Haggard speaks: But can anyone hear over the roar of scandal?
Former evangelical leader Ted Haggard has reemerged from the shadows of disgrace. Two years removed from public allegations of drug use and homosexual trysts with a prostitute, the father of five hit the talk-show circuit this week to reiterate apologies and tell his story of repentance. The appearances on shows like Larry King Live coincided with Thursday’s premiere of an HBO documentary that follows Haggard as he struggled to rebuild his life and provide for his family in the wake of national scandal.
Accompanying Haggard’s return to the public spotlight are more revelations of homosexual activity—these from a former member of New Life Church, the Colorado Springs, Colo., congregation Haggard founded and pastored until his resignation in November 2006. Grant Haas, now 25, informed church leaders two years ago about his experience with Haggard, which allegedly included thousands of sexually explicit text messages and an incident in which the former pastor performed a sex act in front of Haas.
Haggard apologized to Haas in person two years ago, and the church agreed to pay out $179,000 in a settlement that included a confidentiality agreement. But Haas told a Colorado Springs television station that he believes it necessary to go public now to ensure that the community is fully informed before it welcomes Haggard back home. Haggard has released a statement acknowledging an inappropriate relationship with Haas and apologizing for it.
The new revelations cloud the message of Haggard’s reemergence, which otherwise might have emphasized the redemptive value of exposure. In an interview earlier this week on The Oprah Winfrey Show, Haggard’s wife and two oldest children expressed their commitment to keep the family together. Haggard’s college-age daughter Christy said the scandal took her father off a false pedestal: “I never had a dad I felt I could really relate to. And suddenly to see this vulnerable, honest man in front of me opened an opportunity for me to really know who my father really was for the first time.”
Haggard’s wife, Gayle, spoke with similar heartfelt sincerity in recounting her path through anger and pain to forgiveness and reconciliation: “It was never a question for me whether I was going to stay with Ted. . . . I had to make a choice to start with and that was my choice. I choose to forgive him, and I choose to love him.”
Such beauty and power of a family amid redemption has thus far fallen short of trumping the Haas revelations in headlines around the country. And media fascination with homosexuality has further obscured the story’s redemptive quality. In her interview, Winfrey repeatedly pressed Haggard to approve of homosexuality. The former head of the National Association of Evangelicals was less than clear at times in his statements on the matter, answering Winfrey’s pointblank question as to whether Christ accepts homosexuals with the ambiguous: “I believe Christ accepts everybody.”
Gayle Haggard proved far less ambiguous, arguing that a person’s inclinations need not necessarily define who they are. Winfrey immediately objected: “I’m not going there with you, Gayle.”
To his credit, Haggard did clearly articulate a gospel of grace at numerous times throughout the interview, even admitting he’d never really understood it before: “When I was at my lowest point, when I couldn’t pray, I couldn’t read the Scriptures, I couldn’t seek Him anymore, He came after me and the Scripture came alive to me, Oprah, for the first time in a dramatic way. Jesus came for the unrighteous, not the righteous. And I qualify.”
Tragically, many onlookers may miss that message in the sea of scandal still swirling.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top35 Comments to “Haggard speaks: But can anyone hear over the roar of scandal?”
Patton Dodd has written two very similar articles (one at Slate and the other at Christianity Today) that explore this tragedy a little more fully. I, for one, am not really sure what the media blitz is about– if Mr. Haggard wishes to proclaim the Gospel of grace, I think that he should do it more privately for a few more years at least. Especially with all the junk last year about the support letter going out– this sort of thing is hard and there ought to be more time for healing.
Report comment to moderator
Haggard did clearly articulate a gospel of grace,…even admitting he’d never really understood it before
I’m sure he said more than he’s quoted as saying in this article, but I wouldn’t say he “clearly articulate[d]” the gospel in the quote provided here. After the original scandal, Haggard’s statements certainly did betray a woefully bankrupt understanding of the Gospel, especially for the pastor of such a large church. I do hope he’s come to a fuller understanding of the ‘fundamentals.’
Report comment to moderator
Really wish disgraced evangelicals would take a cue from UK cabinet minister John Profumo who was caught with a prostitute in 1963:
http://blog.beliefnet.com/crunchycon/2009/01/ted-haggards-hard-road-to-rede.html
Report comment to moderator
I applaud wives like Mrs Haggard. She along with the wife of Gov Spitzer, Sen Vitter and the wife of sports announcer Marv Albert epitomize the “Stand By Your Man” loyalty we saw so much when the Clintons held the WH.
