A footnote on the decline of the West
I like Penguin Classics because they’re available as affordable paperbacks, with footnotes that explain things I’m too ignorant to understand, like what an “embrasure” is. They also include introductions that are frequently detestable, unreadable, or both—literary criticism these days being primarily the province of small-minded scholars. Take a razor to its introduction, however, and your typical Penguin Classic is a bargain.
I treasure such small efforts at cultural preservation. Most Americans prefer Danielle Steele to Fyodor Dostoevsky, but sales of the former help keep the latter in print. I view it as a hedge strategy of sorts—using ignorance to subsidize cultivation in a roundabout way.
It struck me recently, however, that the editors at Penguin assume—most likely with good reason—that their readers have virtually no biblical knowledge. Thus when the Count says, in Bram Stoker’s Dracula, “But a stranger in a strange land, he is no one,” the editor dutifully provides a footnote to explain that this alludes to the book of Exodus. Ditto for a reference to “men like trees walking” (Mark 8:24), and to Methuselah.
Meanwhile, in the Penguin Classic edition of Jane Eyre, when Jane says of her aunt, “But I ought to forgive you, for you knew not what you did,” the editor is ready with a footnote, lest the reader miss that Jesus likewise forgave his persecutors. Similarly are half a dozen references to the Sermon on the Mount faithfully footnoted, so the reader will catch their import.
It’s a peculiar enterprise, trying to shore up Western civilization in the absence of Christ. This seems a bit like trying to build an ice cream sundae with only nuts and whipped cream. But to their credit, the good people at Penguin forge ahead, printing the books that many of us ought to have read but haven’t, and explaining in dribs and drabs who Jesus happens to be. If you don’t understand Christian dogma, as it turns out, then you won’t really understand Dracula or Jane Eyre, which perhaps explains the illegible introductions prepended to each of their Penguin Classic editions.
Come to think of it, maybe this will prove to be a postmodern form of evangelism. We can’t get most intellectuals within spitting distance of a church any more, but maybe we can reach them through footnotes. It’s better than the alternative, I suppose, which is continuing to pretend that Western civilization can stagger much further bled of the faith that once infused it.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top28 Comments to “A footnote on the decline of the West”
Tony, you need to read Romano Guardini’s The End of the Modern World. Guardini, 1885-1968, taught philosophy and theology at Munich and in my view makes the best case for the decline of the modern period. It is a short volume.
Report comment to moderator
It seems to me that no christian would be reading such a demonic book such as Dracula anyway.
Report comment to moderator
Decline of the West
* Massive illegal third world immigation
* Low birth rates from our most productive citizens
* Political Correctness = A fancy term for censorship of white Christians
* A constant re-hash of past Western sins like slavery, colonialism, and the Holocaust
Report comment to moderator
People who hope to go anywhere in the field of English need to have a working knowledge of the Bible otherwise they’ll be lost in the greats–Milton, Shakespeare, Browning and a bunch of other writers prior to 1900.
Back in the dark ages when I was in college–post 1900–we had a Bible as Literature class for English majors who hadn’t read the Bible.
Interestingly, at the same time the Greek I class started with 1 John–the class was full of pastors-to-be even at my secular school.
Report comment to moderator
“We can’t get most intellectuals within spitting distance of a church any more, but maybe we can reach them through footnotes.” How disheartening to read words that both insult and stereotype those you consider to be learned. I realize that the adage “you attract more bees with honey than vinegar” is not taken from the bible, but have you stopped to consider that maybe you would get more intellectuals in the Church if you adopted a mindset such as this?
By the way, loved the series on Transactional Marriage
Report comment to moderator
#2 Theon — Have you read the original Dracula? It’s hardly demonic.
Report comment to moderator
Well, now that I am going to be retired in a couple of weeks, I know what I will be doing with some of my time – reading Penguin Classics. Thanks for the fine idea. There are so many classics that I never had the time or want to read – and I am always having to explain things to ignorant lefties
Report comment to moderator
3 – Right on. For one faint hopeful second I thought that Tony was promoting Pat Buchanan’s book, The Death of the West.
Oh, well. I can dream, can’t I?
Report comment to moderator
Nick Peters, if you are reading this thread after posting your one message in it so far, I will ask again, <i?Are you a racist?
Seriously, I am not sure if you are or not. I can envision reasons why you may not be even though your posts give that impression. If that’s the case, I don’t think it’s my job to do your work for you. I think you should explain yourself one way or the other.
Report comment to moderator
I think it’s a good idea for people to read the Bible. It’s an important part of our culture and of world culture.
