The son who said, “I will”
Jesus told a story of two sons. Each was given a job by their father. One said right away, “I will not” (very unimpressive), but afterward he did. The other said, “I go” (very impressive), but he did not go (Matthew 21:28-32).
The parable came to mind as I was listening to post-election radio programs. Not 48 hours had elapsed since Barack Obama was elected in a giddy love fest, and the media, nursing a collective hangover, was full of sober reckoning and tamping down of irrational exuberance. In other words, they were saying the things no one wanted to say during the campaign. What is interesting is that this concerted downsizing of popular hopes may have been part of the Plan all along.
Tim Reid, the Washington correspondent for The Times of London, wrote on October 31:
Barack Obama’s senior advisers have drawn up plans to lower expectations for his presidency if he wins next week’s election, amid concerns that many of his euphoric supporters are harbouring unrealistic hopes of what he can achieve.
The sudden financial crisis and the prospect of a deep and painful recession have increased the urgency inside the Obama team to bring people down to earth, after a campaign in which his soaring rhetoric and promises of “hope” and “change” are now confronted with the reality of a stricken economy.
It may not necessarily be Obama’s fault that there are people out there who think he’s going to pay their mortgage. They might have just heard wrong. But when the public sounds one makes whip up euphoria in gullible people, one is probably as much to blame as when a buxom woman wearing a plunging neckline whips up lust. Obama, facing a world on the skids, spake as a god and said “I can”; “I will.” Very impressive.
Let us see what the favorite son does now.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top10 Comments to “The son who said, “I will””
It is a sign of how far we have fallen that people think their benefactor is not God, but rather the government. If people just read our founding documents, they could see the falsehood of that. Government simply cannot fill that role. Both sides promise too much, because of the ignorance of the people. Many want to keep the people ignorant, because it keeps them enslaved. We need to help people become less ignorant. We can do that on many different levels.
Report comment to moderator
Andree/Editor
What does this mean?
“But when the public sounds one makes whip up euphoria in gullible people,”
Something is wrong with this sentence. Please correct it and remove this post from the thread.
Report comment to moderator
But Bob, we’re having so much fun!
Report comment to moderator
Bob Buckles,
I had to read that sentence twice myself, so it perhaps could have been better phrased to be clearer on the first reading, but it makes sense to me now. The problem – to me – is figuring out which words are the verbs, since English lets the same word be either verb or noun in many cases.
It’s talking about “the public sounds [that] one makes” – the things someone says in public. When those things “whip up euphoria” then, she says, the person making those sounds is to blame (and so forth).
Report comment to moderator
Thank you Pauline. Putting “that” in made the sentence make sense.
Report comment to moderator
At Grant Park, there was little in the whipping up. They were already euphoric.
And substantively, the President-elect was about the very deflating noted in the column.
Perhaps it is different where Andre lives, but around here, there was remarkably less euphoria, less raw partisan spirit than in previous elections. Oh, we were glad he won and all (and really glad about some of the down-ticket victories), but the spirit of the campaign was far more purposeful than combative. In our area, the Obama campaign was immensely disciplined.
Report comment to moderator
YES WE CAN!
Report comment to moderator
Yes we can…what?
Report comment to moderator
It may not necessarily be Obama’s fault that there are people out there who think he’s going to pay their mortgage. They might have just heard wrong. But when the public sounds one makes whip up euphoria in gullible people, one is probably as much to blame as when a buxom woman wearing a plunging neckline whips up lust.
I don’t think people heard wrong. Palin clearly told America that Obama would redistribute the wealth. Now if Palin could retract or clarify her statements perhaps the euphoria would die down as it is 52% of America clearly want redistribution.
Report comment to moderator
HRW: Ummm, it was Obama who very cleared said to Joe “the Plumber” that he wanted to spread the wealth.
Wikipedia has been so good as to chronicle Obama’s comment to Joe’s question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_the_plumber
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!