A sign of more to come?
On Monday, the Tribune Co. (which owns the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, The Sun of Baltimore, as well as the Chicago Cubs) filed for bankruptcy protection, listing $13 billion in debt and $7.6 billion in assets. Tribune Chairman and Chief Executive Sam Zell has called the move a “pre-emptive” act to preserve the company’s assets and allow for reorganization. It marks the first time, however, that a major newspaper publisher has had to take such a step in our downturn economy–and it may not be the last.
For a sense of who might be next, consider publishers that have put individual papers up for sale or have had trouble meeting their debt contracts.
Analysts said Tuesday that most publishers fall into that category. The exceptions often cited: Gannett Co., whose $4 billion in debt is reasonable for its size even though its revenue has shrunk, and McClatchy Co., which in September bought about two years of flexibility on $2 billion in debt by agreeing to higher interest rates.
According to Rick Edmonds, media analyst with the Poynter Institute in St. Petersburg, Fla., the Tribune case is considered “extreme.” But even still, some experts warn that the Tribune’s bankruptcy could have a ripple effect in the industry by making it more difficult or expensive for other publishers to get new financing. “A large-scale bankruptcy like this is evidence,” said Mike Simonton, a bond analyst at Fitch Ratings, “that the default risk across the space could be very high.”














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top24 Comments to “A sign of more to come?”
Soon to join the many cultural references that I’ll have to explain to my grandchildren (along with “like a skipping record”):
“See you in the funny papers”
and
“You can’t believe everything you read in the paper.”
Our local paper has become so blatantly liberal I can barely stand to read it anymore. I would cancel, but they have occasional interesting local stories. As it is, we only get the weekend ed. despite the frequent offers for the daily version free for three months. Just don’t have time for it on a daily basis.
Even the funny papers have become so politically lib. they’re not funny anymore. When even the local human interest stories aren’t worth it, I’ll miss the crossword.
(posted to the delightful sounds of 14 y.o. daughter perfecting a gorgeous version of “Away in the Manger” on the piano.)
Have a nice day
Report comment to moderator
(dd says “you mean ‘like a broken record?’” Yeah.)
Report comment to moderator
This is very sad. I don’t think people appreciate how important a role a newspaper plays–and they won’t realize it until it’s gone.
I can get my international and national news from a variety of sources, but only the home town paper tells me what’s really happening in my neighborhood–and helps me live my life better. Today I learned about a serial rapist preying on young girls driving alone at night. My daughter just got her driver’s license. If I hadn’t read that story, the importance of being careful would have remained a story to my daughter. Being able to tell her streets and parking lots brings it closer to home, regrettably, and more real.
Anyway, I just renewed my subscription for a year. I only hope the paper will still be here a year from now.
Report comment to moderator
Finally, the Baltimore Sun is as bankrupt as the legacy of its most notable luminary, H.L. Mencken.
Report comment to moderator
Michelle,
Thanks for elaborating. That is just the sort of local news that our paper is good for. However, I can get this from listening to local radio. But you’re right, it’s nice to be able to pull out an article for kids to read for themselves..
Report comment to moderator
If you look, I’ll bet you’ll find more stories of local interest on the web than in the local paper. For instance, my subdivision has a website with Crime Watch updates. Living in Indianapolis, my local paper is an excellent source of news of the Colts and motorsports, but everything else is the universally-available AP chatter and syndicated columns.
I have as much nostalgia for the local paper as anyone. My mother was a journalism professor at Southern Illinois University and a reporter for the Marion (IL) Daily American. The local paper’s time may be past, however. Oh, well. I used to ride a horse, too…..
Report comment to moderator
Raise your hand if you delivered newspapers growing up?
As a kid, I had several paper routes, and for awhile I delivered for multiple newspaper companies. I got up before 6AM every morning and rode my route on my bike, delivering anywhere from 50-80 houses. Occasionally on *really* snowy or rainy days, Mom or Dad might offer to drive, but most days you just toughed it out.
I had to regularly “canvas” my route and go door to door with promotions to try to drum up new business, and every two weeks we went “collecting” to get the weekly fees directly from the subscriber. It was a good chance for tips (or to be yelled at if you put the paper in the wrong place).
