The 51st “state” weighs in
Although the U.S. presidential election is still several months away, the “51st state” has already picked a winner: Obamamania is sweeping Britain. The Populus survey, which revealed that 48 percent of British voters prefer Sen. Barack Obama, also found that more than half of British voters want to see a Democrat win in November.
Senator [John] McCain is probably being tarnished by a strongly anti-Republican mood among British voters, fuelled by the unpopularity of President Bush and the Iraq war. Back in September 2004, Populus asked whether British voters preferred President Bush or Senator John Kerry to win the presidential election that November. The Democrat came out ahead by 52 to 29 per cent. And for all the talk of a neoconservative alliance, Tory voters backed Senator Kerry over President Bush by 50 to 35 per cent.
The poll shows the extent of transatlantic disillusionment after the Bush era, and, by implication, the potential for rebuilding of relations after the new president takes office next January. The trouble with Obamamania, however, is the risk of excessive expectations, and consequent disillusionment when/if American policies change less than hoped.
If Obama wins in the fall, do you think the nation–and world–will have “excessive expectations” for his White House performance as compared to what would be expected from either Hillary Clinton or McCain? And if so, what kinds of “excessive expectations” do you think he’ll face?




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Special Student Discount for WORLD!








Click to Print
Include Comments










back to top22 Comments to “The 51st “state” weighs in”
Let’s see. . .
Hope.
Change.
With such specific goals you can hardly fail to meet them.
Report comment to moderator
Kristin’s looking to pick a fight with the British. Let me help!
Okay you British 51st staters:
“Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!”
Report comment to moderator
I’m a Democrat, and I want the Democratic nominee, whoever it is, to win.
And I prefer Obama over Clinton as the nominee.
BUT, that said, I could not give a tinker’s dam what the British think! While they are certainly entitled to their opinions of our political process and candidates, that has zero relevance on who I would choose to vote for or against.
Report comment to moderator
So then … Britain has become a colony of The Colonies?
Europe and England keep moving further to the left. This trend will continue until they become colonies of Islam.
Report comment to moderator
The only excessive expectations at work here are the dreams and hopes Obama has of being president. The Messiah and his worshiping disciples have a bad case of excessive, exponential exuberation as well. I am reminded of the dot com bubble that eventually burst. If it looks too good to be true – it ain’t.
After putting forth a US Traitor the last time as their presidential nominee, who could have possibly, hoped, wished, dreamed or guessed the whack jobs on the left would put up an anti American, anti white, racist Marxist as their hope for change this time. They will have to do an awful lot of fooling most of the people all the time before Obama will actually be electable – at least by sane folks.
XION, Islam does not want colonies. They want slaves or British heads will roll. Heads rolling is more likely but some will surrender as slaves no doubt.
Report comment to moderator
Yeah. Thomas is right. If Obama is elected, we will probably be better off for a little while.
After all, Hamas and Bin Laden’s Islamic Peace Corps are enthusiastic supporters of Obama.
So they will probably give us a grace period, and give Obama a chance to get Sharia in place, and to bulldoze churches and synagogues and VFW Halls and infidel things like that. (Except ‘churches’ like Obama’s church – they are pretty much effectively party-line mosques already, and with a little cosmetic external alteration on the marquees, can ‘come out of the closet’ with no trouble at all.)
The Europeans are such a success story, anyway, in terms of knowing how to pick leaders.
We REALLY ought to listen to them.
Report comment to moderator
Heck why not listen to McCain’s advisor and annex Mexico as the 52nd “state”? After all Canada, the US, and Mexico are “all one bloc” according the senór Juan Hernandez… Of much more importance than what our British allies think, is what our 12 million illegal aliens think
Report comment to moderator
I wonder how the Brits celebrate the 4th of July…
Report comment to moderator
Sheesh, why do they even care? Take a poll in the US over Tony Blair vs Gordon Brown, and the most common response would be “Who?”
Report comment to moderator
“So then … Britain has become a colony of The Colonies?”
They are being sarcastic. It’s a way of making fun of their conservative and moderate leaders who have refused to stand up to the US’s foreign policy ambitions.
And I care, a little bit. No reason to run around disrespecting the opinions of other countries.
Report comment to moderator
Luke,
I guess you don’t know that the Liberal Party has been in power in Britain since before Bush was elected. The British Liberal Leadership backed the US when it was attacked and helped the US every way they could – unlike the left in America, See not all liberals are whack jobs.
Report comment to moderator
