A race question?
Did she really ask a race question?
This is exactly what I thought after seasoned ABC News correspondent Ann Compton asked President Obama about his use of race in decision-making during his press conference last night. The economy is tanking, the government is growing like kudzu near Interstate 285 in Atlanta, China’s talking about a world currency, and you ask the president if race has played a role in decisions he’s made as president. What? Are you serious? Who cares?
Here’s how the dialogue proceeded:
“Ann Compton—hey, Ann,” Obama called out.
“You sound surprised,” he added with laughter at her reaction.
“I am surprised!” Compton replied. “Could I ask you about race?”
“You may,” he said.
“Yours is a rather historic presidency, and I’m just wondering whether, in any of the policy debates that you’ve had within the White House, the issue of race has come up, or whether it has in the way you feel you’ve been perceived by other leaders or by the American people,” Compton said. “Or have the last 64 days been a relatively color- blind time?”
President Obama’s response was appropriate. After mentioning that the inauguration displayed a “justifiable pride on the part of our country” because of what we have accomplished racially, he said that all the hoopla about race “only lasted about a day” because of the other pressing issues before us. The president is now being judged according to his effectiveness at addressing the big issues of our time, he pointed out.
Ann Compton is the national correspondent for ABC News Radio in Washington, D.C., and is currently the president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, coordinating coverage and access issues with the White House staff.
It is possible that Compton was not expecting to ask a question last night as President Obama even noted that she seemed surprised when called upon. Perhaps Compton had no question in mind so the best she could think of, on the spot, was a race-related question. After all, she was looking at a black man who must obviously think only along racial lines when thinking of new ways to grow the government. Other than race-related questions, what else would one ask America’s first black president?
At least Compton did not ask about the president’s dogs or where his wife buys her shoes. Given the pressure of possibly being taken off guard, I imagine that I could have offered a series of strange questions as well like “Mr. President, have you read F.A. Hayek’s book The Road to Serfdom?” Or “Mr. President, do you think you’ll make a Clemson football game in the fall? They have a new head coach. Go Tigers!” Or “Mr. President, what is your favorite snack food during meetings?” These are the kinds of questions Americans want to know the answers to during an economic crisis, right? Actually, reading Hayek now would be very helpful in Washington these days.
I do feel sorry for Ms. Compton because she will probably spend the next few weeks being ridiculed. A few folks have already posted complaints about her question at ABC News.com. “Tonight’s question by Ann Compton to the president of the United States was the lamest, worst conceived I could have imagined,” one critic posted. In the end, here’s the moral of the story: If you’re at a White House press conference, always have a good question ready to ask even if you do not believe you’ll be called on to speak. Always.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top22 Comments to “A race question?”
Granted, I don’t watch press conferences as a rule (I did so as a teenager when Reagan was in office, and I’ve occasionally seen one since), so I just don’t know much about whether all questions at such events are usually life-and-death matters. But this seems to me not such an awful question considering race is what made this election “historic.” If nothing else, she gave him freedom to say it hasn’t been an issue. Honestly, not asking the question doesn’t mean it’s not there in some people’s minds, and it wasn’t asked with hostility, so I don’t see the problem. She might have asked a better question, given more time to think, but I don’t see that this one was out of line.
Report comment to moderator
But I thought the blacks wanted us to discuss race. We’ve been criticized because we don’t want to discuss race. Compton wanted to, and the Politician in Chief didn’t want to. In fact, he really didn’t want to discuss much of anything last night. That’s what happened. It was a lousy press conference and that was Obama’s fault, not Ms. Compton’s.
Report comment to moderator
I thought it was a “soft ball” question. Given the seriousness and depth of the other questions, maybe it was only fair that one would be an easy one. I would find it hard to believe that Ann wouldn’t have had a question in mind in case she was called on. Until Ann tells us, we’re only guessing on that point.
Report comment to moderator
The Attorney General in the Obama administration (Eric Holder) has recently called the USA “a nation of cowards” because we refuse to converse enough about race.
Notice how Ann Compton deemed it necessary to first meekly ask permission to ask the President a question about race before asking her question.
(I agree with Anthony that the President did answer appropirately enough, and moved on).
Report comment to moderator
I thought the entire goal of the civil rights movement was all along to render race an irrelevancy to modern American life; you know, the color-blind society??! What color your grandma was is irrelevant in my dealings with you, much the same way what your grandma’s last name was is irrelevant. And my ancestry should in no way bear on your dealings with me.
Yet we persist with hypenated Americanism and wonder why we lack genuine national unity.
