Pennsylvania’s religious vote
Religiously-minded voters turned out to vote in Pennsylvania yesterday. According to exit polls, 36 percent of voters said they attend church weekly, 45 percent said they attend occasionally, and 17 percent said they never attended at all. Of all these groups, only the last went for Obama over Clinton, prompting God-o-Meter to observe that Barack Obama has a secular base.
Despite campaigning with Catholic Sen. Bob Casey, forming a Catholic National Advisory Council and hiring a full-time Catholic outreach director, Obama got stomped in the Catholic vote – 37 percent of Pennsylvania voters and a key swing group that helped George W. Bush win the White House.
Clinton took 69 percent of the Catholic vote to Obama’s 31 percent. Among the more devout (the 18 percent who attended Mass weekly), she took almost three-fourths of the vote. Among those who attend less often, she still got 65 percent to Obama’s 35 percent.
Exit polls also showed Clinton doing better than Obama among white Catholics if matched against McCain. Eighty-two percent of white Catholics said they’d pick Clinton over McCain, and only 59 percent said the same of Obama. Twenty-one percent said they’d go for McCain over Obama, and 17 percent said they wouldn’t vote at all.
The news may not be quite as bad as it looks for Obama, however. Obama didn’t fare as badly among Protestants, neatly splitting the votes of Protestant weekly church attenders. Daily Kos also notes that Obama has made slight improvements since Ohio, raising his percentage of Protestant votes from 36 percent in Ohio to 53 percent in Pennsylvania. Clinton also won 40 percent of the white Catholic vote in Ohio and less (33 percent) in Pennsylvania. Overall, Obama and Clinton are virtually tied for the Catholic vote in a general election.
And religion isn’t a voter’s sole motivating factor. On the Wall Street Journal’s Political Perceptions blog, Steve Waldman said it’s possible that Obama’s problem with white Catholics is really “just a problem with white, working-class seniors, who in Pennsylvania happened to be Catholic.” George Marlin touched on this when he told Human Event’s John Gizzi that aging, blue-collar, white Catholics mistrust Obama as a “Yuppie liberal.”
Christopher Hitchens adds his biting analysis to theirs:
The apparent front-runner has a lot of work to do before he can count on the support of the old-fashioned households who care about guns, values, churches and other keywords and code words that Mrs Clinton can exploit with more conviction than he can.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Special Student Discount for WORLD!








Click to Print
Include Comments










back to top11 Comments to “Pennsylvania’s religious vote”
Like Hitchens, I wondered if the Pope’s visit affected the vote in Pennsylvania. Especially the soundbite of the Pope at the White House saying, “God bless America!” with a special emphasis on “bless.”
Report comment to moderator
I’ll bite. Why does it matter that Pope Benedict said “God Bless America with a special emphasis on “bless?” I don’t think his statement was anything other than a general prayer for the Nation. How is that “code” for “Vote for Hillary, PA.”
Report comment to moderator
The Pope was saying, “Catholics don’t say, ‘God damn America.’”
Report comment to moderator
Scroop, does Benedict follow US politics that closely? One wonders.
These voters lined up for HRC or OBama? Arent both candidates uncompromisingly proAbortion? Doesnt abortion clash with Catholic church teaching?? Evidently to some Catholics it just doesnt matter.
Report comment to moderator
And for non-religious folk such as Scroop, nothing really matters.
Report comment to moderator
A large majority of Pennsylvania is mostly rural, blue collar, pragmatic people. This people are indeed by and large moral people. Most of them are also Pro-Life. According to the President of Grove City College, many of these pro-life Democrats are fairly disillusioned with the stance of the DNC. These people are mostly union workers. And might I say that any company that has a union usually deserves one. That being said. Senator Clinton is a pragmatist and so are many of most Pennsylvanians. So are most Ohioans. This is why Clinton took both these states in the primaries. I would bet that the Clinton camp will shoot for a brokered convention.
Report comment to moderator
It disgusts me to listen to the religious pandering by ALL the candidates…so much so that you really don’t know where they really stand on the matter of Church and State. Obama has a lot of religion whirling around him (my mother-in-law thought he was a Muslim!!!), but you get glimpses of his pragmatic, secular position on hot topics. Clinton regurgitates such saccharine religious rhetoric that I nearly want to vomit. McCain, in his previous campaign, lambasted the religious right, but now he glad-hands preachers at every turn. Sigh…what people need to do get elected…
Report comment to moderator
At least we have two clues to Obama’s postition on religion. Given the deafineing silence when asked to reject Wright hatemongering and Obama’s indication that people cling to religion (also guns, et al) because they are bitter, it would seem that Obama’s underlying psotion may be that religion is a tool to channel and encourage hatred. This in stark contrast to Christ’s call to love and forgive our enemies.
Hiilary seems to have adopted Bill’s technique of making religious references in order pry loose the votes of those so unfamiliar with their Bibles that they gullibly swallow the “Christain” facade she attempts to construct to cover the Postmodern humanist secularism that can be the only real explanation for her action.
Report comment to moderator
Hillary was unable to tell reporters when the last time that she attended church. She said it wasn’t an issue that was important. Obama has admitted that he hasn’t been able to attend church for a long time due to campaign time requirements. McCain probably hasn’t attended church in years.
They are all basically posing for the camera. None represent Christianity.
The truth is. They don’t need to. Bush tried to represent Christianity and was a mess. The US has a secular government. We have religious values but a secular government. I wish people would remember that.
Don’t let the posing and lies distract you. They are not running to be your pastor. The are running for president. Pick the best president based on the issues that you think are most important today.
Report comment to moderator
Theo – 9
YOU WRITE:…..
“The truth is. They don’t need to. Bush tried to represent Christianity and was a mess.”
Who are you to judge President Bush and his beliefs or stand on Christianity? Is it your mess you need to fix?
YOU WRITE:….
“The US has a secular government. We have religious values but a secular government. I wish people would remember that.”
No one has forgotten, so what is your point? Are you lost?
YOU WRITE:….
“Don’t let the posing and lies distract you. They are not running to be your pastor. The are running for president. Pick the best president based on the issues that you think are most important today.”
Are you having trouble Theo?…. no one has said that the nominees are running to be my or your pastor, please try and follow along. We will pick the President we believe will be the best-
Report comment to moderator
Otpw – 8
YOU WRITE: ..”it would seem that Obama’s underlying psotion may be that religion is a tool to channel and encourage hatred. This in stark contrast to Christ’s call to love and forgive our enemies.”
How right you are.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!