Gimme that old-time “Yes, We Can!”
Supporters are fainting away at Obama rallies. Scoffers say it’s exhaustion or a ploy to hype the power of Obama’s rhetoric, but the far more entertaining spin is that an almost spiritual ecstasy sweeps Obamaniacs away and they are slain in the spirit of hope and change.
The fervency of Obamania makes it easy for cynics to compare its emotionalism to that of an old-time revival. Contrary to the assumptions of those who suppose they are swaying and singing for “change,” however, old-time revival politics are nothing new.
Charles Krauthammer says, “The Obama campaign has the feel of a religious revival.” One Obama convert echoes him: “It was like a religious experience. It was inspiring.” World Net Daily calls it “the Barack Obama traveling salvation show – campaign rallies and speeches that seem like the secular counterpart of tent-meeting revivals and evangelistic sermons common in the U.S. a century ago.”
The similarities are eerie. The Washington Post describes an Obama gospel concert:
People rise to their feet, mothers hug daughters, old friends reach out to one another and then embrace strangers. Couples hold each other tight. Some close their eyes and sway in their seats.
Joel Stein, an embarrassed Obama supporter, mocked a friend for weeping during an Obama speech. Sounds a little like the people Jonathan Edwards described during the Great Awakening:
The congregation was alive … every hearer eager to drink in the words of the minister … in tears while the word was preached … weeping with sorrow and distress … with joy and love.
If this is a political Great Awakening, however, it’s not the first. Several political movements – most recently the Religious Right – have channeled a religious fervor into politics. Mark Noll, evangelical author and professor of history at University of Notre Dame, told WoW, “In general, a lot of Americans — too many Americans — take their politics as if it were a religion.”
It happens when movements use rhetoric that “treats an election like the kingdom of God is at stake,” Noll said. Anti-communists used this rhetoric, along with the Civil Rights movement and the Religious Right, treating “political events almost as if everything depended on them.”
Obamaniacs, then, are just the next to succumb to a perennial American temptation: confusing politicians with saints.














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top21 Comments to “Gimme that old-time “Yes, We Can!””
Some people behave in a similar fashion at music concerts.
Report comment to moderator
Obama is reputed (by some whose opinions I do trust) to indeed be an unusually nice/decent guy – when one considers the position he’s gotten too (may that continue to be the case!).
But the fawning and swooning (in the absence of any sort of real policy knowledge on the swooners’ and fawners’ parts) is embarassing.
Report comment to moderator
Is he the antiChrist? And I’m being serious here.
Report comment to moderator
Well that thought had run through my mind….
Report comment to moderator
I had the same thought!
Report comment to moderator
I really don’t find anything that awful about him to say that. Just that he’s engendering a lot of positive vibes. I certainly harbor no dislike for Obama. He seems quite a pleasant fellow. I’d sooner have him as a neighbor than Hillary…
Report comment to moderator
Last night, the Larry Sinclair YouTube video about Obama had been viewed about 280,000 times. Today that number is well over 365,000.
If this keeps up, I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama himself starts fainting at his rallies.
Report comment to moderator
A couple of weeks ago, I watched the Canadian miniseries “Trudeau.” Trudeaumania was similar to the Obamaniacs. The girls swooned over the middle-aged bachelor PM. Girls — my sister for one — adored RFK. This is nothing new.
Report comment to moderator
GD, Karen and Makeitman: Pretty interesting.Take a look at http://www.reinventingjesuschrist.com for some really spooky analysis.
Report comment to moderator
Has anyone been listening to Obama in Houston?
I am hearing a political force the likes of which I have not heard in American politics for some time.
And the message appears to be resonating: Hillary appears to have suffered yet another convincing loss.
Right now this message seems to be convincingly unseating Hillary. What is worth considering is whether McCain can withstand this political jugernaut.
Amusingly, it can be argued that Hillary may be the most critical force fighting to ensure that McCain has a solid shot in November.
