Rules of prayer II
After George Müller got his heart into a place where it had “no will of its own in regard to a given matter,” he remained on guard against feeling as a means of decision-making. When I think on how love drove him to care for thousands of orphans, it seems odd that he would not want feelings to reign. A friend of mine who is a philosophy professor would wholeheartedly approve, despite being an atheist; whenever his students begin a sentence with “I feel,” he nips them in the bud. “Think your way to truth,” he tells them, “don’t feel.”
It’s certainly an odd notion, in an age of irrationality and sentimentality, when you’re supposed to listen to your heart, as a pop song goes, and when learning to love yourself, according to an older pop hit, is the greatest love of all. Aren’t all the movie heroes, after all, people who lead with their hearts?
Yet Müller distrusted his own emotions when it came to decision-making, because he knew what the Bible warned, that the heart is deceitful, and dreadfully sick. When emotions are in charge, such that they govern actions, they are more likely than not to extend first to the self, and to others only insofar as they propel one’s self-love. We’ve all met parents, for example, who tell themselves they doesn’t discipline their children because they love them so very much, but who in actuality love themselves too much, and see their children only as extensions of themselves. The heart can be beautiful, the heart makes us human, but the heart is a lousy decision-maker, because its prime object of affection is so frequently itself.
So Müller, that committed Christian and caregiver to lost children, worked to keep his feelings in check. Only then, he must have believed, could he reflect the love of God, which is always borne out in action, not sentiment. It’s been quite often, in my ten years as a Christian, that I have let my emotions make decisions for me, while I told myself that the whisperings of my deceitful heart were in fact the prompting of the Holy Spirit. Ironically, it’s only as I’ve learned to try, at least, to put my own wants in check that I have found my actions more infused with genuine love, as opposed to sentiment, with self-sacrifice, as opposed to self-centered martyrdom, with courage, as opposed to bravado. It’s one more way that He is strong where we are weak, which is something I learned to pronounce early in my Christian walk, but have only recently begun to understand.
Editor’s Note: Here’s a link to Tony’s first post in this series, “A rule of prayer.”














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top16 Comments to “Rules of prayer II”
Yes. Wanting someing can get in the way of success. It is best to give up the wanting and do what it takes instead.
Report comment to moderator
Sorry , it should be something
Report comment to moderator
I don’t think of “listening to your heart” and “letting emotions govern actions” as being the same thing. Emotions are signals, kind of like the ones on your car’s dashboard, that help you recognize how situations are affecting you. They don’t tell you what to do, but it’s important to pay attention to them.
When we talk about the “heart” in a figurative sense, I think we mean more than just emotions. It includes also what is most important to us. On a typical day, I may not feel any strong emotions in the midst of taking care of family, doing my job, etc. If I went by feelings, I’d wonder if I really love my family when I’m tired of them asking me to do stuff for them. But if I stop to “listen to my heart” I know that I do care deeply about them.
There are times when I don’t feel much, emotionally, about God either, and when – on an intellectual level – I am struggling with doubts. But at those times I can still “listen to my heart” and know that I am in some way irrevocably drawn to following God.
Report comment to moderator
Wow, it’s really coincidental to me that you selected this discussion today. On Saturday, I was at a Women’s Retreat and the speaker dedicated one of the sessions to this. She illustrated it with what she called the “Facts, Faith, Feelings” train where facts (scripture) was the engine, faith a car, and feelings the caboose. She reminded us that the caboose will follow along but can never pull the train.
However, my question (to myself) is, what if you’re in a situation where you can support both sides of a decision with facts (scripture)? I’m in such a situation right now, so it isn’t just an academic question for me. Up until now, I’ve been leaning to one choice simply because when I think about the other, my stomach turns. Is it possible that God DOES use our feelings sometimes to direct us?
Report comment to moderator
Mommy,
I would say yes, that having your stomach turn can be a way God could be directing you the other way. Of course, it’s important to examine what might cause your stomach to turn that way.
What I was taught (but have trouble putting into practice) is what is called “detachment” – which doesn’t mean emotional detachment but that you aren’t personally invested emotionally in one option or the other. I think if we’re willing to be led either way – even knowing that one way may cause personal suffering – then we can detect those ways that God leads us that are below the level of conscious understanding. But first we have to recognize consciously what aspects of each choice attract or repel us, so that we can surrender those to God to give us or not give us according to His will. Like I sais, much easier to say than to do. (And rereading this, maybe not even easy to say – I know what I want to say but I’m not sure how clearly I’m saying it.)