Endyblue, I dont think Christine Keeler was a prostitute if the film “Scandal” was accurate. He recently died by the way and Ms Keeler passed away living in UK public housing. Sadly Keeler was well before the era of Lewinski or Hahn or even Elizabeth Ray and failed to capitalize on her romp with that politician.
Report comment to moderator
Haggard makes Jim Bakker seem classy in comparison, no??
Report comment to moderator
Most of the megachurch/TV-evangelists guys are creepy. But he’s *really* creepy.
Nancy Pelosi’s daughter made the Haggard HBO documentary?! How rich is that!
Report comment to moderator
I pay as much attention to Haggard as I paid to the Inauguration.
ZZzzzzzz ZZzzzzzz
Report comment to moderator
MUD IN HIS EYES – Is that close enough? No offense intended, it just sounds nicely Injun’ to me, and it implies that I see better — oops, no, scratch that. It means that you’re an ongoing miracle of sight!
I read your first link. Here’s my problem with Dodd’s article. Haggard is both a business entrepreneur and a minister of the gospel, simultaneously and inseparately. He represents a familiar category at the end of the XXth C. That’s what Haggard meant when he said his church could not “restore” him for business reasons — it would have cost the business.
The implication of being an Evangelical church entrepreneur is that Haggard can fulfill that role anywhere he can find a market niche, and there’s an enormous market in America for the Church of the Second (and Seventy Times Seven) Chance. It looks like Haggard will launch that brand, too, despite Dodd’s consternation. But that’s built into the design, not a flaw!
Haggard has a legitimate point. Why couldn’t he be a janitor in his church, even if he once “performed a sex act” in front of one of the 20,000 members? If that sin was so disqualifying, he shouldn’t be a janitor at any church, anywhere, just as a teacher who “performed a sex act” in front of a student at one school is disqualified from being a teacher at any school.
Report comment to moderator
My problem with Ted Haggard is that he’s still being fundamentally dishonest. That he’s doing it on a media tour is even more of a shame. He’s going to prolong the suffering of both himself and his family. It’s understandable but sad.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop, I am not sure why you feel the need to use a different name for me except to make yourself feel better by putting others down. If that’s what brings you back here time after time, let me suggest that you might get a bigger return on your hard work at some place like SomethingAwful? They’d probably give you more accolades sparkling wit there, too.
In response to your paragraphs 2 & 3, it would be heartbreaking if this were all about business, and I certainly hope that Haggard wants more than that.
As far as paragraph 4 goes, it is the sin against the trust of the community that was the truly disqualifying part and not so much the nature of the sin itself. It could have been a sex act, it could have been stealing money, it could have been a violent threat. But his deception about it cut a deep wound into the people who trusted him, and it’s probably better for him to be part of another community somewhere (especially he’s going to struggle with wanting to be in the limelight.)
Report comment to moderator
it’s probably better for him to be part of another community somewhere
Isn’t that heartbreaking, too? The Christian community is supposed to be one, not a series of little places named Dodge that sinners have to get out of and move on to, with their same sorry, incognito self. You don’t need a church to get a fresh slate and new surroundings, but it sounds like that’s what you’re willing to settle for, as opposed to transformation. Haggard’s right, after all, it’s about business.
You’re right that I have a laborious dead wit, but I wasn’t trying to make myself feel better by putting you down. You don’t say that you felt put down, as opposed to critical. If you did, though, I’m sorry. But that just goes for you.
Report comment to moderator
PS, your name just felt like too much to type.
Report comment to moderator
that smile in the photo looks so fake. he’s a fake.
Report comment to moderator
The church should never have paid hush money, and a man who agreed to confidentiality should never have breached that agreement. And no, Haggard isn’t biblically qualified to resume ministry. The whole thing is ugly, though I do hope he is indeed learning about grace. He may have much to “teach” in the days ahead–but not as a pastor.
Report comment to moderator
s’no problem. just use MLTW if you’re not feeling like writing out the whole thing in the future. ; )
As far as the Haggard thing goes, I have never been in a megachurch and don’t really know how the whole thing goes. It would be really good if the community could welcome him back as you say, and I think that would be the absolutely ideal situation. But sin has consequences, and I think that the broken trust is still too real a consequence for a number of people for Haggard to stick around. Given the astronomically high profile he has, I think that a time for healing and transformation would necessarily include distance, just as much as any rift between set of people– even Christians– sometimes needs time to heal. We believe in the power of the Gospel message to transform, but everything broken will not be completely restored ’til Christ returns.
