And the bipartisan award goes to …
Both John McCain and Barack Obama claim strong bipartisanship pasts, but when it comes to their legislative records, who really comes out on top? According to analysis by The Washington Times, the bipartisan award goes to McCain, who has done more than Obama to reach across the aisle since Obama joined the Senate in 2005:
In fact, by several measures, Mr. McCain has been more likely to team up with Democrats than with members of his own party. Democrats made up 55 percent of his political partners over the last two Congresses, including on the tough issues of campaign finance and global warming. For Mr. Obama, Republicans were only 13 percent of his co-sponsors during his time in the Senate, and he had his biggest bipartisan successes on noncontroversial measures, such as issuing a postage stamp in honor of civil rights icon Rosa Parks.
What’s your take on the Times’ findings?
HT: David L.














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top26 Comments to “And the bipartisan award goes to …”
Ugh. McCain is too liberal.
Report comment to moderator
How did McCain get his “maverick” reputation if he is so good at bipartisanship?
Report comment to moderator
We all miss the old McCain. What he is today is nothing like he used to be.
Last year he was lockstep with the Bushies 95% of the time.
When he bothers to vote, which he hasn’t done since April, he is 100% Bush in 2008. The transformation to the McBush is complete.
What a maverick.
John McCain was a POW.
Report comment to moderator
Peter L
The American Conservative Union gives McSame an 83 lifetime rating.
Report comment to moderator
This isn’t news. “Bipartisanship” always means “Democrats get what they want.” McCain has been “bipartisan” in this way for a long time, which is why most Republicans and nearly all conservatives wanted someone else to be the nominee.
Report comment to moderator
I can’t recall where, but yesterday I read an article talking about the fact that back in 2000 the medai saw McCain the same way they view Obama today.
Report comment to moderator
And WMB loses the bi-partisan award for being totally partisan in its reporting of “bi-partisanship.”
Report comment to moderator
Report comment to moderator
There is a new POW ad with one of McCain’s buddies.
Report comment to moderator
Well, I hope the McCain people read this blog. They could get a great ad out of this thread.
Report comment to moderator
Obama has never done anything that wasn’t partisan but McCain has been criticized roundly for doping so by conservatives for giving away the farm to those on t he left who easily got the better of him since they never give up much of anything when they compromise.
McCains bipartisan record is unquestioned, Obamas doe not exist and will not just because ‘the one’ says it does. It just means he is lying about it as usual.
Report comment to moderator
They’re getting so hard to keep track of, there is a new website dedicated to cataloging John McSame’s lies. He’s up to 51.
Report comment to moderator
Lets take up a collection to buy Llama a new keyboard.
Report comment to moderator
Llama
I missed you this weekend.
Report comment to moderator
Godlumps, I don’t the trouble is in the keyboard.
Report comment to moderator
llama #11: …McCain has been criticized roundly for doping so by conservatives…
lumps #13: Lets take up a collection to buy Llama a new keyboard.
NT #15: Godlumps, I don’t the trouble is in the keyboard.
Let’s hope it’s not from doping. It may be from too much of that Arizona sun. (I could use some of that warmth now. Overcast and 60s today in NEMO.)
Report comment to moderator
I can’t recall where, but yesterday I read an article talking about the fact that back in 2000 the medai saw McCain the same way they view Obama today.
Oh, yeah. They saw McCain the same way in 2007, too, until the nominations were settled and McCain assumed the mantle of Evil Republican to the media and Upholder of the Faith to conservatives. He is neither, of course.
Report comment to moderator
Is Arizona Sun a brand of tequila?
Report comment to moderator
John McCain’s speech on Thursday night had a familiar ring to it. In selling himself as a conciliatory governor of Texas during his 2000 race for the presidency, George W. Bush said many times that he was “a uniter not a divider.”
MinnPost.com
Radical Agnostics for McPalin: We haven’t suffered enough
Report comment to moderator
The Washington Times is a far-right, Republican newspaper that prints advocacy journalism and is owned by a cult (Moonies). I’d hardly consider it a credible source for news and information.
Report comment to moderator
Washington Times? I missed that. World might as well link to NewsMax or National Review
Report comment to moderator
An intersting video demonstrates that as Bush’s popularity declined, McCain began to agree with him more. McCain sold his soul.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBfngOsvmA0
Report comment to moderator
Indeed, HRW. You are more aware of what’s happening than the McSamers.
Report comment to moderator
I must say this shocks me. I thought Larry Craig was a shoo-in for the bipartisanship award.
Report comment to moderator
“What’s your take on the Times’ findings?”
Apparently for some, impugning the source (the genetic fallacy) is an acceptable substitute for assessing the data. It’s certainly easier, just not usually considered admirable, honest, or convincing.
Take care,
SG
Report comment to moderator
So, then. Beyond some lame swipes at the source, nobody has actually refuted the claim. Guess it stands.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!