Another side of Jesse Helms
Former Sen. Jesse Helms was laid to rest yesterday in Raleigh, N.C., but arguments about his political convictions continue to rage on. Helms may have been stubborn and unwavering in his beliefs and principles, but that doesn’t mean he never admitted to being wrong, as he did in this interview with WORLD’s Jamie Dean in late 2005:
These days Mr. Helms spends his time applying his conservative principles and Christian faith to an area he says he is “ashamed” he neglected for much of the last 20 years of his career: fighting AIDS. In his memoir [Here's Where I Stand], Mr. Helms says he long believed AIDS was a disease that would “probably be confined to those in high-risk populations.” Toward the end of his career he realized: “I was wrong.” In 2002 alone, he notes in his book, “More than a half million babies in the developing world contracted [HIV] from their mothers, despite the fact that drugs and therapies exist that could have virtually eliminated” the mother-to-child transmissions. He also notes that by the end of the year 2003, “one in five adults in Southern Africa was living with HIV/AIDS.”
Mr. Helms told WORLD that the African AIDS pandemic has moved him to spend his last years working to save the lives of others: “It is because of my faith that I am determined to convince churches that we must be involved in helping to combat the scourge of AIDS in Africa. We can offer something no one else can as we show the love of Christ in action.”
“I may have been late in seeing this need,” he said, “but now that I have . . . I feel committed to working as hard as I can.”



WORLD Magazine Library powered by Amazon
Term Life Insurance at Savings up to 75%!
Logos Bible Software for Bible Study
Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Free Hardcover ESV Study Bible!
















back to top28 Comments to “Another side of Jesse Helms”
I just finished reading a book called No Place Left To Bury the Dead: Denial, Despair and Hope in the African AIDS Pandemic by Nicole Itano. She tells the story of AIDS in Africa through the lives of three women in the area of South Africa near Lesotho. Based on what she said and what I remember, I’m not sure how much anyone could have done once the disease became politically correct.
Many people, including Helms, played a role in this health debacle and many died as a result. I’m glad he at least acknowledged his part, albeit way too late for millions of people.
So many things were done wrong in the 1980s–including the insistence that AIDS was primarily a disease of gays, Haitians and hemophiliacs–that it was allowed to get a foothold Africa probably will never recover from.
It was interesting to read the comments by African doctors, that because they were forced to use first world methods in dealing with the disease, the traditional African ways of handling ill health got pushed to the side and the disease ended up becoming more rampant.
Mostly it had to do with privacy laws–pushed into play by those who didn’t want to alter their personal freedoms and be responsible–which mean people testing positive for HIV had to be told behind closed doors and information couldn’t be shared with doctors and family. This made it a hush-hush disease which meant it wasn’t dealt with in a straight forward manner and became a matter of both health and shame and thus less discussed.
Families, who traditionally do all the health care in Africa, were often in the dark and frequently used care methods which increased their risk of contacting the disease. And with little money for drugs, few doctors and an unwillingness to even acknowledge the disease or where it came from–it just spread.
A sobering read which gave me much food for thought. When history looks back on this age, AIDS probably will be just as large an historic player as the 13th century plague. Helms will be just another footnote, if mentioned at all.
Report comment to moderator
Jesse Helms had his warts, as we all do.
His early racist attitudes were a product of his times and locale. However, his Christianity never allowed him to carry those wrongful attitudes to the extremes of Senator Byrd’s KKK activities.
This interview with Jamie Dean shows his genuine repentance for such attitudes towards black people. Furthermore, he was actively doing something about it—faith and repentance demonstrated by works.
His sacrificial care for needy people began early on when he and his wife adopted a nine-year-old orphan with cerebral palsy. Rather than the usual one time donation, this was a supremely sacrificial life-long commitment.
Add to this his outstanding patriotic commitment and untiring work for America over the years and you have a great American.
Report comment to moderator
So Helms was “stubborn and unwavering”?
When was the last time a liberal senator was called that?
It appears it is up to evil white people to solve the AIDS problem in South Africa.
Report comment to moderator
Mickey, why don’t you link Bill Marsh’s post (from his blog) about when he met Helms?
Report comment to moderator
Another Side of Bob Dylan is a much better album.
Report comment to moderator
OK, TJ, here you go:
The Senator and Me
Bill Marsh, the pastor of Christ Community Church (Associate Reformed Presbyterian) in Greensboro, N.C., worked for Sen. Helms on several occasions in the mid-1980s.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks!
Report comment to moderator
And I should add, as TJ did in Whirled Views yesterday, that Bill is the pastor of my church.
Report comment to moderator
Great article on Sen Helms by Bill Marsh (#6)! Thanks.
