Slavery is as slavery does
Here’s a good piece from John Miller, former head of the State Department’s trafficking office. He didn’t work with cars and highways. He worked to eradicate something most of us thought ended in the 19th century: slavery.
Because slavery is universally illegal-though it was banned in Saudi Arabia only in 1962 and in Mauritania in 1981-its existence is subterranean. There are no reliable estimates of the number of people held in bondage. The U.S. State Department and the International Labor Organization put the figure in the millions. The State Department estimates that as many as 17,500 slaves are brought into the United States every year, from many different countries, and it is likely that trafficking within the United States involves several times as many people. As is the case elsewhere in the world, most American slaves toil in brothels, massage parlors, and other sex businesses, or as domestic servants. A large proportion of those who come from abroad arrive by perfectly legal means, often in the company of “handlers” who help them obtain tourist or business visas.
His imperative thesis is: Call it slavery. It may not mean that people are hauled off en masse and in chains, but it’s still slavery, and in this article at The Wilson Quarterly, he looks to William Wilberforce for ideas about how to eradicate it globally.
In most countries, what distinguishes the victims is not their color but their foreignness or otherness. Most of the survivors I talked to were attracted by the promise of a job in a distant land. Once there, they found themselves in unfamiliar surroundings and unable to escape. It is difficult to flee when you know neither the local language nor the geography, and when you have no friends or family outside your small world to turn to for help. I rarely met survivors who had been enslaved in their own community. Moldovan women are enslaved in Dutch brothels, Indonesian men on Malaysian construction sites, and Filipinas in Saudi Arabian homes.
And he closes by reminding us that the United States has “probably done more than almost any other country to eradicate this scourge at home and abroad.” But as of yet, there is no 21st-century Wilberforce to champion the problem.














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top14 Comments to “Slavery is as slavery does”
THe MSM is only interested in slavery if it involves white people controlling black people.
Please always remember it was white people not black people who ended slavery in the U.S. and Europe.
Can anyone possibly doubt that the people in Africa will still be providing slaves to us if we were still interested?
Report comment to moderator
The reasons why slavery exists as huge industry today, as it clearly does, is for the same simple reasons it has throughout history.
The punishment for trafficking in slaves is minimal, almost non existent, so people do it knowing they won’t be punished.
The police and governments do not try to stop it because there is not much they can do to punish them plus who ever they catch will likely get off anyways and be out on the streets before the cops can even write up their statements.
Since they know they won’t be punished the profits are high and there is very much money to made – almost without risk. Demand is huge because no one ever gets caught or punished.
Slavery has been a part of society in many parts of the world since man started marking time – it is cultural.
If 17,500 slaves a year come to the US then it is obvious that no one is doing anything to stop it and, if they do, the perpetrators get off on very light sentences.
If you shoot all slave traders buying and selling slaves and you actually try to catch them, or at ;least put them in proson for the rest pof their life – slavery will stop. Otherwise, you will read articles like this one until hell freezes over or you die which ever comes first.
Report comment to moderator
the United States has “probably done more than almost any other country to eradicate this scourge at home and abroad.”
If you read the article, he describe the long history of the English attempt to eradicate the slave trade yet concludes with the above quote. The evidence doesn’t match the conclusion. Its Britain and its Empire.
Report comment to moderator
Two days ago Glenn Beck commented on a much more current version of slavery in the US. Regardless of any predetermined opinion of the man, I think he’s got a point.
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/13022/
Report comment to moderator
Well, the British Empire hasn’t done anything lately, now has it. Reaching back to the 19th century means what?
Report comment to moderator
Isn’t it true that the people who write blog posts for World on the Web don’t get paid for their valiant efforts trying to save all the atheists, agnostics, liberals and queers?
Nudge, nudge, nod, wink.
Oh, they get saved. What a deal.
Report comment to moderator
Try it, random, try it.
Report comment to moderator
Better a slave for Jesus than a slave to sin, or debt, or man…
Report comment to moderator
Ugh. This is just awful. It really puts the lie to the just legalize it “solution”:
[emphasis mine]
Report comment to moderator
#5 NJL — I agree the British Empire has become the junior partner. My comment was directed to the writer’s lack of evidence for his conclusion. He can’t babble about the British Empire and then conclude the way he did.
#9 I noticed that too. I wonder how he reached these conclusions. Legalization may not be the reason rather the wrong legal framework may be employed. The other problem is the lack of reliable stats for areas in which prostitution. But his comments should make legalization proponents careful about the legal framework they employ.
Report comment to moderator
Remember, that Wilberforce died on July 29, 1833. On July 31, 1834, the United Kingdom freed 800,000 slaves, most in the West Indies. August 1 is still celebrated as Emancipation Day.
Ending Slavery and the ending of July go together.
Report comment to moderator
#7
Free the slaves.
Report comment to moderator
hey HSK you are slipping a bit, son. the red meat is neither as meaty nor as red as it used to be.
although defining ’slavery’ could lead to a very interesting discussion, you don’t seem interested. hmm?
Report comment to moderator
Nick
Google trafficking. You will find voluminous stories and documentaries from the MSM on the topic. It gets covered, but folks just don’t notice it.
Erasmus
In fact there is debate about calling this slavery because countries don’t want the label. You raise an excellent point.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!