Report comment to moderator
We had a case of a child murdered in a small town near my city. Besides the overall sadness of the general situation, something troubled me about the way the local prosecutor handled the case. In speaking to the local paper, he said that he was considering whether or not to ask for the death penalty, and had scheduled an appointment with his pastor to discuss the matter.
It bothered me that this guy was going to dump responsibility for a critical professional decision on his pastor. If he takes both his job and his faith seriously, he should have already seen where they might intersect, and studied the relevant biblical passages for guidance. Absent biblical guidance, he should assume God has no opinion on the matter and proceed as he thinks best. But he seemed to consider the topic an emotional one rather than a rational one.
I’m an engineer, and I don’t normally ask my pastor for advice on choosing grades of metal for a mechanical part, or how to calculate stress on a two-force member.
Report comment to moderator
6-
Thank you, John!
I would guess this leaning on the pastor is a reflection of a Greek or Hellenistic understanding of knowledge, not the Jewish/biblical understanding.
Report comment to moderator
#6
John,
While I agree that it would make sense for a prosecutor who is a Christian to have thought through issues related to the death penalty prior to now, it’s also understandable that he would be looking for guidance. Discussing the death penalty in theory, one may feel convinced one way or the other. But then a real case comes up (one he may not have expected to encounter in small town law enforcement), and it may suddenly seem much less clear.
He may also be asking to speak with the pastor to help him clarify his own views, or to show him if he has missed any relevant Scripture, rather than expecting the pastor to make the decision for him.
Unless your pastor is an engineer (mine is) it would make no sense to ask his advice on engineering issues. But it is part of a pastor’s job and expertise to help in dealing with ethical issues that surface in many careers.
Report comment to moderator
Pauline,
Hmmm… I guess I don’t think I saw this as an ethical issue. I don’t have a link to the article, but the guy’s language made it sound like he had just never thought about it before, that he didn’t know what (if anything) the Bible says about the death penalty, and the decision was just too much for him to handle. That’s scary in a government official.
But I would definitely consult my pastor if, say, I saw my business doing something unsafe, and I needed some encouragement and prayer help to have the strength to blow the whistle.
Report comment to moderator
So what I’m hearing is Müller doesn’t will or want anything (post 1) because he stripped himself of all his will to a state of (I suppose) holy ambivalence. He doesn’t even care who wins the NCAA tournament or whether he wants fries with his hamburger because he has completely removed his own will.
He also doesn’t feel anything or at least he doesn’t acknowledge any feelings (post 2). No action is motivated by a feeling whatsoever.
So he is now this inert lump, a stoic rock without any opinion, emotion or feeling. So God can use him now. If only we were like that – if we attained this ideal spiritual state – God would use us too.
Attaining perfect spiritual perfection EQUALS God answers prayer.
In my experience, just get on your knees, pray to God using the most honest words you have and stop analyzing whether or not you have a feeling or a will or an emotion. You can’t manipulate God’s hand by flogging your body into a certain state of being. Otherwise, the focus will always be on you and your quest for spiritual perfection and not on God’s gracious hand. The result will be spiritual arrogance, not outpour of revival.
Prayer is about God granting the needs of His children, not about how we can unlock his giving by our spiritual attainment.
Report comment to moderator
Outdeep – Good points.
True submission is not in the not caring one way or the other. True submission comes when we do care, we do have a preference, but we choose to leave the decision to God. Not my will, but Your will be done.
Report comment to moderator
Outdeep,
It’s interesting that what you’re hearing is that Muller made himself “a stoic rock without any opinion, emotion, or feeling,” because in my first post I wrote:
I think I was clear that Muller didn’t abandon his desires, but he abandoned his will before seeking God’s direction. Likewise, he worked to set aside his own feelings, so that he could be sure he was doing God’s will, instead of his own will.
His concern was that “just getting on your knees and praying to God using honest words,” as you put it (as if Muller’s words were dishonest?), takes no consideration of the state of one’s heart. This isn’t about a quest for spiritual perfection, or flogging one’s body into a state of being, but about setting aside our own wills, that the will of the Father might be made manifest in us.
Report comment to moderator
One has to ask why there have never been any other George Mullers cropping up in the church since the writing of his revered biographies. One of the reasons is that biographies of this era and genre tended to prop these folks up as super-saints living a type of life that no one seems to be able to attain to no matter how hard we strive.