Report comment to moderator
My college internship at NC State was with Senator Helms via Jefferson Marketing and the Congressional Club. I always found the Senator to be a warm and personal man, willing to speak with anyone and very courteous. The U.S. Senate needs more men like Helms — who are firm in their convictions yet always willing to lend a hand of assistance.
Report comment to moderator
I hope that all got a chance to see Sean Hannity’s last interview with Helms yesterday.
Many ignored and wee late to the AIDS party especially in Africa. For 8 years as the AIDS crisis raged on, President Clinton did absolutely nothing to help solve the problem.
When Jessie Helms and other Republicans asked the new President Bush to please do something when he became president and Bush was moved morally by them he asked for and got $15 Billion to spend on AIDS in Africa. The first time America had ever done such a thing.
The left, who could have easily spent one dollar on African AIDS any time they wanted to, year after year did absolutely nothing while having the chutzpah to claim they were the only AIDS in AFRICA (and around the world) champion since the right was evil and wanted all people with AIDS to just die in the streets where ever they fell.
But it was Jessie and Bush who cared and both apologized for their late thinking and being wrong on this issue. We have heard no apology or explanation from Clinton or from the left why they did nothing while claiming to be the only champion on this issue.
Their only comment when Bush announced the first ever $15 Billion AIDS grant to Africa was that is wasn’t enough.
They said exactly the same thing when Bush pushed through the $400 Billion Drugs for Granny Medicare add. Even though the left said this was their issue, their wish, their program all along and they were the only ones to care about old people and that Republicans were evil and only wanted the old to die in the streets where ever they fell (sounds familiar doesn’t it?)
Even though they had 40 years to take care of Granny’s drug problem they supposedly cared so much about – they ended up saying “it wasn’t enough” when Bush’s bill was passed into law. Never forget to always ignore what a socialsit says but watch what they do oif you wna rtto know the truth about them.
Oddly, this old folks benefit made Bush even more hated by the insane lefty crowd though – even though no one thought they could possibly hate their president more. That speaks volumes too but can be summarized as follows:
Like all terrorists, socialists cannot control themselves, have no shame and can never be satisfied.
Report comment to moderator
Well stated, Llama.
Report comment to moderator
To Llama
What do we have to show for the $15 billion grant we sent to Africa?
Report comment to moderator
We probably have hundreds of thousands of people who are still alive, Nick — not that you care much about the lives of “darkies.”
Report comment to moderator
To Outkast
As I understand it our AIDS program in Africa has been a failure.
To be successful the medicine has to be taken at certain times. As you could probably guess the people we were giving it to were not use to that type of regimentation.
Report comment to moderator
Some far leftists have long speculated on Helms’ eternal fate:
“I think [Helms] ought to be worried about what’s going on in the Good Lord’s mind, because if there is retributive justice, he’ll get AIDS from a transfusion. Or one of his grandchildren will get it.” ~ NPR’s Nina Totenberg, 1995.
That’s not only mean-spirited, it’s unfair-minded. Helms did far more for AIDS relief than most liberals I know of.
Report comment to moderator
The Helms’ adopted a 9-year-old orphan named Charlie with cerebral palsy in 1962. Charlie was quoted in a newspaper saying that all he wanted for Christmas was a mother and father. The Helms’ gave him that present–themselves!
Report comment to moderator
Nick,
Our program to get your head screwed on correctly has failed miserably too but it has not been for a lack of trying on our part. But, we will not quit trying just because we have failed miserably to date, doesn’t mean will give up. We know that trying is not the goal – its the doing that counts in the end.
But that said, you can never do until you try. The left doesn’t even try in these things and so they rarely do anything the stuff they do – isn’t worth doing.
They are very good at pointing out things when people fail at accomplishing things they would never do themselves though. They make the best spell checkers in the world.
Report comment to moderator
MICKEY: Helms may have been stubborn . . . but that doesn’t mean he never admitted to being wrong . . .
Saying you’re “ashamed” that you neglected charitable work is not the same as admitting to “being wrong.” (BTW, why didn’t Dean quote “ashamed” in a complete sentence?)
If Helms was apologizing for his racism and homophobia, that would have been news, and Dean would have put it at the top of the story. More importantly, to be credible, such an apology would have to come while Helms was still in public life — and before he started to lose his memory about what he had to apologize for.
Helms was infamous for not apologizing for his blatant racism, which made him unique among prominent Southern politicians.
Mickey white-washes a sepulcher. Pretending to enforce language standards on a previous Helms thread, Mickey cleaned up a famous Helms quote, “D-d lesbian,” by deleting the offensive word, reducing the quote to “lesbian.” Yet Mickey himself spelled out the D-word in his thread about Rev. Pfleger’s famous sermon, “Oh damn, where did you come from? I’m white. I’m entitled.” (Sgt. Mickey, quoting Rev. Pfleger in “More problems from the pulpit for Obama”, May 30, 2008)
Hypocrisy makes false worship so easy.
