This just in: Obama not Jesus, or even Omnipotent
Christopher Hitchens is earning his title as one of the few remaining public intellectuals, if for no other reason than his opinions, aside from those declaiming against theists, are coolly unguarded and beholden to no one. Which is to say, he never gets too excited about what he likes, nor too impassioned about what he dislikes (again, except his wholesale disregard for organized, or even unorganized, religion). But mostly he comes off like a cranky old professor who knows the chariot is pulled by passionate coursers and demands a reasonable charioteer to keep things healthy. Thus, despite his endorsement of Obama, his post-election essay in Slate is not all vaguely self-congratulatory, like the one written by Frank Rich. Hitchens is generally annoyed by the starry-eyed media right now.
Those who think that they have just voted to legalize Utopia (and I hardly exaggerate when I say this; have you been reading the moist and trusting comments of our commentariat?) are preparing for a disillusionment that I very much doubt they will blame on themselves. The national Treasury is an echoing, empty vault; our Russian and Iranian enemies are acting even more wolfishly even as they sense a repudiation of Bush-Cheney; the lines of jobless and evicted are going to lengthen, and I don’t think a diet of hope is going to cover it. Nor even a diet of audacity, though can you picture anything less audacious than the gray, safety-first figures who have so far been chosen by Obama to be on his team?
My favorite part is this:
There is an element of the “wannabe” about all this—something that suggests that, if the clock were to be rolled back, every living white person would now automatically stand with John Brown at Harper’s Ferry and with John Lewis at the Edmund Pettus Bridge. All the evidence we have is to the contrary: Abraham Lincoln ringingly denounced John Brown, and John F. Kennedy (he of the last young and pretty family to occupy the Executive Mansion) was embarrassed and annoyed by the March on Washington. In other words, there is something pain-free and self-congratulatory about the Obama surge. This has happened before, of course, with the high-sounding talk about the “New Frontier,” the “Great Society,” and “Morning in America.” It’s just that this time it’s more than usually not affordable. There are many causes of the subprime and derivative horror show that has destroyed our trust in the idea of credit, but one way of defining it would be to say that everybody was promised everything, and almost everybody fell for the populist bait.
And remember, Hitchens endorsed Obama. He’s just sickened by the messianic connotations, the ones that have yet to abate, of the man’s election.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top42 Comments to “This just in: Obama not Jesus, or even Omnipotent”
You would think the MSM would have learned their lesson.
They sat meekly by or supported the Iraq War as Bush feed us a pack of lies.
Too little, too late the media criticized themselves for supporting the Iraq fiasco and trusting Bush.
They are now making the same mistake. The MSM were more cheerleaders for Obama than impartial observers.
Report comment to moderator
Somebody has a Messiah Complex. And it’s not the MSM or Hitchens.
Hitchens comments, while colorful, are apt.
But nobody thinks Obama is a “Messiah”. Except those into creating strawmen and burning them down.
Report comment to moderator
LOL, the Greek columns were simply a mistake?
Report comment to moderator
I’m willing to say Hitchens is right here. Even a broken clock is right twice ea day. Go to Miami and talk to some old Cubans about hysterical adulation directed at youth and change.
Report comment to moderator
Well. as a white man who didn’t vote for the Messiah, I agree with Hitchens and want to mend my ways and fake like I was always a disciple of the Anointed from the time he was known as The Boy Muslim. To celebrate my being born again, I am going to delve deep into my foodie background and commemorate this great event by developing a new Obama recipe in his honor that fits me as a proud southerner to his historic background and ascension to Nirvana… bringing me with him in his great grace and generosity. It will be included in my new cook book ‘Recipes That Mortals Can Make Lighter Than Air And Just As Filling.
I call this recipe the ‘Born A=gain Obama South Side Crack HoCakes’
Fry up 1/2 lb of Jimmy Dean maple or sage sausage and set aside in crumbles. Take the kernels off an ear of bi color (its a big tent) sweet corn with a sharp knife, chop up the kernels a little and set aside and set aside. Combine 3 cups of flour with 1 cup of yellow corn meal, 1 tsp of kosher salt and 1/4 cup of sugar in a large recyclable mixing bowl. Add 2 Tbs of baking powder, 1/2 tsp of baking soda, 8 oz of shredded sharp cheddar cheese, 1/2 cup of chopped fine green onions (minced scallions for you elitist lefties) and one chopped fine jalapeno pepper (southern conservative use a small habannero or Serrano for a little more heat) Mix the stuff in this bowl up like you would a minority on welfare (if you were a lefty propagandist), and add 2 cups of milk, 3 extra large eggs (large ones for weak wristed lefties would be fine) and two sticks of melted butter with the 1/2 lb of Jimmy Dean’s crumbled maple or sage flavored sausage that you fried up earlier and the set aside chopped up bi-color sweet corn.
