The sound of the church bells
I hope you enjoy this brief encomium to real multiculturalism, the “multiculturalism of the missionaries” I call it, where beauty and truth and goodness exist as absolutes, but where cultures still do not look alike. Leon Wieseltier, editor of The New Republic, writes about his being a Jew, while listening to the bells of the church. For much of his life, he didn’t like the sound of them. They represented his being out of the loop, so to speak. A minority. But the beauty of the church bells got to him, he says.
I was loitering in the magnificent little cloister at Magdalen College. It was a late afternoon in an Oxford autumn, and the yellow spears of the waning sun were landing in the severe stone geometries of the place and striking the walls like friendly lightning. Suddenly I heard the harmonies of a choir rehearsing evensong–a piece by Byrd, I later learned–in an adjoining chapel. Fixed by the lights and the sounds, I was overcome, and elated by, an unfamiliar contentment, and I thought: this is Christian beauty and I want it. I was shocked by the thought. I remember thinking also that we, I mean the Jews, have nothing like this. This was another variety of minoritarian torment. Soon the joy passed, perhaps because the singing ceased, and my confusion passed with it. As I strolled home along Addison’s Walk, I got it clear in my mind that Christianity may in some of its expressions be beautiful, but beauty is not Christian. Religious or cultural or national definitions of beauty are conceptual mistakes. So I returned, you might say, to my senses. And the next day I returned to Magdalen to consult the chapel schedule, so that I might hear the choir again.
Well-written, and refreshing to read – on the internet – something like literature.
HT: Arts & Letters Daily




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top6 Comments to “The sound of the church bells”
HARRISON: . . . beauty and truth and goodness exist as absolutes . . .
WEISELTIER: . . . beauty is not Christian.
Ergo: Beauty is going to hell.
Report comment to moderator
yes, they have nothing like that, thank you
Report comment to moderator
They don’t have Evensong, but they have gorgeous, unsurpassed choral music. Mendelsshon’s Elijah, Bernstein’s Chichester Psalms, Mahler’s 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 8th symphonies, Schoenberg’s late Romanticism and avant guard Moses und Aron and Kol nidre, Zemlinsky’s settings of Psalms and liturgy, plus music of Kurt Weill, and many others.
How about Ullman’s “Three Hebrew Boys’ Choruses (a cappella)” composed in 1944 for a death camp?
Wieseltier is being kind and flattering to Christian readers. The appropriate response should be, “No. No. It isn’t so.”
Report comment to moderator
Correction: Mahler’s 4th has a soprano, no chorus.
Report comment to moderator
And there’s nothing wrong with a Jew appreciating Evensong.
Report comment to moderator
Unfortunately, NJLAWYER, this thread isn’t about evensong or the lack of Renaissance choral music in the inventory of music by Jewish composers. This thread is actually about Wieseltier and the flatteries he trades with people like Harrison.
Wieseltier’s appreciation of evensong is a kind of compensation for his animus against another branch of Christian sensibility — the Black Church in America. There’s a squabble in the background you need to know about to understand this post. Bill Kristol is dismissing Obama’s religion as “New Age” insincerity. Andrew Sullivan, a connoisseur of Christian devotion, is denouncing Kristol as a “non-Christian manipulator of Christianity” for calling Obama a liar about his faith. Enter Leon Wieseltier. Wieseltier is denouncing Sullivan as a “Jew baiter.”
Pretty, huh? Here’s what’s at stake. In the words of Sullivan:
Obama’s Christianity – modern, moderate, inclusive, non-fundamentalist, African-American – is terribly threatening to the Republican strategy of defining Christianity as exclusively fundamentalist and heartland, and rallying voters to the polls on those grounds.
Wieseltier is checking his lists, seeing who’s naughty and nice, and picking sides between Christians. He declares himself with the Christianists. In service of sweetness and light, of course.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!