The so-so candidate
For all of John McCain’s admirable qualities as a man, as a politician he has a disturbing tendency to jump on the bandwagon of fashionable liberal causes. Too often when a bad idea has captured the collective imagination of liberals—whether it was campaign-finance regulation, hysteria over global warming, or embryonic stem-cell research—McCain has stood with them or even led them. It’s no coincidence that he’s had to rely on non-Republican voters to become the Republican frontrunner.
But, should he gain the GOP nomination, evangelical conservatives should keep in mind three huge issues facing this country:
- The war against Islamic terrorism. McCain’s record here is well known and speaks for itself. So do the records of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
- The Supreme Court. The high court is closer than it has ever been to overturning Roe v. Wade, and a few justices are likely to leave the court in the next few years. We cannot be sure of the type of jurists McCain would nominate (although he says they would be like John Roberts and Samuel Alito, and he is a man of his word), but we can be absolutely sure of the type Clinton or Obama would offer up. If conservatives sit out the November election and help elect the Democratic candidate, they may play a role in cementing Roe in place for another generation.
- Spending. McCain had the political courage to vote against President Bush’s multi-trillion dollar expansion of Medicare—one that will saddle future generations with much higher taxes and weaken the economy substantially if left unchecked. He’s one of the few conservative legislators with a record of standing up to the appropriators on pork projects. It isn’t difficult at all to envision McCain picking fights with Congress over spending, something President Bush was unwilling to do for far too long.
As aliens and strangers in the world, evangelicals should be the least susceptible people to expectations of purity in a political candidate. We’ll never have perfection in government this side of heaven. We have no reason to make the perfect the enemy of the, well, so-so.














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top20 Comments to “The so-so candidate”
Timothy, I think you have hit on the three critical issues that should help us determine what to do in November. If I have to hold my nose in order to keep Hillary or Barak out of office…so be it.
Thank the Lord that my hope is not in man!
Report comment to moderator
Hm, Congressman Ron Paul beats Mccain in each of these areas:
1) Get Osama bin Laden (he voted FOR this even though he voted against the war in Iraq). If our billions of dollars were going toward THIS instead of the building-a-nation activities in Iraq, perhaps we’d have him by now.
2) Roe v Wade? Gone under President Paul.
3) Spending. This one is laughable. Spending will only increase under Huckabee or McCain (check out knowbeforeyouvote.com). With Paul? Cut drastically. -$150 billion anyone?
I know, I know … people have sold their vote to the media and say he’s not an electable candidate (he’s more electable than Giuliani, Thompson and Romney, lol!).
I do appreciate that the author said SHOULD instead of WHEN in speaking of the GOP nomination. He’s far ahead of the MSM in this.
Report comment to moderator
You might want to fix that nasty HTML code showing up though…
Report comment to moderator
And can you share with us just how Ron Paul would eliminate Roe v. Wade, Endyblue? the last time I checked he wasn’t on the Supreme Court.
Report comment to moderator
I know you may all find this very hard to believe considering what I say about liberals in my posts, but even they have a good idea now and again.
Report comment to moderator
Just reflecting, but my notion at present is that as conservatives, we might be wise to trust our defense more than an offense led by McCain. He throws so many interceptions to Democrats (and blocks for them as they run for their goals) that one wonders if he is even aiming at his teammates. All football teams have to punt once in a while. We might be better off punting and trusting our defense at this time.
The McCain-Kennedy bill (on illegal immigration, which did not pass) was as bad as the McCain Feingold bill (which, very sadly, did).
I am keeping my option of voting for him open. However, President Bush (who signed the McCain-Feingold bill) has taught conservatives that it is essential to stand by our principles more firmly even when the man we vote for is elected. Our choice in November may well be, on domestic matters, between left and far left.
Offense wins games; defense wins championships.
Report comment to moderator
NJL – I share that thought. However, all three of the above examples of liberal ideas do not fall within the realm good ideas.
Report comment to moderator
Joel, if Obama or Clinton wins in November your conservative defense will be in tatters for four years on the issues of court appointments, national security, spending, and taxes.
What determines modern presidential elections is the roughly 30% of independent voters. McCain has a better shot than any conservative candidate with the independents voters.
