Judas: hero, or turncoat?
When universities convene to discuss religious texts and New Testament scholarship, the angle always seems to be how this or that academic organization is going to undermine the New Testament canon and reinvent the Biblical narrative. An upcoming conference, though, seems to have a more balanced approach:
Next week Rice University will host 30 world-renowned international religious studies experts as they examine the newly found Tchacos Codex that contains the Gospel of Judas, the Apocalypse of James, the Letter of Peter to Philip and a fragment of Allogenes and Satan. The Codex Judas Congress, March 13-16, is the first opportunity the scholars will have to investigate photographs of the entire original text, discuss it with their peers and present their findings.
The conference was organized by Rice Biblical studies professor April DeConick, who recently garnered national attention for her new book, “The Thirteenth Apostle,” which debunked a stunning claim by National Geographic’s translation of the Gospel of Judas. According to that translation, Judas was a hero, not a villain, who acted on Jesus’ request to betray him. DeConick’s translation confirms that Judas betrayed Jesus.
In other words, we have a scholar at a major university arguing for the veracity of the Gospel. That’s news to me! The National Geographic story about DeConick’s findings can be found here. You can read more about the conference here, you can read the Times op-ed supporting the Biblical narrative of Judas here, and you can read the opposing response here.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top8 Comments to “Judas: hero, or turncoat?”
In other words, we have a scholar at a major university arguing for the veracity of the Gospel. That’s news to me!
It was just a few months ago that DeConick’s retranslation made headlines. I remember when it happened, because I’d just noticed at the bookstore how many titles publishers had hurriedly cranked out announcing the “Judas was really co-oerating with Jesus” theory. I really need to Google around and see if Elaine Pagels has responded to DeConick. Heck, she’ll probably be at the Rice conference, for that matter.
Report comment to moderator
Yup. Just checked. Pagels will be speaking at the conference. I’m always eager to hear her point of view.
Report comment to moderator
Isn’t Judas’s role a real conumdrum though? He betrayed Jesus .. but if he hadn’t, then Jesus would not have been crucified, and if not crucified, no salvation.
At least according to the traditional view.
So Judas did an evil thing, but one that was also necessary in order for Jesus to fulfill his mission.
Hero or goat?
Report comment to moderator
Er … I do know how to spell “conundrum.”
Report comment to moderator
SteveG – Definitely not “hero”. Think “necessary evil” in this instance.
Report comment to moderator
KRM – I don’t like the words “necessary” and “evil” paired together like that. It’s more like God taking preexisting evil (more than just Judas, too – the attitudes and actions of the Pharisees and Roman rulers, also) and rolling it all up and turning into something good, great even.
Report comment to moderator
since it was all planned before the beginning of time why even bother with such definitions?
Report comment to moderator
JohmV – The Christ (an innocent) had to be sacrificed to pay for the sins of others. I think “necessary evil” sums it up nicely. The Pharisees and Romans were part of it too (I don’t leave Judas holding the bag alone by any means – all who ever sinned are part of it, a rather large pool of coconsirators, no?).
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!