Report comment to moderator
Also, Scroop, you should’ve been around back when my screenname was “foolishyetwise”– I can’t tell you how many people thought they were hilariously clever by calling me “foolish” (”I’ll stop there, har har”) or “foolishyetstillmorefoolish” or something along those lines. I shouldn’t have been so hard on you; at least you got the reference and tried to work with it.
Report comment to moderator
Haggard has a long way to straighten out his problems.
I don’t find anywhere is Scripture where a pastor/elder/bishop can commit this type of sin and come back to the pulpit –
GOD forgives all that repent but that doesn’t mean they will be back in the pulpit.
Report comment to moderator
I think Ted praying at the inauggeration instead of Warren would have been very healing for him.
Report comment to moderator
Bianca why is that – what is the comparison between Warren and Haggard?
Report comment to moderator
I don’t know how dishonest he’s being if he’s admitting he’s committed sins but says he wants to honor his vows and that for him, the life he wants is with his family. Doesn’t he get to choose his own life? Of course, it’s really not about his choice for his life. It’s about what homosexual extremists want. He’s not playing along. Oh my goodness, here’s someone who doesn’t want to embrace sin. Here’s someone who is trying to follow the Word because he understands what’s at stake in eternity.
Whatever will the homosexual extremists do if people realize there are alternatives to embracing sin — and then actually lives it?
Report comment to moderator
MLTW — Of course, I get MOUTH all the time. Also unSCROOPulous. I’m not the most popular insect on this blog.
I was scratching my head trying to figure the problem with MIHE. If Jesus put mud in my eyes, I’d boast, even if He told me not to tell. Then I looked up Mark 8 and read that the guy who saw MLTW got treated with spit only. No mud. That’s when I realized my attempt to abbreviate made no sense. Don’t worry — I won’t call you SPIT IN HIS EYES either.
Report comment to moderator
Right on NJLAWYER.
Can any of us cast stones? We can’t know what is in this guys heart. Only God can know. But why go on Oprah? Ewe.
Report comment to moderator
Agreed about the Oprah thing. That could be the old “it all comes down to money.”
Report comment to moderator
I second Anlir’s comment.
Forgiveness is available to all, but trust is not. Some sins have consequences for the rest of a person’s life. For the sake of his family I wish he’d leave the spotlight alone.
Report comment to moderator
I read the article but I don’t know what is meant by “Ted Haggard’s reemergence”. The opening line is that he is emerging from shadows of disgrace through grace. But what does he plan to do?
The focus of this scandal is on his particular sin, but perhaps even more important is his colossal hypocrisy and betrayal and his disregard for the Word of God and for his flock.
What also should be discussed is the state of a church that emphasizes marketing over the gospel and so completely misses the ascendancy of a wolf as pastor.
Churches are full of sinners. But there is a difference between a pastor who humbly admits his failings before God and one who uses the name of God as a means to fleece the flock.
Report comment to moderator
what do you mean by “fleece,” XION? Haggard organized and enlarged the flock to begin with. He also led it on the true path, never into the ways upon which he secretly strayed. When the flock detected his hypocrisy, it expelled him rather than accommodate him. Haggard stayed on script in the didactic drama, “All Have Sinned.” He never said, “I’m O.K., you’ve got the problem.” The Word of God has been vindicated! Maybe y’all are just annoyed that it applies to y’all, too, and you’re not above it all.
Report comment to moderator
Sure, churches are full of sinners, and any pastor will tell you he’s a sinner, too. A pastor, however, is held to a certain standard of conduct which this man did not meet.
I am not annoyed over Haggard at all. The insulting part of your remark, Scroopy, (your last sentence) indicates to me that you simply have learned nothing while posting here. Every last one of us who are Christians have told you over and over again that we are sinners. I heard that Haggard’s church has welcomed him back, but not as a pastor. Both Haggard and his wife said they’ve been supportive since they went back home. What you are missing in Haggard’s story, which if you had seen the small part of the Oprah show that I saw, is that he knows he messed up his entire family and lost almost everything because of his sin and sees that as a great lesson that God is teaching him. He is very lucky that his wife is the Christian she is and can forgive him and give him another chance.
