Hezekiah and the financial crisis
I’ve heard of racism, and sexism, and even speciesism. But I would like to propose a new variety—generationalism. If racism is the discrimination against people of a different race, then generationalism is the discrimination against people of a different generation.
The mistreated generation I have in mind is the future generation. They are that remote and faceless vapor that will take our places on this writhing globe—when we are outahere! If we’re this good at cheating people we can see, it is even less difficult to stiff people who are yet hypothetical.
The remarkable thing I have noticed about the present financial catastrophe is that it is hard to find anyone talking about how this stinks for our children’s children. We used to talk about that when the debt was merely one trillion dollars for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and $700 billion over 10 years for the drug benefit added to Medicare, and 43.5 percent of the federal budget that is Medicare and Social Security.
The only thing I can conclude about the eerie cessation of hand-wringing regarding “future generations” with respect to the $700 billion bailout is that we are all feeling so unspeakably guilty that we have tacitly agreed to not even mention them.
King Hezekiah brought disaster on his people by an act of vanity during a visit by Babylonian envoys. Isaiah told Hezekiah that for his folly “the time will surely come when everything in your palace, and all that your fathers have store up until this day, will be carried off to Babylon.”
But when the King learned that this would happen only in the next generation, he cheered up: “’The word of the Lord you have spoken is good,’ Hezekiah replied. For he thought, ‘Will there not be peace and security in my lifetime!’” (2 Kings: 16-19)













Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top13 Comments to “Hezekiah and the financial crisis”
good thought…. thanks.
Report comment to moderator
Hezikiah had a cowardly “stinks to be them” attitude, but I think we are so short sighted, we don’t think about legacies. We only think about the here and now. And even when it’s pointed out, we don’t take it seriously and think in real terms. It’s all so far away.
There wasn’t a whole lot else Hezikiah could say about his folly to Isaiah when the prophet came to him fuming with the Lord’s anger. Would that we had such prophets and that they would be understood and heeded by today’s leaders who are all about politicla expediency and hang the next generation and the next administration.
Hezekiah knew he was wrong, and his answer was probably very sheepish.
Report comment to moderator
Unfortunately, KLasko, our leaders have the same attitude. It’s the “Not on my watch” mentality. That’s the reason Fannie and Freddy got into trouble. That’s the reason they’re trying to bail them out. That’s the reason Social Security won’t be here when OpTeen and Tinker Bell need it. That’t the reason, despite all the assurrances of SecDef and the 4-stars, our military is inadequate.
etc.
See my post on WV about George Will.
Report comment to moderator
I wrote out a response to this and then deleted it because it’s too grim. I agree with you, Andree, and it troubles me a great deal.
Report comment to moderator
Oh, I think it’s worse. I don’t think it’s because we (the editorial we) can’t bear to think about them. I think it’s because we don’t think about them. A generation or two that aborted its children and left the living ones in day care (if they reproduced at all) isn’t well suited for thinking of its progeny.
Report comment to moderator
That is only part of it.
Our children and granchildren etc. are going to have to live with our decision not to control illegal immigation.
I shudder to think what the U.S. is going to look like in 50 years.
Our politicians would rather have this country overrun by a third world invasion than be called racist, xenophobes etc.
Report comment to moderator
If the federal government doesn’t stay out of the banking bailout business and allow the financial industry to correct itself, we will be leaving a horrendous legacy for ourselves a decade from now and for generations to come.
Central government was formed to protect us from outside invasion and to promote interstate commerce, not to protect us from ourselves (whether it’s bicycle helmets or bank bailouts).
My brother-in-law runs a few small banks in SoCal which did not get involved in risky mortgages, but he’s had to lay off dozens of people and is really struggling right now because the government’s mandated knee-jerk reaction to the banks who messed up is strangling “his” banks with such high reserve requirements there’s no money left to loan out. It’s irritating to see articles about how the small banks are going to benefit from this mess. Not true.
Whoever gets elected next month gets my sympathy.
Report comment to moderator
I love my granddaughter and think she is a charming and bright child full of promise. I think the world she faces will be a terrible one. I thought of putting something in my will leaving money for her to get training on self-defense and using firearms, but people who try to control the future through their wills are completely nuts (even by my standards, which are pretty nuts), so in the end I left that nonsense out.
I did write three short stories in my blog listing three scenarios for my granddaughter’s future. I am not really a horror story writer, so they are pretty mild.
I suspect if she survives, she will hold our generation in complete contempt.
Report comment to moderator
Andree, at one time the idea of debt being paid by future generations wasnt so outlandish. I must say it has always seemed immoral or unfair.
I think the assumption was that birthrates and population growth would go on as it had in the 30s 40s 50s 60s. But then we got Roe. Widespread use of abortion and other pregnancy preventers. Less kids. Deteriorated education system for less kids even with an avg higher amt of tax money per pupil. Jobs routed offshore to places with lower taxes and higher population density.
That very future generation which we hope to foist off our current debt on is looking quite miniscule. Thus, I foresee we’ll need even more immigrants brought in to pay the FICA etc to keep the whole ponzi scheme operating.
Report comment to moderator
Did anyone read how Wm F Buckley’s will intentionally denies an inheritance to a child his son sired out of wedlock? Here is not so much an effort to control the future from the grave as it is an effort to just be mean from the grave.
Note: I’m sure the child’s mother is not as pure as the driven snow either
Report comment to moderator
Just as long as those in office today can forestall the day of reckoning until they’re out of office… That’s the crux of the problem. It’s the “not on my watch” mentality.
Report comment to moderator
To Sawgunner
My hunch is Buckley’s problems with his son and grandson run a little deeper that that.
How can you be mad at the love child and how long can you stay mad at your son for past mistakes?
Report comment to moderator
Nick, judging by how much Christopher stands to get from Daddy’s will I must conclude that Bill’s anger at Chris’ indiscretions waned long ago.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!