Tacit theologies II
Another tacit theological belief I catch myself indulging is the notion that being extra-good will entice God to give me good stuff. Much as I despise Prosperity Doctrine, I preach it to myself at times. I’ll be diligent in prayer not because I want communion, but because I want a better job, or a relationship to be healed. I begin to tell myself that I have work to do, in order to get what I think I need from God. It’s just one of many ways we find to diminish Him, by making him a spiritual vending machine.
In times of fear I revert to the flip-side of this theology, imagining that if I don’t behave better, some dread sword poised over my neck will drop. My sick child will get worse. I’ll get fired from that job I complain about so often, but actually happen to need. So here I come again, quarter in my hand, to the Maker of heaven and earth, to drop in the slot and punch in my order. I beg and plead on my knees, and if anyone were to witness it he might well conclude that I am an earnest-hearted Christian. But what is going on, likely as not, is that I am acting on the false notion that I can, through dint of hard spiritual work, make God do my will.
It’s difficult, because there is the Biblical talk of blessings and curses. We certainly see them in the natural realm: lusts of the flesh (and I include here more than just the sexual ones) frequently destroy that same flesh, as well as the heart and mind hidden beneath it. But one could easily conclude that aside from natural consequences, God is supernaturally meting out additional punishments and rewards based on our conduct. I suppose that’s possible, even likely. But it works according to a mystery that is beyond me. This is why Donald Trump has a Mercedes-Benz SLR, and my pastor has a Ford. It’s why the Apostles were tortured and murdered almost to a man, while many a wicked person has lived high on the hog and died comfortably in his bed. When one surveys the sweep of history, it’s hard to hold to the notion that the physical things one receives supernaturally from God, in this life, are determined by one’s actions.
His purposes, after all, are greater than our immediate wants, which is insanity to the non-Christian, and perhaps to many a Christian as well. We are caught up in the great sweep of a history He shapes, and some of us are prospered while others are ground into dust. What fascinates me is that the latter are sometimes the ones praising Him the most earnestly. The faithful life, it seems, and in particular, prayer, has nothing whatsoever to do with getting a satisfactory result out of God, and everything to do with clinging so close to God that we can pass through the worst this world has to offer without losing the deep-seated sense that we are children in the hands of a loving Father.
Sometimes, when I pray, I actually remember this. Sometimes the sun settles on my skin, or I hear the laughter of my children, and I remember. And thankfully, He forgives me when I forget.
Here is a link to Tony’s first post in this series: “Tacit theologies.”

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top16 Comments to “Tacit theologies II”
Well, he does tell us to pray “give us this day our daily bread”. But how much bread do we ask for? Just enough to avoid starvation? Enough to become bread-selling millionaires? Where does one cross the line from that to prosperity doctrine?
Report comment to moderator
Paraphrased verses below:
—————————————————
The fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.
If you have faith you can say to this tree; be uprooted and be cast into the sea.
Lord give me enough money that I do not need to steal, but not so much that I become apathetic to my dependence on you.
This kind [of demon] does not come out without much prayer and fasting.
————————————————–
It’s difficult for me to know exactly what my prayers achieve, and the purpose they serve…. Yet we are told to pray (and fast) for all sorts of things…
Report comment to moderator
It’s just one of many ways we find to diminish Him, by making him a spiritual vending machine.
While I personally don’t believe in the occult, my understanding is that Jesus offered everlasting life to the other two being crucified. They certainly didn’t follow the rules. All they did was accept this person as their “God”. What is that saying? It’s saying that their “God” accepts diversity. Diversity isn’t just race or religion, but also the “good” boys as well as the “bad”. The bad boys have equal chance of getting to heaven. All this ties in with “Judge not, etc.”. Meaning, it’s up to the deity to “make the judgement”. What it really says is that all those who think they speak for their God will have a lot of ‘splainin’ to do. The Bible gets around this “good boy” vs “bad boy”, by insisting that it’s followers obey the laws of the land.
Report comment to moderator
RDean,
If you don’t believe, check your sources before summarizing. One thief was granted Paradise; he repented and professed belief. Believing that Jesus is Who He says He is is all that’s required for salvation. Had he lived, the thief would have displayed fruit of that salvation, as all believers do.
Read the whole chapter (preferably book) of the “Judge not” section. Doesn’t say what you want it to say.
Report comment to moderator
#4: Had he lived, the thief would have displayed fruit of that salvation
Pure speculation. The two men were described as “thieves”, but for such a heinous sentence, it’s possible they did much worse. My understanding is that when some stole, they lost a hand or a foot. Remember, church leaders wrote the Bible as a guide. They wouldn’t want it to seem that “murderers” go to heaven. Just like the way it never came out and said the children of Adam and Eve married each other. The answer is obvious that they didn’t just have “boys”. The church didn’t want to give approval to “incest”.
To say that someone found “Jesus” while they were being “executed” is just too easy.
Too many follow literal interpretations of the Bible and miss the supposed meaning entirely.
Report comment to moderator
It’s best to give up wanting stuff so much and ask God for help in acquiring the good character attributes, while avoiding the bad ones, that you need and can use to thank God for his graciousness in your everyday successes in life.
Not that it will get you one step closer to heaven by doing so.
The want just gets in the way and causes you to do weird things – even in prayer.
Not that it will get you one step closer to heaven.
Report comment to moderator
Ps. 89
“I will sing of the loving kindness of Jehovah forever: With my mouth will I make known thy faithfulness to all generations…righteousness and justice are the foundation of thy throne: Lovingkindness and truth go before thy face.”
Report comment to moderator
RDean/#5,
Remember, church leaders wrote the Bible as a guide.
Nope. While you may believe that, it’s not a fact.
They wouldn’t want it to seem that “murderers” go to heaven.
Really? I guess Moses and David didn’t go to heaven after all. Paul stood in approval of one; is he out, too?
Report comment to moderator
#8: Nope. While you may believe that, it’s not a fact.
It amazes me that those who profess to follow the Bible know so little of its history.
Christianity around the Mediterranean and the Middle East started to splinter. Groups started to go their own way and have different ways to worship. This worried religious leaders that instead of a unified church, there would be a hundred similar religions. Other religions had Bibles. They are a unifying concept central to a religion. The fact that the original “New Testament” was written in Greek should give you some indication.
Report comment to moderator
RDean,
I think there’s too many instances of incest in the Old Testament to support your claim that those scriptures were modified due to the church’s squeamishness on that issue.
I’m no expert on the history of the New Testament, but church historian Jaroslav Pelikan, in the first of his 5-volume history of the early church, indicates that there were a number of efforts to collect the accounts and epistles of the apostles, and that debates went back and forth for centuries before the final canons were decided upon. You are correct that the impetus for canonization was to counter sectarianism (the first effort, in fact, was made by a heretic, Marcion, who rejected all of the Old Testament, and thought the “Bible” should consist only of Luke and a few of Paul’s letters). I don’t think you are correct, however, to suggest that a centralized authority “wrote the Bible” as a guide. The various components were composed at different times and places by different authors. While a central authority ultimately decided on the canon, it didn’t dictate the writing.
Report comment to moderator
All right Tony! Take’em to the mat!
Report comment to moderator
10-
I was glad to see this post. I wonder what Schaaf would say?
Report comment to moderator
#12 Reg:
Please help. Who’s “Schaaf”? I couldn’t find him anywhere as a source on NT history.
Report comment to moderator
Janie,
Don’t know if I will spell or say any of this correctly as my set is in storage after our moves.
Philip Schaaf, History of the Christian Church. He is an historian.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks!
Report comment to moderator
Mystery solved–Schaff.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!