She’s on a mission for God, or man-as-god
Leah Daughtry is on a mission, and part of that mission is preaching barefoot.
[She] slipped off her stiletto-heel shoes at the House of the Lord Church in Brooklyn, stepped from a pastor’s chair to the pulpit and shouted, “I am on the rise!” She wore a long black tunic with gold buttons that ran from her high collar almost to the carpet. Her graying hair was shorn tight to her dark brown scalp. She always preaches in bare feet in order to “de-self,” she had told me, and to let God’s spirit and words rush through her unimpeded. “I am on the rise!” she erupted again.
The other part of that mission is being chief of staff to Howard Dean and chief executive of the Democratic convention next month. So the Times wants to know, “Can Leah Daughtry bring faith to the Democratic party?” I wonder, too. The answer may be in statements like these, from Daughtry’s own mouth:
The right of self-determination is the concern. If I do all the right things, I will live a full and abundant life – this should be true. But it’s not. Something’s wrong with the equation. Americans may not call this liberation theology, but they have the sense that things aren’t fair.
I’ll agree with Daughtry that things aren’t fair and that something’s wrong with the equation. What’s wrong is sin. Not oppression of one class or race over another. It’s oppression of ourselves by our very own selves. What Daughtry is talking about – well, that’s faith, but it ain’t Biblical. That’s faith in man, not God. Faith that “if I do all the right things, I will live a full and abundant life” is to make the self divine. Perhaps this is what most people think Christianity is, I don’t know. But life is unfair. It will always be unfair.
The lessons of Biblical faith would suggest that 1) nobody can do all the right things, and 2) having a full and abundant life comes from acknowledging #1, along with accepting on faith that God is who he says he is and that he has done and will do what he’s said he’s done and will do. Oh, and the fact that “full” and “abundant” can only mean a life of full and abundant love and service. Race might still be a problem in America, and in the world, and in human history, but it’s only a corollary to the Bigger Problem of sin and rebellion. Can Leah Daughtry bring faith to the Democratic party? Faith in something, but not God. But perhaps that will be enough to give Obama a victory.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top74 Comments to “She’s on a mission for God, or man-as-god”
“What’s wrong is sin. Not oppression of one class or race over another.”
Doh! NOT the “S” word Harrison! hisssssssss!
Report comment to moderator
This may explain the recent upsurge in the affliction of Athletes Feet in the House of the Lord ‘Church’.
However it is important to ‘deself’ oneself, don’t get me wrong.
I once tried taking my shoes off and going bare-footed in church in order to ‘deself’; on the positive side, I felt so free and unencumbered, for surely the surly bonds of slavery to footwear had been cast aside and my soul just soared to dizzy heights of euphoria and ecstasy – why I ascended the very pinnacle of worship to a state almost beyond grace – all ALL BECAUSE MY SHOES WERE OFF and I was quite utterly DE-SELFED.
The down side was that many people fell ill from what they claimed was a terrible odor – they even started putting barf bags in the little holders on the backs of the pews where visitation forms are put, like it was an airplane. The choir could no longer carry a tune and the preacher spent most of his time sniffing and wiping his eyes, instead of preaching. Attendance plummeted and the offering went WAY down.
Finally the Deacon board called in the Health Department.
They eventually zeroed in on my pew. I was not born yesterday, you know, so I slipped my shoes back on before they narrowed it down any further, and ever since then my worship experience has been flat lousy, because I am not properly de-selfed.
But I DEFINITELY know where this Obama lady is coming from.
Report comment to moderator
But life is unfair. It will always be unfair.
…and that’s a good thing? That’s the way god intended it to be? That’s the way all right thinking people want it to be, now and forever?
Life’s a b—- and then you die? There’s nothing we can do about it, except lift our eyes unto our totems and hope our aftlife is better?
So then why the heck are all these preachers mixing into our daily politics??
Report comment to moderator
Faith in a mix of self-help and religion has a long history in American Christianity.
Report comment to moderator
religion as entertainment
Report comment to moderator
Religion; I have trouble with some of the theology of pentacostal churches. I don’t know if it is right or wrong. I just accept it as within the generally acceptable range of orthdox chrstianity. Black Liberation theology is not christian.