Report comment to moderator
NJLAWYER. If you’re not annoyed over Haggard at all, then the shoe doesn’t fit you. I was addressing XION’s prosecution and castigation of Haggard at #25. What you say I’m missing is exactly what I said about Haggard — he’s totally on script, playing the penitent with tears, sentiment, and piety. Evangelicals can feel gratified and perhaps even grateful that a sinner’s fall has proved the gospel’s call. Haggard’s vignette is humanity’s drama, an old, old story that must be played out in every life. So why are some Evangelicals are still pissed? XION isn’t through bringing charges. Given Haggard’s exemplary punishment and miraculous (in my view) conformity with Biblical teaching about his sin, you have to surmise that some Evangelicals simply don’t want to belong to the kind of club that would accept Haggard. I wouldn’t either! But then, I’m not a practicing believer.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop says:
Maybe y’all are just annoyed that it applies to y’all, too, and you’re not above it all.
What Scroop means here is that we are all like Haggard- outwardly doing the right thing, but secretly fighting off homosexuality.
Report comment to moderator
this article doesn’t go far enough in exposing false pedastals
Report comment to moderator
Scroopy, had you listened to even the small portion that I saw of Haggard’s interview on Oprah, and if you understood what it is for a Christian to say “oh, now I get it” and smack oneself, you would also understand what Xion is saying.
If Haggard came to my church and wanted to shakes hands and talk, I would do that. I wouldn’t ignore him. People don’t expect their pastors to be perfect, but they do expect them to set an example. Haggard can’t really do that at this point in his life. He’s still on his “oh, now I get it” journey, and for my part, he’s welcome in the club.
Now, you leftys who support sin never make the distinction between loving the sinner and hating the sin, so you don’t really understand, at least in my opinion, what Xion is talking about. Haggard is definitely not pastor material at this point. He still has a lot of personal work to do — and honestly, he knew he should have been doing it before he got caught. That’s on him. But no one is kicking him out of the club.
You leftys are always talking about “nuance,” but the truth is, when it comes to spiritual matters, you understand little of the nuances there. I realize that’s because you don’t know the Bible as a whole and can’t draw on its lessons as a whole — which is why you guys always find a verse here and a verse there to throw in people’s faces — but that’s on you, not us.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks NJL.
Scroop, you say “I was addressing XION’s prosecution and castigation of Haggard at #25
Perhaps you didn’t notice that my main criticism was of the church. Haggard rose to a very prominent position as head of the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE). He was considered by some to be one of the top 25 most influential evangelicals in America.
And yet his preaching was neo-charismatic third wave excess. He was featured in the movie Jesus Camp. “Haggard looks into the camera and says kiddingly: “I think I know what you did last night,” drawing laughs from the crowd. “If you send me a thousand dollars, I won’t tell your wife.”
He was an outspoken critic during the day of the things he practiced at night. All the while he was amassing personal wealth for himself, living in a large $700,000 home. That is the fleecing. And he preached against the very things he was doing. That is the hypocrisy.
As you know very well, I am a huge proponent of the gospel of grace. Grace is the gospel. But the standards for church leaders are high:
“An overseer then, must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but gentle, peaceable, free from the love of money. … And he must have a good reputation with those outside the church, so that he will not fall into reproach.” 1 Tim 3
Report comment to moderator
I watched the Oprah interview. I can’t speak for him but it is generally better for someone with compulsive sexual issues to find growth and healing in a community of recovery learning and helping one another one-on-one and in small groups. I wouldn’t think it would be a good idea to speak on national television with so little sobriety.
Further, the interview moved too much into the politics of sex and the “you don’t have to act on your impulses” vs. “embrace who you are” arguments. I don’t find these debates particularly helpful or healing.
I think for addicts and compulsive people of various stripes, the the lure to be before a large audience is very much part of the problem, not the solution as it feeds one’s sense of grandiocity. Again, it’s his decision, but most folks I know in recovery would agree it just isn’t a good idea.
Haggard may very well have a ministry of healing and compassion ahead of him but I don’t think it should be as a authoritative spokesman for a very long time.
Report comment to moderator
Tragically, many onlookers may miss that message in the sea of scandal still swirling.
What Bergin misses totally and completely is that real evil in this little drama is a homophobic and superstitious culture that coerces gay men into heterosexual marriage in the name of a fictional deity!
Report comment to moderator
Ted Haggard’s smile is so sweet and purdy.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!