Cool it on global warming (and anti-global warming)
Dr. Bjørn Lomborg, author of Cool It! The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming, says that we all need to think a little more dispassionately about climate change.
We should take action on climate change, but we need to be realistic. The U.K has arguably engaged in the most aggressive rhetoric about climate change. Since the Labour government promised in 1997 to cut emissions by a further 15 percent by 2010, emissions have increased 3 percent. American emissions during the Clinton/Gore administration increased 28 percent.
And he reminds us of some other inconvenient truths, like how sea levels have risen a foot in the last century, but that didn’t seem to ruin too many days at the beach, and how rising sea levels in the future won’t bring calamity. Or how the use of fossil fuels to grow more vegetables has increased nutrition and thus decreased cancer rates. He offers a few more counterintuitive insights, but I suggest his books for a broader and more balanced approach to the issue.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Special Student Discount for WORLD!








Click to Print
Include Comments










back to top33 Comments to “Cool it on global warming (and anti-global warming)”
If sea levels have risen a foot in the last century, it must have occurred before 1942. The sea comes to the same place at The Battery in Charleston, SC that it did when I sold peanuts down there.
Report comment to moderator
I am not worried about the sea level, and it is not because I live 100s of miles from either ocean. No, I believe the Word of God which says He put a limit on the ocean. It can go no further than where He tells it. (Okay, atheists, agnostics and other unbelievers, flame away. You will not change my mind no matter what you say.)
Report comment to moderator
Alaska and Canada are having one of the coldest summers on record. People are starting to think that we missed a huge volcano erupting somewhere, like the ones that ended Snowball earth 600,000 years ago when the entire surface of the oceans was frozen at least 2 miles thick at its thinnest spot. It seems the earth has been warming upever so slightly each year on average since then but, we may be heading into the next Ice Age or Snowball earth in another 600,000 years or soo butit is a a little too early to know for sure.
Better get to WalMart, just to be safe and stock up on the winter wear before the selection is all gone, the price goes up due to demand and the higher taxes the left will surly put on it to make people suffer horribly as soon as the long john supplies get short.
Report comment to moderator
PeterL, if you’re right, my friend who has a home a mile in from the ocean will be very disappointed. I keep telling her if she waits long enough, it’ll be oceanfront property and she can get a good deal.
Report comment to moderator
It would be just fine with me, if I never heard the phrase “Global Warming” again…
Report comment to moderator
“Man-made climate change is certainly a problem, but it is categorically not the end of the world”
Sigh. So much for a “broader and more balanced approach to the issue.” Since when does anyone actually KNOW for a fact what is causing “climate change”?
Does a “broader and more balanced approach” start with the assumption the euphemistically named “climate change” is caused by man? Sheesh.
Report comment to moderator
climate change is far down on the list of reasons to resist the status quo.
Report comment to moderator
While you all weren’t looking, Bush, the oilman, got serious about climate change. His Office on Climate Change has issued its first report. It can be found at http://www.climatechange.gov.
Here are the first few paragraphs of the executive summary:
Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States
Once considered a problem mainly for the future, climate change is now upon us. People are at the heart of this problem: we are causing it, and we are being affected by it. The rapid onset of many aspects of climate change highlights the urgency of confronting this challenge without further delay. The choices that we make now will influence current and future emissions of heat-trapping gases, and can help to reduce future warming. Likewise, our decisions on whether and how to adapt to the degree of warming that is already inevitable can help us reduce the impacts of future warming.
1. Human-induced climate change and its impacts are apparent now throughout the United States. Global warming is unequivocal and is due primarily to human-induced emissions of heat-trapping gases and other pollutants. Observed changes in the United States include temperature increases, sea-level rise, increased heavy downpours, rapidly retreating glaciers, regional droughts, substantial changes in sensitive wildlife, earlier snowmelt, and altered timing and amount of river flows. Impacts of these changes are apparent in many facets of society including health, water, food, energy, and quality of life.
2. Many climatic changes are occurring faster than projected even a few years ago. Global emissions of heat-trapping gases are now increasing even more rapidly than the highest emissions scenario scientists have been analyzing. Arctic sea ice and the large ice sheets on Greenland and parts of Antarctica are melting faster than expected.
3. The degree to which future climate will change, and the scope and magnitude of the impacts, depend on choices made now. Another 1°F of warming in the next few decades (on top of the observed 1.5°F rise) is already locked in due to past emissions. The amount of warming we will experience beyond the next few decades depends upon choices about emissions made now and in the near future. Lower emissions of heat-trapping gases will result in less climate change and related impacts.