Unlike religion politics is about the art of compromise. I agree that McCain wanders too frequently off the conservative reservation, though compared to Obama and Clinton he is an acceptabe conservative.
Report comment to moderator
You’re right, Outkast. I shouldn’t have said that. I should have just said that Paul is the most pro-life of all the three remaining candidates, and his supreme court nominees would reflect this; they will be constitutionalists.
Report comment to moderator
Peter,
I cannot argue with you. Your points are valid. We are still in the primary season and as a Republican, I feel quite misrepresented by the front-runner. Expressing that is still legitimate. Now I will probably be more focused on ideas than candidates, and I plan to work harder from now on to promote principles than politicians. But it’s all in the mix and I thank you for your points.
Report comment to moderator
Make It Man: is something wrong with the HTML code? It looks all right to me, but let me know if there’s a problem and I’ll apply my meager computer skills to fix it.
Report comment to moderator
Time for me to chime in with my one-note chorus:
We should only vote for godly men, or not at all.
I read the same Scriptures to which Mr. Lamer makes reference in the final paragraph, but I don’t come anywheres close to the same conclusions he does. The OT saints were strangers and aliens, too, yet political leaders were held to lofty criteria in that age. Saying that we shouldn’t have “expectations of purity” is both a straw man and an unworthy dismissal of the Bible’s standards. I don’t get it: we want someone better than McCain, so we’re therefore demanding perfection? Nah, if that’s Mr. Lamer’s argument from Scripture that we’re OK voting for McCain, I’m unconvinced. Oh, I see a few points of strategy in the article, but they fail to take into account that God is sovereign.
Report comment to moderator
Yeah (#12): To be fair, it is noteworthy to mention that Lamer was refering specifically to those who have decided (or are deciding) to sit out this election rather than vote for McCain. Not generally those who oppose him (of which I’m sure Lamer is one of). But I do agree with your general sentiments.
Report comment to moderator
Tim Lamer doesn’t really make a clear point on number 1. Though McCain’s support of the Iraq war is consistent and impressive, he has undermined a lot of the general war on terror techniques that conservatives like me support. He is against torturing terrorists because (and this is laughable) he finds it degrading.. He’s against water-boarding, and supports shutting down gitmo…
On number 2, it’s weird considering McCain a “man of his word” especially on issues of supreme court nominees. I’ve never heard that term used at him before. Even though he now claims to desire strict constructionist judges, he did say Sam Alito was “too conservative” to be a supreme court judge. To be fair, he did vote for him though (I suspect, to avoid political backfire). Either way, the “man of his word” label is not so solidified on this one.
In regards to number 3, I do find it hard to picture McCain picking fights with a liberal Congress (or even a liberal minority in Congress) over anything. When things become popular by liberal demand, McCain tends to gravitate towards it.
Report comment to moderator
I can’t and won’t vote for John McCain. Period. If he gains the GOP nomination, I truly see myself staying home in November.
Report comment to moderator
Mark,
Consider voting in November, at least for your state & local options; like senator, representatives or governor and other important roles. Your local options may be more sigificant for you than the presidential option–especially if either McCain, Obama or Clinton are elected. They might need principled resistance.
Offense wins games; defense wins championships.
Report comment to moderator
I appreciate Mr. Lamer’s article. People need to understand that if only ONE matter is up for consideration in any presidency, (yes, I realize there are many) the nominees of the US Supreme Court can sway the diresction of this country one way or another. And I believe more so than the other matters. It would appear that in the next few years, there just might be more Supreme Court vacancies due to age retirement, or health issues. Would it not be prudent for Americans to vote a real conservative (Ron Paul) into office for this reason? He certainly would use the “bully pulpit” to have Congress accept the nominations.
EndyBlue, was I correct in seeing your post as similar?
Report comment to moderator
Ron Paul’s stance on some social issues. But when it comes to presidential competence (especially in regards to national security), the man’s a joke.
Report comment to moderator
Sorry that first line should have read: Ron Paul’s stance on some social issues is pretty sound…
Report comment to moderator
What about Mike Huckabee? You may call me a fool but he could still win. All he has to do is keep McCain from gathering 1,191 delegates and then it is a brokered convention. If you’re unhappy with McCain and your state hasn’t voted yet then do something about it! http://www.mikehuckabee.com
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!