Report comment to moderator
I did quietly return a children’s book called Rise and Shine that my granddaughter (four years old) had chosen for us to check out out of the library for her because it struck me as heavy-handed propaganda and inappropriate for her age. I suppose this was an example of censorship.
I did the same with a book she picked out one day that was about a black slave child growing up in the old South, for the same reason. In that case, it was PC propaganda.
When she’s six or so, she can start learning about religion and slavery and other adult topics. I don’t think she would be ready for worldmagblog though.
For that matter, those of you who have children, at what age do you start letting them read this web site”?
Report comment to moderator
To Random Name
I don’t think I am a racist though people interested in silencing me call me that.
I just think white Christian people should be allowed to speak up for themselves just like every other racial, ethnic and religious group on the planet.
92% of black people vote for Obama, Hispanic people want bilingualism, Islam and Pacific Rim people want to move illegally into Western societies and that is suppose to be okay. But if I speak up for myself I am a racist.
Report comment to moderator
Random – The one avid reader-child in our family started reading the blog when she was bout 11. She started reading “World” mag. at 10. There were some issues I hid from her – maybe one or two in a year – because of an article or two that contained topics I wasn’t ready for her to be exposed to yet. Now, at nearly 14 there’s nothing much I wouldn’t let her read that I would read, keeping in mind that what I may censor for her now is stuff I would be self-censoring anyway.
I’m heartily in agreement with you on keeping “issues” out of kids reading before age 6 or so. Have you looked at books by the Woods (Audrey and husb) in the kids section? “Wierd Parents”, Heckety Peg, and King Bidgood’s in the Bathtub are among our fav’s. Also books illustrated by Steven Gammell – esp. The Napping House, and The Relatives. And all the Frog and Toad books.
There are way too many wonderful, wonderful books out there for preschoolers to let precious read-aloud time be cluttered with pc stuff.
The point of immersing preschool age kids in books should be to create in them a love for story and reading. The education part comes later.
Report comment to moderator
I’ve never read the original Bram Stoker. All vampire fiction–from Stoker right on up to Ann Rice, etc– has always had to deal with the issue of the Crucifix and why the vampire cannot endure gazing at it. I recall a film where the vampire offered his victim the option of drinking from his blood: “Drink this blood and have life everlasting.” And the perverted mockery of Christ’s propitiating death was quite apparent. Still in another film a young man holds up the cross and the vampire snarls back at him “For that to work you HAFTA BELIEVE!”
Report comment to moderator
Nick,
I appreciate that you have answered me.
I don’t believe that you should be silenced. I guess that the main message I get from your comments is that you feel very aggrieved, and rather persecuted as a white person.
The question that still arises in my mind is whether you feel that somebody being “black” is mostly a social category or an actual difference in the person. If being “black” is a social category, then I can understand (though I don’t entirely agree or entirely disagree) then I can understand that you feel a lot of resentment. If you think that “black” people are inherently inferior in intelligence or moral qualities because they are “born that way,” then I would consider that a racist attitude.
Also, after World War II, our armed forces became integrated, a change that gradually led to changes in our society. As many black soldiers served with loyalty and distinction in our country’s wars, and many died and many were injured, I think they are worthy of respect and appreciation, and in no way should be considered as unpatriotic or unreasonably demanding.
In my personal life, I have known and interacted with many black people and many people of other groups and nationalities. In my experience, I have known people of all groups to vary widely, from stupid to intelligent, from wicked to virtuous, and so on.
So again, I’m not sure that you can accept that people are individuals who vary regardless of their race, ethnicity, of if you feel these categories are inherent by their birth and genetics.
I appreciate your answering and I hope we can continue the dialog. I am frank and forthright in expressing my opinions, and many people (here and elsewhere) seem to experience that as “attacking,” though that is not my intent.
Report comment to moderator
akmom,,
Thank you for your reply. I think we are in substantial agreement. My wife and I celebrate Christmas, as does my daughter, her partner, and our granddaughter. To some extent, in our families, it’s a bit of a winter “solstice” festival, but I don’t think we are hostile to Christianity or are conveying a negative impression of it to the little one. Last Christmas, she had an advent and opened a pane for each day. Her mommies told her that Jesus was a man who promoted peace.
When we raised our daughter, we were frank about our atheism, but didn’t feel we had to “indoctrinate her” to be an atheist. We would have accepted it if she had become a Christian, but she held true to our light brainwashing.
I think the same would be true of our granddaughter. If she tells us at some time that she considers herself a Christian, I don’t think that by itself would cause a great crisis. However, if she turned on her mommies in the fashion that some Christians do toward homosexuals (while proclaiming their love for homosexuals) that would be a problem for us. But I’m not going to worry about crossing that bridge right now.
