Wisdom in a crowd
According to the Iowa Electronic Markets, things aren’t looking good for John McCain. For those unfamiliar with the IEM, it’s fairly straightforward: If you believe Barack Obama will win the election, you purchase a contract that will pay $1 if he emerges victorious. Those who want to bet on McCain can do likewise. As I write this, you have to pay about 82 cents to get someone to sell you an Obama contract. McCain contract holders, however, are willing to sell for just shy of 19 cents. That price has been steadily declining these past few weeks.
I like this approach because it relies on a broad group of people to put their money where their mouths are. No “man on the street” interviews. No Cokie Roberts opining from an NPR studio about what people think is important. No polls asking future voter and non-voter alike whom he’ll hypothetically choose. No wonder the IEM has a track record of accurately predicting elections.
James Surowiecki’s fascinating book on this and other “prediction markets” goes by a title I like less and less, however: The Wisdom of Crowds. What he describes are systems, like the IEM, that harness the dispersed knowledge of people, just as a market does to set prices for toothpaste and baked beans. I take issue with the title because knowledge is, I think, very different than wisdom. Knowledge is a collection of facts, whereas wisdom is a deeper and more profound understanding. It takes knowledge to deliver a baby, for example. But it takes wisdom to train him up in the way he should go.
I encounter knowledge all the time, but wisdom seems scarcer and scarcer, not only in my country, but within myself. I used to think I was approaching wisdom, that a few more years of study would get me to that exalted place. Now I see how quickly I, who so often profess to be wise, can become instead a fool.
Knowledge can cut you in two ways. Sometimes we let it falsely substitute for wisdom—as political wonks do, for example, when they imagine that it is mastery of facts that will yield better solutions. Even when we avoid confusing facts for wisdom, there is the reality that every increase in our knowledge of this world, while perhaps edifying, is like a slap in the face, because it draws our chastened minds to how little we actually know.
So where might the crowd, newly capable of drawing on its combined knowledge, go for wisdom? The Psalms say to God. I suppose that’s not a knowledgeable answer these days. The sophist immediately injects questions: Which God? What God? God where? Who are you to tell me? What he really means is: Have God present himself before me and reconcile himself to my knowledge, and then I will consider him.
The frightening thing is that we Christians can be guilty of the same vanity. Some of us are snared by pride, others by ear-tickling doctrines, others by an indulgence of intellect over spirit. More than once I’ve been captured by all three at the same time. Thankfully God brings us repeatedly back to that place where wisdom is eminent, reminding us that His ways are not ours, that the cross of Christ is foolishness to the world, that the beginning of wisdom is fear of the Lord.
That’s not a fashionable belief among the crowd. Fear of God is so . . . Old Testament. But even back in those days the call was definitive: Believe in this unfashionable I AM, or trust in what the crowd of kings and shamans and weak-willed men hold dear.
Sound familiar?




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top10 Comments to “Wisdom in a crowd”
The lyrics to a Hank Jr song come to mind: “It’s all over, but the crying”
I knew the nation was headed for deep kimchee when Jimmy Carter stepped up to advise Barack on foreign policy and economics.
Report comment to moderator
It looks as though John McCain is using the Fred Thompson campaign manual.
As Chas phrased it “a nonpartisan campaign”.
Pledging to cap how much you spend on advertising against Mr Moneybags sure seems ill-advised, eh Mr Campaign Finance Restrictions??
Report comment to moderator
3 things are going to do McCain in:
He is seen as another Bush
His blandness
People are going to vote for Obama because it will make them feel noble
Report comment to moderator
Hi Nick H. Peters: Perhaps your first two items cover this, but he’s also a terrible terrible awful candidate (as is BHO). So that’s another thing.
Report comment to moderator
I’ve never heard of IEM before, but they could be on to something.
I’m getting a sense that the wide swath of the American people are fixing to take a chance on Obama. Mind you, it’s just a feeling and I could be totally wrong, or it could all change in a heartbeat.
But I do sense a narrative is starting to build around a Republican defeat:
1. McCain’s age and health.
2. The Sarah Palin choice was faulty.
3. A sense of desperation on the part of the campaign.
4. The debates didn’t help McCain or Palin.
5. The unpopularity of Bush.
6. A lack of serious enthusiasm on the part of conservatives and CCR’s for McCain (somewhat offset by Palin).
7. The economic meltdown.
8. The negative campaign tactics by McCain & Palin are a big turn-off.
9. People are tired of the Republicans after 8 years.
10. The Democratic base is fired up and will turn out to vote this time.
Mind you, none of these things are significant by themselves, and none of them are fatal. But it does point to a long road to hoe for the Republicans in November.
If I’m optimistic of a Democratic win, it’s by the narrowest of margins – maybe a 51% confidence level. A lot can still happen, and the Democrats do have a knack for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
Report comment to moderator
Doesn’t it seem that IEM would tilt left given the demographic of users? They’re probably on the younger side, might not have a lot of financial responsibilities or explaining to do if they lose. I realize they are betting on the winner, not necessarily their candidate, but perhaps there is an arrogance factor that at work here. They’d be more enthused and bet more since they really want it to happen.
Report comment to moderator
Christians would like to see the more righteous MaCain-Palin to be elected to the White House, but the latest polls might suggest otherwise….Nevertheless, we shouldn’t rely on the White House to build a righteous society/nation. It’s the Church’s job to bring the people back to God. I believe whoever’s gonna win the White House in November, our God is still in charge..as He’s always beeen….Perhaps, in times of peril when we finally lost our freedom, righteous people will finally unite and turn to God this time…
Report comment to moderator
#7
[This is a self-righteous message.]
Perhaps, in times of peril when we finally lost our freedom, righteous people will finally unite and turn to God this time…
This will be different from all the other times “when we finally lost our freedom” how?
Is WorldMagBlog the best that can be done as far as displaying “righteous people” at work? What is the difference between “righteous” and “self-righteous”?
As a self-righteous person myself I am thinking of the vulgar expression: “Don’t try to bs a bs’r.”
Report comment to moderator
If IEM had been in place in 1936 Germany, it would have predicted continued Hitler success. So much for the wisdom of crowds.
Report comment to moderator
Point taken, MM. Yet IEM is only taking bets on an election three weeks from now, not that of the nine-years-distant outcome of a war that hasn’t even started.
My view: the fat lady’s about to finish her song, and hello, President Obama. One more item for Anlir’s list: McCain doesn’t seem to want the job as much as Obama does. He’ll happily step in and take advantage if the Dem shoots himself in the foot, but he’ll go to no particular trouble otherwise. You listen to his speeches and realize he just doesn’t have the fire in his belly. Maybe he knows he played the economy card poorly, a repeat of Bush 92?
Another theory to toss into to the mix: Americans instinctively prevent either party from keeping the White House for too long. After four or eight or twelve years, it’s time for a new approach, and that matters more to swing voters than the particulars of the guy offering himself as the change agent. Thus we take Carter over Ford (the stench of Nixon), Reagan over Carter (economy, Iran), Clinton over Bush I (economy, blandness), Bush II over Gore (taint of Clinton, more blandness), Bush II keeps job because we haven’t suffered enough yet, and now Obama over McCain, because Obama is differenter from Bush than McCain is. Obama will do four to eight, and then the folks in the middle will give the White House to whoever the Repubs offer as an alternative, especially if the Dems run with Biden.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!