Equating global warming with WWII
It seems that most every magazine out there has a special “Green” issue these days, and Time is no exception with its April 21 edition. For only the second time in its history, the magazine has forsaken its familiar red border, this time, of course, replacing it with green. To illustrate its cover headline, “How to Win the War on Global Warming,” Time chose to use Joe Rosenthal’s famous WWII photo of Marines raising the American flag on Iwo Jima. But instead of a flag, those brave men are hoisting a tree, which didn’t set well with some Iwo Jima veterans.
“Global warming may or may not be a significant threat to the United States,” said Tim Holbert, a spokesman for the American Veterans Center. “The Japanese Empire in February of 1945, however, certainly was, and this photo trivializes the most recognizable moment of one of the bloodiest battles in U.S. history. War analogies should be used sparingly by political advocates of all bents.”
Time Managing Editor Richard Stengel defended his magazine’s cover choice yesterday on MSNBC: “[O]ne of the things we do in the story is we say there needs to be an effort along the lines of preparing for World War II to combat global warming and climate change. It seems to me that this is an issue that is very popular with the voters, makes a lot of sense to them, and a candidate who can actually bundle it up in some grand way and say, ‘Look, we need a national and international Manhattan Project to solve this problem and my candidacy involves that.’ I don’t understand why they don’t do that.”
This particular photo manipulation is hard for Time to defend. I mean, you don’t mess with Marines. Maybe they should’ve used another famous WWII photo, the Life magazine one of the sailor celebrating V-J Day in Times Square with a kiss, but instead of a nurse, he could be laying one on a tree.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top19 Comments to “Equating global warming with WWII”
There really isn’t much defense for this photo. There’s just no comparison. And using political justification for it just makes it worse….
Report comment to moderator
It’s just a magazine. Time can put whatever they want on their cover for all I care.
I call this a case of being overly sensitive.
Report comment to moderator
Maybe the spring weather is getting to me, but I am finding it hard to become offended over this. The original photo was apparently staged. it has been used in political cartoons for generations. It was a clever visual statement, I wouldn’t read equivalence into it. But, of course, I haven’t read the text of the article.
Report comment to moderator
The Axis Powers threat in WWII was real. Global warming is questionable as to the long term effects. Yes, we need to control pollution, but most of the quick-fix ideas have other problems. An example: requiring all of us to use fluorescent lights instead of incandescent brings about the disposal of hazardous mercury in the bulbs. Which is worse: polluted air or groundwater?
Report comment to moderator
The difference, of course, is that WW II was indeed actually caused by man’s actions.
Report comment to moderator
It reminds me of an equally annoying propaganda commercial that I keep seeing. It’s states that “we didn’t wait for someone else to storm the beaches of Normandy. Why should we wait for others to solve the problem of global warming?”
It uses other historical and political analogies, but the point was more or less, “You Americans fix global warming!”
Though I’ve noticed that much of these “green” pieces in the media are behaving something like a fad. I have a feeling (though I’ve been wrong before) that eventually it will end up being marginalized or disappear entirely- like the ozone hole.
Report comment to moderator
I loved Dick Cheney’s take on global warming during his speech at the Press Club earlier this week.
He said that lately he was becoming a believer in what some call global warming but, he calls it Spring. He also believe, like global warming alarmists that it will get hotter sooner rather than later but, he calls it Summer.
Report comment to moderator
Amphipolis- There are two flag raisings, one with a small flag and then one with a larger. Both were photographed. The one used by Time and used for the Iwo Jima memorial was the first flag raising in the heat of battle.
Why are we surprised when the MSM and liberals bastardize everything? Everything except the global warming hysteria – that sacred cow cannot be touched!
Report comment to moderator
Harumph! Well, I will never buy another Time magazine!
Report comment to moderator
““It’s an absolute disgrace,” Mates said. “Whoever did it is going to hell.”
Ha ha ha ha, 3 cheers for senile old WWII veterans. Time for someone’s family to take away his power of attorney.
Report comment to moderator
Bob, are you confessing to having purchased Time in the past?
I will have to report this to Victoria immediately. Prepare to be BONGED.
Report comment to moderator
“Whoever did it is going to hell. That’s a mortal sin. God forbid he runs into a Marine that was an Iwo Jima survivor.”
“[W]e’ll stick a dadgum tree up somebody’s rear if they want that and think that’s going to cure something.”
Testy, testy. You’d think Time had put a Mohammad cartoon on the cover or something.
Dadgum is a good word.
Report comment to moderator
“Maybe they should’ve used another famous WWII photo, the Life magazine one of the sailor celebrating V-J Day in Times Square with a kiss, but instead of a nurse, he could be laying one on a tree.”
Report comment to moderator
“laying one on a tree.”
Or, as we say out here in the mountain west, “kiss my aspen”!
Report comment to moderator
At the very least, I think it’s disrespectful.
Report comment to moderator
How dare those lefties co-opt the sacred memory of WWII for their own twisted political ends.
Especially when we all know that Bush’s “Global War on Terror”® is our real WWII …
Report comment to moderator
Whatever, Frank – I still think it’s disrespectful. They have the right to print it – freedom of the press and all, but I’ve long ago stopped expecting the MSM to have a sense of respect for anything pro-war or pro-American of any kind. If the present climate existed during WWII, American history in the second half of the 20th century might have turned out differently, and not for the better.
You might want to try a little range in your chorus – the one note is getting tiresome.
Report comment to moderator
Global Warming is caused by all the hot air coming out of Al Gore’s mouth. And, oh yeah, smoke and mirrors.
Report comment to moderator
klasko (17): … I’ve long ago stopped expecting the MSM to have a sense of respect for anything pro-war or pro-American of any kind.
Frank: Very good. That about sums up the knee-jerk nationalist/American exceptionalist simile: To be pro-American one must be pro-war.
klasko (17): If the present climate existed during WWII, American history in the second half of the 20th century might have turned out differently, and not for the better.
Frank: I know it may be a stretch, but please do try to consider the possibility that not every war in which we have engaged in our brief history has been justifiable.
I.e., the ongoing occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan are neither situationally or morally equivalent to defending ourselves in WWII against nations that attacked and declared war on us.
klasko (17): You might want to try a little range in your chorus – the one note is getting tiresome.
Frank: 1) As long as I have sons who are (theoretically) in harm’s way because of our militarist intervention around the world (i.e., American males still have to register for the draft, even though everybody from the politicians to the generals and admirals claims they don’t want to conscript); and 2) as long as my nation is involved in what many Americans across the political spectrum consider to be an unjust military occupation of two Middle East nations …
… I will speak out. We won’t shut up, we won’t go away.
I’ve never been ashamed or bashful about making clear that I consider opposing our foreign military adventurism to be one of my highest political priorities.
Also, I often find what I consider to be “conservative” hypocrisy when I compare their complaints against liberals to their own actions.
E.g., pro-interventionist conservatives quite often point out — and rightly so — the constant liberal fear-mongering behind the anti-global-warming movement. Yet they never stop to look in the mirror and consider their own constant fear-mongering in order to justify our nation’s “Global War on” an emotion.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!