The Christian realist
Clearly, there’s a theme to today’s posts, about literature, the West, the classics, and reading. At City Journal, Bruce Thornton reviews Against the Grain: Christianity and Democracy, War and Peace, by George Weigel, where the author “gives Christian answers to the West’s most pressing questions.” Weigel is also the author of The Cube and the Cathedral, which you may’ve heard of.
Weigel examines the implications that restoring Christian-and more specifically Catholic-philosophical and theological perspectives to our political discourse would have in a host of areas, including foreign policy, globalization, the problems of the Third World, the role of faith in politics, abortion, bioethics, the promotion of human rights and democracy abroad, and many others. Weigel’s analysis of political freedom is particularly valuable, for the starting point of all other political disputes is our understanding of liberty.
A contemporary idea had by any school child and sold by the media is that we have democracy in America simply because we’re smart, enlightened people who really, really want freedom. It sounds like Weigel would disagree. We have freedom because of the moral and philosophical systems that we have in the West.
In contrast to the materialist determinism or secularist scientism dominating our public discourse, Weigel himself exemplifies what he describes as the “Christian realist sensibility-an understanding of the inevitable irony, pathos, and tragedy of history; alertness to unintended consequences; a robust skepticism about schemes of human perfection (especially when politics is the instrument of salvation); [and] cherishing democracy without worshipping it.”
That’s a nice thought: a Christian realist. Not a Christian Dominionist who wants a Senate full of deacons, and not a Christian Secularist who wants to build a wall of impenetrability between church and everything else.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top9 Comments to “The Christian realist”
“We have freedom because of the moral and philosophical systems that we have in the West.”
Am I being too harsh if I think that anyone who cannot see the truth in this statement, is not only naive, but foolish, and possibly stupid as well?
Report comment to moderator
Make It Man
How can anyone pay any attention to what you say. You are just a simple cabinet maker. You used to be a car mechanic. Did you go to Harvard? Have you studied at Oxford? the Sorbonne? Who do you think you are to have any philosophical thoughts? I’ll bet about the only foreigners you know are refugees from some benighted country that was run by some wonderful Communists or kind socialists.
How dare you take on the international intellectuals and their anointed beliefs. Don’t you recognize the commonness of your beliefs? All you and I are good for is breeding soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines. We should let our betters run the world and our nation.
Report comment to moderator
Quite so… How silly of me…
Report comment to moderator
“A contemporary idea had by any school child and sold by the media is that we have democracy in America simply because we’re smart, enlightened people”
I heard this type of attitude expressed by a delegate to explain why we were superior to Asian, African and South American people and why he voted as he did on a certain topic.
I need to mention that this man was a delegate to the 2003 Episcopal Church’s General Convention and the topic was the consecration of Gene Robinson as bishop. He simply blew off the arguments of the Africans and others as uneducated and unenlightened. (See the June 23 WotW posting: http://online.worldmag.com/?s=gafcon )
This attitude affects many Americans’ thinking from politicians to the leadership of a number of churches.
Report comment to moderator
“We should let our betters run the world and our nation.”
Boy, that’s the truth. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Democracy just does not work.
Report comment to moderator
Unfortunately the operative word is apparently “had” in the phrase:
“We have freedom because of the moral and philosophical systems that we [had] in the West.”
We no longer have those same philosophical underpinnings. Unless we get to reclaiming them, the West will continue its decline (which will accelerate rapidly).
Report comment to moderator
KRM,
Please don’t remind me.
Report comment to moderator
“A contemporary idea had by any school child and sold by the media is that we have democracy in America simply because we’re smart, enlightened people”
Out of curiosity, I asked my younger son (just finished 2nd grade in public school) what he would answer to someone asking why we have freedom in America (and knowing that people in some other places don’t). He thought a while, then finally said he really wasn’t sure, but he’d perhaps say something about how we got started as a country. He couldn’t remember the details of that – but he was certainly on the right track.
Report comment to moderator
Pauline – Gove the public schools some time and our way of life will all be a random accident caused by time and chance – despite the hindering efforts of racist, oppressive, phallocentric, paternalistic, misogynist, homophobic, genicidal, evil white men (a/k/a the Founding Fathers) – and no better than any other culture (worse, in fact, than every other culture!).
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!