There is no frigate like this essay
Emily Dickenson said, “There is no frigate like a book,” and she was right. Books can take you places, but not always to good places. Anthony Esolen, in this 2005 essay, reminds us that we’re fixated on the idea of reading-as-a-good-thing-always. We’ve become convinced that reading, and reading alone, is the key indicator of a young person’s ability to learn. It’s true that in Western Civilization, the greatest minds were usually the ones who were skilled in speaking and listening (500BC – 1500AD) and then reading and writing (1500AD-2008AD), but that fact doesn’t always translate very well to the education of youth. Consider boys.
The problem with our boys is not that they don’t read. They don’t read-and this may make them more truly educable in the long, long run than their sisters, though it makes school more than usually cramping for them. The problem is that we’ve forgotten that there is any form of education other than that to be had by reading. For Christians this amnesia is particularly inexplicable, since Jesus was no bandier of quotes, nor was it an owlish rabbi who whipped the moneychangers.
Esolen continues with this delicious warning that reading is not always a good thing:
Reading is no more to be done for its own sake than is eating. Good food can trim your waist and harden your muscles, and bad food can make you fat and slow and ready for disease. Bad reading not only wastes time; not only does it fail in its vaunted objective, to make you “well-rounded,” whatever that twinkie image is supposed to mean; bad reading makes you stupid. Assuming that if you are not reading, you must be doing something, anything, bad reading at the least steals away time you might spend planing a board or walking down by the river to search for turtles; at worst, it inoculates you against good reading.
This isn’t so much an invective against classical education as a thankful reminder that universal education is about as useful as a universal shoe size. Boys might love reading more if they weren’t told it was the only way to learn something. Boys know better.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top18 Comments to “There is no frigate like this essay”
I ’spose I better stop reading this blog, and go out to the shop instead, eh?
Report comment to moderator
“Jesus was no bandier of quotes” ???
Wasn’t much of what Jesus said, including from the cross, quotes from the Old Testament?
Report comment to moderator
Boys might love reading more if they weren’t told it was the only way to learn something.
That pesky passive voice again.
Report comment to moderator
Well, considering what is being published in most of today’s books for kids, kids who read too much today are likely to be indoctrinated into all sorts of things parents would never deliberately teach them. I am in an online writing group for children’s writers, where I am sometimes quite horrified. Last year, for instance, when to celebrate some sort of homosexual, transgender, cross-dressing holiday, some group was offering free books to any librarian or school teacher. Or when authors of kids’ books are making fun of people who still expect kids’ books to be sweet and innocent. I’m reading lots of children’s books, and I’ve learned to simply expect at least one assult on children’s innocence in nearly every book.
Here’s one example, actually a rather minor one, but it will make my point: In one kids’ book a family’s upstairs neighbor is having lunch with the family. The neighbor is an author, and he starts talking about the contents of the books he writes. And the ten-year-old girl casually adds, “And sex, of course,” and he says, “Of course.” Even completely apart from the morality of the thing, does anyone really want a pre-pubescent girl being casual about sex with a bachelor neighbor?! No? Then why is it OK for a girl to read a book in which a heroine shows her “coolness” by being that casual about sex with a neighbor man?
Report comment to moderator
I haven’t read the post at all yet, but was thrilled to see Esolen’s name mentioned! Anthony Esolen translated the Divine Comedy.
I recommend this translation highly . I read it, and it was like reading the Divine Comedy again for the first time.
Report comment to moderator
OK, now to begin commenting on the actual post.
Reading is no more to be done for its own sake than is eating. Good food can trim your waist and harden your muscles, and bad food can make you fat and slow and ready for disease.
Although there is a pleasure to be had in good eating: we eat good food–an especially well-cooked chicken, a good dessert, or a cup of particularly good coffee–and we enjoy it for it’s own sake.
Reading may be enjoyed in the same way as well. We enjoy books for their sake. C.S. Lewis, in his Of Other Worlds, a collection of essays on writing, suggests that people read pop fiction (think of chick lit, of the Harry Potter books, of thrillers) that isn’t per se literature or doesn’t necessarily add at all to education.
According to Lewis, people read these because they hold for them a sort of magic, a special delight. Reading need not always be educational, as Esolen’s essay suggests (likely enough unintentionally), and it need not always be of quality.
