What’s so funny about Obama?
Apparently not much according to those who rule the late-night TV airwaves. Sure, there’s no shortage of “John McCain is so old …” jokes, but, as The New York Times points out, there’s been virtually no humorous takes “about [Obama's] age, his speaking ability, his intelligence, his family, his physique” or “his race” on the late-night shows.
Why? Mike Barry, a writer for David Letterman who’s been penning jokes about presidents since the Johnson administration, told the Times, “[H]e’s not buffoonish in any way. He’s not a comical figure.” The Times wondered, could it be because the late-night audiences and writers have a favorable disposition toward the Democratic candidate? “A lot of people are excited about his candidacy,” admitted Mike Sweeney, a writer for Conan O’Brien’s “Late Night.” “It’s almost like: ‘Hey, don’t go after this guy. He’s a fresh face; cut him some slack.’” Barry added, “I think some of us were maybe too quick to caricature Al Gore and John Kerry and there’s maybe some reluctance to do the same thing to him.”
So is Barack Obama so flawless that there’s absolutely nothing to poke fun at him about? What about his big ears? “His ears should be the focus of the jokes,” said Jimmy Kimmel. Whew! Thank God for providing that comedic relief!















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top87 Comments to “What’s so funny about Obama?”
I just had a crazy thought. Maybe they are afraid to pick on Obama because he is black.
Report comment to moderator
Strangely, I was thinking the same thing Nick.
Report comment to moderator
I miss Hillary.
Report comment to moderator
He’s mostly untouchable, which is nothing less than I expect from liberal, hypocritical, cowardly non-Christians.
Report comment to moderator
First, he is (half) black and marketed as a “black candidate” so anytrhing less than glowing about him is racist. Second, the comedians and late-night shows skew well to the liberal side, so something about a liberal candidate has to be blatent in order to overcome their feeling of ‘heresy’ in smacking it.
Report comment to moderator
That’s because voting pro-abortion, with a 100% NARAL rating is deadly serious. It’s not a laughing matter to poke fun at someone who deems the life of a child expendable for the sake of liberty. He’s one gravitas dude.
Report comment to moderator
On the bigger picture this just goes to show how unceasingly fair white people try to be to black people.
We are afraid to criticize or spoof a man who has a great chance to be President of the U.S.
In the history of the planet has any other majority tried to be as fair to their 15% (approx.) minority population as the U.S. has been to black people?
In my opinion the harder we try to reach an accord with black people the louder their demands become.
Report comment to moderator
To me he comes at least as stiff and humorless as Mitt Romney and Al Gore were portrayed.
Report comment to moderator
Self-flagellation for the sins of the Fathers is a restitution too far for me.
Report comment to moderator
Obama isn’t funny because he represents and supports abortion.
He has no plan, except his slogan of “HOPE” which has no outline, except to wring the funds from the American people.
He wants to redistribute wealth to those who either won’t work, or have no intention of taking responsibility for themselves.
He isn’t insisting that those who claim victim-hood take advantage of free education that’s offered each kid across this nation.
There’s no humor but disgrace when he talks about “hope” and those who eagerly await their ‘new free “hope” handout’ — hangout with their hands in their pockets with nary one thought of picking up their share of the work.
Report comment to moderator
I’ve always mocked him for his inexperience. Here’s a good example of Obama humor: http://www.imao.us/archives/010132.html/#comments
Report comment to moderator
This is a particularly warped read of the NYT article, even for WMB’s resident spin doctor. Either a more intelligent or less ideologically constrained commentator might have picked out this phrase (perhaps prompted by the appearence of the word MOST) as an explanation:
“Why? The reason cited by most of those involved in the shows is that a fundamental factor is so far missing in Mr. Obama: There is no comedic “take” on him, nothing easy to turn to for an easy laugh, like allegations of Bill Clinton’s womanizing, or President Bush’s goofy bumbling or Al Gore’s robotic persona.”
