Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!
An 'urgency': Sensing threats to institutions of society, church leaders make declaration 
Click to Print
Include Comments
The ravages of sin
Christmas is a time for rejoicing. But we should also remember the pain in the world for which the Savior came.
In WORLD’s special year-end issue, Marvin Olasky reviews several books that bring alive the tragic histories of Naziism and communism, as well as past and current horrors of the slave trade.
Topic: Books, WorldMagBlog
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
back to top19 Comments to “The ravages of sin”
The lack of publicity given to the ongoing huge problem of slavery in the 21st century reveals a pernicious selectivity being used by the mainstream media.
They operate with a race-gender-class template and they cannot get out of it. And it is fine-tuned in their minds so that if the slavers and culprits are not white Christians (and they are not), it’s simply not news.
This is why I find WORLD mag to be more objective and balanced than most of the MSM. Not that it is fully balanced, but it is certainly MORE balanced.
Thank you to Olasky for this review of sources.
Report comment to moderator
TULIP does start with “total depravity” after all.
Report comment to moderator
The points that Olasky makes and Joel cites are valid about the present day world are valid.
Both are disingenuous in their selective reading of the history of Christianity. I am still interested in a reasonably objective historical portrayal of how Christianity evolved from a time when Christians killed each other with a fervor similar to how Shia and Sunnis (and a few other sects) do today.
Doubt I will find it at World or among its resident apologists. Nevertheless, good on Christianity for pulling its act together to a considerable extent. One of these days…
Well, never mind.
Report comment to moderator
KRM,
Indeed it does. Genesis 6:5 “The Lord saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become on the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of the human heart was only evil all the time.” (TNIV)
If it even says so in the latest PC translation (I generally use the ESV), I guess we should take it seriously.
Report comment to moderator
Sin has guaranteed atrocity throughout the ages, yet most human hearts naturally rail against such evil. Should we not be totally accustomed to evil by this point in history? I guess this is what is meant by common grace and the law written on the heart. Let us forge forward in fighting against such evil systems because:
The Kingdom of this world shall one day become the Kingdom of the Lord and of his Christ. And He shall reign forever and ever.
Report comment to moderator
Random – Christianity did not evolve from Christians fervently kill others – Christianity had been around for more than a thousand years when it fell into a (relatively brief) period of internal warfare. Now, Islam started out bloody, and has remained that way.
Janie – I am an ESV fan too.
Just so that others aren’t misled by a slight ambiguity in your comment, the ESV is NOT a PC translation.
Report comment to moderator
There’s a huge difference between claiming to be communists and actually carrying out communism. WORLD writers would do well to learn the simple difference, though I gave up on Olasky ever learning long ago.
Report comment to moderator
KRM,
Thanks for clarifying that–the TNIV is the PC one.
Report comment to moderator
#6 KRM
Thank you for your comment.
Your post may be a fair defense of Christianity, though I suspect “(relatively brief) period of internal warfare” is still being a little generous to yourselves.
I am not a “water carrier” for Islam so I don’t feel a great urge to defend the religion or its historical behavior or beliefs in comparison to Christianity.
My comments about the violence in the history of Christianity is not an accusation that “Christianity is evil.”
I am dubious (and not the only person here who feels this way)
1. That Christianity’s claims about divinity are true.
2. That Christianity’s claims about representing “good” to a higher degree than other groups holds up as well as most people here think they do, though such arguments are difficult to evaluate.
Report comment to moderator
Random _ I fully believe Christianity’s claims to being the one true Trith to be valid and correct. However, I fully acknowledge that Christians are still far from perfect, error prone sinners who frequently do not well live out Christianity (and organized religious is very frequently badly off target).
As to the “relatively brief” appelation, I look at it as a few hundred years out of a couple of thousand.
I ask you this – what other belief system has, over a preiod of no less than a couple of hundred years, been more beneficial to mankind than Christianity?
Report comment to moderator
#10 KRM
Thank you for your reply.
There are two arguments for religious belief:
It is true.
It is good for us.
These arguments are often conflated together, to make them look stronger.
At the start, Judeo-Christianity starts with a myth: human life began with Adam and Eve. As a metaphor, it has some power: I do believe “fallen” describes human beings fairly well. As an inspiration, I find the belief that all human beings are being punished for the failure of an original pair, unattractive. Given abundant evidence of human evolution, this is not a good start for convincing me Christians have a lock on truth, and reading thousands of messages arguing uphill against evolution and for historical claims for Biblical truth over several years on wmb have not persuaded me Christians are in possession of truth about the nature of reality.
If it is not true, than arguing that Christianity is good for us becomes very cynical. As I’ve mentioned, I suspect there are many conservatives–Karl Rove comes to mind–who seem to act as if they think Christianity is a useful myth. If this is true (and I don’t know if it is or not), you are being played for fools by some of your leaders and idols.
In any case, your argument what other belief system has, over a period of no less than a couple of hundred years, been more beneficial to mankind than Christianity? seems to be an argument for “grading on a curve.”
I am not much of a follower or a believer in any “system” that claims to provide guidance on how human society should conduct itself, and as I have gotten older, I have become less of one. One of the books I am reading right now is a history of genocide through the ages. Joseph Conrad summed it up succinctly in Heart of Darkness: The horror! The horror!
I follow Voltaire’s advice in my old age. I cultivate my garden, though I stomp and slice slugs and shoot bunnies with my air rifle.
Most people I know (including Christians) love their children; I think our socio-biological instincts drive our behavior and inspire meaning for us. My granddaughter (though not genetically related) and her two mommies are coming to visit us on the island today. I expect to be cheered up. After a little bout of being a JD at preschool, I hear she is behaving better again.
