Get real
All right. Which way would you rather have lost—in a landslide or by a squeaker?
Many WORLD readers, I imagine, see a long winter ahead. The trouncing at the polls was thorough, painful, and unambiguous. It confirmed the claims of many analysts that the conservative coalition assembled by Ronald Reagan a generation ago has all but disappeared.
So if there is any sense of realism at all, the Nov. 4 drubbing should silence (at least for the next election cycle or two) conservatives’ perpetual pipedream that we in fact represent a majority viewpoint among the American electorate. If only we could get the right candidates, conservatives have argued, and a little fairness from the mainstream media, and slow down the flood of illegal immigrants, the votes would certainly go our way.
Forget all that. We’re a minority, and we ought to get used to it.
Indeed, if the 2008 election accomplished nothing more for the conservative movement than to bring us face to face with the reality of our own minority status, it might still be seen as a very good year. Getting real is usually the first step toward solving any deep-seated problem.
In politics—just as in your family finances, or your spiritual walk, or dealing with some personal addiction—ending the pretense and welcoming the reality is always a wholesome and necessary step. In retrospect, winning the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections probably didn’t help sharpen our perspective. Those razor-thin victories prompted us to think we had more clout than was ever really ours. They misled us into a habit of sometimes brash pretense.
Maybe it’s time for Reagan conservatives like me to pay a humble visit to some of our African-American brothers and sisters and take a few lessons on what it means to find yourself in a perpetual minority role. I don’t mean this merely in a symbolic or metaphoric manner. I mean real, nitty-gritty, face-to-face sessions—as in black face to white face. Maybe that would help us adjust to how we should and shouldn’t act now that we’re discovering what it means to be on the short end of the stick.
Try this very specific case in point as a personal test. Did you catch the news item the weekend before the election about how several reporters for conservative-leaning newspapers were booted from the Obama plane to make room for staffers from Jet and Ebony magazines? You can get upset and angry about that, if you want. Or you can respond with optimistic humility: “Maybe it’s my turn to learn to be in the minority.”
Or maybe we could quietly approach some of our Jewish friends. Jews, after all, are actually a minority group among minority groups; blacks make up 13 percent of the U.S. population, but Jews just 2 percent. We could ask them to go way back, even to Old Testament times, and recount for us how their ancestors managed to keep hope alive when the odds against winning anything at all were overwhelming.
I would ask my Jewish friends especially to remind me, by reading from Deuteronomy 7, that the Lord has a unique perspective on what it means to be a minority. “It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the Lord set His love on you and chose you, for you were the fewest of all peoples. But it is because the Lord loves you and is keeping the oath that He swore to your fathers, that the Lord has brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery.”
Neither ancient Israel nor Reagan Republicans have had a corner on political cockiness and arrogance. Bringing proud and overconfident people down to size seems to be one of the Lord’s main tasks—both in the Bible and in modern history as well. But especially for those of us who claim to know something of the nature of that God, and who are blessed to be pretty well acquainted with His revelation of Himself in the Bible, wouldn’t it be a good thing to humble ourselves—and not have to wait for another political cycle for God to do it to us?




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top27 Comments to “Get real”
So, should we start with church on Sunday? Visit a difference congregation and see how our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ worship in a different context, particularly with a different cultural context?
Our four years in Hawaii were very helpful for us–we learned what it means to live in a place where people don’t always look like you. I found that an Asian-variant face became my own normal after living with Hawaiians for awhile.
And I love movies like End of the Spear, because they show me how Jesus looks to someone who doesn’t think like me but knows the same God.
And that’s what I appreciate about the posters on this blog who don’t see things the same way I do–they give me needed perspective, even when I don’t like what they say.
Report comment to moderator
For all of the swooning and fawning done over Obama and the fact he ran against an incredibly bland candidate he got 52% or 53% of the vote.
You would think he won in a landslide.
Ah yes, our two most fashionable minorities Jews and Blacks. All you have to do is reverse the situation. Just ask yourself how white Christians would be treated in Israel or Africa if they were an overwhelming minority.
Christians are leaving the Holy Land and white people are leaving Africa before they are killed. That might give you an answer.
Report comment to moderator
Let’s review:
Blacks as a minority living in the mainly white U.S.
* Hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars of governmental assistance
* Affirmative action, quotas, set-asides, test-norming etc.
* White people walking on egg shells so they won’t offend black people
* Never ending favorable portrayals of blacks in movies and on TV
Whites as a minority in mainly black South Africa
* The farms they built from scratch have been taken away from them
* Even though white people make up less than 10% of the population they are blamed for everything
* The lucky white people have gotten out of the country. The unlucky ones are living crime infested cities and are being killed, tortured and imprisoned.
