Trodding them underfoot
The managers of an online bookstore I have patronized in the past sent me an email announcing that they are going on a march to end world hunger. They’ve invited me to contribute to the cause. I was struck by how folks who are surrounded by books on history and economics can still come to the conclusion that people are starving in the Third World because nobody has thought to mail them a box of beef jerky.
It’s a coincidence of factors, I suppose: inadequate economics understanding, a bumper-sticker mentality, an overindulged democratic sense that leads perfectly rational Westerners to think that the world can be made better by their collectively saying: “Boo, bad things.” I’m inclined to blame John Lennon’s insipid song.
The reality is that people are hungry because they live under governments that undermine entrepreneurial initiative at every turn, that confiscate property, that wage war internally and externally, that are composed of inveterate thugs. March all you want against hunger, ship as many crates of cereal as you like, it won’t be enough.
It doesn’t help that our foreign aid often serves to prop up the very regimes that are the problem. Or that U.S. agribusiness has such a chokehold on our politics that we restrict food imports from Third World farmers, while at the same time depressing their home markets by dumping our surplus food on them. Not to mention the other business opportunities we deny the poor by highly taxing imports of their clothing and other goods. The data are clear that international trade tends to help the impoverished, yet politicians and their supporters on both sides in this country are indifferent to that fact. They care about votes, and making sure that our producers are protected from competition.
Which has worked wonders for the U.S. auto companies, hasn’t it?
So as I think about how the deluge of campaign mail is about to begin in earnest from both parties, I can only think: a pox on both your houses. Politicians from each party pay lip service to helping the international poor, and compete to see who will allocate more pennies to the losing cause of funding them out of poverty, but the reality is that all we who have cheered import restrictions, or short-sighted realpolitik aid to the thugocracies which from time to time we convince ourselves are in our best interest to support, have contributed to this problem we call Global Hunger.
And the truth is that we are too selfish to fix it. So let’s just march instead.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top13 Comments to “Trodding them underfoot”
So, do Christians of both parties get together to demand change that would help the poor in other countries? This is a failing of God’s people.
Let us put our politics aside to handle this problem for others.
Report comment to moderator
“March all you want against hunger, ship as many crates of cereal as you like, it won’t be enough.”
You know, while all you say about the need for fundamental changes in policies and practices rings true, and while in one sense you are absolutely right that “it won’t be enough,” (something about “The poor you will always have with you”), I just find that statement above to be more… I don’t know…. cynical .. than I would hope that we as Christians think.
So yeah, vote for changed, pressure governments and corporations to do all those good things. But in the meantime where the rubber (on the soles of my sneakers) meets the road, I’ll sign up for the walk-a-thon’s and marches, to raise awareness and a little bit of cash as well.
I’ll take any level of involvement over none at all, thanks.
Report comment to moderator
Good post, Tony!
Thomas, if it is indeed true that the online bookstore is marching to end world hunger, then it deserves to be mocked. I wouldn’t throw my money or time away at a campaign like that. Give me a specific cause with a specific mission that does NOT involve handing over money to governments and I will likely take it seriously. I’m sure Tony isn’t advocating a “none at all” approach either. He’s probably like me, a discriminating contributor.
Report comment to moderator
Since when is it the job of the US government to end world hunger? I can’t find it in the constitution – can some show me where it can be found? Before socialism, the Great Depression and the New Deal it wasn’t even part of the US government’s mandate to end hunger in the USA.
These socialist ideas should never be part of the a US government mandate anymore than ending Global Warming, stopping alcohol or pot consumption, stopping the blood diamond trade or making it legal for mothers to kill their own children just because they don’t want them should be.
I have no problem with the management of a bookstore or any other private individual or group doing what ever they want to help end world hunger but this socialism and social engineering at any state or federal level will end up impoverishing and killing us all.
Report comment to moderator
The advocation of free trade to allievate world food shortages is ideologically pure but ignorant of histroical realities. African nations were once told that they way to modernization was through world trade and were encouraged to change the successful subsistence agriculture to export based crops. Hence, farmers were to sell their coffee beans etc and purchase foodstuffs on the free market. In previous eras the Africans had been able to feed themselves they were now dependent on market forces with not-so spectacular results.
Entrepreneurial farmers, encouraged by western “experts” increased a reliance on markets and hence left the farmer reliant on aid when his cash crop was no longer a valued commodity. The real problem then is not the lack of initiative but rather the distributive functions of the international market place which worked against the farmers who longer planted for themselves and local markets, but took the initiative to become part of the world system.