4. Extreme weather and climate are having increasing impacts on society. The United States has experienced increases in heat waves, wildfires, heavy downpours, and in some regions, droughts, all of which are disrupting our lives…
______________________________________
When a pro-fossil fuel, pro-business administration like this one comes up with a report like this, I think this debate is really over.
And the consequences of being wrong on this issue are truly dire.
The truth here is not just inconvenient, it is uncomfortable and downright scary. Most of us won’t suffer, but out kids and grandkids and any of the hundreds of millions folks living around sea level will.
PeterL: Yep, that’s why religion and politics don’t mix. But I am curious–if you believed that your god was about to run a re-play of the Great Flood, would you advise everybody just to buy a bathing suit and wait for the waters?
Report comment to moderator
Oh. my. socks.
I’m quaking in my flip flops. The planet must truly be ending. The debate is over, we’re all doomed.
WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE!
Truly your logic is unnassailable. [/sarcasm off]
This is nothing but the same thing the current White House has been doing since day one – caving in to the lunatic left.
The debate is not over by a long shot, no matter how much you keep saying so. These folks don’t have a clue what changes the climate. There’s so much they don’t understand that they’ll be working on this for decades.
Report comment to moderator
No. Because he’s not gonna do that. I’d rather just tell you to go buy some Prozac and calm down.
Report comment to moderator
“And the consequences of being wrong on this issue are truly dire.
Too true dat. We’re in for a bad recession at the least, a possible economic crash, and a depression at the worst, if the greenies keep ruining our economy.
Report comment to moderator
MiM: This is nothing but the same thing the current White House has been doing since day one – caving in to the lunatic left.
I just thought that was worth repeating.
I knew I got something wrong there, somewhere…
Report comment to moderator
The British certainly are crazy extreme with their rhetoric.
Some sheik in Qatar had his Lamborghini flown to London for service. One British citizen stated she was “horrified.” Horrified? Talk about a climate of fear and hot air! Horrified??!?!
As John Stossel says, give me a break!
Report comment to moderator
PeterL,
“Eternal Father, strong to save,
Whose arm hath bound the restless wave,
Who bidd’st the mighty ocean deep
Its own appointed limits keep;
Oh, hear us when we cry to Thee,
For those in peril on the sea! ”
The first verse of one of my favorite hymns, “Navy Hymn” or “Eternal Father”.
Report comment to moderator
Make It Man,
Arcadia may be wrong (is wrong in my opinion) about climate change/global warming, but he’s right about one thing: WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE! Is he ready? Are you or I?
Report comment to moderator
Make it Man: Don’t worry, every disaster is always 25 years away. That way the prognosticator doesn’t have to account for his prediction.
Report comment to moderator
If it’s not Global Warming that’ll kill us, it’ll be coffee or germs leftover from not washing your hands before eating or saturated fats.
Report comment to moderator
Make It Man says the debate isn’t over. He’s probably right, but the question is moot. Whether or not we are about to suffer from man-made global warming, the solution to our problems is the same. We must cut our ties to fossil fuels and learn to manage water and agriculture.
Report comment to moderator
Odd GoreBull Warming is supposedly proceeding apace and the supposed ‘cures’ have not been implemented (or have gone backwards for the last decade) – yet the global temp monitoring indicates not only no rise in temp for the last several years, but some reduction.
And the vast majority of the last century’s rise occurred before the events that are said to cause rising temps.
GoreBull Warming is junk science. Pure junk science.
Report comment to moderator
We should gradually become less dependent on fossil fuels, as there is a limited (albeit quite large) supply of oil and other fossil fuels.
But those are currently the most reliable and efficient methods of energy we have, beside some things like nuclear energy.
RRBAR makes sense in saying “WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE!”
We will someday, probably in the near future (or at least the world might end soon) if all the signs are correct. You never know, though.
I just think it would be a nuisance for the tribulation or anything else to happen before
I get married, have a nice car, nice house, etc., etc. But I doubt the world will wait for me.
Report comment to moderator
Herb,
The only thing that is clear is that there is nothing man can do to stop global warming. This planet has been worming ever so slightly since the last Snowball earth 600,000 years ago. The sun also burns hotter every day on average and will continue to burn hotter until it swallows earth and turns it into a cinder.
I think it is time to also clear up a few things for Arcadia. Bush has learned from Obama that you can be on all sides of an issue and lie to anyone, about anything, anytime you want to – when they might disagree with your true beliefs – and they will never know it.