Report comment to moderator
So Nick, is the picture you portray of South Africa the future for white Christians in America?
Report comment to moderator
To Nitrobob
It is something to think about.
Can you imagine what the U.S. is going to look like in the next 50 or 100 years? Our children and grandchildren are going to wonder why we didn’t stop this immigration insanity when we had the chance.
They will pay for our mistakes.
Report comment to moderator
Nick, the demographic future of Christianity is in Africa and South America.
Log out right now. Go to Amazon dotcom and order Dinesh Dsouza’s splendid book “What’s So Great About Christianity” (while you still can). You’ll be glad you did. As long as our JudeoChristian western worldview holds dominion in our politics and culture, the skin pigment thing is not a biggie.
Report comment to moderator
What I foresee is lotsa fingerpointing accusations about how the Reagan Coalition and all it stood for was “stabbed in the back” to borrow a phrase en vogue in Weimar Germany. In fact, I think Pat Buchanan will chair the show trial tribunals.
If the business cycle rebounds by 2012 assuming he wants the White House Barack will probably be re-elected. And problem with that is we got lotsa old judges on the Fed bench, no??
Report comment to moderator
You know, I really wanted to write in to my local paper pointing out the absurdity of many of Obama’s claims. And given my track record, they probably would have printed it. But I did not, because I honestly didn’t want to be thought of as a racist in my community. The Great Silencing of opposition has begun.
Report comment to moderator
Being a minority myself, I would like to thank Joel for what he wrote. It (being in the minority) takes a lot getting used to, but once you do it’s not so bad. You learn to make allies where you can and you realize that others have more in common with you than you realized. Being in the minority also helps you focus on the things that really are important. But the greatest benefit of being in the minority is that it can (if you let it) help you to put yourself in another person’s shoes and make you more empathetic toward others. If conservative Christians learn those lessons it will be worth it.
Report comment to moderator
Is that what you do Anlir?
Put yourself in another person’s shoes and become empathetic?
If must be on a different site.
Report comment to moderator
Anlir,
You learn to make allies where you can and you realize that others have more in common with you than you realized.
Yep that is what immediately comes to my mind wheh I think about you all right – especially when I don my dancing, if empathetic shoes, wrap myself in all those silken scaves and hand out candy to the kiddies, just hoping to make friends
Report comment to moderator
The election this year should be (and will be) a wake-up call for true Americans. Just like the ‘94 election ushered in a new GOP revolution, so shall 2010 . . . followed shortly thereafter by 2012 . . . and . . .
NEWT/SARAH 2012
Whoo-hoo!
Report comment to moderator
Nick Peters: For all of the swooning and fawning done over Obama and the fact he ran against an incredibly bland candidate he got 52% or 53% of the vote.
What is a landslide then, Nick? Reagan in ‘84?
As it happens, Brainiac, Reagan only got about 59 percent of the popular vote in 1984, and just about everyone agrees that was a landslide. Obama’s was not quite that dramatic, but it was impressive.
Reagan won 49 states in that year. Obama won this election with almost 100 more electoral votes than Bush got in either 2000 or 2004, and turned some states that would have seemed firmly Republican.
I know rightwingers have to try to minimize it, but really, Obama’s win was significant.
Report comment to moderator
Wow. I still don’t see 53% as all that significant given the circumstances: economy, “historical election,” the unpopular war, and the 8 years “tired of one party” trend in elections.
Most people I talked to voted for Obama because they found him appealing — not because they can delineate anything he stands for.
So, I completely disagree with the premise of this entire thread.
Report comment to moderator
Dear Outkast: “true Americans”? Say what? As in crusty-old-white-outdated Republicans? And, wait, let me guess… God doesn’t love Democrats, because they’re not “true Americans”. Wake up and smell the coffee. Let’s stop pretending that God’s hung up on Partisianship, parties, politics… and focus on the bigger picture: after 8 long years of Republicans in power, the pendulum has (inevitably) swung the other way. That’s what keeps this great democracy of ours balanced: everyone gets their say. Yes, the pendulum will eventually swing beck to the right, but in the mean time, pray for your new president (1 Timothy 2:1-2), and quit pretending that the only true Americans are the ones that see things your way.
Report comment to moderator
TRS: Bush won in ‘04 with 51 percent and Republicans widely declared it a mandate. So how is Obama’s 53 percent not even more significant?
Report comment to moderator
To SteveG
I don’t find Obama’s 53% noteworthy in fact I am surprised he didn’t win by more.
First time voters (mainly non-white) were a huge factor for Obama.
