Movies: The rat that got ripped off
It was ranked by many critics as one of the year’s best films, receiving a higher score at Metacritic.com than any film nominated this year for best picture. Although it garnered five Oscar nominations, it was never considered a serious contender for best picture honors. Why? Because “Ratatouille” is an animated work.
Its five nominations rank as the most ever for a computer animated film, and rate second among all animated films, only surpassed by the six received by Disney’s “Beauty and the Beast.” That picture, done in the traditional Disney style in 1991, stands as the only animated film to ever be nominated for best picture.
If not for the best animated feature category, it’s safe to say “Ratatouille” would have been strongly considered for best picture. Brad Lewis, the film’s producer, is quick to point out that he has no sour grapes with the academy — and that he’s ecstatic about the five widespread nominations.
Still, he has to wonder.
“Ultimately, it makes it perhaps too convenient for people to look at an animated film from an isolated perspective,” said Lewis. “Somebody can say, ‘You know what? We have a place for that, so we don’t necessarily have to give it broader consideration.’ “
According to columnist Tom O’Neil, “It’s folly to have a separate animated category because it hurts the chances of a movie like ‘Ratatouille’ for being in the best picture race.” But do animated films really deserve an equal shot at earning the title of best picture?




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top16 Comments to “Movies: The rat that got ripped off”
Has this come up before. Animated films have been around for a long time, and I don’t recall any controversy before now.
If they were to give animated films a shot at “best picture,” then would there be a separate category for life-action features? I think that that people who make animated films actually have an advantage by having a separate category–otherwise they would almost never have a shot at getting an Oscar for their films at all.
Report comment to moderator
I think the “Best Actor” award should come from an animated film.
Report comment to moderator
Oscar has a bunch of weird rules. For instance, how come “The Lord of the Rings” won best picture when it was shot entirely in New Zealand? Shouldn’t it have been “Best Foreign Film”?
In reality, “best picture” is available to any film shot in English, no matter what country it’s from.
And what about that category of “Best Foreign Language Film”? This is basically “Best film in a language other than English”. This really knocks out a lot of great movies from the top categories.
For instance, “Pan’s Labyrinth” should have been a shoo-in for best picture last year, but it was in Spanish.
Go figure.
Report comment to moderator
I liked the movie, but “rip-off” wouldn’t be a word I’d choose when describing how it didn’t win best picture… It wasn’t that good.
Report comment to moderator
Isn’t there a big difference between a human actor making the moves of the character, incluidng the emotions (not just the voice) that make it quite different from an animated version of a character? They’re different kinds of movies, so I vote for two categories.
Report comment to moderator
John M:
Best Foreign Film, at least at the Oscars, IS Best Foreign Language Film. They’re not two separate categories. And whether it’s eligible for Best Motion Picture or not is largely dependent on where the money comes from, though the criteria is still kind of nebulous. (This is why “Diving Bell and the Butterfly” didn’t get nominated for either Best Film or Best Foreign Language Film – It’s in French, but the director is American, and the money came from all over the place.)
NJLawyer:
The Best Film Oscar actually goes to the producers, which means that it’s an award to the whole, not just the actors or the production designer or director . . . etc. So whether it took a lot of acting prowess is somewhat irrelevant – though obviously, good acting is a contributor, because the producers technically hire the actors and often are the ones to bring them on to the project.
Report comment to moderator
Chas:
I think the Simpsons gave out an award at the Emmys for Best Actor once
Report comment to moderator
The line between “live action” and “animated” is pretty blurry these days. An awful lot of what we saw in the Lord of the Rings or the Chronicals of Narnia is computer generated.
Report comment to moderator
John M:
In re-reading your comment, maybe that’s what you meant?
Yes, I agree the Oscars are a bit messed up. They’ve had some bad exclusions this year. Basically, I’m going to be watching for Jon Stewart.
Report comment to moderator
Alissa, aren’t they producing two very different products when they have a film with real people and a film with animated characters? At least, I think they are.
Report comment to moderator
NJLawyer: They’re different kinds of movies, but the Best Picture category doesn’t specify best live action movie … I don’t have a great problem with animated movies being excluded, but I can see an argument for why they shouldn’t be.
Actually, “Best Picture” does seem to have some unwritten rules. It never goes to “genre” films (science fiction, fantasy, horror) … The Return of the King won in 2003, but it seems to be the only one that ever has. Musicals win sometimes, and so do history-based period pieces, but not anything with fantasy elements other than singing and dancing.
There are not a lot of comedies on the list either, though there are a few. Serious, weighty realistic drama seems to be what the academy favors.
Report comment to moderator
I can see the argument. Brad Bird has yet to make a bad movie, and in fact several of his films probably could’ve passed for Best Picture material if they’d been live-action. Heck, I’m of the opinion that The Iron Giant is the best animated film I’ve ever seen, and it’s definitely better than American Beauty (which won the Best Picture & Best Director nods the year it came out).
Report comment to moderator
Alissa, I actually did realize they were the same category, I guess my post was a little disorganized.
That’s interesting about the backers’ nationality though. Hmmm…
Report comment to moderator
The missus and I went to see “No Country for Old Men” last evening. The ending is a little quirky, but the more I thought about it (and the movie as a whole), I loved it. We don’t see a lot of movies in the theaters, but this one will be hard to beat. I checked on the villain in the film, Javier Bardem, and he’s won just about every best supporting actor award to this point he could possibly win. One reviewer called him the most memorable screen villain since Hannibal Lector. Not a bad comparison, except he has better table manners.
Report comment to moderator
SteveG, # 11: Would you consider a movie like “Silence of the Lambs” to be a “horror” film? Or what about westerns as genre films? At least two in recent memory have won Oscars for Best Picture (”Unforgiven” and “Dances with Wolves”), although both were genre-busting westerns to a certain extent.
Just asking.
Report comment to moderator
But do animated films really deserve an equal shot at earning the title of best picture?
Yes. And I’m sure it’d be quite possible for a film to be simultaneously nominated for Best Animation and Best Picture because…
John M. #3: For instance, “Pan’s Labyrinth” should have been a shoo-in for best picture last year, but it was in Spanish.
Actually, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon was nominated for Best Picture and Best Foreign Language Film, so it is definitely possible to get nods in two “Best Film” categories.
And if “Best Foreign Language/Best Picture” is possible, then wouldn’t it seem plausible that “Best Animation/Best Picture” could also be possible? Just a thought.
The assumption that Ratatouille missed out on a Best Picture nom because it’s an animation may, I say ‘may’, be premature.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!