An optimist and a realist
If you read or see the two-part, Pulitzer-prize winning (and scandalous) play Angels in America, which takes place in the 1980s, during the Reagan Revolution, then you’ll get a good feel for how most liberals hated – really hated – Ronald Reagan. He was everything bad about America, to them. But now, more than 20 years later, and Barack Obama, new scion of the liberal elite, is calling him a great president. What happened? This Newsweek piece proposes to answer the question: Why are liberals finally loving on Reagan?
[H]e understood that you cannot govern this country if you’re a pessimist. Pessimism has always been a strand of conservatism-pessimism about human nature, pessimism about government. [...] He said that when the American people are happy, good things happen: they invest, they save, they have children. So he thought that getting America back to cheerfulness was an intensely practical program.
So, that’s one reason. And it’s a nice thought. Of course, one can believe in a fallen human nature and be perennially happy. In fact, one can only be truly happy if one understands the true character of creation, but only if one also understands that all this can be redeemed. Reagan was an optimist, and a realist. He was, after all, a man who called evil what it was. Christians, too, should be optimists.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top8 Comments to “An optimist and a realist”
HSK,
Pessimism has always been a strand of conservatism.
What a crock. Pessimism, shared poverty in all things and universal misery are the hallmarks of Socialism and the core of being a liberal and a Dmocrat.
Report comment to moderator
Didn’t you mean to say that you cannot believe in a fallen human nature and be perennially happy?
Report comment to moderator
I agree with Llama, pessimism is a liberal thing. They don’t think people can get along in life without the government to take care of them. Also, they seem so unhappy and even angry.
Report comment to moderator
Make It Man,
I think he meant exactly what he said. Just because one rightly recognizes the fallen nature of man, that doesn’t mean that one cannot (or should not) be happy–particularly when one understands that God is redeeming His creation.
Report comment to moderator
Any liberal who hated Ronald Reagan and was old enough to vote against him is now over 40. They grew up. That’s why they now realize he was great.
Report comment to moderator
I think Llama meant to say “Demoncrat” not Dmocrat.
As a card-carrying one myself, I must say, that the question of optimism/pessimism can be found on both sides. The actual question is about the ability of government to do good, and more broadly the perfectibility of human nature. Both of these items are commonly found among liberals. Not surprisingly, conservatives take a different view (we’ll not use the dread “p” word, spare the Llama’s ears): the doubt in government’s ability to act is a stalwart theme for conservatives. And it’s not like they think highly of human action either.
Now this is all generalization, mind you. There are conservative exceptions. The most notable recent exceptions would be the cake-walk and roses school of the Iraq war supporters. As the ensuing years have revealed, a little more pessimism might have been a good thing.
Report comment to moderator
HSK Barack Obama, new scion of the liberal elite, is calling him a great president.
Obama admires Reagan, but I certainly hope it doesn’t go any farther than that!
Unfortunately, Obama has hinted that he agrees with some of Reagan’s critique of liberal “excesses” of the 60’s and 70’s. That’s fine as a civic piety for a conservative electorate, a political gesture that’s itself Reaganesque, but it’s politically incorrect and nothing that can help him achieve any historical purposes.
Wilentz’s devotion to democracy is inspiring and instructive and so forth, but he tends to underplay the dark side, and doesn’t tell Newsweek that Reagan tapped into greed and fear and tribalism — powerful forces. Reagan was a kind of “market correction” or pause during which the Willentz’ parade of democracy marched sideways while awaiting a drum major in the mold of Jackson and FDR. But Reagan was worse — he unleashed powerful forces that are coming back to hurt us.
Report comment to moderator
Why are liberals finally loving on Reagan?
‘Cause he’s dead!
According to the head of the Democratic National Committee, “The only good Republican is a dead one.” or something like that.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!