Jimmie Lee Jackson died. James Bonard Fowler killed him. There’s no debate about that. But the upcoming trial over the killing is so contentious, so freighted with history, that the judge in charge ordered up a jury pool four times the normal size in an effort to seat an impartial panel. 

 

That pool of 600 jurors will report October 20 to an Alabama courtroom to begin voir dire in a trial dating back to the 1965 killing that made civil rights history. When a Feb. 18, 1965, civil rights demonstration erupted into a mêlée between marchers and police, Fowler, then a state trooper, shot Jackson, who later died at a Selma, Ala., hospital.

 

His death led to two historic civil rights marches: The first, turned back at Selma by armed state troopers, became known as “Bloody Sunday.” The second, led by Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., made it from Selma to Montgomery, the Alabama capitol, and led to congressional passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which fully enfranchised African-Americans.

 

A grand jury in 1965 reviewed evidence against Fowler, but did not return an indictment. Forty years later, Marion County District Attorney Michael Jackson, the county’s first black D.A., reopened the murder investigation. (The D.A. is not related to the victim.) In 2007, a grand jury indicted Fowler for murder. The former trooper has pleaded not guilty, claiming he shot Jimmie Lee Jackson after Jackson attacked him with a bottle and tried to snatch away his gun. 

 

Prosecutors argue Fowler shot the victim as he tried to defend family members from club-wielding state troopers. Defense attorneys for Fowler argue their client can’t get a fair trial in majority-black Marion County, where monuments honor Jackson as a civil rights hero.

 

 

What do you think?