The recycling myth
Sweden is about as close as socialists will get to Utopia. The country is often held up as the paragon of what all civilized nations should be, particularly when it comes to climate change and why governments should force their citizens to recycle. In Sweden, you have to recycle just about everything, and this can take a lot of time.
So what do you do with your waste? Most homes have a number of trash bins for different kinds of trash: batteries in one; biodegradables in one; wood in one; colored glass in one, other glass in another; aluminum in one, other metals in another; newspapers in one, hard paper in another, and paper that doesn’t fit these two categories in a third; and plastic of all sorts in another collection of bins. The materials generally have to be cleaned before thrown away – milk cartons with milk in them cannot be recycled just as metal cans cannot have too much of the paper labels left.
Per Bylund, the Swede (and American Ph.D. student) who wrote the article, says that the success story of recycling in Sweden is really just a myth, and he tells us why. This post isn’t slinging mud at well-intended governments. It’s slinging mud at well-intended governments that obfuscate information about their coercive policies meant for the greater good.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top14 Comments to “The recycling myth”
Big socialist government at it’s best. When the most socialist papers start talking in capitalist terms, it’s time to rethink the situation….
Report comment to moderator
Here in liberal Sonoma County you cannot throw away batteries, and yet they have not come up with what you are supposed to do with them other than drive to the transfer station which will accept them. That’s a 17 mile, one way, drive for me to dispose of one AA battery.
I store them up in a plastic bag marked “dead batteries” and then take them on vacation with me and throw them away at the airport. Ridiculous.
My husband points out that unless you make it simple, people are not going to go to the trouble. I’ve been recycling paper, plastic, cans, etc. for nearly 30 years. We now have curbside recycling, which is great though it’s hard for me to throw everything into one bin.
It’s hard to believe they make any money on this, but we’re well trained out here.
Report comment to moderator
Think I mentioned this before but years ago entrepeneur son at around ten had a recycling business. Using his wagon he marched around the neighborhood collecting recyclables, sorted, rinsed, stomped etc. When he had a garage full, we transported his stuff to the nearest recycling center (not really very far) and he quickly learned that for all his effort he usually lost money on the fuel to get there.
As for us here now, we compost all compostables including newspaper. We burn burnables. We reuse what we can. The two girls are making their old jeans into quilts as we speak. The nearest recycling center is nowhere near here.
Report comment to moderator
Facts are very stubborn things. This program in Sweden apparently doesn’t work, no matter how much the government promotes it or forces it on the citizens. I’d be pretty put out with a program that cost me more and more, required more and more effort and expense on my part, and that caused trash to pile up and vermin to thrive. Even if I thought recycling was a good idea!
Report comment to moderator
Kyle A, governments don’t deal with facts, just programs.
Report comment to moderator
I live in a planned community. After I pay the redemption fee for plastic/aluminum containers at the store, I have to pay a monthly fee to have recyclables hauled away, even if I take the bottles and cans to a center.
Report comment to moderator
I collect my used batteries in a small box. It takes a few years for it to get full, then I take it to work where they have a battery collection bucket.
Our Cub Scout troop took a tour of our local waste transfer station recently. The recycling part was particularly interesting. I remember when recycling programs only accepts #1 and #2 plastics, but it seems here they take everything. They have a gigantic machine that crunches all that plastic into a big cube. And the manager showed us the variety of stuff that gets made from the plastic, from carpet to decking material to parts of jackets.
She’s working on getting curbside recycling, and unit-based fees (so that you pay for the trash and recycling you actually produce, not an average assigned equally to every household.) I’ll certainly be happy to have curbside recycling – I have bags of plastic, bags of cans, bags of glass, and piles of cardboard waiting for me to get around to going to a dropoff point.
Report comment to moderator
We don’t have curbside recycling or municipal trash pickup here. For trash, you can hire a private, town-approved trash hauler or do pay-per-bag at the town transfer station. (We pay by the bag and try to compost food waste to cut down on trash.)