Now don’t mix all together too much or your Crack HoCakes will be tougher than they are in real life. A few clumps are OK.
Get griddle or Iron skillet hot with sausage grease and fry up your Obama Crack HoCakes like Yankee Lefties make pancakes in NYC. Unless you live in a halfway house like most lefties, this recipe will make way too many Crack HoCakes. But, since I always eat this on Thanksgiving Day morning, from now on anyway, take half the batter and bake it at 375 degrees in an 8×8 baking pan or iron skillet till the top is golden brown. You will use this Crack HoBread later on for the base of your Obama Hobread Turkey Day Stuffing (recipe to follow later).
I know it seemed like a lot of work for some finely made, if difficult, Born Again Obama South Side Crack HoCakes and most lefties are too lazy to make recipes from scratch – much less do anything not associated with drug and crime. So, I made an easier version for my Comrades that they can use instead and be happier about their hope for a new future where they don’t have to do much of anything to get rich white folks to pay for everything they want and need. Here goes.
Most cornbread mixes are 6 Oz. Take two of them you shoplifted from the Korean grocer on the street corner and make per the directions (Steal the complete ones where you just have to add water – no… beer, wine or whisky are not substitutes for water). Fry up on a hot greased griddle, skillet or metal trash can top. Pretty easy Comrade don’t you think. You can add a small can of Mexicorn and some fried up sausage if you can pinch them from somewhere and some minced green onion you take out of dumpster from behind the Chinese restaurant if the pickings are exceptionally good and you wnat to be Warren Buffet for just a minute. Anything left over you can make some corn squeezins with them and get drunk later.
Report comment to moderator
#2 Off our game are we?
Calypso Louis seems to think PEBO is a messiah. I believe he advocates burning things, but I’ve yet to hear of straw.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9cRpS5mSq0
Report comment to moderator
When Jimmy Carter was elected I devised a Nuclear Jimmy’s Engineered Peanut and Pecan Pie But after his term the name changed to Nutty Jimmy’s American Hostage Pie. It is delicious.
Maybe I could do a presidential cook book if Obama wouldn’t be too offended, put me in the gulag and force me to cook for him.
Report comment to moderator
Those who claim that President Bush “feed us a pack of lies” (like #1) are lying.
Report comment to moderator
#2 Arcadia,
Tahnks anyweay, I’ll go with what Obama said himself about his being a Messiah if you don’t mind.
Report comment to moderator
Well, as it happens, our new president has no slave ancestry,
His wife and children do. His office and government, and the constitution which he promises to defend do, too.
Why can’t Hitchens at least celebrate the fact that the president-elect restores an African name to an African-American nation from whose chronicles African names were erased? Obama does to American proper names what the Battle of Hastings did to English, entering our word hoard next to Omaha!
Report comment to moderator
“But nobody thinks Obama is a “Messiah”. Except those into creating strawmen and burning them down.”
Psssshhhhh! Right. And the MSM didn’t carry Obama’s water either. Even after the MSM admits it, and countless journalists decry it, our resident liberals fail to see the light…
Report comment to moderator
Scroop,
Hitchens ENDORSED Obama. Hello? Anyone home?
Report comment to moderator
Hitchens: Although his ancestors were not American slaves, Obama’s parents’ marriage was illegal in a number of states where his birth certificate would have stated “Negro boy” and they would have been taken away in handcuffs for fraternizing in public. Obama himself could have been scolded for toddling down the sidewalks of certain streets or using the front door of the hardware store.
Report comment to moderator
Hitchens is always sour, but doesn’t usually peddle such sloppy silliness. A totem only has to be adopted to be authentic. For billions of people in the world, Obama is an emblematic African American. Maybe Hitchens is still confused by English notions of pedigree. Americans believe that self-fashioning and popular culture trump all.
Report comment to moderator
I call this recipe the ‘Born A=gain Obama South Side Crack HoCakes’
The only possibility for humor in this will be watching Outcast stamp a yellow laugh symbol on it and WMB put up with it.,
Report comment to moderator
To Scroop #13
Are you so hard up to find white racism that you are bringing up hypothetical examples?
