“Introducing Children to Masterpieces”
While we’re on the subject of art and masterpieces (see Thriller post, below), you might like this piece from Humanities, the magazine of the National Endowment for the Humanities: “Introducing Children to Masterpieces.” This is my favorite paragraph:
It would have been easy for Rembrandt to depict the growing prosperity of the Dutch Republic during the seventeenth century. A number of Dutch painters of the time made a handsome living doing so. But he refused to limit his interest to those who could pay for his services. While many Dutch towns became the envy of Europe for their efficient removal of beggars and other indigents from central areas, Rembrandt extended his artistic sympathy to people who pled for scraps and the spare coins of the well-to-do. Those who lived on the fringes of society were not without dignity and were worthy of inclusion in art.
Now, this isn’t really what the Humanities article is about, but it reminds me: Rembrandt was a believer. His faith and belief in the incarnation and value of the physical body and dignity of humankind were elemental in his painting. He painted real people doing real things in a real world, and he painted himself crucifying Christ. This might come off as kitsch nowadays, but it sure don’t look like it from here.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top13 Comments to ““Introducing Children to Masterpieces””
Read Dickins’ Christmas Carol to your family this season!
Report comment to moderator
Let the magesty of Handel’s Messiah fill the halls of your home.
Report comment to moderator
Remember that the Bible is the greatest artistic masterpiece of all, and share it with your children early and often.
Report comment to moderator
My 8 year old bought a Calvin and Hobbes book over the weekend and can’t put it down.
Report comment to moderator
Michelangelo’s Pieta is a really good masterpiece for children to learn from. I believe it was the first piece of art I really “saw”. I don’t mean, just looked at, but the first one that made me feel awe.
I remember asking my mom why Mary was so big and she said she didn’t know what I was talking about. She couldn’t see it. That’s how skillful the work of art is. Most people don’t even notice it. If Mary stood up, she would be nearly half a body length larger than the Jesus. Add the expression of both and the incredible amount of detail. To me, it’s the finest piece of sculptor in existence.
What is even more amazing? Michelangelo used to sculpt many of his works from the top down. They would look like milk slowly being drained out of a large container while revealing the statue within. The legacy he left is amazing. If he were alive today, Fred Phelps would picket him. Funny.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/Michelangelo%27s_Pieta_5450_cropncleaned.jpg
Report comment to moderator
sculptor – > scuplture
Report comment to moderator
When our boys were young, I insisted they visit art museums. They carried a list of ten things they had to find in the museum, and then had to identify the painting and the artist. (Find a white horse, find a picture with a dog, find a painting of the Virgin Mary and baby Jesus, tell us the Bible story in a painting).
Once they found all ten, or half an hour had gone past, they were free to go outside and play football on the lawn with their father while I took my time.
It made me laugh the first time one of the boys told me he had taken a date to an art museum . . .
If you make it fun, they’ll enjoy it.
Report comment to moderator
Rdean,
Thanks for the lovely discription. It was the Chagall windows the first time I really “saw” as you described and felt that awe. That first seeing sort of opened up the rest of that world.
Report comment to moderator
For me, laying on the pews of the Vatican was almost a religious experience. They had just cleaned up the ceiling mural to its original look.
I take my daughter to the art museums on a frequent basis. She enjoys the Group of Seven and the Impressionist. I just attended Hansel and Gretel: The Opera with her. She loved it and was singing in the shower when she came home.
She also has a huge Calvin and Hobbes collection.
Report comment to moderator
I’m fortunate to be walking distance from the Rothko Chapel, which (lit completely by natural light) is a different place each time I visit. Some time I want to go in the middle of a rain storm.
Report comment to moderator
sculptor – > scuplture
Funny that you wrote that.
No, not that you have a spelling error in correcting your spelling error, but the similarity to
Creator -> creation
is ironic.
Report comment to moderator
Michelle, What a brilliant tactic!
I used to take my children and my nephews to the Chicago Art Institute. I’d have them sit in front of an impressionistic piece with paper and crayons and try to copy it or draw something of there own inspired by the painting.
Then we’d go to the realists, then contemporary, then modern, etc.
It’s one of my favorite places in the world, but None of them have thought about going to an art museum on a date. That’s a great date.
Report comment to moderator
My wife has a fine arts degree so our children can’t avoid the classics.
When we lived in the city we spent a lot of time in museums. It’s good to start early and go often so children are brought up knowing how to behave there; I was amazed when other parents told me they couldn’t bring their children to museums. What a pity.
I just finished reading a history of the Medici (CF Young – excellent). It has given me a much deeper understanding of Renaissance art.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!