Report comment to moderator
It must be easy to accuse Senator Helms of “blatant racism” without any supporting documentation, Scroop, showing context and intent.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop: On that other thread, I was trying to clean up a volatile string of comments from over the holiday weekend and went a bit too far in my cleaning. In hindsight, I should’ve left some of the comments as they were. It’s a tough call sometimes as to what’s appropriate and what’s not. We try to be consistent, but we aren’t always.
Report comment to moderator
Mickey, thanks. It’s not possible for any of us to be consistent, we just take our lumps and explain in good faith. I have no problem with Worldmag’s style sheet, but am sometimes surprised at what is or isn’t on it. “Faggot” seems to be OK but not the 3-letter word. Also, the D-word, once used, now appears to be banned, except when quoting it to condemn its use.
Report comment to moderator
Outkast — David Broder published a scathing indictment of Helms in the WaPo, flatly calling him a “white racist,” when Helms retired from the senate. Broder claimed that Helms’ offenses against America were malicious, unrepented, and a-typical of the modern South. As far as I know, Helms didn’t respond these charges.
Report comment to moderator
The reason Senator Helms probably didn’t “respond to the charges” is because they were undoubtably false charges, Scroop. Sometimes they best thing to do when false charges are made about us is to ignore the people making those charges.
Many people today (thanks to the prevailing side of the War Between the States) believe that conflict was over slavery, when it fact it was over state’s rights. The same type of misunderstanding comes when many outside of North Carolina judge Senator Helms, apart from context.
When I was interning for the Senator back in the mid-80s, his press secretary was Claude Allen, an African-American man. It was always humorous to watch the Democrats down there complain about racism when the truth was Senator Helms was extremely accepting of people of all ethnic backgrounds.
Report comment to moderator
Gentlemen don’t ignore charges made by gentlemen. Broder has an enduring reputation as a professional and honorable observer of politicians. WaPo exposes damaging indictments like his to widespread inspection and review, and to history. Helms didn’t challenge Broder’s conclusions because he he didn’t have a defense for his behavior, and because refusing to give a defense was the principle satisfaction he provided his disaffected, bitter supporters.
The mentally ill Claude Allen was Helms’ and afterwards George Bush’s House Negro. Consider: The chief domestic policy advisor to the president and the top Black staff member in the White House had no power, no influence, no voice. Allen didn’t make policy, he carried it out.
John Podhoretz at The Corner pointed out Allen’s “utter obscurity despite the seniority of his position.” (3/11) Podhoretz said: “I wrote a book about the Bush White House. I know . . . I’ve read . . .I’ve been . . .and gone to . . .So let me say this about accused thief and former White House policy bigshot Claude Allen: WHO?”
This hero of personal achievement was a paper pusher — who took revenge by targeting Target with false receipts. Allen would have done more for himself by cursing Helms to his face.
Your claim that the civil war was not about slavery is crazy — for being gratuitous and futile, if for no other reasons.
Report comment to moderator
I repeat, Scroop, what you call the “civil war” (when the North invaded the Southern state, which were merely trying to secede from the Union, as was allowed for in the Constitution), was not about slavery. Revisionist history (written by the North, the side that won the war) has taught generations of Americans that it was, but it was in reality about states’ rights.
Did you know that General Lee freed his slaves long before General Grant let his go? That Abraham didn’t care for the negro (would have never dreamed of allowing them to vote, for example) and only offered the Emancipation Proclamation in an attempt to wreck more havoc on the South?
Report comment to moderator
BTW, Claude Allen was (and is) a very soft-spoken and mild-mannered gentleman who unfortunately made some poor decisions at one point in his life.
If you’re throwing stones, I hope you’ve never made mistakes of your own.
Report comment to moderator
Claude Allen’s mistake was being too “soft-spoken and mild mannered” not to express his feelings about the existential absurdity of his false position directly to his employers, Helms and Bush. His repeated larcenies at Target were not a mistake, they were a crime. It would be meaningless for me, an anonymous poster, to say I’ve not committed crimes. For all you know, I could be blogging from prison. But I’m not, and I haven’t.
As Samuel Johnson remarked about American rebels of an earlier generation, “How is it that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of negroes?” Without slavery, there would be no Republicans to threaten the South’s way of life, and no peculiar “civilization” to defend against Yankees. Slavery had a low profile in the talk by both sides leading to war, but all knew that war would be a “death-grapple with the Southern slave oligarchy.” See Battle Cry for Freedom, p. 311-12.
As you know, this is a vast topic, and I’ve said my peace about it for the purposes of this thread.
Report comment to moderator