Politics; If it is wrong for christians to expect Republican politics to be christian, how is it OK to think Dmocratic politics should be christian? My christianity should shape my politics.
I just don’t agree with much that the Democrats put forth. I am fearful that some people will fall for this “religous” push. But then I am sure that the same kind of push was done by Republicans in the past. I don’t like mixing politics and religion.
I am sure that many Democrats in the past didn’t like the religious support given Republicans in the past. Democrats’ political faith directed their lack of faith in religious people. Now the Dems “need” religious votes.
Report comment to moderator
I can remember as a kid going bear foot in the summer. It wasn’t because I wanted to de-self myself or anything so important as that. I’m not sure I know know for sure what de-selfing means then or now but if has something to do with being bent over a sofa – I’m again’it
We were just plain poor and it was less expensive not have to buy summer shoes. Cheap flip flops (no not the politicians) had not been invented yet nor was Wal-Mart in them thar hills either. It’s just that no kids in their right mind, de-selfed or no, wanted to wear any shoes in the summer where I came from – nor be caught dead in them. I still don’t know if you would want to be caught de-selfed when dead or not.
Later, after going to college, going plain whack job liberal like all kids do and deciding there was no good reason to wear underwear anymore either, my mother got a little concerned about my being de-briefed but, she wasn’t going to send me to any preacher of any color or political persuasion to get me straightened out about being sans briefs – even if I might have been de-selfed then and didn’t know it.
I eventually grew out of being de-briefed and being a whack job socialist, but for the life of me i don’t know to this day if I was ever selfed, de-selfed or undi-selfed or if I am one of them now. Sorry to shed a lessened understanding of this on some of you but I just couldn’t help myself because I have a question. Does this mean I am ‘on the rise’ too or do I need to take my undies off again for that to happen or should I perhaps buy a new sofa instead?
Report comment to moderator
Entertaining comments–as well as an interesting post. I take off my shoes at every opportunity– church,too–because it feels so good. I try to do it without anyone noticing. My only experience with being “de-selfed” (as far as I know) is at the hands of the Lord. I trust that he knows exactly what to take and what to leave intact in this regard.
My mother, who was not a Christian, told me many times that “life is not fair”. She also told me that no one is “right all the time”. So, hopefully, even some non-believers are smart enough not to fall for the opposite, though to think it possible might be nice.
Report comment to moderator
I know some people who seem like their shoes are their identity. These people are totally de-selfed when they’re barefoot.
Report comment to moderator
Janie – I don’t know if you’re Pentecostal or not (I am), but we Pentecostal ladies are known for slipping their shoes off during service. I do it myself as well.
Report comment to moderator
“Life’s not fair.”
When we belong to & trust in God, we don’t have to worry about what’s fair or not (for ourselves). Everything that comes our way is filtered through His will. If the world treats us unfairly, that’s okay because God is in control & will work it out for the best.
Long ago I heard a man (the teacher of our Adult Sunday School class) say that he thinks that when Christians say that life is unfair (in regard to their own circumstances), they are in effect saying that God is unfair.
That has stuck with me & changed how I look at my own circumstances. When something seems unfair to me, I think, “Yes, but God allowed it, & He is not unfair.”
Report comment to moderator
As I floated the spring fed river in Florida this weekend, I kept my sandals on. Perhaps it would have been better if I had de-selfed myself, since I now have stripes of sunburn on the tops of my feet. At least if I had been de-selfed, my sunburn would have been monolithic instead of patchwork.
I definitely have a sense of self now that the socks and shoes are back on… owwww.. I have a distinct longing to go shoeless and selfless in the office…
Report comment to moderator
To all those commenting on the “life is unfair” comment, I have to say this, in total agreement with that fine black man who told the judge:
“I don’ wants no justice, yor honor, I craves mercy!”
Report comment to moderator
She’s probably the chick who taught Dean that Job was a new testament book.
Report comment to moderator
LOL, Fyne Jr.!
Report comment to moderator
From the article – And the sign reads “They Owe Us.”
THINK ABOUT IT! Who OWES who what? That is the under-riding theme -
Report comment to moderator
Llama: You are right, I never thought of like completely de-selfing, down to underwear and all.
