The moderation of the professorate
Oh, we talk too much about the politicization of the modern university and how all the professors are nutballs who believe and teach all kinds of hog tripe. As with anything else in the world, it’s not such a black and white issue. Some really terrific professors believe some really terrible things. Some really terrible professors believe some really terrific things. And so on. This story in the Times does suggest, though, that the stereotypical radical leftist professor is dying out in higher education. Or if not dying, at least retiring, just like Boomers everywhere.
“There’s definitely something happening,” said Peter W. Wood, executive director of the National Association of Scholars, which was created in 1987 to counter attacks on Western culture and values. “I hear from quite a few faculty members and graduate students from around the country. They are not really interested in fighting the battles that have been fought over the last 20 years.” Individual colleges and organizations like the American Association of University Professors are already bracing for what has been labeled the graying of the faculty.
This would only be a good thing, ideologically speaking, if the Replacement Professors were more balanced, more moderate on political issues, less willing to toe the leftist line. And they seem to be that way.
“Self-described liberals are most common within the ranks of those professors aged 50-64, who were teenagers or young adults in the 1960s,” [two researchers] wrote, making up just under 50 percent. At the same time, the youngest group, ages 26 to 35, contains the highest percentage of moderates, some 60 percent, and the lowest percentage of liberals, just under a third. When it comes to those who consider themselves “liberal activists,” 17.2 percent of the 50-64 age group take up the banner compared with only 1.3 percent of professors 35 and younger.
So, hey. There’s something good coming from the giant swell of retiring Boomers.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Special Student Discount for WORLD!








Click to Print
Include Comments










back to top7 Comments to “The moderation of the professorate”
The National Association of Scholars is a godsend to the secular university, though it will take a generation or more to undo the damage done by the hard-edged secularist influence.
There is a first class book out on this subject, The Decline of the Secular University by C. John Sommerville.
Report comment to moderator
. . . more balanced, more moderate . . less willing . . .
Could you please tidy this up, Harrison? More balanced and more moderate are like more pregnant. A person is either balanced or unbalanced, moderate or immoderate. And surely, ideology is primarily a matter of thought, not will, especially for professors, who are in the business of talking rather than doing. And it is not a good thing for professors to be weak-willed in the expression of their thought.
Report comment to moderator
ScroopMoth, though it may come as a surprise to you traditionally the best of professors going back to the founding of the university in the Middle Ages are indeed balanced, moderate and civilized, even while rigorously advancing their views. Read Aquinas passim for a good example. Not all professors follow the fevered model of the leftist yahoos who somehow think their utterances are the perfect truth.
Report comment to moderator
Well, not to through some water on the fire but…. this is from the Times. We know that the fairness and balance of the overwhelming 80%majority of socialist professors have been under attack and monitoring by conservatives because of perceived and real left bias, bigotry and discrimination.
We also know that the Times is nothing more than a mouthpiece, nearly offal now, for the socialist DNC and Democratic Party.
Sorry, I take what ever they say with a grain of salt and watch what they do. In 2006 university professors voted 80% Democratic hardly different than the rest of the education field at all levels. This does not talk into account the ones that voted green, Nader etc either. When I see them actually voting 50% conservative, the doing, then I will start to think that one of the last few bastions of socialism has been desegregated.
Until then, university professors, other educators, lawyers, judges and journalists will be monitored closely and called to task as necessary when they discriminate against conservatives, religious people and anyone who isn’t a card carrying socialist and doesn’t march in lockstep to their slave masters wishes.
Report comment to moderator
Just out of curiosity, PETER LEAVITT, how much Aquinas have you read? Since you’re recommending a reading list to me, perhaps it’s fair to ask how much of it you’ve read, starting with the name at the top of your list. Now, I’ll go first, not because I’m a gentlemen, but to make myself look magnanimous. Of course, you’ll be truthful without regard to my answer, which is located in the next post, in order to help keep you true. Close your eyes now and start typing your answer.
Still reading, huh? Well, back up, and read #2 again. What it says is compatible with what you said, so what’s your problem, except that I wrote it. Further, you make no sense when you claim that leftists believe in perfect truth. They very much believe in seeing through a glass darkly, and y’all whack them for that all the time.
Report comment to moderator
I spent a solid week in the UGLI reading excerpts of the Summa . . . at least four hours a day, and to the detriment of some of my other work. That wasn’t my week for a report (I did the millenarianism unit) but it was a big topic for a conscientious scholar like me. We spent weeks with Albertus Magnus, Averroes, and Nicholas of Cusa. Plus, Peter, I took a whole course on Aristotle.
I’m afraid there’s no remedy for me in your reading list.
Speaking of moderation, Aquinas advocated execution of heretics and by extension, holy war. Nowadays we call that kind of thing “Jihad.” Aquinas believed in economic justice, meaning fair wages and just prices. Being against income inequality, he thought the rich could have too much and the poor too little. Aquinas thought usury was like homicide. Nowadays, we call that socialism or worse.
Report comment to moderator
It will take 20 to 40 years to undo the damage of the Radical Boomers though.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!