I will look at the books you suggested. We are quite familiar with the “Toad and Frog” books. Other favorites when our daughter was young were the “Francis” books, the Scandinavian Astrid Lindgren books, and the Finnish Moomintroll books.
Report comment to moderator
My daughter is a freshman at a well-regarded private university in the South. In her freshman seminar class, each student was asked to bring in an object from the culture with some kind of religious symbolism or reference. She brought in a shopping bag from the store Forever 21, which had “John 3:16″ printed on the bottom. Out of 18 kids in the class, only about 5 had any idea what that was about. In fact, another student brought in the same item and knew it had something to do with the Bible, but beyond that was clueless.
Report comment to moderator
#9 Random,
Careful Sonny. One post does not make one a racist but I am Guessing that 300 will. Even though the person being questioned has posted many times in a similar way and any sane person would conclude that yes, he is a racist, Mickey may warn you about your question instead and threaten you, God forbid, with who knows what. You being a persecuted, victimized flaming agnostic as it is, I wouldn’t want you to think that Mickey is an agnostic hater and you end up hating another Christian if he tries to silence you. For now he just hates llamas and loves bigoted racists and anti Semitic types instead. It is better to keep it that way. I know it is a strange world and some people are easily fooled by their Christian Compassion. But you don’t have to worry about that in the least.
Never ever trust a racist and anti Semite who claims to be a Christian and just looks like a racist and anti Semitic because they are sticking up for their own rights
Report comment to moderator
#18
Thank you for your post. I think you and New Jersey Lawyer should perhaps have a conversation about Nick. Victoria might join in also as she worries about me (because of my Jewish ancestry.)
I am not sure of what point Nick is trying to get across. You may be correct. You may not be.
Report comment to moderator
Llamas spit.
Report comment to moderator
Regarding Penguin Classics, the Dorothy Sayers translation of Dante’s Divine Comedy may not be the best poetically, but the accompanying notes are worth it all.
And Penguin is the only place to get Augustine’s complete City of God.
My only complaint has been that the books are made of such lousy, sulfur-rich paper that they yellow and fall apart in about 10 years.
Report comment to moderator
Nick is without question a xenophobe with at best a deep dislike and distrust of foreigners and other races. These are very dangerous people in any society. One can raise decent questions of immigration, affirmative action, victim hood, etc., though within the context of protecting “white people” it becomes xenophobia. Let’s call a spade a spade.
Report comment to moderator
For that matter, those of you who have children, at what age do you start letting them read this web site”?
*****My son was 15 (almost 16) when I first allowed him to read some of my posts and some of the others’ responses.
He now occasionally checks this blog at 16.
But, he had to have a worldviews class first, and I had to feel that he was reasonably anchored before he could deal with this site.
He doesn’t post.
Report comment to moderator
However, if she turned on her mommies in the fashion that some Christians do toward homosexuals (while proclaiming their love for homosexuals) that would be a problem for us.
******Random,
What do you considered “turning on” someone?
If I have a friend who is a homosexual, and I say, “I don’t approve of your lifestyle. I believe you are living in sin. I believe you can change.” Is that turning on them? If so, then when do you become concerned about my right to my beliefs?
Is it better for me to lie to my friend and act as if I approve when I don’t? Is that what friends do?
So, when my brother was living in sin with a woman for 7 years (they are finally married now), was I to pretend that I didn’t disapprove? Was it unloving of me to disapprove?
Yet, I really do love my brother. We still got together. I was nice to his woman (now his wife). I didn’t regularly give presents to the children then (since they weren’t his biologically or by law yet), but I do now. And, I was very nice to them. As soon as they were married, the children were to call me “Aunt TRS” and I refer to them as my children’s cousins.
So, tell me, why can’t a Christian disapprove of something that a person is doing and yet still love them? And, why does disapproval equal “turning on them” in your eyes? (Or were you limiting your comments to those few Christians who actually do throw the “offender” out of the house and/or turn their backs on them completely? If that’s the case, then you should both be more clear in what you state and make it clear that you understand that this is actually a minority among Evangelical Christians.)
Report comment to moderator
TRS,
Thank you for your comment. This is a very difficult issue, and I have no easy answers.
When my daughter told my wife and I that she was “engaged” to her college roommate, it took us about a week to “accept” the idea of the relationship. There was never a thought of rejecting her and the relationship. I had already over years rejected the mild and unthinking prejudice against homosexuals I had grown up with, and after time as a teacher seen childish bullying and scapegoating for this and other reasons that appalled me. To have it happen in my family meant that I had to personally accept in theory and in my dealings with other people. It wasn’t that difficult to be honest.