But for some reason, I don’t think the Elders would go for it, though.
They are so danged conservative, it is frustrating.
They don’t even allow chewing tobacco or dogs in the church, so I expect this would be a no go from the git go.
But maybe if Obama is elected, he will pass a law that everyone must be de-selfed. He has already promised to tax the shirt off my back, which is partial de-selfing, anyhow.
Report comment to moderator
Fyne has the best one liner in the whole thread…
Report comment to moderator
He has already promised to tax the shirt off my back, which is partial de-selfing, anyhow.
I don’t know, MiM, Drill’s liner has to come in a close second!
Report comment to moderator
The whole Democrat religious thing is an utter farce, a political put-on. This insight from the article is a good indicator.
She [Daughtry] helps Dean lace his speeches with, as she puts it, “the language of values rather than what Democrats are known for, which is facts and figures.”
Dean’s knowledge of Christianity is borrowed and counterfeit. His Christian commitment is non-existent. I believe the same is true of Obama.
Report comment to moderator
#14 Fyne,
You must be right because I am positive she didn’t teach him what a J-O-B was.
Drill, once he taxes the shirt off your back it will be just bare enough for Obama, as the new slave master or Dark Lord, to whip it real good.
I’m guessing he is for reparations for slaves and believes you, as an evil ex- Black Whippin’ Whitey, really deserves a good whippin’ – just on the principle of the thing.
Since he is real fond of that good old time liberation theology which was founded on ‘It’s all Whitey’s fault’, I’m sure the Master will get his pound of flesh from you and be smiling about it, hoping you won’t notice he has his hands in your pocket the whole time too.
When he finds your pockets empty, I’m guessing you won’t feel your sunburned feet much longer and wish your toes were burned clean off instead. He has buddies, dressed more strangely than Batman, who will take your head clean off for sport.
But it is just a guess and I’m sure that if you de-self yourself in a more blacker sort of way, possibly like Batman did in his latest movie, you might be able to hide in the shadows with Wee Willy, the Hill and possibly Robin. But I wouldn’t count on it since he will be looking for them everywhere now doubt
Report comment to moderator
Of course, their is nothing that brings greater pleasure to conservative Christians than mocking, denigrating or calling into question other folk’s faith. Particularly if they aren’t a Republican.
Report comment to moderator
Well, the glass-half-empty crowd is certainly out.
O ye vigilant watchers of the walls of Zion, it’s not like you have the same type of folks on your side, is it?
This mocking carries the assumption that of course, Democrats cannot be religious. Trying to hold that and then complain that the Daughtrey is an Arminian (that’s what she’s asserting in that bit about self-determination) — that’s kind of rich. The One who Elects, certainly elects those who are also Democrats, hate to break it to you.
The same mocking also conveys why Daughtrey is so needed by Evangelicals themselves. Left to your own lights, you would wall off the faith, making it a thing of the crabby Right. I think it at least as possible that God is using folks like Daughtrey, Vanderslice, and others to prevent His voice getting from getting muffled.
Report comment to moderator
Well, I don’t know how anyone can gleefully and fully support partial birth abortion (as Obama and his supporters do) and be Christian, including the featured woman who removes her shoes to be ‘de-selfed’ but serves a master who celebrates the butchery of children.
I know there are pro-life Democrats (they claim, anyway). I just don’t understand how they reconcile supporting a man who facilitates murder of children with their pro-life sensibilities.
Yeah. I mock the hypocrisy that allows a person to call themselves ‘Christian’ and be feted as such, even as they enable and ensure butchery of innocents.
I have a suggestion. Focus on the killing, and the enablers and allowers of the killing, not the well-deserved mockery which exposes the vile thing for what it is.
Oh. But I forget. Politics over all. So I won’t hold my breath.
Report comment to moderator
Does anyone know what “de-self” means and why taking one’s shoes off accomplishes this?
Whether you tell people from the political podium or from the altar in the church that they can have what they want, you are promising something that you can’t deliver.
If it sounds too good to be true — it is!