But no, Mickey selective takes on quotes that will be good meat for the dogs!
One might have also at least lived up to the credibility of the NYT and included some discussion about those who ARE making fun of Obama. Bill Maher and David Allan Grier are two listed.
Report comment to moderator
Obama’s style of priggish and pretentious moral earnestness has always been a prime target for humor. Groucho Marx enjoyed many such moments at Margaret Dumont’s expense. Humorists such as Mark Twain mined this rich lode for many a laugh. If the comics have a hard time figuring out a “comedic take” it’s because they don’t want to try.
Report comment to moderator
How many church goers stay up for Saturday night shows anyway?
“Early to bed…” just shows you that those slackards who watch those shows are liberal, socialist, god haters.
No, really, I never watched any of the late night shows. They are after my bedtime.
Report comment to moderator
Barack Obama is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever known in my life.
http://tinyurl.com/h4ocb
Report comment to moderator
The official Barack Obama Jokes web page: http://barackobamajokes.googlepages.com/
Report comment to moderator
Maureen Dowd pegged Obama as finicky and abstemious.
You wouldn’t want to invite him to your barbecue because it would be a downer to watch him scowl and nibble. Not volatile like McCain in the face of challenge, but he’s sullen and resentful of intrusion — gnarlly to the max! Obama tries too hard to foresee mistakes, and finds himself constantly in knuckle-headed error, which tempts him to withdraw and sulk.
The comedy will emerge from Obama’s efforts to control and balance his temperamental weaknesses — forcing himself to consume Oscar Meyer wieners and Bud in a can, forcing him to blurt out spontaneous expletives against his inclination, etc.
Report comment to moderator
So the media and late night hosts are walking on eggshells too scared to criticize Obama. Fine. That’s their right.
But what is worse is that the mainstream media are running interference for Obama and doing all they can to prevent Obama from ever having to share a stage with a host or an interviewer or an opponent who is conservative and smart enough to challenge Obama’s messianic claims and speeches.
Not only are the media (in most of its forms) failing to criticize Obama, they are actively protecting him.
Report comment to moderator
Obama has extremely little experience, precious few accomplishments and has not even (to my knowledge) ever even had to share a stage or do an interview with a real conservative (if he has, I have not seen it nor has he had enough such first-hand scrutiny to qualify him for this level of competition).
But Obama does makes a lot of carefully scripted speeches before cheering adoring (and sometimes) mindless fans.
Report comment to moderator
NOTICE: Below are excerpts from article
June 16, 2008
Look at all the experience the Bushies brought to the White House. Bush Sr. a call away, Cheney, Baker, Rumsfeld, Powell, et al. And look at what a disaster they made of the country. I wouldn’t say experience in Washington is a good thing. Lack of it is one of Obama’s only good points. That said:
VOTE FOR BOB BARR IN 2008!
Report comment to moderator
NOTICE: For some reason the information below should have been stated on top of post #20 but didn’t post –
June 16, 2008
Report comment to moderator
To Godlumps
You are correct about experience. Besides no one has gone from the Senate to the Presidency since 1960.
Look at Bush. If he wasn’t born into a third generation political family he would be guessing weights at a carnival.
Report comment to moderator
Don’t forget that President Bush graduated from a prestigious Ivy League college, Nick, and had better grades than some of the Democrats who make fun of him!
Report comment to moderator
Victoarrhea, my gullible friend.
Your job of muslimificating Obama is going to be tough but hang in there.
Report comment to moderator
TJ (#15),
Your link is right on target!
Report comment to moderator
LOL, that’s a poll from way back in February, GL! It’s so far outdated it’s hilarious.
BTW, Christians usually don’t make fun of other Christians by twisting their names into a reference for a bowel movement.
Report comment to moderator
They might if said Christian is spreading false information and fertilizer about another Christian for political purposes
Report comment to moderator
Lumps,
Your little article was written back in February, THINKS HAVE CHANGED
July 11, 2008 6:24 PM
The NEWSWEEK Poll: Is the Glow Fading?
