Racist, sexist, or merely opportunist?
Okay, here’s how this works. First, look at this image and take a note of your initial reactions. Second, look at this image and then take note of your secondary reactions. Third, read this article about whether or not the image is racist. The following paragraph will only make sense once you look at the images, above, so do that first.
I was struck less by the stereotypes at play than by its erotic value: It’s a hot image, and what’s sexy about it is more a matter of celebrity than race. Bündchen doesn’t look terrified. She looks exhilarated. And James looks neither mad nor simian: He looks triumphant. Vogue could have put one of the issue’s more friendly, less suggestive photos on the cover. But they’re comparatively dull. In the other shots of James and Bündchen, the two look like old girlfriends. The fun and sex that leap off the cover are gone. On the cover, the superstar and the supermodel have surprising chemistry, the kind that makes you stop pushing your shopping cart and pick up the magazine.
What do you think?














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top35 Comments to “Racist, sexist, or merely opportunist?”
I have asserted elsewhere that white people can’t talk about race without the risk of being labeled racist. In this case you can’t put a picture of a black man with a white woman on a magazine without the same risk.
I disagree somewhat with the opening statement in the article: “No matter how many ‘courageous’ speeches Barack Obama gives, America will never be a ‘Let’s talk about race’ kind of place. It’ll always be a ‘Let’s talk about how we can’t talk about race’ kind of place.”
From university campuses to talk shows to political speeches, race is a topic that is talked about a lot. However, if you want to get away with it, you have to either be non-white yourself or you have to be willing to talk very carefully and to say exactly the right things about it.
I concur with Morris when he says, “I, for one, have racism fatigue. I’m wiped out.”
Report comment to moderator
The picture is not racist! It is using sex and sports to sell a product. The negative response is classic Victimology psychosis. Any thoughts relating this to the classic King Kong poster only tells you something about the mind of the beholder. Too many people are subscribing to the good Reverend Wright’s distorted view of America. It is time to move on into the 21st century.
Report comment to moderator
I thought is was funny. What I don’t find funny is the rest of the article where men are allowed to look healthy while women are expected to look like they haven’t had a square meal in years.
Report comment to moderator
Everything is racist. If you don’t think so, you’re a racist.
Report comment to moderator
Frankly, I thought it was more sexist than racist.
Report comment to moderator
Kyle wrote: “I disagree somewhat with the opening statement in the article: “No matter how many ‘courageous’ speeches Barack Obama gives, America will never be a ‘Let’s talk about race’ kind of place.”
I agree with Kyle, but more than somewhat. I think the sentence in the article really indicates the bias of the author. I live near a school and can see who walks with who after school. I also live relatively close to a business area where the kids congregate. There seems to be no problem among the kids — they seem to not only get along, but have black and white members of their various cliques. Mine is not a poor town; economically these kids from upper middle class homes for both races (at least at this end of town). They get along fine, and so do their parents. We all live side by side here.
When I first saw this picture, I saw a strong man and a smiling woman. I didn’t think he was angry. I thought he was striking a pose that he would on the court. Nor did I did think she was too thin. (In fact, I said to myself “you used to look like that back in the day.”) I thought they were chosen because they represented their professions, and though I wouldn’t have been able identify either one by name, I thought they must be two big names in their fields because it was Vogue. I heard about the controversy, but when I looked at the picture again, I said “what?” That anyone even thought to compare this photo to King Kong — again, that says more about the author than the rest of us. Perhaps it is time for the media to get over its obsession with race. Perhaps they’ve been inciting the riots, so to speak, far too long. The rest of us have grown up and moved on and would rather deal with the real economic and educational situations for the poor no matter what their race.
Report comment to moderator
Bündchen doesn’t look terrified. She looks exhilarated. And James looks neither mad nor simian: He looks triumphant.
When I looked at the image I thought she looked detached and he looked cautious. Two strangers uncomfortably posing together.
Report comment to moderator
When I look at the first picture, I see something TOTALLY different than what the rest of you are saying.
Note that the man has an expression of anguish and astonishment on his face, his hand is splayed out in a sort of reflexive physical shock, and he has dropped his basketball which is in the very act of falling to the floor.
Now the woman has a look of devilish glee on her face, as if she just did something very underhanded and funny indeed.
Not that her right arm is not visible, but is somewhere behind the man.