Report comment to moderator
The idea that one cannot be both a Christian and pro-choice is the stuff of fanaticism. In fact there are many Christians who are pro-choice (mind you, not pro-abortion). And there are many Christians who are also Democrats. The Christian world is much, much wider than the narrow fanatics on here.
Report comment to moderator
The gospel of the left for the last several centuries has been, ’scorn for what is and hope for what may be’. Change is what matters, even for the worse.
The Democratic Party has always had faith. Faith means faith in government. And no matter how many times Democratic policies fail to accomplish their vision, they keep the faith.
Report comment to moderator
The gospel of the left for the last several centuries has been, ’scorn for what is and hope for what may be’. Change is what matters, even for the worse.
That statement is a flat-out lie.
What Democrats say is that we as a country can do better. We can take better care of our sick. We can take better care of the needy among us. We can do better with our policies toward the poor. We can do a better job dealing with things like injustice and racism and equality. We can acknowledge the past (both the good and the bad) and use it to spur us on to do better as a country.
Or we can listen to the negative whiner’s of the Christians right/Republican Party.
It’s looking more and more like people are gonna go with the party of hope this time around.
Report comment to moderator
#28 Let’s test this theory. Say something nice about Bush.
Report comment to moderator
The Christian world is much, much wider than the narrow fanatics on here.
As Xion insinuated on another thread this afternoon (quoting from God’s Word), wide is the path leading to destruction.
Report comment to moderator
Hi, Karen O,
No, I’m not Pentecostal, but my husband was raised in a Pentacostal church. He never takes his shoes off in church, but does not mind if I do!
Report comment to moderator
I hate to break your heart Xion, but Bush isn’t running this time. But I can say something nice about McCain. He’s got a good sense of humor, which is a huge plus in my book. Oh, and he likes Abba. I hear the Log Cabin Republicans are trying to get him to use “Dancing Queen” at his campaign rallies.
Report comment to moderator
#28 Anlir
“We can take better care of our sick.”
Will this national health care be run like the DMV? Social Security? IRS? Give an example of a government agency that most people agree is well run.
” We can take better care of the needy among us.”
Have you ever gone to try to collect $ from the unemployment office? Welfare? Do you remember when President Reagan said that if all the money spent on welfare would give each welfare recipient $40,000? The government is inefficient at handing out money, or anything else.
“We can do better with our policies toward the poor.”
Did the Great Society work?
“We can do a better job dealing with things like injustice and racism and equality.”
injustice There is not much of this in the US in the way Democrats see it. Republicans see some, but it most often is things Democrats push, like reparations for slavery, “hate crimes,” getting rid of secret ballots for union votes.
racism We already have laws against it. Racism is all in the mind. How does the government change the mind?
equality Equality of outcome or equality of opportunity? Democrats seem to want equality of outcome. Republicans want equality of opportunity.
“Or we can listen to the negative whiner’s of the Christians right/Republican Party.”
Your solutions have already been tried and they didn’t work. Your desires were good, but the answers didn’t work. Trying again with more of the same won’t work any better than it has in the past.
Report comment to moderator
He’d probably do it, Anlir! Now that’s funny!
Report comment to moderator
Let’s just hope he doesn’t choose Abba’s Waterloo for his theme song!
Report comment to moderator
Your solutions have already been tried and they didn’t work. Your desires were good, but the answers didn’t work. Trying again with more of the same won’t work any better than it has in the past.
Well, one could level that charge right at the Republican Party too. Considering that 85% of Americans think this country is on the wrong path and the Republicans have been running the show for the last 8 years, I’d say their “solutions” are on life support. A number of conservative thinkers believe the conservative movement is out of steam and needs to be reformed.
The way I see it, the Republicans are running a campaign based on the negative this time around. The monkey is on their back because they’ve pretty much been in charge of Washington for the last 8 years. Like it or not, this is going to be a referendum on their reign.
Report comment to moderator
Ok, has anyone thought to ask why a woman is a pastor and preaching to men?
Try getting the biblical prohibition against female elders/pastors right first, then start dealing with her twisted theology.
Report comment to moderator
#36 Anlir
“…the Republicans have been running the show for the last 8 years…”
Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House 2006-to present
Harry Reid Senate Majority Leader 2006-to present
Why not a referendum on their reign?