By Jonathan Darman
A month after emerging victorious from the bruising Democratic nominating contest, some of Barack Obama’s glow may be fading. In the latest NEWSWEEK Poll, the Illinois senator leads Republican nominee John McCain by just 3 percentage points, 44 percent to 41 percent. The statistical dead heat is a marked change from last month’s NEWSWEEK Poll, where Obama led McCain by 15 points, 51 percent to 36 percent.
Report comment to moderator
Excellent news. I wish they would include Bob Barr.
Report comment to moderator
Outkast can always be counted on to defend and join in on the bearing of false witness, so long as the subject is a Democrat.
The 10 Commandments really are optional in the minds of some Christians it seems, at least if it’s a choice between obeying or scoring political points.
Outkast and few others around here are particularly shameless about it.
Report comment to moderator
Outkast – 27
We need to remember that BM’s are on some peoples minds more often than not, so typing might take on a rather strange tone/noise/smell when all else fails in the ATTENTION ZONE
Report comment to moderator
Victoarrhea- it wouldn’t have been on anyone’s mind if you hadn’t dropped a smelly one in the middle of a thread.
Report comment to moderator
Godlumps seems to be implying that Obama is a Christian.
Let’s see.
Obama is on record as enthusiastically supporting the procedure in which a full-term healthy baby is delivered and then killed by jabbing a sharp instrument into her brain. Not only does he support it, he wants you to pay for it (continue paying for it) too.
Interesting position for a ‘Christian’; he must be a follower of some other Jesus Christ than the one I am familar with. A newly ‘media-anointed’ Jesus once named Moloch, perhaps?
Obama has gone on record as saying that Christ is only one of many acceptable ways to God.
Interesting position for a ‘Christian’; I guess one can call Christ a liar and still wear the label for political gain.
Obama has as his very long-term supporters and friends and advisors, haters and bigots and cop-killers; furthermore his past and present language and actions have indicated continued solidarity with them in all things.
Interesting position for a ‘Christian’; I guess
Heck.
I have a chicken-eating, sneak-thieving, shifty-eyed hound dog who has a FAR better claim to the label ‘Christian’, than the media-created con-man and shyster known as Barack Hussein Obama.
As far as the original question of what is funny about Obama, it is more useful, humor-wise, to watch the inane and artless attempts in the media to cover up his actual positions and record and to attempt to defame and smear John McCain and any who do not toe the establishment line (often by the stupid and juvenile method favored by God-Lumps on these threads of making up derogatory names, in lieu of substantive arguments or meaningful points.)
Report comment to moderator
Good one Drill!
You gotta love that flip-flopper McSame!
Report comment to moderator
Thank you, Drill.
We know that when the chips are down what McCain can withstand. We know that as soon as it is no longer politically expedient, Obama will throw his family and friends under a bus. I doubt Obama would have had the guts to insist on POW Alvarez going home first.
Report comment to moderator
McCain couldn’t remember where he lived…
Report comment to moderator
Clearly Mickey and The Christianists do not get the Comedy Channel, where Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert hold forth regularly with great humor on the foibles of Senator Obama. But then, O’Reilly is on repeat on Faux News from 11-12 p.m. when The Daily Show and The Colbert Report are on. Priorities man, priorities!
And it wouldn’t really matter if Obama was held up nightly for humor and ridicule. Mickey and The Christianist would complain that he was getting all the good jokes.
Report comment to moderator
So much for being the “voice of reason” on this blog, eh Anlir-babe.
Report comment to moderator
Anlir, I don’t watch O’Reilly or Jon Stewart. I don’t have cable. Lots of people get through life without them.
And it isn’t just partial-birth abortion that Obama is in favor of. If you survive the abortion and are born alive, Obama has no use for you and won’t give you constitutional rights then either.