For me, I think it better that kids are reading something rather than playing a video game or watching the TV. I suppose the one exception would be these cool books about sex.
Report comment to moderator
I hate how children’s literature is more depressing than real life these days. Have any of ya’ll read A Series of Unfortunate Events? I did. All thirteen books. And you know how it ended? WITH NO ANSWERS. NOTHING. I almost sent an angry letter to “Lemony Snicket”.
Report comment to moderator
‘bad reading makes you stupid.’
Well, bad reading isn’t the only thing that makes you stupid. Also, there are many things in the world that can be fixed but stupid isn’t one of them. So once you are stupid you will be for the rest of you life.
Some you you will note that on occasion I caution some folks not to be whack jobs. The reason is simple. Scientists now believe that, right before you hit the irreversible stupid, there is a stage one will pass through and it’s technical term is called whack job. Nearly 97.75% of people that hit the whack job stage can not be saved from stupid. So, I caution people not be a whack job for god reason. Call it Christian charity and conservative compassion.
Sadly, those that hit the stage before whack job only have about a 5% chance of recovering from it and 95% end up stupid eventually.
So, if I feel it necessary to call you or a loved one a whack job, do not take it personally – all is not lost – but it could easily never be found
Report comment to moderator
KIMBERLY: I recommend this translation highly .
What for?
Report comment to moderator
For reading Dante. I suppose if you’re not interested in Dante, then you’re probably not interested in Esolen’s translation.
But I’ve read the Ciardi translation and the Esolen translation, and I’ve heard reviews of the others, and Esolen’s is my favourite.
I knew I had to read it when a guy friend of mine told me it made him cry.
Report comment to moderator
I think what you gain from reading has to do with what you read. Reading can be pleasureable or it can teach you something. Either way rading improves vocablulary, self-expression and being able to understand others. I know several boys who love to read and I know some girls who hate it.I love to read and I love to be active, and run around. Childrens literature can be depressing but tben so can life. Childrens litterature can also be cloyingly optimistic too. Bad things will happen to you in life. The key is how you ( or the main character) deals with problems.
Report comment to moderator
Cheryl I’m reading lots of children’s books, and I’ve learned to simply expect at least one assult on children’s innocence in nearly every book.
Like this?
The eye that mocketh at his father, and despiseth to obey his mother, the ravens of the valley shall pick it out, and the young eagles shall eat it.
Or this?
And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters.
Or this?
He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD.
Or perhaps this charming anecdote.
[T]hey took the king’s sons, and slew seventy persons, and put their heads in baskets, and sent him them to Jezreel. And there came a messenger, and told him, saying, They have brought the heads of the king’s sons. And he said, Lay ye them in two heaps at the entering in of the gate until the morning.
That last one beats the heck out of the “twelve little girls in two straight lines” that my girls grew up listening to and reading.
Report comment to moderator
KIMBERLY: For reading Dante . . .
That’s what matters. I get the feeling a lot of conservatives like Esolen for his notes.
I have Esolen’s Inferno and have read several cantos, which were flat to my ear. I’ve also read Mandelbaum and Pinsky.
I often look over at the Italian side of the book and interpolate as much as I can, based on my French and Spanish. Unfortunately my Italian is on the level of opera libretti: Eccola! Andiamo! Finch’ an d’al vino! Non piu andrai, farfalone, amoroso!
As many times as I’ve started it, I’ve never actually read the Paradiso. Did you like it?
Report comment to moderator
Um, Ok. I get some of this. I spent my youth voraciously reading anything I could get my hands on, and 99% of it was pure trash that seared my spirit and hardened my heart.
But let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water.
My wife’s younger brothers wouldn’t be caught dead with a book, and they were jocks growing up. But they DID grow up, and now they look back and realize that they really should have applied themselves in school…as in READING!
Let’s not celebrate the real manly-man image of a dumb jock who won’t read. That’s going too far the other way.
Reading is an absolute MUST. Don’t harm that.
Report comment to moderator
What happens if you spend your youth reading Zane Gray?
Report comment to moderator
Chas: You’re a better man for it.
Report comment to moderator
I read a lot of Zane Grey too Chas. Dad had a collection. You ever read Pistol Pete’s book? Dad had a signed copy…
Report comment to moderator
I read too much as a kid. That’s why I post condescending messages.
Don’t let your kids grow up reading.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!