Report comment to moderator
Michelle Obama said recently that America’s soul is sick, and Barack can heal America’s soul. Barack also claimed to bring the “Kingdom” here on earth. He sounds alot like Kim Jong Il and Hitler in the early days to me.
He is setting himself as a kind of messiah, and the unwary masses are so ripe for that. What’s even worse is that he isn’t ugly like Hitler, and dresses better than Kim Jong Il, so I don’t think there’s any stopping him.
Sadly it’s the poor and weak who’ll suffer the most under his policies. The poor will get poorer as he diverts more money to UN bureaucrats and African dictators, and the unborn babies of the world will lose the tiny shreds of protection they now have.
Report comment to moderator
Joanneb
I agree. The more I become acquainted with Obama’s ‘beliefs’ the more I questions ‘WHO IS THIS MAN?’ what on earth does he believe?
Why does he go to a church who makes Farrakhan ‘Man of the Year’?
Why does Michelle his wife believe that for the past 26 years she ‘For the First Time in My Adult Lifetime, I Am Really Proud of My Country’…….!
So what happened to 26 years?
Obama’s ‘pastor’ married he and Michelle, this is the same man who gave Farrakhan ‘Man of the year award’- and no one notices, or questions this?
Report comment to moderator
#3: Is he the antiChrist? And I’m being serious here.
No, that would be George Bush.
Report comment to moderator
#12: Why does he go to a church who makes Farrakhan ‘Man of the Year’?
I would think that coming from someone like you, you would be happy that he goes to a church at all.
Hey, Louis Farrakhan and Richard Cohen: You Can’t Scare Me
By Michael Chabon
Writing in his regular column for the Washington Post today, Richard Cohen sought to frighten me and every other Jew in America into believing that Barack Obama at worst supports, and at best tacitly approves of, the vile ideology and racialist libels that Louis Farrakhan has variously promulgated over the course of a long and serpentine career.
Having received a number of anxious emails from fellow Jews across the country, quoting from or including the entire text of the column, I can reassure Mr. Cohen that his efforts have not gone in vain. No one could argue, however, that Mr. Cohen set himself a difficult task. As a Jew, I know how easy it is to fear an anti-Semite, in particular a rabid one who, like Farrakhan, claims to have the ear of millions.
Indeed, it is as easy to fear hatred as it is to feel it; that is precisely why I refuse to be afraid. An extremist cannot flourish without the good offices of alarmists and those whom they incite to fear.
Now, I am certain that Mr. Cohen — whose work I grew up reading and admiring in my family’s hometown newspaper — would argue that nowhere does he accuse Barack Obama of any sin worse than an ominous silence. In his column Mr. Cohen merely relates the troubling information that a magazine published by the minister of Obama’s church gave an award to Louis Farrakhan, and that the same minister, Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright, has made a number of approving statements about Farrakhan in the past. How, Mr. Cohen appears to want to know, can Barack Obama let such perfidy pass without condemnation?
I say “appears to want to know” in part because Mr. Cohen knows perfectly well that Obama has publicly disagreed with his family minister over the subject of Farrakhan; but more than this, I believe that, in fact, what Mr. Cohen really wants to know is the same thing so many American Jews — indeed, so many Americans — want to know: Just how afraid should I be?
Alas for Mr. Cohen and for all of us, in the service of his own fear he resorts to employing the time-honored strategies (smear and guilt-by-association) and tactics (a false appearance of reasonableness, assumption of unproven conclusions, selective reference to facts not in evidence) employed by the very demagogues and masters of hate whom he is presumably trying to combat. Why has there been no response from the Obama camp to this deeply troubling message of hate?
Well, as it turns out, there has been a response — at least two of them — and Mr. Cohen even quotes them in his column. Since they interfere with his crucial business of frightening himself and the rest of Jewish America (not to mention the quotidian duty of filling one’s allotment of column-inches), however, he ignores them. In so doing, Mr. Cohen resorts to a time-honored principle of propagandists of hatred: Every denial is in fact tantamount to a confession.
