Obama out of bounds?
Ask any red-blooded American, liberal or conservative, and he or she will tell you that the most pressing matters our nation faces are the economy, national security, and … straightening out the BCS mess. OK, I’m being facetious with that last one. But our president-elect did weigh in on the lack of a playoff system in college football’s top division on “60 Minutes” last night, calling for an eight-team tournament to crown a national champion:
“If you’ve got a bunch of teams who play throughout the season, and many of them have one loss or two losses, there’s no clear decisive winner. We should be creating a playoff system. …
“It would add three extra weeks to the season. You could trim back on the regular season. I don’t know any serious fan of college football who has disagreed with me on this. So, I’m going to throw my weight around a little bit. I think it’s the right thing to do.”
BCS coordinator John Swofford responded:
“For now, our constituencies—and I know he understands constituencies—have settled on the current BCS system, which the majority believe is the best system yet to determine a national champion while also maintaining the college football regular season as the best and most meaningful in sports. … We certainly respect the opinions of President-elect Obama and welcome dialogue on what’s best for college football.”
I agree with Obama on the need for a playoff, but should the president of the United States involve himself in matters of sports? Kind of reminds me of when President Nixon allegedly sent in plays to Washington Redskins coach George Allen, or when President Clinton tried to intervene in the 1994-95 baseball strike.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top22 Comments to “Obama out of bounds?”
Why not? Though it’s certainly not one of our nation’s more pressing matters, President-elect Obama could use his influence to help bring much-needed change to college football.
Of course, Presidents could be even more pro-active after they become ex-Presidents. Could George Bush become the next commissioner of baseball?
Report comment to moderator
I don’t think the president should be wasting his time by getting involved in sports…although I will make an exception in this case.
A playoff system is needed, and if Obama can help it happen, great.
I doubt he can though. The reason we don’t have a playoff is simple: money. The vast majority of fans and coaches have been pleading for a playoff, but the BCS people always claim that the majority are on their side. The only “majority” siding with the BCS are the conference commissioners, and frankly they are the only ones that matter. It’s all about the money. Don’t believe for a second when they say it’s all about the student-athletes or the tradition.
Report comment to moderator
First of all, weren’t his comments tongue-in-cheek? I campaigned against Senator Obama, but there were times I thought the conservative media were too hard on him twisting his words and meanings in ways that we conservatives hate when done to us.
Secondly, you are right. We all hate the BCS. Something should be done. Somebody’s got to lead. If he wants to get involved, perhaps that will distract him from other policy matters that we fear will take place during his first 100 days.
Thirdly, I sure hope he doesn’t “socialize” college football in the process.
Report comment to moderator
“…which the majority believe is the best system yet to determine a national champion while also maintaining the college football regular season as the best and most meaningful in sports.”
Do authority figures just enjoy sticking their foot in their mouth? Do they like the taste of shoe or something? Or are they just compulsive liars when there’s a lot of money at stake?
I don’t follow football, but I’ve listened to enough of you guys to know that no one (especially the fans) likes the way this is set up – except for the folks making lots of money off of it.
What “majority” is he talking about?
Go ahead and flame me, I’ve already admitted I don’t know what I’m talking about…
Report comment to moderator
It could happen provided he redistributes all their wealth evenly
As it stands now, the bigger conferences make alot more money with the BCS, which is why they wont move to playoff system.
Report comment to moderator
If you let the politicians intervene in sports, next thing you know they’ll want to regulate labor contracts, housing finance, the price of ag commodities etc, the price of prescription drugs, your retirement savings, etc.
Best now we nip nip NIP it in the bud before govt just gets involved in every sphere of our lives.
Report comment to moderator
Take a look at that photo. We now have verifiable proof that Obama is a leftie!
A don’t know of anyone who doesn’t hate the BCS. But half the fun of each college football season is rooting for teams to “mess up” the whole system in order to put another nail in its coffin. My college alma mater (Georgia Southern) is a part of the Division formerly known as I-AA. They manage to play an 11 game season, followed by a 16-team (4 round) playoff. The first round begins Thanksgiving weekend and is over before Christmas. It seems to work just fine (also in Division II and III as well).