Report comment to moderator
I think it will be very hard to contain the enthusiasm in the Africa-American church for Obama. They see their Canaan Land in sight and they are lifting their voices. I could not be happier for them! If the Miracle occurs, I will weep with them and even shout “Thank you Jesus!”
Report comment to moderator
Oh Bob. You just don’t get it. The “Big Enchilada” is the White House. It’s a referendum on Bush and the job he’s done as leader of the Republican Party for the last 8 years.
It’s pretty well understood that the Dems will increase their majority control in the House and take control of the Senate by 5 or 6 votes.
Now, stranger things have happened, and the Republicans could turn it all around by November 4th. We’ve yet to see the awesome and terrible power of the dark side of the force, after all.
Report comment to moderator
#37 DAV
I said “… I have trouble with some of the theology of pentacostal churches.” in #6. I really didn’t want to diss the Pentacostals. Maybe I wanted to stay on topic too much.
In the quoted article, the Black Liberation theology was mentioned. I think that is heresy. I, maybe wrongly, assumed that the part about restitution for slavery and the “They owe us!” sign are also part of Black Liberation theology. I fail to see how BLt is orthodox.
Anyway, I don’t believe that Anlir understands as much as Anlir pretends. The Democrats are just blowing smoke. Some good hearted christians will not see through this screen and choose BO. Some true believers will know and still choose BO.
What did Ronald Reagan say about the Democratic Party?
God’s will be done.
Report comment to moderator
What don’t I understand Bob?
I have no doubt that the fanatical conservative Christian Republicans on here would sooner gun down their mother in the street than vote for Obama. But they’re a small minority of Christendom.
I suppose if one believes in “God’s will”, then it follows that they should rejoice if Obama is elected, since it would clearly be Her will.
Report comment to moderator
Dav – 37 – I’m sure the excuses are endless, but not found in the Word of God.
Report comment to moderator
Anlir – 42
YOU WRITE: …. “I have no doubt that the fanatical conservative Christian Republicans on here would sooner gun down their mother in the street than vote for Obama. But they’re a small minority of Christendom.”
Anlir it’s just this kind of OUTBURST which give you a special mention. Is it what you eat during the day, or ………..? Certainly you can contain yourself to post without ” Republicans on here would sooner gun down their mother in the street than vote for Obama.”
The mirror might give another story to your “fanatical” approach.
I don’t know any Christians who hate their mother. Do you HATE your mother Anlir?
Report comment to moderator
Vicky Dear,
That would be “fanatical conservative Christian Republicans”, not just Republicans. There are, after all, some good Republicans. Maybe.
Report comment to moderator
#33 Bob
Give an example of a government agency that most people agree is well run.
The military? Or should the gov’t privatize it?
Report comment to moderator
For all the carping, Medicare is run pretty well. It’s administrative costs are far lower than private insurance companies. The defrauding of Medicare comes from the medical community, not the government.
National Parks is another area the government does well. We have a fine system of national parks in this country.
The Post office does pretty well too. Considering it must deliver to every American home and business and move millions of pieces of mail every day, it does a pretty darn good job.
Are those areas (and others) perfect? No. Any enterprise run by human beings is going to have it’s shortcomings and failings. But all in all, we have a lot of things that government (at all levels) does well.
Report comment to moderator
Anlir, you need a mirror, the sooner the better!
get a big one, full length, and don’t get fanatical mixed up with anyone else but…….
Report comment to moderator
HRW wrote: Give an example of a government agency that most people agree is well run. The military? Or should the gov’t privatize it?
You’ve picked out the one agency the U.S. Constitution HAS decreed that the national government SHOULD run. Can you give us an example of some agency NOT prescribed for government control in the U.S. Constitution??
Report comment to moderator
Outkast – 49 give him something he can handle
Report comment to moderator
DAV 37: You nailed it, brother.
Report comment to moderator
When my mother said, “Life’s not fair,” it was usually because I was making an unwarranted complaint that I didn’t get what I wanted when I wanted it. That’s usually what Democrats do. For example, they say it’s not fair for somebody who works harder to get a promotion or a raise in salary. Or they say that it wouldn’t be fair for everybody who earns money to pay income tax. Or they say it’s not fair for people to make a profit by selling oil.