I would not accept anything. As I’ve mentioned before, one of my students after graduation conspired with her boyfriend to murder her husband. If my daughter had cold-bloodedly murdered someone, I would have a lot of trouble accepting or “supporting” her.
In my mind, murder is evil and unacceptable. A homosexual relatonship does not (by itself) fall into the category of evil.
I have watched my daughter and her partner raising our granddaughter in a skillful and loving manner. To my mind they deserve to respected as parents in the same way you would want your grandchildren to respect you children as parents. (I don’t know your age, marital status, situation as far as children, etc., so this is a imagined situation.) If you had a grandchild who said, “I have decided I am not a Christian,” my expectation is that you would not want to have that grandchild turn on their Christian parents in a condemning and contemptuous fashion.
That is what I meant by my statement. If my granddaughter decides she is a Christian, then I would still expect her to be polite and respectful toward her mommmies. Just as I expect you would want an atheist grandchild to be polite and respectful to her parents.
If my grandchild started preaching at her parents, that would be her right. It would also be my right to say, “Sorry, granddaughter, I in turn choose to reject and condemn you.”
There are many possible variations on these problems. When my brother and I were teenagers, he was much more of a babe magnet than I and had a variety of girl friends. At one time, he was seeing a girl of Chinese ancestry. Her parents were very upset that she was dating an American (Jewish) boy. She snuck out of her house to see my brother for a while.
At one time I was at a bus stop talking to the daughter of my daughter’s “backup” babysitter who was a white evangelical Christian. Daughter (about 18) complained to me that she was dating a black ski instructor and hiding the relationship from her mother.
We live in a tangled and complex world and in a society with many competing and struggling values and standards.
I simply disagree with the beliefs at this web site in regard to homosexuality. When the situation went from being an abstract theoretical value and a situation in my own life, I “walked the walk” of these values.
We can talk about this four hundreds of hours and we can exchange hundreds of messages. The situation boils down to we disagree. You believe in a God I don’t believe in. You believe that this God has communicated values and standards to you that I don’t agree with. No opinions are going to change. Fortunately we live in a society where we don’t settle these disputes (usually) by violence, but we are still in a situation of conflict and disagreement and someone will win and someone will lose. We are not in agreement on this issue. I doubt in the long run you will be on the winning side.
Report comment to moderator
“I don’t approve of your lifestyle. I believe you are living in sin. I believe you can change.”
The first 2 sentences are indeed part of historic Christianity. The third sentence, well, it depends on what the meaning of the word “change” is. A person choosing to voluntarily stop their “sins” in a lifelong struggle? Sure. Changing a homosexual orientation to a heterosexual one? There is no evidence in science that this can be done and nothing in the Christian religion teaches this. To the contrary the Christian religion teaches about immutable sinful nature in the law of your members. Christians have to deal with the fact that the homosexual nature is, at least for many, an immutable part of one’s being. You might ask why God would burden someone with such an immutable trait to commit sin? But you might also ask why God might burden someone with Down Syndrome or all sorts of terrible birth defects and diseases.
Personally I don’t think there is anything “defective” about the homosexual orientation; but were I a Christian, there are arguments I could use without engaging in the myth peddling that everyone can have a full functioning heterosexual orientation.
Report comment to moderator
I went to high school in the ’70s when classics were avoided in favor of literary junk as ‘Catcher in the Rye’ and ‘Catch 22′. Since then I’ve made it a point to try and read the classics one by one until I’m dead.
I’ve discovered that reading the classics is REALLY HARD! Some of them really tax my brain and require quite a bit of work to make sense of them. I’ve concluded that our ancestors were really SMART! Modern literature is no work at all. Apparently Western literature is in decline.
Report comment to moderator
Great article! If you can get “Uncle Tom’s Csbin” from Penguin, it must be at least a 20-pounder with all the Bible footnotes it must contain. Until now, I’d been wondering why I wasn’t forced to read that in High School along with “The Catcher in the Rye” and “The Shepherd of the Hills,” etc. But I was, as they call it, ‘educated’ in the 80s — when anything Biblical was truly becoming taboo in the public school system. If all families of high school aged children would read “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” with them it would help to resolve many of our racial issues. Caucasians need to be reminded that we are all equal in God’s sight and that skin color doesn’t necessarily reflect whether the color of the heart is black or white. “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” And the African American community has never publicly, to my knowledge, expressed ANY gratitude whatsoever for the REAL civil rights movement that culminated in the Civil War and the thousands of people who were willing to fight and die for their freedom. All we ever hear is the same deceptive whine about how white America is “Downright mean” (to quote the wealthy Mrs. Michelle Obama) to them and forever “holding them back” from success in America. To which I’m sure Oprah would heartily agree.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!