“Pokemones”
It gets harder to write. “It is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret” (Ephesians 5:12). Dredge up all your dirtiest adolescent fantasies—the stuff you never breathed to a soul—and teens are performing them in daylight in Chile.
Well, in the darkness. On page one of The New York Times, a photo of 14-year-olds, who should be open-faced and innocent, have that glassy-eyed look of dissipation that is the hallmark of Satan. In a formerly conservative Latin American country, someone has figured out how to culturally sanction a Hugh Hefner dream of disrobing, kissing, and groping as many strangers as you can in one evening. The contestant who pairs off with the most is hailed as the “Ponceo.”
The Times calls it a “sex rebellion” (as if this were a civil rights movement to throw off the shackles of oppression), and “sexual exploration” (as if we were talking about Vasco de Gama). It is disgusting to call it a youth movement at all. What it is is a cynical industry, born of the perfect storm of waning morality and waxing internet connectivity, in which adults are profiting from profligacy at the price of their children’s souls.
“Party promoters use Fotolog … to organize their weekend gatherings, inviting Fotolog stars—the site’s most popular users, based on the number of comments they get—to help publicize the parties …,” some of which have been attended by over 4,000 youth.
A Dr. Ramiro Molina, director of the University of Chile’s Center for Adolescent Reproductive Medicine and Development, says, “Chile’s youth are clearly … testing the borderlines with their sexual conduct.” With insight like that, what hope is there for the children if the fathers “grope at noon as in the night” (Job 5:14)?













Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top7 Comments to ““Pokemones””
maybe it is not shameful to mention what the disobedient do NOT in secret
neither is it shameful to recognize acts of light
Report comment to moderator
I still don’t understand what’s happening. Nevertheless, the “sex rebellion” has been going on since the sixties. And it appears that they are not “testing the borderline”, but have crossed it. There are no limits to how far you can go on the other side.
Report comment to moderator
Many conservative Christians a) treat free enterprise as idolatry; b) are surprised when free enterprise turns sex into a commodity; and c) lament about how our society displays corrupt attitudes about sex.
When I point this out I will be labeled as a “lefty,” “socialist,” etc. I am not against free enterprise. I am skeptical about free enterprise being treated as idolatry.
Your mileage may vary.
Report comment to moderator
Certainly Chile is not the only place where this is going on . Rejection of absolutes, any standards of behavior, is ultimately going to lead to this, as it has here. Foundational to all of this is the rejection of any authority outside of ourselves. Satan’s cry is “freedom!” The freedom that leads to absolute slavery and death.
Report comment to moderator
Random – You certainly have a valid point.
Even the best system will have some corruption in it, as we live in a fallen world. Many people will take a mile from the inch they’ve been offered.
Report comment to moderator
Sounds like Chile’s church is asleep. Whither that nation’s version of Josh McDowell, Dawson McAllister or Suzie Shellenberger? Already the cell-phone camera has opened up to youths the options of sending nude photos of ea other here in the USA and Lebanese and even Saudi kids will eventually get wind of that as well.
Paradoxically, as society at large seems to get more “pornified” I think the old traditional skin mags will find themselves readerless/subscriberless. When what was forbidden and furtive becomes commonplace, who will care about Miss March’s data page?
I have always felt that smut-peddlers should be the biggest opponents of permissive dress codes along with those zoning laws which permit a proliferation of adult bookshops or strip bars.
Report comment to moderator
#4 Zatos: Rejection of absolutes, any standards of behavior, is ultimately going to lead to this, as it has here.
See, here we have an example of the kind of all-or-nothing thinking I have such a problem with.
In this context, the assumption is: sex must be confined to heterosexual monogamous marriage, or else anything goes.
Most of us non-Christian liberals share your moral revulsion at this sort of early and impersonal sexualization. It’s depressing and scary and sad, to me just as much as you.
But I suspect many people won’t believe me, or at best will be skeptical, because I also don’t share the conservative Christian view of abstinece/monogamy. I think it’s quite possible to have sexual relationships outside of those boundaries without coming anywhere close to the extreme transgresiveness of the Chilean example.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!