Unavoidable forensic conclusion: The photographer seems to have caught the woman in the very act of giving the man a totally unexpected and enthusiastic wedgie, or maybe she has just dumped a glass of ice water down his back.
Report comment to moderator
Some of the comments above are quite humorous. However we must acknowledge that for some perception is reality.
There is an obvious attempt to duplicate the King Kong/Fay Ray posture leading some who are racially sensitive to conclude that LeBron James is being depicted as a gorilla (a comparison that will get a visceral response among many in the black community) and the suggestion of “jungle fever”, another term used to depict the attraction of a white woman to a black man.
Parody to many, an insult to some. But to both, perception is reality.
Report comment to moderator
My initial reaction to the first image was that the woman looked airbrushed-thin, but then I thought that it was only in comparison to the man [I did not know who either was by sight, but have heard of both: he for basketball prowess, she for being the latest Tom Brady arm candy].
When I saw the second image, the first thing I noticed was that it was from Slate so I knew that the accompanying commentary would be from the left and find a way to bash someone on the right who has no connection to the picture. [I was right, note the totally unnecessary reference to Karl Rove].
Is it racist? No, if it were it would mean the photographer is a racist, not the viewer. Annie Leibovitz usually takes dramatic photos, sometimes they’re provocative, sometimes they’re just eye-catching.
I never would have thought about King Kong, but Slate pointed it out. And that’s my real point: I don’t think the average American thinks of everything in racial terms, but those invested in identity politics keep trying to make us think we do. If they can convince us we’re racists, they can keep pushing their belief that they know what’s best for us.
Report comment to moderator
Drill – Hehehehe!
Report comment to moderator
My first impression was “basketball players and the women who love them”. Then not to be sexist “Models and the men who love them.” Then seeing the King Kong poster, I could go no further because my mind immediately jumped to the Simpson’s episode “King Homer”…brilliant comedy. So my mind thinks of white people as apes…and I’m white. Have I just ruined the media narrative?
Report comment to moderator
I agree that it is more racy than racist. Some people have thin skin and will take offense for the slightest reason. Other pics in the set would have been less offensive to the thin skinned, but they still would have found something to complain about.
Report comment to moderator
My immediate reaction to the first was, “Dang! What a hottie!” followed by , “Who’s that guy? Or is that a piece of furniture?”
Some label probably fits me, but I don’t care.
Report comment to moderator
I think this picture is a political statement; it clearly represents Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
Note that the Hillary Clinton character has just dropped her basketball, probably referring to her losing the Texas Democratic primary (or maybe a superdelegate or two) to Obama. Hillary Clinton also has an expression of utter amazement and astonishment on her face and her hand is grasping wildly and futilely at the falling ball.
Obama, on the other hand, is practically wiggling out of his dress in delight, and has a look of complete electoral ectasy on his face.
Report comment to moderator
My first reaction was that the man looked angry, and the woman looked like she was trying to look sexy. Neither appealed to me. I didn’t think about any connection between them, only the obvious contrasts. The juxtaposition of the two conveyed nothing particular to me, and I would not have given it a second glance if I had seen it at the store.
Report comment to moderator
“Only on a second glance, at a supermarket checkout, did any of the cover’s subtexts surface for me.”
Yes, and that is how racism at its most pervasive WORKS? Do you think racism would be so difficult to root out and expunge if it walked around with a name tag? That Wesley Morrison is exhausted by racisms persistence into a focus on celebrity is no reason why the rest of us should not object to the continuation of what is obviously a racist national narrative. This cover rearticulates a stereotype, a misconception, and white-panic in one movement.
Report comment to moderator
Report comment to moderator
I’m a little envious of people like Luke. I think it’d be a lot of fun to go on a racism expedition…to scour the earth looking for any sign of racist activity, whether it’s intentional or not.
I’m going to start my journey by going back through my movie collection–I bet I can find A LOT there. Man, I hate those Hollywood racists.
It almost sounds as fun as a homosexuality expedition. You know Top Gun was a homo flick, right?
Report comment to moderator
Luke,
Are you saying you immediately thought of the King Kong picture before it was mentioned to you? I certainly didn’t.
White panic? Even if the photo is meant to link to the old movie, she hardly looks panicked. Wouldn’t some liberals call that progress?
Report comment to moderator
Luke, what is your idea on how to end racism? I don’t believe that sniffing around for it is the best way to end it. In fact, I think it is just the opposite. I think that people who see racism everywhere are almost as racist as people who take things at face value without reading racist motivation into every text and every image.