The whole premise of such stories are that if you get yourself into a certain spiritual state (”empty myself of my will”, “don’t respond to feelings”, “get rid of self”, or whatever spiritual sounding catch-phrase you want to put here) then the magic key will be found for God to pour forth His spirit and answer prayer.
Unfortunately, the whole focus gets turned inward to one’s own progress and that person can be obsessed attempting to attain this spiritual carrot that no one seems to have attained except those revered in the biography.
Churches that emphasis this sort of teaching generally produce two kinds of people: 1) those who are filled with spiritual arrogance because they have convinced themselves they had “attained” (though everyone else can see they are at least as willful as the next guy). 2) those who are filled with guilt and condemnation because with all of their striving, they feel they fall so short to the glorious ideal written about in Muller’s biography.
The heart is cunning and baffling. Even when we think our heart is pure, we come with mixed motive. That is why I think prayer is more about God’s gracious response to His children’s cries than his reward to those who managed to remove every spot.
Report comment to moderator
Outdeep,
Thank you, that was refreshing, seriously. It is God and his faithfulness, and is it not disturning how quickly we lose the focus?
Report comment to moderator
14-
Sorry, It is ABOUT God and his faithfulness
Report comment to moderator
Outdeep,
You have some very interesting ideas, specifically:
“That is why I think prayer is more about God’s gracious response to His children’s cries than his reward to those who managed to remove every spot.”
and
“Prayer is about God granting the needs of His children, not about how we can unlock his giving by our spiritual attainment.”
Consider, perhaps, a different view of prayer:
“Prayer is infinite creation, far superior to any form or art or science. Through prayer we enter into communion with Him that was before all worlds. Or, to put it in another way, the life of the Self-existing God flows into us through the channel of prayer. Prayer is an act of supreme wisdom, of all-surpassing beauty and virtue. Prayer is delight for the spirit. But the circumstances accompanying this creative work are complex. Time after time we are conscious of the mind’s inability to rise to Him. There are moments when we feel ourselves on the verge of madness. Pain forces us to cry, ‘Thou wdidst give me Thy precept to love, which I accept with all my being, but there is no strength in me for this love. Thou Who art love, come and abide in me, and perform in me all that Thou hast enjoined, for Thy commandment exceeds my powers. My mind is too frail to comprehend Thee. My spirit cannot see into the mysteries of Thy life. I desire to do Thy will in all things but my days go by in perpetual conflict. I am tortured by the fear of losing Thee because of the evil thoughts in my heart; and this fear crucifies me. I sink. Lord, save me, as Thou didst save Peter who dared to walk on the water, to go to Thee.’” Archimandrite Sophrony (Sakharov), “On Prayer”
Seems to me that this little excerpt from Archimandrite Sophrony’s most excellent work points out that (1) prayer is about neither getting nor giving but about communing with God and (2) communion with God results in us desiring God’s will, even if we can’t quite make it on our own power. I don’t want to put words in his mouth, but Tony’s articles on George Muller seem to be pointing in exactly this direction– the desire for communion with God and an example in George Muller.
You also make a really depressing statement: “One has to ask why there have never been any other George Mullers cropping up in the church since the writing of his revered biographies.” My only answer to this is that your eyes may have blinders on them. I’d challenge you to read something like the books “Precious Vessels of the Holy Spirit,” “The Ascetic of Love,” “A Monk of Mount Athos,” any of the many lives of Mother Teresa of Calcutta, and the like. (You won’t find these in the multimedia sales temples for popular Christianized garbage). I could even give you an example of my own parents, who live and have lived very much after the example of Muller, Jim Elliot, and similar folks when it comes to provision of their worldly needs. In light of this very small sampling of the lives of holy people who are our very contemporaries, I think that any statement that there is a dearth of George Mullers in the world today is narrow-visioned, at best. I’d challenge you to find an ounce of arrogance in any of these folks’ lives. As for guilt and condemnation, do not the Scriptures themselves teach us that we are sinful? Realizing our guilt and condemnation, however, is very different from giving in to despair. Thus, although you may find some people drawn into despair because they do not understand the role of guilt in bringing humanity to repentance, I challenge you further to find such despair in the lives of those mentioned above, even though they are fully aware of their guilt and condemnation.
God desires us– no commands us (and therefore enables us)– all to become holy. This is no magic key to what we perceive as “God’s blessing.” What God does with us as we travel the path to holiness is pretty much up to Him.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!