Geez, I feel like I’m talking about operating steam shovels or something ancient like that. How did I get to be 46?
Report comment to moderator
46? How young you are.
Report comment to moderator
I feel bad for the newpaper employees (most of them, anyway), but I admit that I’m glad that the information gatekeepers are losing power.
I do wonder how we’ll start the fires in our fireplace when the one local grandpa who still gets a paper can’t pass them on anymore…guess that’s an opportunity for a new industry! Firestarters-R-Us.
Report comment to moderator
…I admit that I’m glad that the information gatekeepers are losing power.
Excellent point.
Report comment to moderator
Local news is a dilemma Michelle. I don’t know how big a berg you live in, but if you’ve got only one paper option, I think you’re right to support it as long as you can stand to do so—assuming it is doing a good job keeping up on real local “news” vs. just offering local advertising disguised as news used as column-inch filler.
Here in Colorado, we’ve got two papers operating out of one facility (office/printing/distribution) co-publishing the Saturday/Sunday editions under different mastheads but offering separate papers M-F—all in an attempt to hold down costs. The Rocky Mountain News half went up for sale recently and it’s not looking good for buyers. It’s the more “conservative” half as the liberals all prefer the Denver Post which is a reflection of recent election results. Outside the metro area there are regional papers of varying quality depending on the demands of their readers, but all of which offer primarily the same liberal line with lipstick in an attempt to interest conservatives.
We also have a company printing several smaller municipality/suburb/neighborhood papers as the metro area is made up of formerly separate towns now merged. This company does a poor to fair job of keeping up with real local news as advertising is their focus.
To have more than a marginally cursory knowledge of, or to be on top of what’s happening in local government, one must physically become involved and attend all the meetings of various councils/boards/commissions—not something your average citizen has enough interest to invest the time. And the down side is that when this level of involvement is pursued, TMI quickly occurs. The result of this lack of real news is a clique of the old same people running everything and a very uninformed electorate.
Report comment to moderator
The Chicago Tribune has gotten so bad at local coverage that it isn’t really of any value for that. Unless you’re checking high school sports scores, the Trib has utterly superficial local coverage. I say good riddence to them – they failed at they self-apointed task and can now go the way of the buggy whip.
Report comment to moderator
Stubob,
There’s not much available on the web in terms of local news here – except at the local newspaper’s own website, and they only post a portion of each day’s paper. I’m sure in a big city like Indianapolis there are a lot more groups with a web presence. Here there aren’t enough web-savvy people – at least not with the time and interest – to keep up-to-date the few websites there are dedicated to local organizations.
There are some out there, but if they’ve been updated in the last month they’re doing well. My son’s elementary school has a newsletter giving important upcoming dates – from last June. The high school band director is begging for someone to take over the band website, because he doesn’t have time for it. I use the web a lot for finding what local information I can, and it amazes me sometimes how out-of-date some websites are – until I remember how much I struggle with trying to keep our Cub Scout pack website up to date.
Report comment to moderator
I foresee the declining dino dailies will take a leaf from their colleagues across the pond. In a last ditch effort to lure in loyal readership, might US papers resort to the “page 2 girls” from the UK.
Not yet sure how many “readers” the page 2 pix lured in.
Report comment to moderator
I despise the conservative bias of our local paper, (part of a small chain of 12 or so small market papers), but would very much miss not just the crime coverage, but coverage of municipal, county and state government, features on local folks, classifieds and even the occasional ad inserts.
It’s a pretty big fish in a small pond, and were it to disappear, things would be a lot quieter and we would be poorer in many different ways.
Report comment to moderator
Sigh.
I’ve been a newspaper reporter my entire career and hate to see this happening (and not only for personal survival reasons).
Michelle, thank you, you make excellent points. Local news is generally NOT available elsewhere in most communities. At our paper, we are now all blogging & twittering. Our crime blog tells readers what those helicopters hovering overhead are all about. Just this week we had a report about a high school girl who escaped an abduction while walking home from school.
We sit through hideously boring city council meetings, which nevertheless produce news that we report & that really matters to our residents. We tell you what’s being developed on the big vacant lot in downtown, or whether that public school will be built in your neighborhood. Today’s paper included a story about a local church that wants to build housing on its property for recovering drug addicts. The city council denied the application. I’m guessing my colleague sat through hours to get that story reported.