Also McCain had the worst of both worlds. He was seen as the vile Bush’s double while at the same time running as a non-incumbent.
And really how many people thought Bush’s victory in 2004 was a mandate (besides Bush)?
Report comment to moderator
It was Cheney who started the “mandate” talk in ‘04, but it was quickly picked up by many of the pundits. I will grant you that neither Bush nor Obama has an obvious mandate (but Reagan’s 59 percent was only a little better … he still had 41 percent of the voting population against him, even after a successful first term.)
But even without an enormous popular vote victory — which in a country as diverse as ours is very unlikely for anyone — Obama still won big.
And as for your obsession with non-white voters, Obama’s support among blacks was only a couple of percentage points more than Democrats always get. He did apparently make some gains among hispanics compared to Kerry and Gore, though.
Report comment to moderator
People like NICK H. PETERS speak as if the Democrats used an “African American Strategy” finally to trumped the “Southern Strategy.” But conservatives who think this election had a lot to do with African Americans are mistaken.
The key of course was Hispanics. They turned many of the 9 states Obama took away from Republicans. Hispanic voters swung 24 points for the democrats, far surpassing the increase of 15 points in the African American vote. This is a colossal change in our politics, because Hispanics are the only demographic group that is increasing significantly as a share of the electorate.
I’ve been telling you so. But no, y’all moaned that illegal immigration was a terminal assault on lawfulness and a revolution in our social order, rather than a harmless infraction like speeding 65 in a 55 zone. You fretted over Spanish as if it were a foreign language. You fantasized about the gratification of roundups, deportations, and walls. You forgot the genocide and imperialism that made you a majority for a fleeting moment in history, but that’s another story. Mainly, you forgot to thank God for the stranger within your gates, because without the amount of immigration we get from illegal entry, our population cannot supply the labor needed to keep our aging economy growing.
Hispanic voters understand these things, and have decided that you don’t.
Report comment to moderator
RE: 52.6%.
That was huge. Consider that in 22% of all counties in America, Whites voted for McCain in greater margins than they voted for Bush, going against the trend of White voters everywhere else. These voters are the “boarders” who reside in Appalachia, Arkansas, Northern Louisiana, East Texas, and Oklahoma. They are “racially conservative,” which means they don’t like the idea of having a Black man “over them” and are apprehensive the Blacks beside them will get more “aggressive.” A White Democrat would have gotten a lot of those votes.
Nevertheless, Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight says:
What ultimately distinguishes the elections that are considered to have been realignments is the efficacy of the governance of the rising party, rather than the force with which said party took office.
Report comment to moderator
SteveG: No presidential candidate in the two-party system in America has ever won more than 61.1% of the popular vote. So 59% is pretty impressive, and if anything qualifies as a popular vote landslide, that does. 40% of the nation voting against the incumbent is pretty much a given.
Obama’s victory is more impressive than Bush’s, but as you say, neither has an obvious mandate. Obama does have an electoral vote landslide.
Personally, I don’t see anything less than a 10% margin as a popular-vote landslide. Sure, Obama won a clear victory, and I wouldn’t describe the margin as “narrow”. But I wouldn’t call it a landslide either. But of course, it’s just my personal view.
Report comment to moderator
#21
I agree.
Report comment to moderator
11-what exactly did you mean by your comment?
Report comment to moderator
If the GOP had lost by a whisker, we’d all still be arguing about why we lost. As it turned out, the entire party (or at least our smartest thinkers) seems to agree about the real reason we lost (McCain wasn’t conservative enough). It’s only the leftists who are saying otherwise, which should bolster our thoughts about what we have to do in the future to defeat them.
BTW, if anyone had an “electoral mandate” it was Ronald W. Reagan, who took 49 states.
Report comment to moderator
#23: It’s called humor. Try it sometimes.
Report comment to moderator
McCain wasn’t conservative enough … I really, really hope the party leaders think that’s the reason and try to get a much more conservative candidate next time.
But I suspect the party leaders know better and this is just Outkast’s delusion.
Report comment to moderator
“which means they don’t like the idea of having a Black man “over them””
Yeah cause they just couldnt possibly disagree with the man’s philosophies and ideals and vote accordingly. They must be just racist….
“McCain wasn’t conservative enough”
He isnt and wasnt. But he is “more conservative” than Obama.
The party leaders obviously dont know anything worth trumpeting, look at the economy. All the leaders rep and dems need to be replaced.
But as far as Obama’s presidency goes, as Kim Wade said a week ago, Blacks no longer have an excuse. The opportunities are here in America for anyone to succeed. Obama is proof of that.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!