What they need is a father- or mother-figure to remind them that life’s not fair. What they don’t need is another childish person telling them that they are entitled to get whatever they want, and that somebody else must make sure that they do.
Report comment to moderator
“In fact there are many Christians who are pro-choice (mind you, not pro-abortion).”
There you go again. If the choice is to abort, then obviously you are pro-abortion if you are pro-choice.
It’s simple. What if I said that I personally oppose conning elderly people out of their money but support the right of others to do so if they choose? You’d see the moral fallacy, right?
THINK!
Report comment to moderator
There you go again Kyle.
I realize this drives the fanatical anti-choicers into a mindscreaming frenzy, but there are a lot of pro-choice folk who are not pro-abortion. The refusal to acknowledge this is the reason why the anti-choice movement will remain too radical for most Americans.
THINK!
Report comment to moderator
On “Not fair”: If our kids make that complaint, they lose whatever treat or privilege they were about to get.
Parents know that rewarding whining increases the whining.
Rewarding complaining increases complaining.
Rewarding not working increases laziness.
Rewarding irresponsibility increases irresponsibility.
The gov’t as Father does a really LOUSY job!
Report comment to moderator
Karen O, #11,
Life is not fair = God is not fair…
Seems terrible to say out loud, but that’s what the accusation boils down to.
I’ve been convicted about that, too. Good reminder.
Report comment to moderator
Outkast,
Based on comparisons both utilities and health care work better as a gov’t run enterprise or a controlled and regulated monopoly. Utility rates went up in California following privatization and deregulation. A few years back a blackout that hit most of the north east including Ontario was caused by poor maintenance by a private utility firm in Ohio. We can argue health care and never resolve the dispute however looking at cost per person the rest of the OECD with differing versions of gov’t health care have the more economical model as well as better outcomes — infant mortality and life expectancy.
I orginally picked military because I knew you and others would agree that the federal gov’t should prvide it. Although I am curious if you think its appropriate for the gov’t to outsource the military. To be consistent in your position, you would have to endorse outsourcing which is the more expensive option.
Its been generally observed that education needs to be universal for the benefit of society. For universality to be achieved some form of gov’t control and sponsorship is needed — preferably at the local and prov/state level with the federal gov’t only providing some national standard.
So that makes at least three — health, education, utilities (electricity and water)
Report comment to moderator
Its been generally observed that education needs to be universal for the benefit of society.
By you, maybe. According to the U.S. Constitution (you know, the thing that established our nation) the only responsibilities of the national government should be to enact war, make currency and establish treaties.
Report comment to moderator
#57
Totally disagree. The gov’t shouldn’t run the health, education, or utility industries!
Just look at what our gov’t has done to education in this country! The more we spend, the worse an education the kids get.
When we acknowledge that education is suffering, we give THE SAME PEOPLE who already blew it MORE money, thinking they’ll get it right.
This is madness! Public education has become a convenient place for politically correct social experimentation.
Talk about a functional monopoly–parents can be arrested for truancy for not handing over a child to this dangerous, failing system. (I mention dangerous–proof would be the need for metal detectors at many schools now.)
Kids need to be educated, but NOT by the gov’t.
Report comment to moderator
“there are a lot of pro-choice folk who are not pro-abortion.”
Since you so emphatically claim this is true, Anlir, could you exlain HOW one can be pro-choice but anti-abortion?
Report comment to moderator
They must have been for it before they were against it, JBH.
Report comment to moderator
“there are a lot of pro-choice folk who are not pro-abortion. “
But they are for the choice to abort, making your distinction essentially meaningless. We are not talking about red wine or white, or paper or plastic grocery bags, when we misuse the word “choice” to make a vote for deliberately destroying a living human being as some sort of expression of democracy.
And we are not anti-choice, as you mischaracterize us with you Orwellian language. We do not oppose all choice, only that which involves killing unborn babies.
Report comment to moderator
But they are for the choice to abort, making your distinction essentially meaningless
Only in the minds of the anti-choice fanatics is the distinction meaningless.
