Religion: Christian anger
Every now and then, I search the archives of Touchstone to see what they were writing and thinking ten, fifteen years ago. I found this article, “Cultivating Christian Anger,” from a decade ago this month, where Theodore Pulcini, a religion professor, describes the problems of implied in the title. He chides Christians for so much anger – this was in the zenith of the Religious Right, when we were mad and not going to take it anymore – and offers some solutions to it. The problem is, Christians know about righteous indignation, and sometimes feel it’s more warranted than it really is.
Rarely a day goes by when I do not read, either on the Internet or in print, a piece aimed at combating a perceived error afoot in the world. The motives of the authors are usually quite lofty, but their purity of intention is often tainted by the unmistakable manifestations of anger, among which the following figure most prominently:
Simplism. In righteous zeal for establishing what ought to be, one finds it is so much easier to deprecate opponents by depicting them with as little nuance as possible [...]
Caricature. This is simplism taken a step further. Angry commentators usually understand their opponents much better than they let on [...]
“Nostalgism.” What better way to stoke the fires of anger than to depict one’s opponents as the saboteurs of a better time, when things were more like they ought to be. Anger not only clouds one’s perception of the present, it also tendentiously reshapes memory [...]
Arrogance. This is anger’s flip side. Anger constantly assures those within its grip that they have every right to scorn their opponents [...]
Granted, lots of Christians have relaxed a little in the decade since this was written. We, as a giant and heterogenous group, have calmed down. We know we are not in the New Israel. We know we cannot make this place Heaven. We have realized that our City on a Hill is really Rome, and that love and grace and diligence are just as important as anger and justice and passion. But we still have a long way to go.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top31 Comments to “Religion: Christian anger”
lots of Christians have relaxed a little in the decade since this was written. We, as a giant and heterogenous group, have calmed down.
Funny, I was thinking, if anything, it’s worse.
Report comment to moderator
RDEAN,
This was an observation of my own experience. The Religious Right was more vocal, more vociferous back then.
Report comment to moderator
Yes, it was HSK, but Christians were just finding their political voice ten years ago.
With this current election, it is incumbent upon Christians to remember that we can’t make this place into heaven for sure. That’s not going to happen; it can’t happen. Nevertheless, on a personal level we can vote not only to preserve our freedom as Americans but to ensure our freedom to be Christians.
Report comment to moderator
Not the Roman Empire, Harrison, the Holy Roman Empire. We have Christian emperors, universities, and a very big, landed and tax exempt Church. The Vatican still picks our bishops (except for the piskie and the Methodist ones). Christians put up a powerful fight on behalf of church law. What are you missing, except the Inquisition?
Report comment to moderator
Until last week, I would have thought Christians were relaxing a little and given some credit to the Emerging Church. However, last week’s “Young Evangelicals” thread convinced me that they’re just as angry as I was at their age, the difference being that their anger is more directed at the Church.
So, I don’t know if Christians really have “relaxed a little” or if people like HSK and me find ourselves and our aging friends relaxing and assuming the Church at large is like us.
Report comment to moderator
“Nostalgism.” What better way to stoke the fires of anger than to depict one’s opponents as the saboteurs of a better time, when things were more like they ought to be. Anger not only clouds one’s perception of the present, it also tendentiously reshapes memory
The above has not disappeared. Evangelicals still believe the Cleavers and the Ingalls were the norm and wish to return to this non-existent past.
Report comment to moderator
I wouldn’t say that HRW. I would say that Evangelicals have an ideal and strive for it. And just so you know, the Ingalls did exist!
Report comment to moderator
I know they did but the book series was written from the memories of an older women reminiscing about her childhood which makes it suspect and the TV series was “cleaned” to make family entertainment. In reality the 19th C farm life on the frontier was far dirtier and poor than portrayed on TV.
The ideal is framed by nostalgia that is on what has been not what should be.
Report comment to moderator
Lord, I hope Victoria doesn’t see this thread. You’ll see some Christian anger, alright, HSK.
Report comment to moderator
#2: The Religious Right was more vocal, more vociferous back then.
But possibly not as publicized. I don’t remember American servicemen who have died in Iraq being picketed by people such as Fred Phelps.
No one put up ridiculous “creation” museums spending millions.
I can’t remember wanting to put discrimination into the constitution.
I don’t remember having a president who gives the impression he has two way discussions with God.
I can’t remember Christian leaders ever blaming natural disasters or terrorists attacks on innocent American citizens.
I can’t remember Christian leaders advocating assassination.
I don’t remember Christians ever being so warlike.
I don’t remember Christians putting so much effort into fighting science to the detriment of the country.
I certainly can never remember Christians talking so negative about the poor.
I think it’s much worse today.
