personally, I’ve experienced, on very rare occasions, miraculous answer to specific prayer. I’ve also experienced the heartbreak of desperate prayer unanswered. I can’t believe that any of it flows from anything I do, and yet I pray nonetheless, because when I pray I feel closest to this God who is at times distant and other times closer than breath. That’s just where I am, anyway. Others probably have different thoughts about this dilemma, I’m sure.
Report comment to moderator
Actually, Bush is nothing more than your elected president, even if you didn’t vote for him and Bush represents you – and nothing more. So, it was was really you who killed perhaps hundreds of thousands of poor poor innicen tpeople and I, for one, am holding you moperseanally accountable for their genocidal deaths. You are not a Night Trian. It seems you are a Nightmare instead. Perhaps, even Hitler would have been proud of you.
See how stupid you sound now?
Report comment to moderator
Had Hitler won, no true man with a chest would sing his praises. Fortunately men like Churchill, Eisenhower, and Patton did fight. 174,090 American warriors were killed in action fighting Hitler. Churchill for one expected to die, falling down, choking on his own blood had Hitler defeated Great Britain. Pastor Bonhoeffer did not die in vain.
As to the comparison of Bush and Hitler, that is an egregious travesty of the truth unworthy of a detailed response.
Report comment to moderator
In regard to Night Train’s comments, the grim science fiction writer Philip K. Dick wrote a science fiction “alternative history” book called The Man in the High Castle describing a world where the Axis won and the west lost.
Could have happened. There’s nothing inevitable about the “good guys” (as we like to think of ourselves) winning and the “bad guys” losing, until afterward, when we say “Wasn’t it brilliant of Eisenhower and MacArthur to win,” and wasn’t it brilliant of Reagan to defeat the Communists. Just like the movies; the good guys won.
I was born in 1944, near the end of World War II. I remember (dimly) the Korean War. Because of my wife having a baby, I was deferred from the Vietnam draft. My father helped put together Strategic Air Command bases to defend us against Russian bombers. Now, near the end of my life, we’re in an endless “War on Terror.” I ride a ferry to work which has been identified (by whomever studies such things) as the number one nautical terror target in the country.
My first guess of how I go will be to have a heart attack like my father. My second guess will be to go in a daze of Alzheimer’s like my mother and an aunt. Guess #3 is an unknown disease. (They run in my family also.) Guess #4 is to go with a bang as I ride the ferry. Made it this morning, though.
Report comment to moderator
Wow, Night Train, you really stepped in “it” on this thread, didn’t you! Do you really think the only thing Adolph Hitler did wrong was lose a war? And if he had in fact won WWII, do you think we’d be singing Hitler’s praises today — or would we in fact be continuing to fight against his oppressive and murderous regime?
Report comment to moderator
You’d be doing neither. You’d be home making beds and doing dishes, just as you are now, while your wife went out and did the man’s work.
Report comment to moderator
There’s an interesting (to me) novel by Thomas Harris, titled Fatherland, set in a post-war Germany which has been victorious. Have you read it?
No, I haven’t. Until quite recently, I read very little fiction. I’ll have to see if it’s that the library. Thomas Harris, huh? Don’t tell me Hitler comes back and starts eating people’s livers with fava beans?
Report comment to moderator
Night Train, that remark about what Outkast would be doing is of the vicious ad hominem variety. Knowing Outkast on this blog, I should be glad to fight with him in a foxhole in any war.
Report comment to moderator
No it isn’t. There’s no reason to suppose that things would be any different than they are today. Outkast, by his own admission, stays home and does dishes and makes bed while his wife it out earning their living. And he finds time to come on here and cheer Sarah Rode and her equally gender bending military career.
Imagine that. A man who lets his wife do the man’s work and support him while he stays home doing the woman’s work cheering a young lady who’s training for combat, and learning how to be a rifleMAN, and dressing like a man, and acting like a man, and leading men, in a military career. That’s sick, Peter. And you know it. You won’t have to worry about ever being in a foxhole with Outkast. Maybe Sarah Rode, but not Outkast. Some serve by fighting in foxholes. Others just watch FOX news.
Report comment to moderator
The premise of the Harris book, from what I recall, is a detective trying to solve a crime in Germany, who happens upon the cover-up of the Holocaust, and who therefore tries to get the word out before the authorities run him down. The theme confirms your point of view about Hitler being a universally regarded bad guy less because of his actions than because of his actions combined with the fact that he lost the war. In an interesting twist, the anti-semitic Joe Kennedy (patriarch of the Kennedy clan) is U.S. president, and has tacitly colluded in looking the other way regarding the Holocaust.
Report comment to moderator
Night Train, that remark about what Outkast would be doing is of the vicious ad hominem variety.
The more I think about this comment, the angrier I get. First off, Outkast is arguably the worst offender on here when it comes to ad hominem attacks. Second, Outkast and yourself both claim that we are right now in a battle for Western survival with the War on Terror. All that stands between us and the genocidal IslamoFASCISTS (you know, like the Nazis?) are the brave men and women in our military. Osama Bin Laden and his rabid followers are, according to you guys, hell bent on destroying the West and will stop at nothing to do it. And yet Outkast sits at home, blogging on here about doing dishes and making beds, while Sarah Rode goes off to fight the enemy, and even as our military is woefully short of manpower, and has to keep extending tours of duty for those who actually are fighting, and is having real trouble meeting recruiting goals. So where do you get off telling me that Outkast would be in a foxhole in a hypothetical war for American freedom? Because right now, with what you both describe as a war for American freedom actually going on, he’s home making beds and doing dishes, and cheering young ladies as they go off to war.
There’s nothing “vicious” about my post. It’s simply the observable and obvious truth.
Report comment to moderator
Night Train, I think you must have some kind of an issue with men as caregivers. Maybe it’s not what you consider “manly”, but it is very hard work. I applaud Outcast for being willing to do it.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t see the issue as men being caregivers. Of course they are, but they’re supposed to care by providing financially for the family. Men are not to be supported by their wives unless they’re incapacitated. God has given husbands and wives different roles.
I really don’t want to sound nasty, but I think it’s really sad that this kind of basic stuff has to be explained Christians. Do we really need to explain to Christians what it means to be a man and what it means to be a woman per creation? I shudder to think what else Christians will have to have explained to them over the next several years.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!