The Christmas letter
We all get them—those long, boring accounts of the latest family accomplishments conveniently tucked inside a Christmas card. But not all Christmas letters are like that. Some can be highly interesting and inspirational. Have you received any like that this year?
Here’s one that Eb Roell, a retired missionary living in Boulder, Colo., and the author of Piercing the Night, sent out this year and gave us permission to reprint here:
We’re creatures of habit, and habits, such as the “How are you?” inquiry, tend to lose meaning. Likewise, after 2000 years, our commercialized Christmas is but a caricature of what was arguably the most significant event in history; gone is its wonder, faded its realism.
Had the incarnation of the Christ been late—just a divine two days, say—the first Christmas could have been celebrated in the age of the internet, with attention-grabbing headlines such as “Inn Rejects God,” “Virgin Births E.T.” and “God Born in Homeless Shelter.”
The guiding star might have been a GPS. The wise men from the East could have been Emperor Akihito, the Dalai Lama, and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. The presents? How about a Lexus LS600hL from the emperor to replace Mary and Joseph’s aging Volkswagen; the “Light of Truth” award, apropos, by the Tibetan priest; and competing promises of peace by Ki-moon.
In keeping with His rejection by the powers that “would have been,” the Babe’s significance announced in the Knesset would create uproar among ultra-orthodox Jews, and a “Welcome to Our Planet” speech by our president would be decried as a violation of the Establishment Clause and evoke a verbal hemorrhage by anti-Christian liberal unions. Those among us who decided that He is “the real deal” would, just the same, be disparaged by our cultural elite as naïve, easily led intellectual weaklings.
Therefore, I trust you’ll bear with me as I list that Babe’s powerful impact on the affairs of humankind as evidenced in Christianity’s historic force for good, unparalleled in the practice of any other religious, philosophical, or political ideology. For lost in the tardiness would be . . .
. . . a time capsule in which some of His followers, imperfect though they were, had put that “naïveté” to work when they pushed back the boundaries of ignorance in almost every field of knowledge; modernized the nursing profession and organized this globe’s most extensive network of healthcare facilities; through Bible translation alphabetized over 2,500 languages, thereby contributing to the enlightening of Stone Age tribes in the most remote corners of the earth; pioneered the abolition of slavery in Europe and America; established the most far-reaching disaster-relief organizations on the planet; formed a bulwark against atheism and communism, in the name of which 100 million-plus souls perished; created some of the world’s finest music and works of art; started the alma mater for no less than 13 British prime ministers—Oxford University’s Christ Church; founded civilization’s most stable, most prosperous, and most generous republic and were instrumental in the formation of some of its choicest institutions of higher learning, including Harvard, Yale, and Princeton.
However, God wasn’t late—never is. And behind the façades of Santa Claus, the winter solstice, Easter bunnies, Darwinian evolutionary theory, and ironically, an air of intellectual superiority in PC garb, a wayward Western culture in general, and the United States in particular, continues to reap the benefits of that Babe’s impact. No wonder then that, as the saying goes, “Wise men still seek Him.”
Merry Christmas!














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top13 Comments to “The Christmas letter”
While it is an interesting idea, there is one minor problem with this:
a “Welcome to Our Planet” speech by our president would be decried as a violation of the Establishment Clause and evoke a verbal hemorrhage by anti-Christian liberal unions.
If Jesus had waited until now to be born, there would not have been an “anti-Christian” anything, since there would not have been a Christian faith. In fact, would there even have been an Establishment clause? Would we not all be worshipping Roman, Greek or Norse gods? A lot of “would have beens” to consider.
Report comment to moderator
And all the conservative evangelicals would have been the ones openly accepting Him and worshiping Him right from the start? Let’s be careful not to give ourselves too much credit…
Report comment to moderator
I’m quite certain that the current religious establishment would have contained many that would have opposed him….
Report comment to moderator
“Arguably” the most significant event in history? What would you argue ranks with the incarnation?
Report comment to moderator
Kwerna, besides one God/man (Jeus Christ) taking on the sin of ALL mankind on the cross, having to face His own Father turn his back on him while life hung by a thread? Besides the only person in history who was the King of heaven, crucified like a common criminal having done NOTHING wrong, and to raise from the dead on his own power? Besides restoring my pathetic and defiant soul because of my mere acceptance of his aforementioned sacrifice on the most demeaning, excrutiating way to die just so I wouldn’t hafta go to Hell?
I’d say not much…………
Report comment to moderator
The incarnation was God taking human flesh to do exactly those things.
Report comment to moderator
If I knew Ed and he sent me that Christmas letter, I’d ask him to take me off his Christmas list.
Report comment to moderator
What was Eb Roell REALLY trying to accomplish with this so called “Christmas letter” – in many ways its a play on words if you can even call it that.
Report comment to moderator
“all the fictional ‘what ifs’ mean nothing”
They may mean nothing, but they are still worth something. Imaginary scenarios can compel the reader to look at the real and actual with fresh eyes and renewed appreciation. The significance and meaning you find important are highlighted by just such a literary device as you decry.
Report comment to moderator
It shouldn’t amaze me because it is so common in our culture, but it always does when people ignore (or refuse) considering the claims of Christ or the effects He has had on our world. “That is an amazing list of accomplishments. (yawn) But, let’s talk about something I like better; like grammar.”
Surely people can understand that this Christmas letter is simply trying to illustrate the astounding impact that Jesus Christ has on our world. Why are people afraid to discuss that?
Report comment to moderator
People aren’t afraid to discuss that–there are reams on the subject, including Ramesh Ponnuru’s excellent “What’s So Great About Christianity,’ and it’s true that Christianity fueled a cultural revolution that changed the world.
But it’s kind of like recommending Holy Communion for the health benefits of the bread and wine. Jesus isn’t some neato secret decoder ring for achieving your utilitarian ends, and one of the paradoxes is that if you seek those, you lose both them and Him.
Report comment to moderator
#7 buddyglass — LOL! I was just thinking the same thing. If I got that letter in the mail, I would have skimmed it — but I do read in detail the letters sent from family and friends. I love them! I love hearing what is up with people’s lives — Christian or not. So I can’t comment on the content of the above letter. I approached it for what it was (how it was introduced) and in that context it didn’t interest me.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!