Report comment to moderator
As a Clemson alumni and current Clemson Grad student, I officially recind Mr. Bradley’s implied invitation for President Obama to come watch a Clemson game next season. Let him go to Notre Dame or something….
(However, if Mr. Bradley wants to come to a Clemson game that’s fine by me. Come by my tailgate party while you’re here. Just follow the smell of the authentic dirty rice and grilled blackened chicken. I’ll save you a plate.)
Report comment to moderator
I don’t think Muslims care what race you are so I would expect race not to be a problem for Obama.
Report comment to moderator
Obama answered the question like any Black man who knows he’s got to exceed performance expectations.
Of course race is on everybody’s mind. The man makes the White House look corny, like an outdated stage set. It’s not just wrong for him, we realize. It’s wrong for all of us. I suppose they have to keep the blue, green, and red rooms. You get where this is going. It’s time for a black room.
Report comment to moderator
#8 Scroopy,
Clinton already had a very black room. It was called the Lincoln bedroom. Obama is too late for a black room him being the second black president and all
Report comment to moderator
“any Black man who knows he’s got to exceed performance expectations”? That’s the one thing he’s not doing.
Report comment to moderator
Race isn’t on everyone’s mind. What’s on my mind is this government takeover without so much as a glance at what legislation really says. And now they want to do that with health care. That fellow who turned down Commerce is opposing the budge because there’s no debate. That’s what’s on my mind.
And I don’t think Ann Compton should be mocked for the question. What’s wrong with the question? It’s not lame.
Report comment to moderator
Being as Dear Leader is the ultimate beneficiary of Affirmative Action, race questions are absolutely fair game. A poor use of limited time, perhaps, but nonetheless legitimate.
Report comment to moderator
LLAMA: . . being the second black president . .
Think of him as the last white president.
Report comment to moderator
Poor thread
Poor thread’s lying dead.
Report comment to moderator
I’m with Anlir #3 on this one. (I know, weird, eh?) It was a lame softball question. My eyes rolled back in my head when I heard it.
What is more shocking though is the dialog about it. Black is not a race. Races such as Caucasoid and Negroid have long been debunked as failed 19th century anthropology.
There is only one race, the Human Race. African or Indian or Asian and other traits are more properly termed ethnic. It has to do with familial lines, not some imaginary branch in an evolutionary tree. We are all of one blood.
Ann Compton is simply asking forgiveness for her own white guilt perpetuated by a culture of racial misinformation.
Report comment to moderator
Report comment to moderator
Report comment to moderator
Victoria, the definition of race has evolved into what modern dictionaries now define. But the historical definition of race has been long debunked.
The evolution of the term ‘race’ is well known as explained in many places, such as http://books.google.com/books?id=3nWDg6MpQlEC&pg=PA309&lpg=PA309&dq=race+ANTHROPOLOGY+REDEFINITION&source=bl&ots=T9RsX9gko-&sig=1VuK8UeZmfQPgTlIWs-3h0ltMiA&hl=en&ei=sz_QScj0E4rmlQenm6zaCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result.
The biblical definition of people groups has withstood the test of time and the familial lines (nation, kindred, tongue) or ethnos is much more in line with the neoanthropological definition of race.
The Bible has been correct all along. “God has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth,” Acts 17:26
Report comment to moderator
Xion – 18
Sending one off to “Here comes the Bride” on WMB is hardly a definition – you use this as PROOF? - LOL
You can pretend to your definition but its false.
As far as your definition of “neo-anthropological” meaning:
neo-anthropological definition
1. The scientific study of the origin, the behavior, and the physical, social, and cultural development of humans.
2. That part of Christian theology concerning the genesis, nature, and future of humans, especially as contrasted with the nature of God: “changing the church’s anthropology to include more positive images of women” Priscilla Hart.
Xion this doesn’t meet the criteria of ‘race’ or ‘ethnic’ – further more there is no evolution of the definition it is still the same – where have you been?
Acts 17:26 “And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
The passage above which you refer to has nothing to do with race or ethnicity – you miss the point – have you not read of all the groups, be they race or ethnic in the Bible? – you’re mixing it up Xion -
Report comment to moderator
O Danny Thread…
Report comment to moderator
#19 I don’t know why the link failed. If you paste it into a browser it works. Here is the link again.
I also don’t know why Victoria so adamantly contradicts the biblical definition of people groups. Perhaps because to agree with the Bible, she would have to admit (gasp) that she might be wrong. Let Victoria be true and God a liar.
Report comment to moderator
Xion – 21
Two words, ‘race’ and ‘ethnic’ have two different definitions, they don’t mean the same thing, there is no gasp, lol -
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!