Report comment to moderator
Hitchens is always sour, but doesn’t usually peddle such sloppy silliness.
Well not always but I find a lot of his reasoning to be extremely sloppy.
Report comment to moderator
First, one must take into account that Hitchens is politically conservative in a very “Thatcherite” sort of way.
Second, one must take into account that he’s as mean as a snake. He’s pretty good at cutting people down with his high-falutin’ rhetoric.
Third, the media pundits don’t speak for the people. I don’t know of a single regular person who refers to Obama as a “Messiah” or any other god-like terms. I think it’s primarily a straw-man set up by the right.
Fourth, there are always negative people around to complain about success.
Report comment to moderator
llama: #2 Arcadia,Tahnks anyweay, I’ll go with what Obama said himself about his being a Messiah if you don’t mind.
Huh? Okay I’ll bite, what do you claim he said? (This ought to be good).
Report comment to moderator
Racism never was and still isn’t hypothetical, Nick H. Peters, and for all practical purposes “white racism” is a redundancy.
Report comment to moderator
“…and for all practical purposes “white racism” is a redundancy.”
Thanks for labeling all us “whiteys” as racist. Isn’t name calling against WMB rules?
Report comment to moderator
“I think it’s primarily a straw-man set up by the right.”
Hey fan boy, we’re not the ones having Obamagasms out here…
Report comment to moderator
…for all practical purposes “white racism” is a redundancy.
It isn’t “a redundancy,” but it sure is insulting. “White racism” is no more redundant than “black criminality.” See how this name-calling works?
Report comment to moderator
Arcadia (19): I don’t know what Llama had in mind, but there’s this:
…I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment…when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal;…
Report comment to moderator
#15 Scroopy,
I stopped using Smiley Faces after lefties complained I made too much fun of them. Now you can’t spot first amendment and ACLU protected humorous satire when it hits you in the like a tonne (that’s English) of bricks. Like I said, lefties won’t learn to love, or evolve into humans for that matter, until they get a sense of humor.
Plus millions of Blacks and Whites like me, regardless of political persuasion, grew up on HoCakes and that is one fine recipe for some and theother one is plenty good for lefties who don’t care what slop their masters swill their way – like you
Report comment to moderator
Stubob: Hey, that’s pretty good. I suppose if one does not believe that global warming is going on at all or that there is nothing humans can do about it, and really believes that Obama somehow meant that his mere presence might have those effects it could be interpreted that way.
But somehow I think that, just maybe, a more reasonable interpretation is that Obama was referring to policies and actions to be taken by others rather than his own magical supernatural properties.
If McCain had said “this is the day we began to win the Iraq war”, how would you have interpreted it? That he was magically going to win it? Or that he might institute policies so that our soldiers could win it?
Report comment to moderator
#15 Nicky,
Why wouldn’t they put up with it when they put up with you?
Report comment to moderator
Ok Arcadia,
I swore off of doing work for lefties for free but, go to Google and type in Obama Messiah and see how many hits, variations adn feature films pop up
Report comment to moderator
Sorry, The Islamofascists in Turkey complained to Obama about using their county name in our Obama Turkey Day HoBread Stuffing. So Obama is going to issue a presidential executive order to rename our stuffing to
Obama Really Big Chicken Day Ho Bread Stuffing. Obama went on to say that a really big chicken suited, Americans, him and his world leadership style better anyway and he was sorry Llamas offended the Islamofascists in Turkey. Obama has vowed vowed to wipe llamas off the face of the earth for Islamofascists everywhere.
Report comment to moderator
STUBOB: “White racism” is no more redundant than “black criminality.”
I’m pretty sure I disagree with this, and am equally sure you don’t know what I meant.
“White racism” is a redundancy because, for all practical purposes, racial discrimination was practiced in America by Whites, the only people who had the political authority and economic power to do so. “Black racism” exists to the extent there are Black people who dislike people of other races, but without institutional force, such dislike is a commonplace and unimportant feature of all populations everywhere.
“Black criminality” is not a redundancy at all from my point of view because we have a significant level of “White criminality,” with one of 106 White adult men incarcerated, according to Pew.
Report comment to moderator
According to Merriam-Webster
racism:
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race 2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
Report comment to moderator
I’m not sure what you mean either Scroop Moth. A “redundancy” is “the use of duplicative, unnecessary or useless wording” (Wikipedia). It is found in phrases where different words have the same meaning. Examples: “an added bonus”, “a variety of different”, “hot water heater”, “killed him dead”. So if “white racism” is a redundancy, then “white” has the same meaning as “racism” or “racist”. Which is not true, even as “black=criminal” is not true.
