Report comment to moderator

Apparently anyone can’t. Night Train, you repeatedly demonstrate that you, in fact, do not know how to read. The reason no one “rebuts” you is becasue your “arguments” are infested with fallacies and nonsense. There is no rebuttal to that except to name it or ignore it. I suppose one could take the time to point out each and every one but your persistent ignorance proves such efforts would be a waste of time. If they weren’t so sad and destructive your comments would be entertaining. If any Logic teacher would happen to come across your comments they would find a treasure house of examples of logical error and poor understanding they could share with their students. But perhaps you know all this already. Perhaps you deliberately misunderstand people in order to score points with those who don’t know better. For your sake I hope that you are merely ignorant. Being malacious is far worse.

Report comment to moderator

George, your moniker notwithstanding, you’re not very serious. Innuendo? There’s no innuendo in my comments. Innuendo is an implication or an insinuation. I’m not implying that Bradley is promoting this book. Anyone can read the post. I’m not insinuating that Orbis Books is the publishing arm of Maryknoll. I provided a link so anyone can check it out. I’m not implying that Maryknoll promotes Liberation Theology; that’s a well known fact, and anyone can read their books to satisfy themselves if they doubt me. I’m not insinuating that Liberation Theology is radical Marxism in a Christian guise; Liberation theologians proudly admit as much. I’m not implying that James Cone is a professor at Union Theological Seminary. He is; it’s beyond dispute. I’m not insinuating that Cone preaches a black power gospel and Liberation Theology; he does, and anyone can read his books to verify it for themselves. I’m not implying that Cone said “the white church” is a manifest ion of the anti-Christ”. He said it, and Bradley quoted it on his blog. I’m not insinuating that Bradley has a post on his blog called “White Evangelical Seminaries: White Supremacy’s Greatest Friend”. I’m saying it’s a fact.

Nice try, though, George.

Report comment to moderator

It’s all true, Gandalf. I have nothing to hide. So please explain how the fact that I believe what I do changes any of the facts I presented above.

Thanks in advance!

Report comment to moderator

You demonstrate an aptitude for innuendo and are accordingly praised by those who appreciate the same.

As for your wacky admiration of Sitchin, what’s good for the gander … {:~)

Report comment to moderator

Report comment to moderator

74. Gravatar by Night Train 02.24.08 at 2:00 am

Let’s see. I’m not a Christian. I reject the Bible as the Word of God, think much of it is nonsense, and regard the god of the Bible as a racist, homicidal, genocidal maniac. I think the ancient astronaut theories of Zechariah Sitchin do a lot better job of explaining man’s origin than the Bible does. And somehow Amphipolis thinks I’m a follower of this Old Testament centered Christian Identity cult?

Report comment to moderator

Report comment to moderator

Report comment to moderator

Report comment to moderator