Report comment to moderator
Yeah, yeah, we know NJL – Obama goes around murdering babies. Next we’re gonna be told he roasts them in his back yard. Thankfully the crackpot Christianists who so predominate on this site are a tiny sliver in the general population.
Report comment to moderator
“Both McCain and Senator Barack Obama are trying to woo voters who are outside their natural demographic. In this election, for Senator Obama, that means trying to reach working class, non-Muslim white women who love America.” –Jon Stewart
“It was quite a weekend, politically. Yesterday, an estimated 75,000 people attended a Barack Obama rally on the banks of the the Willamette River. … And if you believe the media, listen to this. After the rally, Barack Obama fed them all with just five loaves of bread and two fish. Amazing!” –Jay Leno
Report comment to moderator
You’re actually not so far off, Anlir. The gruesome partial-birth abortion that Obama supports is nothing less than murdering babies, making Barry an accessory in their deaths.
Report comment to moderator
Bush is an accessory to 4120 dead soldiers according to Outkast’s brilliant mind.
Report comment to moderator
President Bush may be ultimately responsible for those who die fighting in Iraq, Roaring Lamb, but those soldiers all volunteered to join the military. The unborn babies aren’t volunteering to have their skulls bashed in and brains sucked out.
Report comment to moderator
Let’s see, what can we poke fun at? Not his race, nor his ethnicity, nor his Muslim background, nor his mother, nor his fathers, nor his childhood, nor his inexperience, nor his funny ears, nor his friends, nor his religion, nor his politics, nor his plans for America, nor his racism, nor his sappy religious platitudes, nor his pastor, nor his desire to be God’s instrument to bring heaven on earth.
What’s left?
Report comment to moderator
That’s the truth Outkast, but the liberals couldn’t care less about an infant safely tucked away in the womb, it just isn’t important — what is important is that they can have their lives as the mother of these infants restored to ‘not pregnant’ starting over.
Only a selfish woman would willingly lay down on the alter of the abortion table to rid herself of a helpless infant — how cruel is that?
Report comment to moderator
- 46 –
Ridding the nation under GOD of its unborn children so that selfish parents can go on with their lives, without responsibility.
To empty oneself of a small child, call it legal, never waiver from the face of that which resembles the faces of those who sin and then destroy the life which they made in passion, but tear open its life and throw it away.
What was the question again? Oh yes, “What’s left?” —- nothing, a battered body, a helpless infant who’s only crime was to be conceived, (is conception a crime) and then thrown away, yes it’s dead now, the heart is still, the limbs don’t move.
The 48 messages of whining so far in this topic is pretty funny. But your whine is my command. I will work on funnyizing Barack. I am a slow thinker and I have to go to the dentist this morning, so it will take a while.
Report comment to moderator
So, I’m thinking Anlir is also in favor of killing a baby if it is born alive for convenience sake.
Report comment to moderator
Michelle Obama is Hillary Clinton in blackface.
Best I can do on short notice.
Report comment to moderator
NJLAWYER: . . . killing a baby if it is born alive . . .
An abortion isn’t a live birth
Report comment to moderator
JOEL MARK #18 So the media and late night hosts are walking on eggshells too scared to criticize Obama.
I think I understand what you say here. Even though Maureen Dowd, Jon Stewart, and Stephen Colbert mock Obama, the media and late night hosts are too scared to criticize him.
Hmm. Brilliant, Joel. As usual, you see through the chaos to the immutability of your own ideas.
Report comment to moderator
I wonder if those who think the media has been walking on eggshells actually watch late night television. Obama is regularly mocked and its funny unlike the web page posted above (#16)
Report comment to moderator
SCROOP: . . .An abortion isn’t a live birth
A partial-birth abortion is indeed a live birth.
Report comment to moderator
HRW: Based on the report, it’s the New York Times who thinks the comedians are walking on eggshells.
Report comment to moderator
If the NYTimes thinks so, it must be wrong, right?
“Partial-birth” isn’t birth. Partial-birth is an armadillo in the middle of the road. A fetus extracted in a partial-birth abortion is a dead duck!