The history of Christianity strikes me as much less edifying than you find it. Our mileage does vary. Although I have encountered many pleasant people at wmb, as a group, conservative Christians do not make an impressive impression. For example, while I do not argue that Christians “oppress” homosexuals, their words and demeanor about gay people are excessive to any problems they may cause and do not reflect well on your group.
Also, Christianity seems to do best when it is most oppressed; when it gains power, it makes a mess of things, just like all the other groups. The last eight years have been a typical example. However, I don’t think the point has really hit home yet. I am tempted to vote for Huckabee. It would be painful indeed if he were elected, but I think conservative Christians should be forced to clean up the mess they are leaving.
I do not believe that there are “absolute [moral] values” in the universe, but on a daily basis, I act as if there are.
In a similar fashion, I am not sure I believe in “grading on a curve.” If Christianity is the best belief system humans have ever come up with, I would still give it a “D” at best.
Report comment to moderator
Joel
There you go again. There have been many documentaries and news stories but they call it trafficking nowadays.
Report comment to moderator
Random – “I do not believe that there are “absolute [moral] values” in the universe, but on a daily basis, I act as if there are.”
Do you not see this as fairly flawed thinking? I don’t believe in “x” but I will pretend to do so on a moment by moment basis? Why would you consciously decide to live a lie? If you can’t live on a daily basis without absolutes, then perhaps you ought to accept that they exist (at which point you might start to look at identifying them).
“In a similar fashion, I am not sure I believe in “grading on a curve.” If Christianity is the best belief system humans have ever come up with, I would still give it a “D” at best.”
I think that the philosophical/theological foundation of Christianity is comelingly stronger than any other system I have looked at (and I’ve looked at many). It explains everything – even why people do so poorly (remember, Christians as as flawed as everyone else – we simply have the unearned and undeserved gift of grace and a chance to do better with our lives – over the full course of our lives – than those without that gift; our individual milages, as you might say, varies considerably).
Report comment to moderator
CoyoteBlue,
Good point and I think it adds to my point in a powerful way.
I wish you a merry Christmas or happy holiday, however you celebrate it. Take care.
Report comment to moderator
#13 …see this as fairly flawed thinking?
I consider it as part of the pain of being alive in a difficult world.
I don’t believe one can “reason one’s way” to an infallible and impregnable ethical system.
A shortcut is to say that “God gave you one.”
Then people “prove it is the voice of God” by latching on to questionable claims, such as the Garden of Eden.
The argument about slavery is an example of where Christians have struggled. At one time people who considered themselves perfectly good Christians kept slaves. Other people who were against slavery considered black people inferior and advocated sending them back to Africa.
Newton the slave captain who became a Christian and then had the “slapped self” alongside the side of head moment and said, “I should not be doing this.”
And so on. Secularists such as myself struggle to be ethical and lead meaningful lives.
Christians such as yourself adjust your Christianity and behavior and struggle to be moral and lead meaningful lives, while all the while claiming you are following eternal truths and perhaps just discovering how to follow them better.
As Night Train points out, the day will probably come when you work yourself around to learning to live with homosexual people (without trying to deny them the opportunity to live in relationships and families while denying you changed anything in your eternal values).
Report comment to moderator
Random – Without a belief in absolutes, how can one really struggle to be “ethical”?
What is ethical without absolutes? You can dial up anything you want without absolutes, as can anyone else,
You seem to think slavery is wrong, but how can you say so without absolutes? Without absolutes, if you oppose slavery, you shouldn’t own one but can’t criticize anyone else who does own a slave (or many slaves).
Report comment to moderator
Joel
Merry Christmas to you — Hope your Christmas eve service is something truly special this year and that the congregants come away feeling renewed.
Report comment to moderator
KRM, “ethical” only refers to one living out the beliefs of one’s moral system. A relativist who lived his or her life according to the tenets of relativism would be just as ethical as someone living out his or her life according to the tenets of Christianity.
Report comment to moderator
#16 KRM
I am currently reading Garry Wills’s book Head and Heart Jon Rowe has mentioned this book also. Garry Wills is an unorthodox Catholic and an interesting historian.
There is much of interest in this book. As an immediate reaction to your message about absolutes, I was stirred by the beginning of Will’s book where he describes the hanging of Mary Dyer in 1660: A Quaker woman in her 40s, the mother of six.
Her crime was refusing to stop preaching in Massachusetts. They had taken her to be hung previously along with two younger Quaker men. The Puritans didn’t want to hang her. They forced her to watch the hanging of the other Quakers, in the hope it would convince her to repent and at least stop preaching (and stay in Rhode Island with her husband).
She continued to return to Massachusetts and to preach. Eventually the Puritans thought they had no other choice but to hang her, which they did six months later.
There is much more that is disturbing about this historical event that Wills covers in more detail than I can here.
The Protestant Puritans believed they were acting on the basis of their absolute values.
I have said, that the purpose of conservative Christians and people of various other flavors talking to each other should be to make each other uneasy.
I am uneasy about the problems of an ethics that is not based upon absolute values from God.
I think conservative Christians should be uneasy about how Christian belief in knowing absolute values led them to actions such as the hanging of a Quaker woman who insisted on speaking her mind, and many other disturbing actions by Christians over the centuries and to this day.
You are courteous in speaking to me, which is one of the reasons I continue this conversation. There are courteous people here and people who are not courteous in their postings. I weary of those who are not, and shortly I will cease to post sarcastically to them (which may or may not be as discourteous on my part as I find them in their communication to me).
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!