And I’m sorry that you took offense.
I probably should have used a different lettered word.

Report comment to moderator

She is a woman who is totally out of control, but lets not call anyone this kind of name. Certainly you all have more self control than she does? Yes or NO?

You choose

Report comment to moderator

Report comment to moderator

But see that’s the point. What you say here is a regrettable, but true, fact of history.

“The inevitable logic of the liberal position is to be for treason,” is a vicious slander against a group that comprises close to half of your fellow Americans.

I appreciate you make a distinction between the leaders (evil) and the followers (dupes), but I don’t see that your heroine does.

“But here’s the real problem with Ann’s extremist rhetoric of calling people who diagree with her a “traitors”:

Hmmm.
It seems you also, have the problem of making claims that just aren’t true. Find me a quote where she says those who don’t agree with her are traitors.

She doesn’t agree with liberals, and “The inevitable logic of the liberal position is to be for treason.”

Ergo, people who don’t agree with her (politically) are traitors.

Report comment to moderator

You said it…I didn’t, nor would I.
In fact, I think it takes a serious resolve to seek out actual “truth”. I don’t think that people who are inclined to vote for liberals are idiots..just grossly misinformed.
I wouldn’t call someone an idiot who believes what the vast majority of sources of information say is true. I would just ask that people double-check there sources. Check out both sides of an opinion, before making a judgment.

“But here’s the real problem with Ann’s extremist rhetoric of calling people who diagree with her a “traitors”:

Hmmm.
It seems you also, have the problem of making claims that just aren’t true. Find me a quote where she says those who don’t agree with her are traitors.

“1. It calls for some sort of action against the accused.”
Yeah, we call that voting where I come from. ”

After all, one cannot let traitors to live among us freely”

(sigh)
There you go again…getting all emotional.
No one is threatening you. We’d just prefer that our leaders be conservative…that’s all

“2. It puts upon the accuser the responsibility of offering up proof, or a retraction.”

But she does offer proof for her “claims” (as opposed to observations)

“3. When one jumps straight to calling people “traitors” simply because they disagree with them, one loses all credibility. It’s akin to calling the weatherman a “liar” simply because he was one degree off on his prediction of the temperature”

No…It’s not akin to that at all. In fact I don’t see where you’re coming from with tht analogy, at all.

“Calling a person a “traitor” leaves no room for dialogue”

Spying for communists leaves no room for dialouge.
A lot of our countrymen were, and are (under different circumstances than the commies were) traitors.

P.S.
I always cheer for the good guys.

Report comment to moderator

All of the leaders of the Democrats are traitors, not all of the people who elected them. (All the people who elected them are merely idiots.)

Well, that makes all of the difference in the world Mr. Meaner!

Not!

Personally, I think Ann does what she does because she found a “niche” that gives her lots of attention and money. Only a person with some serious mental issues would be able to believe her own rhetoric. But, I could be wrong – she could be seriously unhinged.

But here’s the real problem with Ann’s extremist rhetoric of calling people who diagree with her a “traitors”:

1. It calls for some sort of action against the accused. After all, one cannot let traitors to live among us freely.

2. It puts upon the accuser the responsibility of offering up proof, or a retraction. (Ann does neither, she just keeps screaching “traitor!”).

3. When one jumps straight to calling people “traitors” simply because they disagree with them, one loses all credibility. It’s akin to calling the weatherman a “liar” simply because he was one degree off on his prediction of the temperature.

4. Calling a person a “traitor” leaves no room for dialogue. When we resort to calling our fellow countrymen “traitors” for disagreeing with us, it short-circuits all civil discourse. As history shows us well, the next step us usually violence and people taking up arms against each other.

Cheering for Ann Coulter when she calls people “traitors” is like cheering when a football player from the other team is seriously injured. It shows a total lack of class.

Report comment to moderator

that’s all

just…heh

Report comment to moderator

Never does. She is very judgmental and full of hate.

Report comment to moderator

(I hope you all stood for the national anthem!)

Report comment to moderator

because they wanted us out of Iraq before ‘08, so their president wouldn’t have to deal with it.
That’s why you’re seeing some back-track now. They realize that in Jan ‘08 there will still be troops in Iraq.
Some of them now actually appear to be willing to make progrss in Iraq. Shameful…but, better late than never.

Report comment to moderator