Report comment to moderator
DRILL . . . implying that Obama is a Christian.
What do you say Obama is, blessed Drill?
Report comment to moderator
““[H]e’s not buffoonish in any way. He’s not a comical figure.”
Says who? JibJab certainly makes him look buffoonish in the latest “Time for some Campaignin’” video.
It’s an equal opportunity jab at the presidential campaigners, but I had to laugh at Obama’s “change” segment.
I don’t know if the link will work for you, but this is what I clicked on to get there. You may have to putter around JibJab.com to find the video.
http://sendables.jibjab.com/
Report comment to moderator
The two choices are not just Muslim and Christian, Scroop. Obama could be somewhere in between.
BTW, my post 56 was simply a statement of fact. It’s not the MEDIA that’s walking on eggshells, according to the NYT, but rather the COMEDIANS.
Report comment to moderator
Oh, Scroopy! Live in legal fiction world all you want, but when a baby is extracted up to its neck and is wiggling and squiggling, said child is ALIVE! But legal fiction world needs the head, too, and if you pierce and suck out the brain, when the head comes out, wiggly squiggly is dead. (I take umbrage at calling such a murdered child a “dead duck.” It’s callous.)
I used to wonder what it would be like when the old judge I worked for finally met up with the Creator and tried to justify a few things. A brilliant lawyer for sure, but I have to tell you, this lawyer/poster understands that the Creator won’t buy the argument you or the old judge make that it’s not a live birth.
Not to mention the fact that our liberal friends gloss over Obama’s failure to accord constitutional rights to a fellow citizen who has survived the abortion process.
Just sayin’.
Report comment to moderator
When I see folks like NJL going off the deep end, screaming at people like Obama, and calling them a murderer, it confirms for me (and others) that Christianity isn’t worth spit. Christianity “changes” people all right – it makes them meaner, angrier, more hateful, self-righteous, judgemental donkeys.
Report comment to moderator
I have never read NJL’s posts as “screaming.” So, I think you’re putting your own perceptions into play here.
And, of course, she’s plumb right. Killing a baby is killing a baby. It is you who are defining it as something else.
Who is more loving and caring? The person who wants to save the baby or the person who is busy trying to redefine it so that it is perfectly ok to equate it to a “dead duck?”
Funny how Liberals can simply redefine what is morally good, and call someone who is more loving, caring, humble, and self-sacrificing “meaner, angrier, more hateful, self-righteous, judgemental donkeys.”
Who’s calling names? Who’s allowing millions of babies to be killed? Hmmm.
Report comment to moderator
Bush is an accessory to 4120 dead soldiers
*****Hmmm. 4,120 volunteer adults fighting for their country.
vs.
1.3 MILLION aborted babies EACH YEAR who had no choice
Yes, of course, those are completely comparable things. [sarcasm now off] sigh
Report comment to moderator
Anlir: Who are you calling a donkey, Mr. Democrat?
If anything I want to be called an elephant.
Report comment to moderator
Obviously, Obama being elected President (as he likely will, the Republican well being so poisoned until the Democrats get their chance to mess it up) is part of the long term scheme to get Michelle (as I told you, the black Hillary) eventually elected President.
Conspirators (right and left) plan far ahead. For example, the election of Bush senior was a long-term plan to get Bush Jr. elected, just as the election of JFK was a long-term plan to get Ted elected (that one is still simmering in the overn), and now the long-term plan to get Michelle elected.
Nick (#1 and #7) should really learn to stop trying so hard to be fair to black people. His heart is in the right place, and he frequently posts with this end in sight, but he’s just going to get his feelings hurt.
On the other hand, one of these days, the College of Cardinals, is going to choose a Pope from Africa. You just know it’s going to happen.
Then, at last, Nick’s hopes will be fulfilled. Hang in there Nick.
