The education-industrial complex
Paul Peterson, director of Harvard’s Program on Education Policy and Governance and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, is doing something more and more people seem to be doing. He’s a respected educator with serious academic credentials and clout among the indoctrinated, and he’s blaming much of public education’s problems on public educators: namely the unions and the government offices who conspire with them. He calls them the “educational-industrial complex.”
Before the education-industrial complex was erected, America led the world in its commitment to education. From the earliest days of our Republic, many small towns each heavily invested in the community’s students, more so than any other nation. Teachers and students were held accountable to community expectations. Local investments contributed to a vibrant educational system that expanded rapidly, helping to propel the nation to the world’s pinnacle by World War II.
Notice the theme here: local control, accountability to the community.
Around 1970 or thereabouts, the educational-industrial complex was hammered into place: School boards gave teachers collective bargaining rights. State governments assumed greater responsibility for financing the schools. The courts instructed schools on the civil liberties of their students. Regulations multiplied. America gained a federal Department of Education. And state and federal dollars poured into the system [...] Grades inflated, learning faltered, graduation rates stagnated. The mammoth, expensive, drug-infested, security-obsessed high school was better suited for incarceration than learning.
The only schools that will thrive are those where good teachers can be hired, regardless of “certification”; where bad teachers can be fired, regardless of how long they’ve taught or how nice they are; where students can be held to higher standards, disciplined, rewarded, punished, and pushed; and where administrators can be creative and accountable. The government won’t be able to do much of that. Save Western Civilization. Go private. Go homeschool. Go somewhere. Horace Mann and John Dewey never saw it coming.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top17 Comments to “The education-industrial complex”
I think the go somewhere recommendation ends up in some rather bad and unintended consequences. While abandonment of the public school enterprise will prove helpful for a few parents, it indulges in the fantasy that I am unaffected by the overall quality of our schools.
Of course, if I harbor a hierarchical or elitist view of education that is no harm. But that in turn poses grave risks to both our economy and our society.
Report comment to moderator
I doubt the educrats and the bureaucracy they control would agree to going back to local control. Perhaps some state government with lots of guts and integrity could challenge the status quo.
Report comment to moderator
The current problem with public schools was a slow evolution (will it be its demise?). Back when small towns were “heavily invested” in the community’s students, the parents were also way more likely to back the hand-picked teacher as the authority over conflicts. It was not just the educators and the sytem that evolved.
Too much state and federal bureaucracy? Yes, even in private schools. Teacher’s lobbies run amok? Absolutely. Parents expecting the schools to do their job and bureaucrats buying into it? Too much so. It was a slow evolution that needs an abrupt overhaul. Who is up to the task? The problem is that culture changes very slowly.
Report comment to moderator
It interesting that Peterson dates the decline to around 1970. That’s just about the time that intransigent, segregationist, “separate but equal” local school boards were finally brought to heel by the feds and states in order to protect minority students and assure at least some kind of equality.
I would also be curious to know how exactly Mr Peterson claims local authorities enforced standards way back in his imaginary version of the grand old past.
Report comment to moderator
Harris is right. Like it or not, each of us has a vested interested in good public education. Certainly the system’s a wreck, but we need to agree that its demise would be a bad thing.
Report comment to moderator
Harris is somewhat right. But that’s all the more reason to provide school choice, so that private education standards are not available to just the few who can afford it (or who struggle to pay for it, as I have done for my kids).
It’s also all the more reason to bust up the unions, demand high standards of the teachers, teach instead of “provide services,” and so many other measures.
Leaving the public school behind may not be the best answer, but its better than staying in it while nothing changes.
Report comment to moderator
Poor Paul Peterson. His peers are educational terrorists and will soon turn on him and call him everything but a white man. They will try to do everything in their power to shut him up,
He should be very careful. These people are nuts. Truth doesn’t exist for them and they will not allow discussion about this socialist program or allowed it to be changed in any way.
They will never ever allow anyone but socialist teachers be in control of socialist public education. Socialism fails at everything.
We have been pointing these things out for decades and absolutely nothing has happened to change it – except it has gotten much worse.
Since nothing can be done and there is no compromising with elitist socialists allowed, we have been forced to come up with other solutions on our own while being fought by these insane socialists all the way at every turn. They just tried to pass laws in California that you couldn’t legally home school your own children without you being certified and accredited by them in every subject.
They are against private schools for your children while they send their children to them. They are against school vouchers, against public money being given on private schools especially religious run ones. They are against testing students and teachers to ensure achievement goals are being met. They are against charter schools against any change whatsoever. Plus you are not allowed to even talk about change either without being personally attacked.