I grew up reading and admiring Richard Cohen’s column because I grew up half an hour from Washington, in the visionary city of Columbia, Maryland, a racially and economically integrated “New City” planned, and built, to serve as a model for a new way of thinking about race in America. Columbia and the children it raised up reaped the fruit, and savored the victory, of the preceding decade’s great struggle for equality and justice, which had made such a vision possible.
One of the most painful passages in Mr. Cohen’s column invokes the broken promise of black-Jewish unity as embodied by the lives and deaths of James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner, without appearing to acknowledge that in falsely impugning Barack Obama he is damaging the only politician in America who has any hope of redeeming that promise on a national level, whose very rise to the lofty precincts of “electability” is proof that the promise is redeemed, in little ways, every single day; just as it continues to be broken, every day, by every African-American or Jew in this country who is not actively reaching out to heal the division, and to work for for justice and fairness and opportunity for everyone.
Barack Obama knows that black people and Jews need to come together to fight for all the important issues and values they share. He knows that we need to start talking from the center of our communities, and stop whispering or shouting at the extremes. As a Jew whose heritage comprises the bitter memory of racist demagoguery insufficiently denounced by the powerful, would I welcome a stout denunciation of Farrakhan by Obama? Sure I would. But that same great heritage also boasts of the most staunch and fearless struggle against the forces that seek to divide us, to set us against one another, and it’s that side of my heritage that I choose to honor.
Let’s all choose, Jews and African-Americans, to set fear aside, and work for a return to the days, whose memory Cohen’s fear-mongering so grievously tarnishes, when we set aside everything that separated us to join together in the service of our common American good.
Report comment to moderator
Rdean,
Save us all the trouble and give the source for your material ……….WITH LINK.
It isn’t all that hard, you just copy paste the site, and then print.
When you do it the way it should be done, with the source, we can read this much easier. Just think, paragraphs, source and site. It’s all so easy! WORD FOR WORD, isn’t that clever?
Michael Chabon: Hey, Louis Farrakhan and Richard Cohen: You Can’t Scare Me – Politics on The Huffington Post
Report comment to moderator
No. I don’t think Hussein Obama is the Anti-Christ.
I am pretty sure he is Alfred Neumann, with a sort of sun-tan.
And his followers/supporters are the same TV-educated chuckle-headed morons of the up and coming generation who think Atlanta is a state and that wearing their underwear around their knees and their pants around their ankles is really cool.
The Republic stumbles on in spite of an increasingly idiotic electorate. But for how long?
Report comment to moderator
Last night as I was driving down the road I thought to myself “I wonder how long it will be before conservative Christians start calling Obama the “anti-Christ” or “Hitler”? Well, not long apparently.
Report comment to moderator
RDean,
I too would love to see an end to the divide between Blacks and Jews in America. Ever since I became aware of it, it puzzled me. However, I have great sadness that a man who calls himself a christian, honours Farakhan.
Farakhan went over to Africa and the Middle East a few years back and was served in the dictators’ palaces by slave women, mostly Sudanese Christians captured and sold by GOS troops. Can the slaves find common ground with Farakhan and his supporters? Should they? Whether or not Obama shares his pastor’s views; Obama’s policies, the votes he’s already made in the Senate and his quasi-messianic claims all make him reminiscent of both Kim Jong Il and Hitler.
Report comment to moderator
A number of people have suggested that Obama may be a supporter of Farrakhan.
Based on the following reference:
News Article on Obama statement on Farrakhan
it would appear that this is not correct.
It appears there are other references on this point if people insist on further corroboration.
Report comment to moderator
A number of people have suggested that Obama may be a supporter of Farrakhan.
Based on the following reference:
wwow.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/01/obama_distances.html
[replace wwow with http://www
it would appear that this is not correct.
It appears there are other references on this point if people insist on further corroboration.
Report comment to moderator
The following discusses this point further:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/298/
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!