Rather than create undue stress for the weak minded, for no reason, all Bush has to do is find out what crazy idea the whack jobs on the left have driven themselves insane over this time – and agree with them by saying he is as nuts as they are. Instead of saying for example ‘OK you stupid, insane, whack jobs, there is no such thing as man made global warming so quit bugging me about it, calling me Hitler and sucking your thumbs for Heavens sake.’
Instead, Bush just repeats the crazy du jour ideas of the left, publishes it on an official looking government website and voila, no more whack job harassment comes his way. The little weak minded piggies get swilled pure slop but they love it. They actually think they have won and immediately begin to think Bush is right about everything else they believe in too.
Bush once again has run circles around the entire,if large, whack job left – with his brain cow tied behind his back – even though he didn’t fool Arcadia in the least. Bush didn’t break a sweat even with all that global warming that is killing everything – even stuff that has no brains and never was alive in the first place.
Report comment to moderator
Can I get a second opinion on that “WE’RE ALL GONNA DIE?” thing?
ok.
WE’RE ALL GONNA SUFFER AND THEN DIE!
Oh shucks. It’s even worse than I figured….
Report comment to moderator
We must cut our ties to fossil fuels and learn to manage water and agriculture.
Ummmmm… perhaps. Even more to the point is cutting our dependence on foreign oil by drilling at home and putting in natural gas pipelines etc…
Simultaneously we should be developing alternative energy sources that make sense. I’m no fan of Bush’s Ethanol program either… That’s not a development, that’s a regression.
Report comment to moderator
Natural gas burns extremely clean and current cars can be converted with a minimum of fuss. I should know, As a mechanic I worked on natural gas engines for several years…
Report comment to moderator
Herb,
Since I’m involved in agriculture, I’d like to know what you mean by saying we have to learn to “manage agriculture”?
Report comment to moderator
Herb, your statement was incomplete. You and others who want to be independent of fossil fuels need to say: “We need to become independent of fossil fuels by ….” Then fill in the blanks. Fifty-five mph, cardigan sweaters, 68 degrees in winter and 85 degrees in summer have been tried. Even T. Boone Pickens says that his Big Windmill scheme will only free electric generation so that we can use natural gas for propulsion.
Report comment to moderator
MIM, (post 23)
I’ve said the very same thing before,
but just like becoming economically dependent from China, I doubt it will happen as we’d like it to, because it’s been happening for so long.
And about China, the funny thing is that while they’ve succeeded in making things that are sold everywhere, they still have yet to hit the mark on electronics (at least as well as Japan does) and CARS! Some of their newly unveiled cars at a car show were awful. Ha.
Report comment to moderator
An interesting site for technology.
http://www.technologyreview.com/index.aspx
From MIT.
Report comment to moderator
Just for the sake of clarity, Lomborg is not in the camp of Global Warming deniers. Rather, his skepticism is directed toward the catastrophism of left. As the ,a href=”http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com”>Copenhagen Consensus points out, there is plenty else that can be done, that from an economic view (cost/benefit) will actually have a greater positive impact. Of course, as of yesterday, on e — the Doha round — is done.
Report comment to moderator
Well, cobbled up that link. Here it is in better form: the Copenhagen Consensus shows what else we can do — global warming is not the end all of issues. Indeed, as multiple issues feed one another, a broad-based program of relief and amelioration make sense.
Report comment to moderator
MIM post 10: Because he’s not gonna do that. I’d rather just tell you to go buy some Prozac and calm down.
Yeah global warming will make the average temp go up 1 degree in ten years……….and me without my SPF 75!!
I really love loonie lefties. they are so much fun, huh?
Report comment to moderator
We just got done with an ice age, so now the earth is warming up again. Soon we’ll have another ice age and the PCsters will be complaining about how we’re all making it cold with our hatred. It’s all one.
Report comment to moderator
Something funny pertaining to this is on Jeremy Clarkson’s DVD, Clarkson: Supercar Showdown. For those who haven’t heard of him, he’s one of the hosts of Top Gear, a British car show that’s pretty cool, funny and more…OK, to the point.
In the movie he demonstrates the disadvantages of the “GeeWhiz,” an electric car. (or “quadricycle”)
While driving this tiny vehicle, the sky is gray and cloudy, so he says something along the lines of this:
“They say that cars cause global warming. Well, every time we have one of these things, the weather is awful. We should go get some cars out here and warm up the place!” By the way, even those who aren’t “car freaks’ like me might like the show and also this DVD because of Clarkson’s humor. For instance, the race between the electric car and a table… (guess who wins?)
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!