Personal attitudes can still be racist. There may be only one person in an entire “race” who is racist, and he may have no influence at all; but he is still racist. Otherwise you could only describe institutions and practices as racist, but people with their own dislikes couldn’t be called racist.
Report comment to moderator
The word “discrimination” has to be the primary term in our definition of racism, because without it, racism is just an intellectual mistake and an idiosyncrasy of personality, not the systematic policy of oppression we’ve experienced. One individual doesn’t make a regime.
Conservatives think of evil as a personal moral flaw and blame individuals rather than society. Thus, racism for them is private prejudice for which virtuous individuals share no moral responsibility.
NICK H PETERS compels himself to distinguish “white racism” from other possible forms of racism, presumably the “black racism” of blacks who dislike whites, as if that had any social significance at all. There was no racism in America than white supremacy, however, so Nick’s “White racism” is a redundancy.
Liberals see racism as a cultural behavior that is reinforced by political authority and economic power, rather than as an individual moral flaw. God might look upon an individual’s private prejudices in isolation, but liberals don’t.
Report comment to moderator
So if a black boss favors his black employee over his white employees, that’s not racism?
Report comment to moderator
Of course not. Because we all know that blacks do not have power. They’re victims not the oppressive white devils, dontcha know.
Report comment to moderator
But, evils in society ultimately stem from evils in the hearts of people. The way to improve society is to change hearts and minds of individuals. At least, that’s how I see it. When enough people turn against something, society will change (and laws as well, eventually). It begins with individual people. And for individuals, it begins in the home.
As the home, so the nation.
Report comment to moderator
Since it’s been anticipated that I’d say this (as a white male Republican): LOL, Llama!
Report comment to moderator
Interstingly, then, poor white trash can’t be racist either, because they have no cultural power. Are you aware, Scroop, that most white people have little to no cultural power? Come on, I was a very poor white child who once had a black crossing guard call me “whitey.” Now, it’s rather pitiful to pick on a kid, but the assumption that white people have power and black people don’t is simply foolish–it depends on the people and the situation. Especially since in a face-to-face confrontation, the black man is more likely to have fighting experience and/or a weapon, either of which can level the playing experience pretty quickly.
Yes, historically there has been more white racism than black, but I don’t think that’s true today. And the addition of “power” to the definition of racism is not only inaccurate, but as I think I’ve demonstrated, it doesn’t even effectively make the point that white people can be racist but black people can’t.
Report comment to moderator
The other Hitchens wrote a similar column, only more clearly from someone who did not endorse Obama.
Report comment to moderator
We have milliseconds, microseconds, nanoseconds, picoseconds and leftiseconds. A leftisecond is how long it takes a liberal to trash one of their own when he says something conservatives agree with.
Report comment to moderator
There are plenty of folks decrying the water carrying media these days, and it’s not always conservatives.
Camille Paglia has an incisive column over on Salon about the lack of media coverage of Obama and their “sadomasochistic anti-Palin orgy”. Hat tip to Drill for his link on the Wirled Views today:
I’ll give you the text version over on Free Republic because it doesn’t have all the pesky ads at Salon that slow things down.
Report comment to moderator
KBELLS – Did you see “White Man’s Burden” with John Travolta? That movie provides a narrative about a black boss who discriminates against white employees. Of course a black boss could mistreat white employees but I don’t think it would amount to racism in the absence of conditions that reinforce oppression.
I’ve heard white employers, among whites, refer to black men as “boys.” Granted, bossman is old and another is dead. Black men sometimes are alcoholic and crackhead farm workers, a condition which does not make them un-useful to savy farmers. We all know employers who treat loyal black servants with lifelong affection and deference. Wealthy social conservatives cultivate these relations in the South. Not long ago, I attended a housekeeper’s funeral. Her employer trusted her implicitly in almost all matters, even where a doctor and a lawyer would have been appropriate, and continued to pay her salary when she was too old to work. Her employer paid for the funeral — but did not attend. The list of survivors in the notice did not match her marriage, which shockingly revealed that the housekeeper at one time of life had gone creeping. Despite half a century of faithful service, the housekeeper had failed in her most essential role as a keeper of the social order. I still don’t understand whether that post-mortum rejection was disappointment or an assertion of superiority.
Life is complex, isn’t it? I know a black business owner who prefers white employes because of performance. His black customers think this is just, and are delighted with the service they get.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!