Report comment to moderator
“When I see folks like NJL going off the deep end, screaming at people like Obama, and calling them a murderer, it confirms for me (and others) that Christianity isn’t worth spit. Christianity “changes” people all right – it makes them meaner, angrier, more hateful, self-righteous, judgemental donkeys.”
When I compare the above, to this:
“I used to wonder what it would be like when the old judge I worked for finally met up with the Creator and tried to justify a few things. A brilliant lawyer for sure, but I have to tell you, this lawyer/poster understands that the Creator won’t buy the argument you or the old judge make that it’s not a live birth.”
I realize just who it is that’s angry and doing all the screaming and name calling.
Report comment to moderator
A half-extracted fetus is momentarily alive, but nonviable, like a new-hatched turtle that crawls to a few yards of the surf but doesn’t get in. A half-extracted fetus is undergoing destruction, not birth.
Stopping abortion in mid-process is irrational, like discontinuing electrocution after the first jolt, not pulling down on the legs of a swinger whose neck didn’t break from the drop, sewing Mary, Queen of Scots, up in a neck brace after the first fall of the headsman’s ax, or putting cattle back on the same train that brought them to the Chicago stockyards. You get the picture.
If your purpose is to introduce an involuntary emotional reaction to the debate about abortion, NJLAWYER, it’s silly for you to take umbrage at an aversive reply.
Report comment to moderator
The specific language that Christianists use (”murderer!”) is irrelevant. What’s relevant is the rage and hatred behind the words, which are unmistakeable. I realize that Worldmag is home to some of the most fanatical anti-choicers around. Thankfully they’re a minority in the real world.
Report comment to moderator
“*****Hmmm. 4,120 volunteer adults fighting for their country.”
They volunteered in good faith to defend our country and were sent to attack a country that posed no threat to us. The troops did the right thing. Bush used them inappropriately and thousands are now dead as a result.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop Mouth,
I know you’re not that out of it. Your examples are ridiculous. A partially birthed baby HAS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT. The child is going through a natural process that SHOULD lead to a normal birth. This is interrupted by a non-natural, calculated procedure to destroy said infant.
So, not one of your examples is even in the same realm. The doctor is not stopping an “abortion in mid-process” but rather is terminating a birth in process.
Honestly, the contrary-to-fact, counter-intuitive, wild manipulations some of you will go to in order to save your particular world view would be funny if it weren’t so horribly sad.
Report comment to moderator
What’s relevant is the rage and hatred behind the words, which are unmistakeable.
******What I see is the LOVE behind the words. You are the one adding the hatred and rage. In comparing what you write, and what most WMBs write, the facts back up just who is full of rage and hatred. It certainly isn’t the people trying to protect the babies.
Report comment to moderator
Bush used them inappropriately and thousands are now dead as a result.
*****If that were so (and I’m not conceding that, just allowing it for argument’s sake), then these people were still adults who volunteered knowing what could happen. We have NEVER fought a war where people didn’t die, and others didn’t think the war wrong. Never. It is the way of war.
I noticed, however, that you were not able to face the second half of what I wrote. 4,120 volunteers is sad, but far less than most wars have produced. Again, they were adult volunteers. They had a choice.
Trying to compare that to 1.3 million babies A YEAR who had NO choice is like comparing a puddle in your yard to Hurricane Katrina flooding.
Report comment to moderator
TRS The child is going through a natural process that SHOULD lead to a normal birth.
Induced abortion, unlike spontaneous abortion, isn’t a natural process. A half-extracted fetus is half-out because the abortionist pulls it half-out to kill it, not because it’s being born. The abortionist interrupts pregnancy, not birth.
I’m not trying to make you feel good about abortion. Stay sad or angry, disgusted or determined. Fine. All I’m saying is, you don’t get to control the language about abortion. Saying abortion is birth doesn’t make it so.
Report comment to moderator
Saying abortion is birth doesn’t make it so.
******And, vice versa. Saying a healthy child that is 3/4 out of the womb is “an abortion” and that having induced it makes it okay, doesn’t make it the truth and doesn’t make it right.