Recycling can be taken to the dump or to one of two or three drop-off locations around town. The drop-off spots have single-sort recycling now. That means plastics #1-#7, cans, paperboard, newspapers, magazines, paper, cardboard, etc. can all go into the container together. Containers should be rinsed and crushed, but labels are okay. So that’s pretty easy. We just have a hard time getting everything into the car to take it away! Out town is growing, population-wise, but is recycling enough that we’re actually producing less solid waste from year to year.
Maine also has a bottle return – pay your 5-cent deposit when you buy soda, bottled water, beer, etc., and get your money back when you take the empties to a bottle return place. Our town has collection boxes set up at the dump and recycling places so people can donate cans and bottles to the community services agency. Not a bad system, really.
Report comment to moderator
Harrison writes: This post isn’t slinging mud at well-intended governments. It’s slinging mud at well-intended governments that obfuscate information about their coercive policies meant for the greater good.
Oh, you mean……..like our goverment?
Just think, if this nation elects a true, blue liberal like Hillary, Obama, or John McCain, it’ll get alot worse.
Report comment to moderator
I’m familiar with sorting trash, having lived months at a time in Germany over the past 15 years, where my daughter grew up. My take on this half-backed rant from a right-wing website is, more power to you, go back Sweden, run for office, and abolish municipal trash collection. Then eliminate the law against defecation in public. If there’s no market-based incentive to requiring citizens to use toilets, government shouldn’t disregard the inconvenience, the lost time, as well as the accidents people suffer while attempting to find the Klo.
Parents in Germany get mad at their kids for not coming home on time, but they don’t get scared. I think the behavior of not polluting the well does good in all kinds of ways. Here in America, I’ve spent hours picking up trash along the road in front of my house. People even litter while I’m out there — maybe it was some of you!
I seriously doubt that Sweden prohibits people from getting their trash picked up by private contractors. My guess is that private contractors look at what they have to do to the trash and calculate they can’t compete.
Report comment to moderator
Harrison should sling some of his mud at a man who preserved the vernacular wisdom that animates these good intentions . . .
Viel hände machen leicht arbeit (o. Werk). Luther
. . . not to mention the “coercive policies meant for the greater good.”
Viel Hände und wenig Köpfe gewinnen die Schlacht.
Talk about elitism!
Report comment to moderator
Has anyone asked why municipal pickup started in the first place? Just go to a third world country and see what a lack of pickup looks like. So, the overburdened trash system is going to start overburdening the health care system soon. I bet public dumping becomes a problem very soon in certain parts of Sweden, especially in areas where the culture of conformity is not as ingrained.
BTW, this is a profitable system. You have mandated fees that seem to increase every year, and service that is cut every year. Sounds like a classic embezzlement scheme to me. Plus, you have an extortion racquet of secret police checking your trash for verboten goods.
Report comment to moderator
The socialist mindset generally ignores a lot of human nature – other than the evental use of coercive force to gain compliance with ‘what central planning determines is good for us’.
Report comment to moderator
This is about the most strategic missile I’ve seen HARRISON launch from this blog — a preemptive strike! Whether calculated or intuitive, the twist he puts on his argument is deadly.
Harrison is accusing a social-democratic government of hiding responsibility for its marginal products (in this instance, the futility of enforced work). Evasion of accountability is not just one failing out of many. It happens to be the cardinal vice of capitalism to deny responsibility for the marginal products of its system by assigning moral blame. (Thus, Olasky makes a career out of blaming the poor.) Harrison attributes to socialism the evil that is most characteristic of capitalism.
Harrison’s missile strikes me as the kind of argument he’ll use again. This time it’s a dud, because everyone who has had to obey the rules of Euro trash, without asking why, already knows how burdensome it is, and doesn’t need a Swedish economist to come clean with the data. The dust-heap drudges also know that recycling is a lot more than just a way of getting rid of garbage. Anyway, when Harrison comes up with something like this again, and the strategic reply will be: People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!