Keep track of those gigabytes!
Here’s a plan reminiscent of the old dial-up Internet days that I’m not too keen on: Time Warner Cable is conducting an Internet trial in which new Beaumont, Texas, customers will have monthly allowances for the amount of data they upload and download. Web users who go over the limit will get slapped with a $1 per gigabyte charge.
Metered billing is an attempt to deal fairly with Internet usage, which is very uneven among Time Warner Cable’s subscribers, said Kevin Leddy, Time Warner Cable’s executive vice president of advanced technology.
Just 5 percent of the company’s subscribers take up half of the capacity on local cable lines, Leddy said. Other cable Internet service providers report a similar distribution.
“We think it’s the fairest way to finance the needed investment in the infrastructure,” Leddy said.
While phone companies are unlikely to impose metered usage on DSL customers due to a different network structure, other cable providers are also looking at ways to rein in heavy users. Those of us who have cell phone are already used to monitoring the minutes we use and paying extra for going over our allowance. But will consumers accept metered Internet usage? Information-technology consultant George Ou told the FCC he doesn’t think so: “The metered Internet has been tried and tested and rejected by the consumers overwhelmingly since the days of AOL.” What do you think?




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top10 Comments to “Keep track of those gigabytes!”
Wasn’t there an old urban legend that sounded like this?
Report comment to moderator
Time Warner is an oil company in technology clothing. It has nothing to do with “fair” and every thing to do with their profit.
The city in which I live only had one choice for TV cable service–Time Warner. City Hall had a revolution on their hands and now there are other choices. It didn’t effect us since we have a dish, but to our friends and neighbors Time Warner is the poster child for corporate greed.
Report comment to moderator
Metering is a horrible idea. I use wi-fi and I considered a limited plan based on gigs, but decided against it when I found out it was extremely limited. So I went in with a buddy and bought an unlimited wi-fi plan for $60 a month ($30 each). We share the wireless card. So far it’s worked out great.
Report comment to moderator
This has to happen; the majority of users will never even approach the limits by browsing their usual sites and email, but the mega-downloaders slow things down for everyone else. 1/GB isn’t that much, anyway; it takes a lot to do 1GB such as downloading major software distributions.
Depending on what the monthly limit is, this may not affect many people.
On the other hand, I wonder how much data I use watching Netflix online…
Report comment to moderator
Another opportunity to liberate us from our dollars.
How about shutting down those who fall below minimum usage? Nothing is safe anymore. How soon before we have to pay to use the toilet on airplane flights? I say 6 months.
Report comment to moderator
If there’s going to be a fee, perhaps it should be for video usage, which (as I understand it) takes up the most bandwidth.
Report comment to moderator
Ivan is spot on. Once internet providers figure out how to charge us for it, over and above their usual fees, congress will figure out how to tax us for it.
Report comment to moderator
Adios – in the market where I live, Comcast is the Cable TV extortioner.
Report comment to moderator
I have no problem in paying for what I use or consume and neither should you.
You should be upset that 95% of us usage losers are subsidizing and paying for the 5% of usage winners and we are paying a huge amount.
If this doesn’t get fixed soon, then the Internet as we know it will be quite different and much more expensive than it is today.
Report comment to moderator
So an average DVD would cost us 5-7 dollars to download, and the same for someone to upload? That’s robbery. It would be cheaper to rent.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!