If the picture had been of a bulky white man and a skinny white woman, then it would have been racist for NOT including any black people. If it had been of a bulky black man and a skinny black woman, then it would have been racist for implying that black people are more sexually promiscuous than white people. If it had been of a bulky white man and a skinny black woman, then it would have been racist for depicting the exploitation of black women by white masters. And so on, and so on, and so on.
The two people in the photograph look like they are having fun. The black basketball player obviously agreed to do it and obviously didn’t consider it a racist pose. It really is just showing off the vast differences among human beings. That seems like a good thing to me.
Report comment to moderator
Just read Tom Minnery’s column about how racism is prolongued by the media. I think it’s true. If it weren’t brought up by the media every time you turned around, we might even have an actual discussion of the issues in this election campaign, rather than the state of Obama’s or Hillary’s standing with women/blacks/hispanics etc etc ad nauseum.
Report comment to moderator
Where is ZZ when you need him?
Of course, it IS all Bush’s fault!
Report comment to moderator
I believe, by the look on the black mans face, that this white woman may force him to drive to the hole in order for him to score
Report comment to moderator
1. I didn’t really see it (other than the commercialization of male athletic performance and female form/look not dependant on any performance capability).
2. I saw a stretch to try to maunfacture it.
I am racism fatigued as well. My family didn’t get here until after slavery. Some of my family were discriminated against.
I don’t owe anyone anything for anything someone else’s ancestors did to anyone else’s ancestors. Continuing to focus on the bad past simply prevents movement toward any better future.
Report comment to moderator
I also think that this black man is more electable than Obama. He certainly has more endorsements, white women, money and moves than Obama too.
the moral of the story is that it is way better to LeBron than O’Bomb
Report comment to moderator
I’ll just wait to see if Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton think it’s racist.
After all, they are the experts.
(Then maybe Vogue can be persuaded to write a big, fat reparations check to American blacks …)
Report comment to moderator
Cameron (20): White panic?
Frank: Not her panic, you nincompoop! The panic of all us white men that LeBron James has snatched Giselle Bundchen from our protective grasps and now intends to … well, you know …
That “white panic.”
And Luke … go play in traffic.
Report comment to moderator
“Do you think racism would be so difficult to root out and expunge if it walked around with a name tag?’
No, I think you’re a walking billboard for Tom Minnery’s point….
I know some racists, and it’s patently obvious when they listen to songs by Johnny Rebel:
http://tinyurl.com/3cdeab
Report comment to moderator
“Do you think racism would be so difficult to root out and expunge if it walked around with a name tag?”
If racism is defined as ‘perpetuating into eternity stupid mindless pathological associations of EVERYTHING to questions of race and guilt and victimhood, and constantly working to make racist mountains out of utterly non-racial molehills’, I think it DOES locally have a name tag of sorts:
“Luke.”
I am slowly beginning to realize that the most destructive racists of all (in the modern era in America) are leftists (white, black, and in between) who view and use race as a political weapon and tool and who are only interested in perpetuating and increasing racial tensions in order to further their own power.
The Left requires bitter divisions and disunity and discord in order to thrive; so the obediant Leftist will work diligently and constantly to manufacture divisions and disunity if they are not there, or to widen and nastify existing divisions as much as possible. That is pretty much the Left’s play-book these days.
Report comment to moderator
First picture: What a pretty girl.
Second picture: Dismay.
Article: I liked the photos better–especially the swimming one.
Last reaction: What was the cover story about?
Report comment to moderator
Frank – Jesse may have another kid that needs a Budweiser distributership for several million dollars less than fair market value. It worked for Anheuser-Busch, it might work for Vogue.
Report comment to moderator
Frank,
Call me naive–I understand what you mean by the phrase now.
Report comment to moderator
OF COURSE Vogue did not mean to be racist. What they meant to do is what the mass media is always trying to do nowadays… promote interracial relationships. Read the post regarding this article at my website (click on my name) for a FUNNY and ILLUMINATING look at the controversy.
Report comment to moderator
andinlocalnews – 34
YOU WRITE:…..
“OF COURSE Vogue did not mean to be racist. What they meant to do is what the mass media is always trying to do nowadays… promote interracial relationships. Read the post regarding this article at my website (click on my name) for a FUNNY and ILLUMINATING look at the controversy.”
Really ? . . . . . and what PROOF do you have “the mass media is always trying to do nowadays… promote interracial relationships”-
We will be waiting-
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!