Report comment to moderator
Christ wasn’t being cynical when he said “the poor you will always have with you.” He was telling those around him that his time was limited, so listen up, you need to learn this before I leave. We don’t need to sponsor walks for fancy dinners that make the participants feel good about themselves, where most of the money donated goes to the cost of the event. We need to do what the Good Samaritan did, step up to the plate. As Christians — not Americans. It is NOT in the Constitution that it is the USA’s job to end world hunger. This can all be done privately, and traditionally, this has been done through missionary work and donations, but there are other non-profits, non-governmental agencies that do similar work. But when you have members fo a society that hates all forms of religion except their own undying worship of government control, which is anti-freedom by the way, you get this idea that government should be doing what individuals should do. Besides — it lets the socialists off the hook. They don’t have to give of themselves. They let the government do it for them. Says a lot about their hearts.
Report comment to moderator
They don’t have to give of themselves. They let the government do it for them. Says a lot about their hearts.
OK – so government funds consist of your hard-earned tax money (or so I’ve heard countless times on WOW) for which you demand accountability in the voting booth, except when it comes time to aid the poor? Then they somehow become an excuse for “socialists” to be uncaring?
Ah the logic of lawyers…
Report comment to moderator
Spinoza,
“for which you demand accountability in the voting booth”
Yeah. Charity is the domain of private enterprise and individual openhandedness and not the domain of government issued entitlements. So, we need to hold government accountable to NOT using our money for activities the government has no business being involved with.
“except when it comes time to aid the poor?”
No. We would hold them accountable – to STOP using taxpayer dollars to fund welfare programs which are by nature law and entitlement, and not charity. The “heart” and “caring” is simply removed from the equation.
Yes. It seems socialists often “care” with other people’s money. They politicians say they care, but caring has nothing to do with it anymore once welfare becomes law.
Report comment to moderator
So if all it takes is a march or two to end world hunger, what have they been waiting for? I guess we’ve just found our culprit for hunger. I say we try them in a world court for all the deaths that could have been prevented if they had only had their march 5 years earlier. With great power comes great responsibility, right?
Report comment to moderator
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000573.html
Report comment to moderator
Tony, This is a very good post. It really got me thinking. Thinking so much about it that I actually registered so I could respond here:)
I’m just a fat, white, middle-income suburbanite, who does his best not to take his Starbucks and Super Target for granted, but I do try to keep up some with what is going on in the world of poverty and missions. I guess it helps me deal with the guilt of living the candy coated lifestyle that I do.
However, I’m still not convinced by your post that you actually have any real ideas for solving the problem of world hunger/poverty? I loved the post from HRW because he gave some more texture to the complexity of the problem.
We obviously can’t go around the world overthrowing any government we deem as unworthy to lead their country…
I don’t think the solution is as simple as saying this can all be done by privately funding missionary work…
We serve a God of unlimited resources, but we are a people of limited resources. It seems to me the best way to fight poverty in the world is through public-private partnerships regardless of religion or how corrupt we percieve the NGO or government partner. The ONE campaign has accomplished this somewhat.
I know very little about this from a macro perspective, but it really bothers me when I see such simple solutions trotted out as the end all be all for a problem that is so complex and so huge.
Maybe God is telling us the best way for us to proclaim His name is through partnerships and working together, side-by-side, toward common goals?
Report comment to moderator
This is not as complex and huge a problem as we may perceive. Christians really do have all of the resources we need.
Each Sunday I and an accountability partner walk around the streets of Saint Petersburg handing out sandwiches (2 pieces of bread, meat, cheese) to folks that are hungry. Beggars in Russia ask for money to buy a piece of bread. We tell them that we do not have money, but we would be glad to share some bread. We give a sandwich (or two) Then we listen, then we share Christ, then we listen and try to help anyway we can. The key is to invest yourself in the person in front of you.
I am not trying to solve world hunger. I am trying to help a hungry person move toward Christ. The best way to proclaim Christ is to well… proclaim Christ. Then get out of his way because he can change the world.
Report comment to moderator
Jason,
We can’t overthrow governments on a whim, but we can tie the aid we give them to substantive reforms in the institutions necessary for prosperity: rule of law, property rights, stable money supply, a regulatory regime where benefits outweigh costs, and so on. I recommend the Mercatus Center’s work if you’re looking for more specific solutions.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!