It is best to let their insane school system die, they will kill it all by themselves. Why waste money on something that will always be second rate to privatized education? Let their kids be ignorant – yours deserve better. Just educate your children privately. Government has no business being in the education business – period – especially a socialist one.
There is no government supplied good or service that cannot be done way better and less expensively by private enterprise. We know this so we need to just continue going down that path.
Eventually their socialist system will collapse like it always does and you and your kids don’t want to be anywhere near it.
StuBob is wrong on this one.
Report comment to moderator
Arcadia, are you suggesting that with the influx of minority students, the standards had to be lowered to accomodate them? I’m not sure what you are trying to say.
Are you trying to say that the concern about education problems is really a cover for ongoing resentment over segregation?
At my son’s small private school there are several Black, Hispanic, and Asian kids who all outperform the average public school student. And there would be more of them if the government would let the parents spend their education allotment at the school of their choice.
Report comment to moderator
I mistyped. I meant “desegregation” in the second sectio of my comment.
Report comment to moderator
#4 ARCADIA
“It interesting that Peterson dates the decline to around 1970. That’s just about the time that intransigent, segregationist, “separate but equal” local school boards were finally brought to heel by the feds and states in order to protect minority students and assure at least some kind of equality.”
I will not argue this, but please explain the fall of mighty California schools from the top of the heap to the bottom. This was paralleled by the Democrat-ization of the Golden State.
I guess that the liberals just need more time and more money to fix the problems of our schools, like they have fixed the Washington, D.C. schools.
Report comment to moderator
llama There is no government supplied good or service that cannot be done way better and less expensively by private enterprise. We know this so we need to just continue going down that path.
When you need a cop, I’m sure you’ll be glad to call the private militia run by your competitor or enemy. And instead of being fearful you will be thankful for all the hideous taxes you saved.
When you get on a plane, I’m sure you’ll be comforted by the thought that the privatized safety agency was just taken over by a French/Arab consortium.
And when you approach a curve on a new, rain slicked road, I’m sure your kids won’t mind that the asphalt supplier and quality inspection company actually belong to the same shareholders.
But hey, it’s a dog eat dog world and if your kid just happens to be asleep on the back seat, well, it’s just the marketplace at work, isn’t it?
Kyle A: I am saying that unfortunately there are a lot of places (including more than a few in the north) in this country where like-minded people of the same race or religion have and would gladly exercise the power to educate their own kids at the expense of their neighbors’.
And yes, in my opinion there is a direct line connecting Southern resentment over forcible integration and the rise of the Nixon coalition and the “Reagan Democrats”.
Racism is an insidious evil which is a long way from having disappeared.
And religious supremacy, coming from many corners, seems to me to be getting worse by the day. The idea of allowing these zealots to be paid by the state to propagate their doctrines is just this side of nuts.
Sadly, this country still needs someone to reasonably fairly enforce rules honoring our commitment to provide every child with at least access to a good education without regard to that child’s color or his/her family’s beliefs.
Report comment to moderator
Hey, Arcadia, now answer me.
Report comment to moderator
People complain about organized religion all the time. It’s about time we took on organized education.
Report comment to moderator
I read Peterson’s article and I must say that I am a little glad that the current political candidates are not seeing education as a huge issue this time. If Hillary, Barack and John were harping on education that would increase the chances of any one of them doing more damage (at a great expense too) once elected. Don’t give a mandate to politicians like those three to save education.
Report comment to moderator
Llama says: It is best to let their insane school system die, they will kill it all by themselves. Why waste money on something that will always be second rate to privatized education? Let their kids be ignorant – yours deserve better. Just educate your children privately.
Way to love the poor, bro. There might be a way to privatize education entirely and affordably, but it would take a century to put in place. In the mean time, our cities are full of youth who can’t read or add. The common schools have been an American solution to such a problem since the 18th century. They need to be fixed a thousand different ways. But, abandoning them is abandoning the most vulnerable Americans.
There is no government supplied good or service that cannot be done way better and less expensively by private enterprise. We know this so we need to just continue going down that path.
1) Law Enforcement
2) Military
3) Air Traffic control
4) Post roads (see Constitution)
Report comment to moderator
Will we get a change in public education by doing the same things over and over? (Isn’t this the definition of crazy?)
Most of us agree that higher education is way Liberal. How will we get a change in schools when we have the same bent of teacher being produced by the Liberal/Leftist schools of education that presently produce our teachers? Christian Liberal Arts colleges need to produce balanced teachers, not right wing nuts. Time will tell when Christians (Christ) start to make a difference.
Report comment to moderator
Certainly the system’s a wreck, but we need to agree that its demise would be a bad thing.
The current system might be analogous to a “Weekend at Bernie’s” in which the current school system is Bernie and Department of Education and the NEA drag the body around, hoping we won’t notice.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!