My daughter was induced, and — guess what? — they considered her a natural birth.
Someday, you will answer for your opinion to a much higher source than I am.
Report comment to moderator
BTW, it is the LIBERALS who are working hard toward redefining language, redefining history, and redefining culture.
The whole point of being a Conservative is that we don’t want those redefinitions.
But, as many have said, if you control history, you control the present, and if you control language, you control the culture.
The sad thing is that the Liberals learned this faster than we Conservatives did.
Report comment to moderator
The location of a half-out fetus doesn’t indicate or determine whether the fetus is being destroyed or delivered. The half-out fetus can be in the process of spontaneous abortion due to natural causes. This isn’t birth. The half-out fetus can be undergoing extraction to interrupt pregnancy through induced abortion. This isn’t birth, either. The half-out fetus can be undergoing expulsion at the culmination of pregnancy, childbirth.
Drawing a distinction between birth and abortion doesn’t require a liberal project to redefine language. Also, conservatives are just as good with words as liberals.
Report comment to moderator
How is any of this funny? Where’s the funny part?
Report comment to moderator
There’s nothing at all funny in what Scroop wrote in post #77. It’s actually very sick.
Report comment to moderator
Was Dr. Mengele funny, XION?
Report comment to moderator
When you mention the evil name of Dr. Mengele it’s more than anyone can imagine.
I wonder how many have seen the original photos of children who’s genitals were removed, never to be who GOD ALMIGHTY made them to be, only becuase they were Jewish children.
How much pain, how much suffering should a child, and infant, a small child in the womb suffer at the hands of evil men. NONE
Report comment to moderator
Lest anyone think the image of Barak Hussein Mengele is a liberal’s cartoon, consider the words of the Christian bloggers:
CCC #6 . . . voting pro-abortion, with a 100% NARAL rating is deadly serious. It’s not a laughing matter . . .
VICTORIA #10 Obama isn’t funny because he represents and supports abortion.
NJLAWYER #40 If you survive the abortion and are born alive, Obama has no use for you . . .
OUTKAT #43 Obama supports . . . nothing less than murdering babies, making Barry an accessory in their deaths.
If XION isn’t ROTFL, angels in heaven can’t help him.
Report comment to moderator
#82 ?????
Your post doesn’t even make sense. How do any of these (very true) comments say ANYTHING about an image of “Barak Hussein Mengele?”
I guess you don’t have to make sense or play fair when you’re trying to cast the other side as wrong.
Report comment to moderator
#82 I was hoping this thread would stay on track and provide something funny to laugh at about Obama. I could use a good laugh. But apparently nothing about Obama is funny. So then, all I can do is hope he loses. Now that would make me smile!
Report comment to moderator
So let me summarize the results of the discussion:
Obama Hussein Barack is funny because he looks like a sun-tanned Alfred Neumann.
Obama Hussein Barack is not funny because he has the ideology and ‘morals’ of Dr. Mengele, at least when it comes to children.
Obama’s supporters (here and elsewhere) are simply very pathetic (neither funny nor not-funny)as they whole-heartedly support the ongoing butchery, attempt to justify it, semantically slicing and dicing it with the finesse of a Goebbels (anyone hear the ghostly voice whispering of ‘human’ versus ’sub-human’, echoing down through the years and past countless piles of rotting corpses), and (of course) hurling vituperation and insults at any one who dares to disagree with them (see particularly Anlir’s posts at 41 and 62, if you have a taste for horrorshow).
Report comment to moderator
Obama . . . has the ideology and ‘morals’ of Dr. Mengele, at least when it comes to children . . . if not Jews, gypsies, and homosexuals, too.
Thanks for your accuracy in defining degrees of Mengele-ishness, DRILL. Obama can count on your impartiality and justice!
Report comment to moderator
DRILL, your summary of this thread is inaccurate. Barack Hussein Mengele has the guilt as well as the “ideology and morals” of Dr. Mengele. See #43
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's blogs to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!