Report comment to moderator
Too late Night Train…… I’m on the thread!
Maybe I’ll have something for you to complain about later. Stay TUNED!
Report comment to moderator
Isn’t there a verse in the gospels to the effect that the Lord’s servant must not quarrel? I just don’t have it available right now. But, it must have to do with a wasting of energy or some such thing. I wonder where that fits in.
Report comment to moderator
9-
“Christian” and godly are not always the same thing.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t agree with the vaunted professor.
Report comment to moderator
REG,
Is this what you were thinking of?
2 Tim 2:23-25
Don’t have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels. And the Lord’s servant must not quarrel; instead, he must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful. Those who oppose him he must gently instruct, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth…
Report comment to moderator
Savedbygrace – I think of that piece of scripture often as I read some of the discussions on here. I usually try to stay out of theological/doctrinal arguments.
One friend of mine, upon hearing about some of those “debates”, said it sounded like people were using scripture as “potshots”.
Report comment to moderator
15-
Thank you. This may be the one. Perhaps the gospel verse had to do with shaking the dust off your feet and leaving, and not after a useless debate, but before?
Report comment to moderator
STU BOB: . . . people like HSK and me find ourselves and our aging friends relaxing . . .
Maybe Christians should make a rule you have to wait until you’re in your 40’s if you want to be angry and bossy regarding Other People’s Weaknesses. Some Christians are allowed to get medieval, everybody else has to chill.
Report comment to moderator
P.S. One of the saints, I can’t remember which, preached along these lines. Criticizing others and giving advice, he said, requires more personal capital than you have when you’re young, so you need to wait, not because you may do harm to others, but because young Turks jeopardize their own souls.
Report comment to moderator
19-
Seriously, imagine saints preaching today. All saints, all in the priesthood of believers.
Report comment to moderator
Could saints do magic like Moses? Was Moses a saint? Are their powers always the same or different?
Report comment to moderator
“…but to ensure our freedom to be Christians.”
-from #3
This seems to be a good example of the kind of simplicism criticized. I’d agree that Christian institutions do not dominate the culture to the degree that they once did. Nevertheless, I see no evidence that anyone’s freedom to be Christian is under attack in this country.
I also agree with those who argue that evangelicals are more noisome today than before. Fifteen years ago, I don’t recall Creationism museums or efforts to write anti-gay amendments into state constitutions.
Report comment to moderator
I think the church is pretty much like other groups, in that you find a variety of people in them. In this case, some are angry, some are not. Some people will find stuff to be angry about wherever they are. We seem to have an angry society.
I also agree with StuBob, who observed that maturity tends to mellow people out.
Report comment to moderator
HSK, before I read more carefully, I just thought you were describing your own favorite rhetorical devices.
Report comment to moderator
My perception is that a substantial number of (mostly evangelical) Christian leaders saw some of their members getting upset at some (counter-)cultural developments. They utilized that anger to bring some people back into and to the churches and served as a loudspeaker for those people.
But now I think those same leaders are trying to shift the people’s anger at “the culture” into anger at anything claimed to be un- or anti-christian.
Every time somebody looks crosswise at a Christian these days, it seems like the thumpers spring into action with claims of anti-christian discrimination or dire visions of screaming hordes of secularists or islamic jihandists taking over the country.
And in foreign lands, except Iraq, wherever a Christian (usually an evangelizer of some kind) is treated poorly, someone is urging us to send in the cavalry.
Report comment to moderator
“Christian” and godly are not always the same thing.
They should be. I wish I was.
Report comment to moderator
#22. Check out the First Amendment vs. Discrimination story. As least one Christian’s freedom right be involved in something she saw as sinful is being taken away.
Also Catholic Charities freedom to be involved in adoption was taken away in Massachusetts.
Report comment to moderator
I think RDean is right HSK. Your own comrades may have calmed down, but public perception is that Christians are more angry and condemnatory than ever.
Report comment to moderator
Follow up on 28:
That’s how reputation works, positively and (in this case) negatively.
On one hand there is not a lot that can be done for the damage of the past. But we do have the capacity to think anew, to reform ourselves. And to be honest, when it comes to politics, wrath is one of those tools that seem so beguiling on first use, and only later do we find it corroding our soul.
So here’s to debate: may it be tough-minded, fair, and honorable to the God who is both Truth and Love.
Report comment to moderator
Spinoza:
So Rdean is right in his reflection of public perception, even though the perception isn’t well-founded? That kind of “right” would seem to say more about the perceiver than the perceived, no?
Report comment to moderator
Anger is not sin. Some things we should be angry about==”Be angry, and sin not.” Jesus was angry at times.
Unfortunately, as we become more supine, more synchronistic, more sold out, we can’t be bothered to be angry anymore.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!