But college bowl games are big business. There’s a lot of money to be had under the current system. But I suspect there would be a lot of money to be made with a playoff system (and we wouldn’t have to lose the minor bowls if we had one).
A while back I watched an ESPN show (one of those “Five Reasons You Can’t Blame…” broadcasts) that defended the current bowl system. One good point: the way the format currently stands, every game counts in college football. As such, college football has the most exciting regular season of any college sport. Contrast with the sport that probably has the most exciting post season (basketball), where the regular season isn’t that meaningful, as long as you are one of those 65 teams who gets in and you don’t get seeded too low. Would a playoff system diminish the regular season? Probably not if it were only 8 teams, but it could. Something to think about.
Report comment to moderator
Okay, I’m playing the dumb girl here, but what does BCS stand for?
Report comment to moderator
“Bowl Championship Series”, Kbells. Here’s a helpful wiki link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowl_Championship_Series
Report comment to moderator
Thank you TJ.
Report comment to moderator
You are welcome.
Report comment to moderator
I’m for which ever system will help Alabama the most.
Report comment to moderator
One good point: the way the format currently stands, every game counts in college football.
To an extent, that is true. But I don’t think the argument holds up perfectly. It used to be that you had to win all of your games in order to be crowned national champ, since generally only 1 or 2 teams accomplished that feat. But that is less common now. Each year it seems there is a debate over which one-loss teams should get into the title game. Or in the case of LSU last year, which two-loss team.
So if you are still in the hunt with one or even two losses, then not every game counts the same.
If you create an 8 team playoff, I think the intense regular season would remain–each week is still important, and you would still only be allowed one or two slip-ups in order to make it into the playoff.
Report comment to moderator
LOL. The BCS is pretty much irrelevant when it comes to Alabama. Since they are undefeated and ranked #1, they will be in the title game as long as they beat Auburn and then Florida.
However, I’m predicting that we will have mass chaos in the coming weeks. Texas Tech could very easily lose to Oklahoma this weekend. Alabama could lose a couple weeks after that in the SEC championship game to Florida. Then you will have a bunch of one loss teams vying for the title game. Who will get in is anyone’s guess.
And consider this: USC is a sports media favorite, and they will certainly be near the top of the BCS, but they could win out the rest of the season, be in one of the top two positions, and not even win their conference (if Oregon St. wins out, they will be the PAC-10 champs b/c they beat USC). You could very realistically have 3 undefeated teams, Boise State, Utah, and Ball State, neither of which will be in the title game and only one of which will probably make the BCS because of the rules and such. What a mess.
Report comment to moderator
Messiahs have no problem fixing any problam – with their words alone. Why lift a finger if you don’t have to?
Report comment to moderator
The BCS is truly a mess. One loss and you miss it. Take recent years when teams who lost in a conference championship game (Missouri last year) got thrown out while less competent teams in conferences w/out championship games go to the big game and lose (Ohio State for the last two years).
Report comment to moderator
14. Well, let’s all hope and pray that Alabama beats Florida and all that doesn’t happen. For the good of the country you know. We don’t need Obama bringing his socialist world view into college football.
Report comment to moderator
Alabama beating Florida might not be good for the country, but it would be good for my sanity.
Report comment to moderator
If Obama can fix college football so there isn’t a controversy every year over who gets into the championship game, then more power to him.
I think he has a better chance of fixing health care.
Is he ready to take on the special interests of the BCS conferences. Look at the ACC this year. It will get a free ride into the Orange Bowl even if its champion is not ranked in the top 25. There is a $17 million payout. That’s alot of money for a team that is destined to be blown out by a top ten team.
Report comment to moderator
Do you guys ever listen to yourselves?
Report comment to moderator
20. Yes.
Report comment to moderator
I both talk to myself and listen to myself. I find that I have stimulating conservations when I do so.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!