Mark Twain sails again
I was excited to read on the Los Angeles Times book blog Jacket Copy that HarperStudio will next month release a collection of Mark Twain’s unpublished short works. The book, called Who is Mark Twain?, will feature both fiction and nonfiction.
Well…I think I’m excited, anyway. In the world of a writer, sometimes there’s a good reason works remain unpublished: They are below either the writer’s or the publisher’s standards. Even Jacket Copy says of Twain’s “new” short story “The Undertaker’s Daughter” that it “has few sharp edges, only some wit that winks between the lines.”
I wonder if Twain would’ve wanted some 21st century editors rifling through his papers and putting out a new book. The thought of a posthumous, unvetted-by-me collection of say, my own journal writings, is absolutely terrifying.
(Not that anyone would want to publish such a thing, of course…)




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top12 Comments to “Mark Twain sails again”
Anyone here ever read “The Further Adventures of Huckleberry Finn”?? Splendid book penned by a Twain scholar from down under. This Aussie captured the characters and twang perfectly.
Huck and Jim head west to the gold fields in California circa 1849-50. The cast of characters they meet up with along the way (LDS pioneers) all the while being pursued by a detective for a murder they didnt commit made it a splendid read, one with appeal for all Twain fans.
Report comment to moderator
Lynn, I’d buy a copy of your journal!
Actually, in keeping with the idea of not publishing people’s unpublished works, I think that if they simply hadn’t been published yet, that’s one thing (I have some of those), but if they’re early works that were in his lifetime deemed not worth publishing, they really should be subjected to the same scrutiny–and arguably the same editing–as any other work published today.
Speaking of editing, I’ve found that as a general rule, buying a book that’s advertised as “the way the author meant it to be published” (i.e., unedited) is a bad idea. I’ve seen three examples that I’d say were better in the original. One is Anne Frank’s diary, which her father approved for publication. He left out some adolescent sexual musings and some discussions of the adults’ arguments (”restored” in an edition published after his death. Frankly (no pun intended), the additions don’t add to the book, and they undercut a father’s wisdom. Second, a number of years ago I read a book, I believe it was Black Boy that Book of the Month Club was advertising as a restored edition. After reading the book, I read what changes had been made, and agreed the book would have been better with the edits than after it was “restored.” The original publisher had published only the first half (or first section anyway) of the book, and indeed the second part meandered and got tedious. In addition, the author had a scene that was gross and overly sexual, and it had been replaced with a better scene.
I think probably the worst instance I’ve seen is an edition of letters from C. S. Lewis to his childhood best friend (initially published in America as They Stand Together). After Lewis’s death, the friend let the letters be published, but he went through and deleted a few passages with black marker. The editor kindly “restored” those (sexual) passages, with only his word to tell us he did it accurately. It’s one of the few Lewis books I don’t own, because the “restoration” was so unseemly (and impossible to verify) and the introduction so rude as well.
Report comment to moderator
Note to Lynn and the rest of worldmagblog: Mark Twain was a bitter atheist. I don’t know which is worse…when conservative Christians vilify a perfectly good atheist writer such as Dawkins or Philip Roth, or when they adopt one and pretend not to see his atheism as in the case of Orwell or Clemens/Twain.
Report comment to moderator
#3 agreed –
Some of my fave Twain Quotes –
Man is the Religious Animal. He is the only Religious Animal. He is the only animal that has the True Religion– several of them.
- “The Lowest Animal,” 1897
Man has been here 32,000 years. That it took a hundred million years to prepare the world for him is proof that that is what it was done for. I suppose it is. I dunno. If the Eiffel tower were now representing the world’s age, the skin of paint on the pinnacle-knob at its summit would represent man’s share of that age; & anybody would perceive that that skin was what the tower was built for. I reckon they would. I dunno.
- “Was the World Made for Man?”
(32,000 yrs and 100 million years were the best scientific estimates in the pre-radiochronology era of Twain).
Report comment to moderator
I think Twain was a Unitarian Universalist.
Report comment to moderator
When we went through Twain’s house in Hartford, we were told that for years his wife had asked him to come to church and to become a christian. He finally told her he didn’t believe and turned his back on God. He never wrote and published a thing after that, so the story went.
Report comment to moderator
A few years ago, The Atlantic published a previously undiscovered short story by Twain. I wonder if this is related to that?
Report comment to moderator
Favorite MT quote – If Jesus Christ was alive today the one thing he would not be is a Christian.
Report comment to moderator
Having been a guide at the Mark Twain Cave last summer, this work may be interesting to peruse.
Report comment to moderator
I so loved Tom Sawyer & Huck Finn as a kid.
Report comment to moderator
I’m pretty aure taht while Mark Twain might not win any awards for evangilism, he wasn’t a bitter atheist or a universalist. He was slightly sarcastic about various elements of the church, but come on most of teh stuff he says we’ve all thought at one point or another. I think he really just said it as it was.
Report comment to moderator
Teenage_Tinkerbell, with all due respect, I think you have rose-colored glasses on. Also, Mark Twain’s attitudes about various parts of life changed at various times during his life. Toward the latter part of his life, he encountered a lot of tragedy in his personal life and he became increasingly disillusioned on topics such as politics and religion.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!