For most Americans, while they may not like abortion, they support the right of a woman to make her own choice on the matter.
Report comment to moderator
No one should be allowed to make the choice to kill their unborn or just-born baby.
Report comment to moderator
Outkast,
Read carefully Outkast, I never said federal I did say I think it should be state and/or municipal level just like the US constitution. National standards need to be defined but that can be done between states. Education often needs to respond to local interests and local needs — differing skill base needed, differing school calendars may be used.
Report comment to moderator
I read very carefully, HRW, and you clearly stated that the national government should set standards under which the states should operate their schools. WRONG!
Report comment to moderator
set standards but not operate
Report comment to moderator
Whose standards on:
Evolution vs Intelligent Design?
Multiculturalism?
Sex ed?
Revisionist history?
As long as the standards are objective, like math, phonics, geography, and reading comprehension, it might work, but “educational standards” are not left there.
Public education is very much a tool to shape the next generation of citizens by those in power over the educational standards.
Report comment to moderator
Anlir
If, in every excuse a woman uses to abort her child, you replaced the words ‘fetus’ or ‘baby’ for ‘two year old’, you would call in Child Services to take the poor child away.
For example….
How dare you pass judgment on the woman, when you have no idea what she’s going through?
You’re a male, so you have no right to comment.
It’s the right of every 2yo to be wanted.
No one’s forcing you to kill your own 2yo.
Keep your church out of my home!
We’re not pro–killing-2yos, we’re pro-choice.
We want to make 2yo-killing safe, legal and rare.
If we make laws against this, then those who are rich enough will be able to hire a hit man to kill the toddler, while the poor could not afford this, so such laws would discriminate against the poor.
Unless you are prepared to adopt this child, you have no right to tell the mother that she should not kill her.
If we don’t make it possible for the mother to kill her 2yo safely, then she’ll do it unsafely and possibly put her own health in danger.
Laws against 2yo-killing would violate the woman’s right to privacy, which judges tell us is in the US Constitution.
It’s speciesist to give a Homo sapiens 2yo so much more protection than a chimpanzee 2yo.
You’re opposed to killing 2yos only because you’re a religious fanatic.
The child was conceived by incestuous rape, and her existence is a continual reminder to her mother of what happened, so she should die because of her father’s crime.
Stem cells could be harvested from this 2yo that could help cure many horrible diseases and disabilities—you religious fanatics want to stop this scientific research and cut off all hope of a cure for Alzheimer’s, heart disease, Parkinson’s, quadriplegia and diabetes.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/reviews/beckwith.asp
Report comment to moderator
And those standards always come with monetary strings attached, HRW, so the states are indebted to the national government to achieve those. Ergo, allowing the national government to set standards takes away power from the states.
Report comment to moderator
Well done, OT. Exactly.
Report comment to moderator
Correct me if I’m wrong isn’t the core of school board/district funding from local property taxes only to be supplemented by lump sum grants at both the state and federal level. The power of the purse seems to be more local. In my situation, the conservative gov’t took away the local board autonomy and gave the purse strings to the province Similar to the US, education is constitutionally a provincial concern and until very recently there were no national standards which made student transfers a difficult concern leading to students taking an extra year.
Mom of 5,
natonal standards do not have to be specific. Grade level expectations need to be addressed if only for the pragmatic reason of student transfers. I teach health which includes sex ed, its in the provincial curriculum, the main text is developed provincial with local issues inserted. In practice this means, I inform parents ahead of time as to the content and ask them to supply the moral guidance they feel is appropriate.
As for your other specific concerns — I can’t comment since they are generally an American only issue.
I agree that public education is a tool to shape the next generation, hence I enjoymy job. As I tell my daughter, she goes to school to become civilized. My inner marxist views public schooling as indoctrination into bourgeoisie morality.
Report comment to moderator
Correct me if I’m wrong isn’t the core of school board/district funding from local property taxes only to be supplemented by lump sum grants at both the state and federal level.
Yes, you’re wrong. As Gomer Pyle would have said, “Surprise, surprise!”
Report comment to moderator
Why exactly do you have to teach sex ed in Health, HRW?
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!