The birds, the bees, and TV
Parents and sociologists who have speculated that sex on television may encourage teen promiscuity now have a newly released study to back them up. Watching sexual content on TV increases teen pregnancy, according to researchers at the Rand Corporation.
Lead researcher Anita Chandra followed 1461 teens ages 12 to 17 from 2001 to 2004. Those who watched high levels of sexual content on TV were twice as likely to be pregnant before age 20. Time writes:
Yet it’s not likely, nor realistic, to expect the television and movie industries to curb the amount of sexual content in their products. That’s why the American Academy of Pediatrics created the Media Matters campaign more than a decade ago, to not only promote awareness within the industry of how influential their TV shows and movies are to youngsters, but also to alert parents to the critical role they play in monitoring and mediating what their children watch.
And the researchers did this work before the proliferation of TV on the internet, which allows teens even easier access to sex-saturated media. Media isn’t cutting back on sex-saturation. Even commercials are getting more overtly sexual. I remember going to an innocent movie this summer and seeing ads for Levi before the flick that made me blush.



WORLD Magazine Library powered by Amazon
Term Life Insurance at Savings up to 75%!
Logos Bible Software for Bible Study
Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Free Hardcover ESV Study Bible!


















back to top18 Comments to “The birds, the bees, and TV”
This subject reminds me of a frog being boiled alive.
I’m watching people being boiled alive in raunchier and raunchier programming, and they just don’t believe it’s happening to them.
Report comment to moderator
once again, well, DUH
Report comment to moderator
I was watching something last Saturday in the middle of the day, and a commercial came on for Axe Body Spray…whatever that is. Anyway, the commercial portrayed what happens when a guy uses the body spray–evidently, he makes women turn into animals. He entered a bedroom, and the woman suddenly became ferocious, and the two engaged in some animal-like behavior. A bit of circling each other, some wrestling, some straddling and thrusting. Who knew this spray could provide such orgasmic delight. And who knows how many families got to watch that, free of charge.
My wife and I just looked at each other, shocked, and glad that we didn’t have any kids in the room to see it. I’m not one for censorship, but I do wish that networks would show a little restraint during family-viewing hours.
Report comment to moderator
I suspect that a common internal and/or external restraint curbs both what people watch and what they do. And lack thereof vice versa.
Report comment to moderator
Graceland–
Axe’s commercials are notoriously sexually explicit, so I’m not surprised at this one you watched. I believe it’s a deodorant of a kind …
Report comment to moderator
We’re pretty much down to Noggin and PBS. And he’s outgrowing these.
Report comment to moderator
Were not cigarette commercials banned for the explicit reason of cutting down on youth smoking? These commercials were cited for their targeting of young people. Ah, but the difference is the acceptability of progressive sexuality and the perverted notions of ‘art’ that we are forced to never question.
Report comment to moderator
I record a couple of shows I like to watch. For people who do this cutting the explicit commercials down during family viewing hours isn’t enough…I don’t want to have to explain to an 11 yr old what Extends is.
Report comment to moderator
I am all for recording what you want to watch, without commercials, and with a remote in hand. Just today, for example, Oprah has a show on at 4:00 all about sexuality. A lot of parents may have unattended kids home from school at that hour. Let’s face it: that is being done for the ratings, not for the common good.
Report comment to moderator
#3 and #5:
Axe is a type of deodorant and bodyspray that I’m slightly embarrassed to say I use.
What is sad to me is not necessarily the fact that these things are easily found in stores and on TV but more that advertisers (and the general population) have no more shame. It’s also sad that guys believe girls will like them if they wear Axe.
Report comment to moderator
So I see the feminists are outraged by a GPS chastity belt, but they’re not outraged by a “personal sexual enjoyment” style of MP3 player that’s blatantly advertised to teens and is designed to advertise their private sexual practices in public?
GPS lingerie - warning, slightly racy photo.
Report comment to moderator
I have no kids, so I don’t really have a dog in this hunt, but it seems to me, if enough of you were outraged, then this wouldn’t be happening. I understand that you all have it difficult raising kids in this environment — at least that’s what I hear from Christians and non-Christians alike — but the political will is not out there to change anything. That’s because the majority of you all want it. Advertisers get away with these commercials and sexy programs are put on tv because they get a product sold and get ratings. That comes from the consumer.
I don’t know what it will take for enough parents to contact their congressman and senators — but remember that they listened when people complained about the immigration bill. The will to change just isn’t there.
Report comment to moderator
#3 Graceland,
Did they show the part where the guy take out his Axe and hacks the woman to peices with it? That would be the best part fpr these twits and a shame we missed it
Report comment to moderator
The best invention on the planet at present is digital recording. I can select all the shows I want to watch and it records them for me. Then I can watch at my leisure and skip all the commercials. Also, you can pause a live show and rewind or go into slow motion. This is great for watching sports.
Report comment to moderator
I’m sure the content increases adult sexual activity as well. Just the name “Desperate Housewives” could encourage adultery and lead to the complete destruction of just a few more rocky marriages. Thus leaving the teens we are concerned about with divided parents in separate households trying to survive in a divided family with whole new set of trials.
What we televise is far more destructive to the teens than just encouraging them to promiscuity.
Report comment to moderator
This is why we have no cable tv.
This is why the computers in our home (including the laptop) are password protected to block the internet, and why I’m the only one in the family with the password (per hubby’s request).
It’s not just moving pictures that are the problem, either. Victoria’s Secret windows are pornographic, for starters. Even WalMart has explicit signage to promote its “Intimates” section.
I don’t take the kids to the store very often anymore–my 10 y/o son, in particular, is shocked and offended (thankfully) by the lack of modesty. I hear about it for days after he gets an eyeful.
It does make me angry that immorality is lapping around my children, dragging at them like an undertow current, waiting to destroy them in an unguarded moment.
It does drive me to prayer. I don’t think the politicians are going to be allies in this part of the culture war.
Report comment to moderator
The UN Convention on the Rights of Children would undermine parental authority to limit children’s access to such smut.
Report comment to moderator
No it doesn’t. I watched all kinds of stuff on TV when I was a kid and I was a virgin on my wedding night.
Report comment to moderator