Yeah, I’m pretty sure they use the word liberal like Locke used it, or like Ron Paul uses it!
Report comment to moderator
And if so, what kinds of “excessive expectations” do you think he’ll face?
Let’s not fool ourselves about the 51st state — unfortunately it isn’t Britain. There’s no doubt that Barrak’s biggest primary challenge on the way to the nomination, if not the election, is the state of Israel.
That’s a “two for one” state. One state is Jewish Israel populated by Israelis there and Jews here with a bond to the dreams and realities of Israel. The other state is Christian Israel populated by apocalyptics here with a messianic agenda that terrifies politicians and makes even Jews nervous.
Barrak seems to be winning the primary. Jews have asked him to show himself a Mensch and tell them how much he loves Israel, the idea and justice of Israel, the romantic thrill of Jewish settlements, the premises of Zionism, and how little he cares about the paradoxes that shadow Israel’s determination to defend itself as it sees fit, and how slightly he regards the cost to American reputation overseas. Barrak has gone down on his knees to answer the kishke question: Convince me that you love me so that if you ever hurt me, I’ll know it won’t matter, you didn’t mean to. Obama is telling Jews in as many ways as he has fingers and toes how strongly he supports Israel. Even the warmonger Martin Peretz is praising Obama’s “exhilarating experience with American Jews” and with their worries and dreams.
The general election will be tougher. Christian Israel will try to make hash of any Obama reference to a problem in the middle east in order to accuse him of saying something bad about Israel. Christian Israel will have us all tied up in knots. He’ll just have to make the best of it, if he can.
Report comment to moderator
Gee, I always thought the 51st state was Puerto Rico.
Report comment to moderator
“Take a poll in the US over Tony Blair vs Gordon Brown, and the most common response would be “Who?” ”
That either proves that the US is more important to the world, by way of popular consensus, or that the average American is less informed about world politics than the average Briton (or both!).
Report comment to moderator
That would be nice, NJ.
Report comment to moderator
Getting back to the original question…
JUST A FEW EXCESSIVE EXPECTATIONS B.O. WILL NOT MEET
- HOPE for Ecomonic Properity: he will finish the job of destroying our economy by
+ raising taxes
+ using “global warming” as an excuse to add unnecessary and prohibitively restrictions and requirements (BTW, per NASA readings the earth’s temp had remained steady for a decade or so and THE EARTH IS NOW COOLING)
+ shunting much needed economic resources to further wealth redistribution and
+ HOPE for safety and world peace by opening the doors to Islamofascist terrorism while insisting on having “dialogue” with them like Neville Chamberlain with Hitler — instead of fighting them like Winston Churchill.
- HOPE for Reduced racial tension
- CHANGE to better the lot of the little man (proletariat for those of you Che Obama supporters)
+ statistically, the gap widens between the Haves and the Have-Nots during Dempocratic administrations
- HOPE for honesty and reduced corruptionGetting back to the original question…
JUST A FEW EXCESSIVE EXPECTATIONS B.O. WILL NOT MEET
- HOPE for Ecomonic Properity: he will finish the job of destroying our economy by
+ raising taxes
+ using “global warming” as an excuse to add unnecessary and prohibitively restrictions and requirements (BTW, per NASA readings the earth’s temp had remained steady for a decade or so and THE EARTH IS NOW COOLING)
+ shunting much needed economic resources to further wealth redistribution and
+ HOPE for safety and world peace by opening the doors to Islamofascist terrorism while insisting on having “dialogue” with them like Neville Chamberlain with Hitler — instead of fighting them like Winston Churchill.
- HOPE for Reduced racial tension
- CHANGE to better the lot of the little man (proletariat for those of you Che Obama supporters)
+ statistically, the gap widens between the Haves and the Have-Nots during Dempocratic administrations
- HOPE for honesty and reduced corruption
+ Obama was caught red-handed selling influence while an Illinois Senator but that was swept under the rug by the minstream Media.
Report comment to moderator
Oops, accidentally double-pasted. Sorry.
Report comment to moderator
Scroopy, have you ever had plantains made the way the Puerto Ricans or Dominicans make them? Delicious!
Report comment to moderator
I’ve had plantains the way Costa Ricans make them. Yes, they are delicious. I can’t figure out how to do it. Perhaps the trouble is getting my hands on some good plantains. Maybe a 51st stater could chime in with some help here?
Report comment to moderator
NJ lawyer Yes I have! Without a doubt, a supreme dish.
WIGLAF, me neither. When I try at home, they’re pithy, starchy, and without a trace of etheric delicacy.
Report comment to moderator
Yes, it would be nice to have a recipe! There’s a double frying or baking or whatever they do.
Believe it or not, the best I’ve had — and they were approved by those in the know from Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic — were prepared by a Chinese restaurant. You might want to see if your local Chinese restaurant makes them.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!