(Oh, and you know where radio gets its stories? Yep, from the local newspaper every day, often read verbatim on the air.)
Our newspaper offers plenty of “good” stories along with the crime that people need (and want) to know about — my assignment on Thanksgiving was to cover a family who delivers homemade Turkey dinners to the staff at the hospital where their premature son remained hospitalized for 4 months (he’s 3 years old now, and accompanies his parents on the holiday run). On Christmas Eve, I’ll do a story about I family I know in my church who will be finalizing the adoption of their baby girl on that day.
I’m just saying that people may come recognize the value of their local paper only when it’s gone.
Report comment to moderator
And thanks Arcadia for your perspective as well. Our paper used to have a conservative editorial slant, now we’re liberal. Whatever. Those things come and go.
Meanwhile, the reporters are pounding the streets and yawing through city council and school board meetings and poring over police reports, all on the community’s behalf.
Report comment to moderator
ps to my earlier comment about local radio news, that goes for local TV news as well. How many times have I spotted the duded-up broadcast reporters scanning our articles before doing their standup on a particular story.
They often rely on the newspapers to do most of the grunt work for them.
Report comment to moderator
Without our local paper we would never learn that Jeff Miller had been given a presidential award. He is the one who started the “Honor Air” recognition here that was copied elsewhere.
We would not know of the local sports heroes, who are exceptional in their field. This is important to them and the community. Without the local paper we would still have 4-way stops on Main St. rather than going back to lights. etc.
So, I agree, we need it.
However, a few days ago, I mentioned a headline that blasted something about “Sarah Palin not the only one using campaign money for clothes! when the article had nothing to do with Sarah.
They, not the internet, are largely responsible for their own demise. They should report the news as fact, not editorialise on the front page.
On the WV, I mentioned the Tribune and LA Times going bankrupt. I suggested that the DNC could bail them out.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t mind our small, local paper, although I ought to subscribe to it again. It did go Liberal about 5 years ago, when it was bought out by some bigger paper, and that kept me from re-subscribing then.
But, our main Oregon paper…I won’t touch it with a ten-foot pole. It is extremely Liberal, biased, uninteresting, and — as someone pointed out — filled with even Liberally biased comics.
They tried to give me 4 months for free, and I told them NO, NO, NO. They were shocked. Who wouldn’t want it for free? ME.
My only problem is that I miss all the other things a paper is good for…wrapping breakables, lining things, underneath messy art projects, etc.
I’m having a really hard time feeling sorry for newspapers, although I can feel sorry for people like Donna.
Report comment to moderator
Complaints of bias are legitimate, for whatever reason most folks who go into journalism are liberal. To what extent that influences a person’s reporting varies, but my sense is that we used to be much more cautious about letting any of that seep into our stories.
The internet perhaps has made everyone feel a bit more free, I don’t know, but I do think there needs to be a renewed emphasis on the value of objectivity to the extent that is humanly possible. It amazes me that so many of my liberal colleagues completely shrug off the charge of bias — the perception is so widespread that we in the industry ignore it to our peril.
But the reason papers are in such dire economic straights really is a result of ad revenue, including classifieds, being lost to the internet.
Our paper is a daily that covers several local communities, our circulation is about 80,000. So we’re not tiny, but we do emphasize local coverage.
As I said, Im afraid people won’t realize what they’ve lost until they’ve lost it. And I’m not talking about “wrapping breakables.” Journalism serves an important role in a democracy and in a community and I’m sad to see it come to being so disparaged.
Report comment to moderator
In regard to the Tribune, the accusation is that Zell, the purchaser, arranged his financing so that employees who thought they were getting bought out end up with little or nothing, while he gets quite a bit.
Good work if you can get it.
Report comment to moderator
Why would I pay for political advertising? I get plenty for free.
Papers need to make themselves relevant by doing good investigative reporting. Make people sit up and notice. Think about that as you read the lazy year in review recycled copy that is about to be sold to us as news.
Report comment to moderator
But with shrinking staffs & resources, investigative pieces are going to be rare indeed.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!